Ban Depleted Uranium

gram swaraj
rabble-rouser
Member: 12527
Joined: Dec 30 2005

First, search for images using the term "depleted uranium." 

The UN General Assembly will be voting on a resolution in early December that will move the world towards a ban on the use of depleted uranium (DU).

Ask Minister Cannon to authorize a vote for a moratorium and ban on DU.

websites:

Campaign Against Depleted Uranium

http://www.cadu.org.uk/

International Campaign to Ban Uranium Weapons

http://www.bandepleteduranium.org/


Comments

gram swaraj
rabble-rouser
Member: 12527
Joined: Dec 30 2005

Quote:
from http://www.bandepleteduranium.org/en/a/198.html 23 October 2008 - ICBUW Pressure from DU producers and users slows DU treaty campaign:The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) has submitted a new resolution on uranium weapons to the United Nations First Committee. If passed, in voting early in November, it will then be voted on by the United Nations General Assembly early in December. Read on to find out how you can help.

ICBUW campaigners pushed hard for the text to include a request for a general moratorium on the use of uranium in all conventional weapons, until such time as long-term health and environmental studies on the impact of uranium weapons are complete. However, increasing pressure from some NATO members, coupled with growing unease among DU users and producers forced the text to be weakened. In spite of their efforts, the resolution will keep the issue alive in the UN system for the next two years.  [...]

Take Action! The passage of this resolution is by no means assured, at either the First Committee level or General Assembly. We need you to write to your Foreign Minister and urge them to support this text.  For the General Assembly vote contact them by December 1st. To see how they voted last year, please visit: http://www.bandepleteduranium.org/en/a/152.html

Of great importance are those states that abstained last year and who might be persuaded to back a resolution this year: Albania, Andorra, Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria,      ***CANADA,***    Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Micronesia (Federated States of), Moldova, Norway, Palau, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Tajikistan, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Turkey, Ukraine.

 

=========================================

forlorn for the functionality and friendlier feeling of the former format (furthermore, it was far faster)

http://www.gandhiserve.org/information/questions_and_answers/faq7/faq7.html


gram swaraj
rabble-rouser
Member: 12527
Joined: Dec 30 2005

So have y'all reviewed some pictures of what depleted uranium does to people? (I assume plenty of babblers are more up to date than I on this.) It gets into the air, it gets into the water, and the little radioactive particles are in places other than areas of military conflict.

Quote:
http://www.cadu.org.uk/intro.htm

Depleted uranium is also used in civilian products. For example, it is used as ballast in aeroplanes (having disastrous consequences in 1992 when an El-Al jet crashed into flats near Amsterdam - depleted uranium was also involved in the recent Stansted Korean Air crash - see CADU News issue 3 for full report). It is also used in some hospital equipment. The alarming Euratom (European Atomic Energy Community) objective which will allow the 'recycling' of low-level radioactive waste in to consumer goods has also raised concerns that depleted uranium may be used in this way.

The CADU site implies the extent of DU in civilian life is not known, stating: "We also have a strong interest in identifying the extent of its civilian use and achieving as much limitation of this as possible."
Quote:
http://tuberose.com/Depleted_Uranium.html

Cancer starts with one alpha particle under the right conditions. One gram of DU is the size of a period in this sentence and releases 12,000 alpha particles per second.

Urge Minister Cannon to actively support a worldwide ban on DU using Canada's vote in the UN in early December.

=========================================

forlorn for the functionality and friendlier feeling of the former format (furthermore, it was far faster) http://www.gandhiserve.org/information/questions_and_answers/faq7/faq7.h...


gram swaraj
rabble-rouser
Member: 12527
Joined: Dec 30 2005

Quote:
http://www.cadu.org.uk/intro.htm

In the 1950's the United States Department of Defense became interested in using depleted uranium metal in weapons because of its extremely dense, pyrophoric qualities and because it was cheap and available in huge quantities. It is now given practically free of charge to the military and arms manufacturers and is used both as tank armour, and in armour-piercing shells known as depleted uranium penetrators. Over 15 countries are known to have depleted uranium weapons in their militaray arsenals - UK, US, France, Russia, Greece, Turkey, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Egypt, Kuwait, Pakistan, Thailand, Iraq and Taiwan - with depleted uranium rapidly spreading to other countries.

=========================================

forlorn for the functionality and friendlier feeling of the former format (furthermore, it was far faster) http://www.gandhiserve.org/information/questions_and_answers/faq7/faq7.h...


gram swaraj
rabble-rouser
Member: 12527
Joined: Dec 30 2005

Another good site:

http://tuberose.com/Depleted_Uranium.html

=========================================

forlorn for the functionality and friendlier feeling of the former format (furthermore, it was far faster) http://www.gandhiserve.org/information/questions_and_answers/faq7/faq7.h...


wwSwimming
rabble-rouser
Member: 13538
Joined: May 1 2006

Which nations use Depleted Uranium munitions, besides the United States ? 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

http://LASIK-Flap.com ~ Health Warning about LASIK Eye Surgery


Jullrah
recent-rabble-rouser
Member: 16631
Joined: Oct 11 2008

Since the gurus at the Pentagon and their "coalition of the chilling" cohorts claim its safe, have them go in and clean up wherever it has been used.

No need for expensive HazMat suits or anything, wot with the financial meltdown etc.

Be a good after-politics job for BushBlair and their warmongering cabinets and general staff.

The rest of the civilized world should go ahead and ban it.


gram swaraj
rabble-rouser
Member: 12527
Joined: Dec 30 2005

wwSwimming wrote:

Which nations use Depleted Uranium munitions, besides the United States ?

Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depleted_uranium

It is thought that between 17 and 20 countries have weapons incorporating depleted uranium in their arsenals. They include the U.S., the UK, France, Russia, China, Turkey, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Egypt, Kuwait, Pakistan, Thailand, Iraq, and Taiwan. DU ammunition is manufactured in 18 countries. Only the US and the UK have acknowledged using DU weapons...

Natural uranium metal contains about 0.71 percent U-235, 99.28 percent U-238, and about 0.0054 percent U-234. In order to produce enriched uranium, the process of isotope separation removes a substantial portion of the U-235 for use in nuclear power, weapons, or other uses. The remainder, depleted uranium, contains only 0.2 percent to 0.4 percent U-235. Because natural uranium begins with such a low percentage of U-235, enrichment produces large quantities of depleted uranium.

(See above wikipedia article for list of countries with stockpiles of DU.)  This is what I make out of my recent readings. So-called "depleted" uranium is what's left over from the ore after the more "useful" isotope for reactors and weapons has been extracted. So the arms manufacturers and and nuclear power plant owners (for example, General Electric-NBC) had whole yards full of the by-product U-238: expensive to dispose of, sitting around as a hazardous waste, and not being used for much until the 90's, when some geniuses figured they would try to turn this liability into monetary profit. American taxpayers most certainly subsidized, through the Defense Department,  the development of DU munitions. 

DU is an excellent material for busting through armor: 1.67 times denser than lead and pyrophoric, meaning it burns on contact with air. The dense projectiles are white hot by the time they hit a tank, or whatever target. DU's short-term military utility on the battlefield was proven in two Iraq wars and the Balkan conflicts. Super! especially for the manufacturers of DU shells (such as Alliant Techsystems, HQ'd in Minneapolis, traded on the NYSE, symbol: ATK). These wars served as testing grounds for their new "products".

The nature of DU munitions sets off an arms race dynamic, whereby the advantage it gives to one side makes the opposing side feel less secure and more apt to seek similar weapons that would at least even the odds, prompting the other side to regain their advantage by...etc. Arms races are great for profits, which provides more to dole out as dividends to make shareholders in this rampant capitalist system obliviously happy.

With depleted uranium, you can win the battle, but lose the planet.

DU's pyrophoricity also means that a fine aerosol spray of radioactive particles is created as projectiles speed through the air. A US medical officer named Rokke measured DU particles of 0.1 of a micron (he and his staff were wearing filters that would stop particles of 10 microns). Keep in mind that U-238 has a half-life of 4.46 BILLION years. With more and more countries insanely incorporating more and more DU ammunition into their arsenals (for air, land and sea use), even small skirmishes may release long-lasting radioactive dust into the environment.

Conventional battlefields of the near future may turn into dead zones that could remain lethally radioactive beyond the rest of the time we crazy apes have left on this planet. The ppm levels of radioactive particles in global commons like the oceans and atmosphere will get a permanent boost with every conflict in which DU is used (likewise ppm levels ratchet up every time DU rounds are fired in military tests and training exercises).

I'm not sure how to track the upcoming General Assembly vote in early December. Anyone else have info on how to keep track of it?

In any case, the most urgent action in the next days is to push Lawrence Cannon to authorize a vote that will help move the world toward a comprehensive ban on depleted uranium.

Cannon may be a bit occupied with the Mumbai attacks at the moment. But consider that some attackers reportedly spoke Urdu with Pashtun accents - does this indicate they could have came from regions where DU may have been used? When you see images of the damage DU has done to people [search google images, I implore all babblers], you can imagine how the use and mere existence of DU munitions is actually a root cause of terrorist attacks. Mind you, there are many kinds of terrorism, I deplore them all.

When you search and view images under "depleted uranium", you will also see that a ban on DU is, very literally, a no-brainer. What will Canada do in the upcoming UN vote?

 


gram swaraj
rabble-rouser
Member: 12527
Joined: Dec 30 2005

injuries and birth defects attributed to depleted uranium


gram swaraj
rabble-rouser
Member: 12527
Joined: Dec 30 2005

Depleted uranium ammunition has been tested in several American states.

Some questions to pose the government of Canada, whoever may be in power, are: Where in Canada has depleted uranium been tested? Will the government place a permanent ban on the military use of DU in Canada? Will the government make mandatory the disclosure of information as to where DU is being used for civilian purposes?

Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depleted_uranium#Civilian_applications

Civilian applications for depleted uranium are typically unrelated to its radioactive properties. Depleted uranium has a very high density and is primarily used as shielding material for other radioactive material, and as ballast. Examples include sailboat keels, as counterweights and as shielding in industrial radiography cameras....

Aircraft that contain depleted uranium trim weights (Boeing 747-100 for example) may contain between 400 to 1,500 kg of DU. This application is controversial because the DU may enter the environment if the aircraft were to crash. The metal can also oxidize to a fine powder in a fire. Its use has been phased out in many newer aircraft. Boeing and McDonnell-Douglas discontinued using DU counterweights in the 1980s. Depleted uranium was released during the Bijlmer disaster, in which 152 kg was lost.

 

========================================= http://www.gandhiserve.org/information/questions_and_answers/faq7/faq7.h...


gram swaraj
rabble-rouser
Member: 12527
Joined: Dec 30 2005

There isn't even a moratorium on the use of depleted uranium yet. Pressure Cannon not to side with the DU special interest groups, nor to abstain like some wanker. The UN votes in early December on a resolution.

Quote:
from Campaign Against Depleted Uranium Website

[Page last updated: October 29, 2008]

Write to Your Foreign Minister Today

CADU and ICBUW urgently need your help in persuading your government to support a new resolution at the UN First Committee. The resolution is a continuation of the process started last November when a vast majority of states backed a resolution highlighting concerns over the health and environmental effects of uranium weapons.

The Non-Aligned Movement has now submitted a second resolution that will keep the issue alive in the UN for the next two years. ICBUW had hoped that the text would call for a moratorium but the political will is not there yet, particularly in a majority of NATO member states.

We need you and your member groups to contact your elected representatives and Foreign Ministries with a request that they support this resolution. The First Committee vote will be early in November, the General Assembly vote a month later. The resolution is entitled: A/C.1/63/L.26 Effects of the use of armaments and munitions containing depleted uranium...

Last year many states were unprepared for the resolution and it passed with a huge majority, this year DU users and producers have been piling on the pressure so the outcome is far less assured. People power can make a huge difference to this campaign and now is the time to apply it....

Send this to your local elected representative AND your Foreign Minister:

Dear_______

I am deeply concerned about the continued use of conventional weapons containing uranium. Because of their long-term impact on human health and the environment I believe they breach the basic norms of International Humanitarian Law and the Geneva Conventions.

The United Nations First Committee will...

========================================= http://www.gandhiserve.org/information/questions_and_answers/faq7/faq7.h...


Merowe
rabble-rouser
Member: 5020
Joined: Apr 16 2003

This is a very useful resource, thanks Gram...I'll follow up with a letter or two, I've been aware of DU for some time now and CANNOT fathom why it is still off the radar as an issue; it needs far more publicity. As if landmines weren't retrograde enough...


gram swaraj
rabble-rouser
Member: 12527
Joined: Dec 30 2005

Merowe wrote:
I've been aware of DU for some time now and CANNOT fathom why it is still off the radar as an issue; it needs far more publicity.

I know what you mean. I've been aware of it for a long time too, but fell under the impression that it was just some short-term problem localized to areas where tank busting rounds were used. I've known about DU since at least the Kosovo conflict, and I thought then, it should be a war crime to use that kind of stuff. But did I do anything about it, did I even talk to others about it? No, partly because I wanted to believe it was not such a big deal, but largely because info on depleted uranium was like chocolate chips in the media flavor of the month, and then it disappeared from the "news". 

A big question is: "Who owns the mainstream media?"

The MSM operates to sell newspapers and get internet hits; they don't operate to tell the whole truth, as that would mean endangering the profits of the interconnected corporate oligarchy that is running amok over most of the world.

========================================= http://www.gandhiserve.org/information/questions_and_answers/faq7/faq7.h...


wwSwimming
rabble-rouser
Member: 13538
Joined: May 1 2006

gram swaraj wrote:
First, search for images using the term "depleted uranium."

 http://images.google.com/images?q=depleted%20uranium

What surprises me is how ignorant many, possible most, so-called "progressives" are about this issue.  I've mentioned it at antiwar gatherings & dinners after antiwar gatherings & the response is typically "so what ?  what's the big deal ?"

 The goal in Iraq is not democracy, the goal is population reduction.  As the group Doctors without Borders has described it, DU is the "perfect weapon for killing large numbers of people".

An aside - ATK is the same US corp. that tried to buy MDI. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

http://LASIK-Flap.com ~ Health Warning about LASIK Eye Surgery


Loretta
rabble-rouser
Member: 1222
Joined: Apr 22 2001

Some progressives have taken steps.

 

Thu 12 Jun 2008.

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

BC Southern Interior MP tabled a motion on abolishing depleted uranium arms

OTTAWA – NDP MP Alex Atamanenko (BC Southern Interior) - tabled a motion (M-509) on Wednesday calling on the government to take a leading role in helping to abolish the use of depleted uranium (DU) in armaments and munitions. The motion also calls for the government to cease the deployment of our military and civilian personnel in regions where these weapons have been or will be used.

“The Canadian government must take strong and decisive action to help rid the world of this environmental and toxic health hazard. Long lasting and often deadly effects on soldiers and innocent civilians alike have been well documented,” said Atamanenko. “Our military does not use depleted uranium weapons and we should not be deploying our soldiers to fight with armies who do.”

http://atamanenko.ndp.ca/page/258

 


gram swaraj
rabble-rouser
Member: 12527
Joined: Dec 30 2005

wwSwimming wrote:

An aside - ATK is the same US corp. that tried to buy MDI. 

Sorry, what is MDI? For curiosity's sake, could you post links to details of the attempted purchase?

What eventually happened to MP Atamanenko's bill? 

=========================================

http://www.gandhiserve.org/information/questions_and_answers/faq7/faq7.h...


SwimmingLee
rabble-rouser
Member: 15847
Joined: Dec 22 2007

gram swaraj wrote:
wwSwimming wrote:

An aside - ATK is the same US corp. that tried to buy MDI.

Sorry, what is MDI? For curiosity's sake, could you post links to details of the attempted purchase?

What eventually happened to MP Atamanenko's bill?

=========================================

 I don't know about MP Atamanenko's bill.

 MDI is McDonald Detwiler.  They have considerable engineering expertise in satellite robotics & GIS (geographical info. systems).  The American spy industry is a consumer of their products.

The large (#6 ?) American defense contractor ATK tried to buy MDI about a year ago.  Their was enough public outcry that I think the sale/purchase was interrupted.

ATK Munitions - which one is DU ? 

It's too long a list

Corporate History

Richard Sanders, who I think is a member of Babble, is a great info. resource on the ATK-MDI transaction, and defense technology itself. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

http://LASIK-FLap.com ~ Website Created by Injured LASIK Patients


gram swaraj
rabble-rouser
Member: 12527
Joined: Dec 30 2005

Thanks, SL.

http://www.cadu.org.uk/info/campaign/30_1.htm

Update on UN resolution:

Quote:
Dec. 2/08: 141 states support second uranium weapons resolution in UN General Assembly vote

The resolution, which passed the First Committee stage on October 31st by 127 votes to four, calls on the three relevant UN agencies – the World Health Organisation (WHO), the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to update their positions on uranium weapons.  The overwhelming support for the text reflects increasing international concern over the long-term impact of uranium contamination in post conflict environments and military ranges....In the 17 years since uranium weapons were first used on a large scale in the 1991 Gulf War, a huge volume of peer-reviewed research has highlighted previously unknown pathways through which exposure to uranium’s heavy metal toxicity and radioactivity may damage human health. Throughout the world, parliamentarians have responded by supporting calls for a moratorium and ban, urging governments and the military to take a precautionary approach. However the WHO and IAEA have been slow to react to this wealth of new evidence and it is hoped that this resolution will go some way to resolving this situation.

Thus far, 19 states have submitted reports to the Secretary General; many of them call for action on uranium weapons and back a precautionary approach. It also places the issue on the agenda of the General Assembly's 65th Session; this will begin in September 2010. The First Committee vote saw significant voting changes in comparison to the previous year’s resolution, with key EU and NATO members such as the Netherlands, Finland, Norway and Iceland changing position to support calls for further action on the issue. These changes were echoed at the General Assembly vote. Once again Japan, which has been under considerable pressure from campaigners, supported the resolution.

Of the permanent five Security Council members, the US, UK and France voted against. They were joined by Israel. Russia abstained and China refused to vote. The list of states abstaining from the vote, while shorter than in 2007, still contains Belgium, the only state to have implemented a domestic ban on uranium weapons, a fact that continues to anger Belgian campaigners. It is suspected that the Belgian government is wary of becoming isolated on the issue internationally. Two Nordic states, Denmark and Sweden continue to blow cold, elsewhere in Europe Poland, the Czech Republic, Portugal and Spain are also dragging their feet, in spite of a call for a moratorium and ban by 94% of MEPs earlier this year. Many of the abstainers are recent EU/NATO accession states or ex-Soviet republics such as Kazakhstan.

Australia and Canada, both of whom have extensive uranium mining interests and close ties to US foreign policy also abstained. ...

The two year period before the General Assembly re-visit the issue is going to be a crucial time for our campaign. Internationally we need to ensure that the three UN agencies take all current research into account, and that they take the scientific uncertainties as reasons for caution, not complacency.

No surprise about the way Canada voted. Shame!

---------------------------------------------------------

http://www.gandhiserve.org/information/questions_and_answers/faq7/faq7.h...


NDPP
rabble-rouser-for-life
Member: 16891
Joined: Dec 28 2008

US Uses Arms for Genocide in its Wars (and vid)

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/224068.html

"The use of depleted uranium (DU) ammunition is US wars across the globe is 'genocidal' and 'a tremendous crime against humanity' an analyst tells Press TV. A new report shows US forces have used massive amounts of DU in Afghanistan - causing a huge number of congenital deformations and cancers.

Several UN human rights commissions have prohibited the use of depleted uranium on humans, including during military conflicts. However the US government has used weaponized depleted uranium on humans, including 340 tons during the Persian Gulf war in 1991; every missile used during 1998 Yugoslavia; at least 1000 tons in Afghanistan in 2001 and 2400 tons in Iraq in 2003.."

This is a crime against humanity of unparalleled proportion. Committed by our allies and in war theatres we participated in.


Login or register to post comments