7-year-old FN given "haircut" by teacher's aide - authorities say "no big deal"
Have you seen the film footage of residential schools giving Aboriginal children haircuts? Apparently some of the traditions are alive and well. What is truly disturbing is the police, the Crown, and the school authorities not seeing that it's a big deal. Their predecessors I'm sure felt the same way.
Thunder Bay mom wants answers after teacher's aide chops off son's hair
A Thunder Bay woman is demanding an explanation after a teacher's aide at her son's school cut his long hair — an action her lawyer says is clearly assault while the Crown insists there are no grounds for charges. [...]
The seven-year-old boy had chin-length hair before the incident last month. His mother said staff at McKellar Park Central Public School were aware her son was letting his hair grow so that he could take part in traditional First Nations dancing.
The mother told CBC News she was stunned when her son told her it was a teacher's assistant who lopped off 10 centimetres of his hair.
"I said, 'Why did she do this? Did she say anything?'" said the mother. "And he said, 'No, and after she cut my hair, she took me by the shoulders and forced me to stand in front of the mirror. She made me stand there and said look at you now.'"
cant incite violence all im gonna say
Deeply disturbing. I hope that mother sues the school district to the moon.
oh my gosh. racist beaty standards.
That is outrageous, that is abuse. I hope this issue doesn't go away, charges should be laid, that they are not being laid only proves how deeply racist our society is.
The unfortunate side to this event is that the kind of thinking that created residential schools, the 60's scoop and now poverty based removal of children from their homes and communities, is still alive and well in the thinking of a majority of Canadians today. While this is truly a remarkable case, I do know that there are many more incidents that occur daily that raise the hair on the back of my neck. They do not often make it into the media, nor are the majority of Canadians willing to acknowledge their abhorence.
It comes as simple as the rhetoric that occurred with the story on "Status Indians Face Threat of Extintion" here and elsewhere. People cannot see that status cards are very different from licenses and social insurance cards. They can't understand that defining people as a race by not only their colour, but also by a number cataloged for future use, is as dangerous as the Nazis numbering the Jews in prisoner of war camps. The intent of status cards are not to prolong native people being culturallly distinct, but to eradicate them from being identified in society at all. Eventually when the "blood quantum" under which the status cards are provided, runs out there will be no more "Indians" to stand up against government and coporations seeking to expropriate their land, resources and lives.
While everyone should be outraged at the cutting of someone's hair against their will and consent, we should also be outraged that in 200 years of our common living arrangement, native people are still being cheated out of their land, and abused through poverty, unclean water, lower access to education and health systems. These things are happening everyday but quickly slip from our minds in favour of our own petty issues, media sensationalism and apathetic behaviors that distract us constantly.
Just so I'm clear: it's perfectly legal in Canada to cut someone else's hair, whether they want it or not? There are, as the article suggest, "no grounds" for legal action??
I strongly suggest a few of this boy's relatives hold that teaching assistant down and shave her bald. At that point I'm very confident we'll find out if there really aren't grounds for action.
I think the message has been, is and always will be, "assimilate or die" regardless of what is said.
The tragedy of that is that they, the Cree, the Ojibiway, the Sioux and Dene and the many other first peoples of this land have something to teach us and as long as our arrogance insists that our way of life is the only way of life we will never learn what that is.
Imagine for a moment that this had happened to a white kid in a Toronto public school; to an aspiring little ballerina, perhaps.
Wouldn't charges of assault be laid immediately? As well as the dismissal or suspension of the assailant, with an apology from the highest levels of the board?
Rereading what I wrote I think I should add that our tragedy is competely optional, any of us are free to learn, the tragedy for the First Nations People is continually renewed and is not optional for them.
This completely blew my partners mind when he heard it on the news last night, and he is beyond furious, I do not know if he has ever been so angry. Anyhow my anger over this pales in compare, and I will be doing so some contacting of people today.
The Crown says it is not in the public's interest to pursue charges, Which translates into, "a little First Nations boy is not worth it", then I suggest we make sure they know the public is interested in justice being served for this little boy! Flood the Crown Office will calls!
Lakehead School District website says they are involved in Aboriginal education, seems as if they are the ones needing the education!!!!
http://www.lakeheadschools.ca/
Contact for the Lake Head School Board offices is:
The Jim McCuaig Education Centre
2135 Sills Street
Thunder Bay, Ontario
P7E 5T2
The board office main telephone number is (807) 625-5100.
Thunder Bay Crown Attorney's Office contact info is
Crown Attorney's OfficePerson handling this case number is:
416-326-2210
Phone this number below to complain about the person's handling of this case:
1805 E. Arthur Street Thunder Bay, Ontario P7E 2R6
Phone: 807 625-1620. Fax: 807 625-1618. Director Chris Hacio Erickson
No fucking kidding!
I made the calls for the links you gave remind, thank you. I was given this number: 416-326-2210, this is the Crown Attorney dealing with this issue.
Okay thanks ennir, saved me some coin in long distance calls. Will change the original post too.
ETA: No actually it won't, as I am going to phone the Crown head office to complain about how the person in charge has handled this case!
I just called. They're redirecting all calls to Brendan Crawley, who is in communications for the Ministry of the Attorney General. His phone number is 416-326-2210. Save yourself a step and flood HIM with calls.
I just got his voicemail so probably he's not even picking up, but we can at least flood his voicemail!
I told him that this is a racist decision on the part of the Attorney General's office, that cutting people's hair against their will is most certainly assault, and if the teacher's aide had done this to a little white girl, they'd be all over it. I finished by telling him to tell the crown attorney to do his or her job and charge this aide.
ennir, they told me that Brendan Crawley (the phone number they gave us) is someone in communications with the Ministry of the Attorney General, not the crown attorney handling this case.
I also phoned the school board and I was switched over to Charlie Bishop who is apparently handling this.
Which is why we should be flooding the Crown Attorney's office too, to complain about their handling of it, they are apparently just trying to shuffle the blame.
Thanks for clarifying that Michelle, I say call all the numbers, let them all know how offensive this is.
I phoned back a second time to the board and was given Bruce Nugent (807) 625-5214. He says that an investigation is still ongoing and it may result in suspension or termination and that this is a conern to the board. I urge people to phone and express their concern that this even happened and their expectation that the board will be following through with an appropritate result for this teachers assistant.
Bruce Nugent (807) 625-5214 cell (807) 628-7459
Suspension or termination, if it happens, isn't good enough. That child should be compensated.
This is fucking insane! Who the hell thinks they can jsut cut someone's hair? Wow. I'm just shaking my head on this one.
Assault charges are required.
Could you imagine the outcome if a First Nations adult took a little white boy aside and gave him a "warriors" hair cut of the Mowhawks, or Iraquois? They would be in jail faster than their getting home for dinner.
This is a racist action by the teachers assistant, followed up by further racist actions on the part of the Crown.
This is more than merely an assault, this is a hate crime. Can you imagine if a Christian teacher cut a Sikh child's hair, or an Ortodox Jewish childs side locks? To many FN people, long hair has significant traditional religious significance. Appalling. I shall be writing as soon as I can consider how to address it within the realm of reasonable discourse.
How does it fit within the terms of "reasonable discourse"?
Well they have a lawyer so I am sure they will be going through him (or someone he suggests) for a civil lawsuit as well - and good for them if they do it as they will likely recieve more compensation through the court than they would the school board's offer.
Also reread the article and the TA is already suspended so I am suspecting that the investigation has to do with termination from the board since it is still ongoing.
Exactly, and excellent analogy.
Agreed. I brought this up when I talked with Bruce Nugent and when I left a message on the Lawyers machine (the comparison to Orthadox Jewish children). This should definetly be a central point to any communication with the board and the crown.
I think this thread dovetails a bit with the one on the purpose of a legal system.
How would one go about rehabilitating the teaching assistant in this case?
Sensitivity training, loss of job, and exclusion from ever working with children again.
We have no idea what was going through the mind of the teaching assistant, what she knew and didn't know, and I think that's the wrong focus.
Let me reiterate what I said in the opening post:
It's very convenient for the authorities to focus on individual perpetrators, when they themselves are the problem. In Ireland today, various Church and Irish government bigshots are making tut-tut noises about the rapes and assaults of children, as if these things didn't happen under their watch and as if some isolated low-level individuals were the problem. I don't know exactly how, but they must be brought to account.
Makwa is correct - it's a hate crime. But there's more than one criminal involved here.