I expect that the BC conservatives will win Chilliwack and then a few more BC liberal MLAs will also cross to the Tories and boom they will have official party status
The question is when and whether big right-leaning names in the BCLibs decide to start high-tailing it over. If someone like Kevin Falcon jumps ship, or even just doesn't run again, then the writing is really on the wall.
2009 election results
Libs - 49 seats - majority of 14 seats
NDP - 35 seats
Total - 84 seats
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Columbia_general_election,_2009
Since 2009
Lib Campbell resigned, Lib Clark elected, Lib majority of 14 seats
NDP Bob Simpson now sits as Independent, Lib majority of 14 seats
Liberal Iain Black resigned, by-election April 19, Lib majority of 13 seats
Liberal Barry Penner resigned, by-election April 19, Lib majority of 12 seats
Liberal van Dongen now member of Cons, Lib majority of 11 seats
I wonder if any Liberals would get alienated in the other direction, upset at Christy's desperation to lean right, and cross to the NDP or at least quit caucus?
Don't disagree with that, as things are looking good for the BC NDP, who are only a year away from the next election.
And it would also be very good to get Independent MLA Bob Simpson back into the BC NDP fold.
Don't disagree with that, as things are looking good for the BC NDP, who are only a year away from the next election.
And it would also be very good to get Independent MLA Bob Simpson back into the BC NDP fold.
But would he? whats keeping him as an indie?
I wonder if any Liberals would get alienated in the other direction, upset at Christy's desperation to lean right, and cross to the NDP or at least quit caucus?
The BC NDP is doing well enough on its own not to have to start rutting around in the BC Liberals recycle bin looking for their "rejects and refugees". Anyone who was willing to run as part of the Gordon Campbell team in 2009 - is persona non grata in the NDP!
Regardless, the rats are fleeing the sinking ship.
Keep an eye on West Van MLA McIntyre - another unhappy camper in the BC Liberal house that Christy built or should I say destroyed.
2009 election results
Libs - 49 seats - majority of 14 seats
NDP - 35 seats
Total - 84 seats
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Columbia_general_election,_2009
Since 2009
Lib Campbell resigned, Lib Clark elected, Lib majority of 14 seats
NDP Bob Simpson now sits as Independent, Lib majority of 14 seats
Liberal Iain Black resigned, by-election April 19, Lib majority of 13 seats
Liberal Barry Penner resigned, by-election April 19, Lib majority of 12 seats
Liberal van Dongen now member of Cons, Lib majority of 11 seats
Funny way to do numbers but thats wikkipedia for you.
84 seats requires 43 to govern. The BC Liberals had 6 seats to spare after the 2009 election. They have lost 2 to resignations and the by-elections are in April. The BC Conservatives have picked up 1. If the government loses the two by-elections it will have 46 seats. If 4 more BC Liberals were to cross the floor to the Conservatives then the government could fall on a no confidence motion.
If Christy Clark was smart she would desert this sinking ship herself and run for the federal Liberal leadership. She can reprewsent the heart and soul of what it means to be a federal Liberal today!
Finally BCers are seeing through the hype and BS eminating from Christy's photo-op premiership. She hates unions with a passion yet she was front and centre during a recent photo shoot at RTA in Kitimat. The only problem for Christy is that this union project started a couple of years ago but where's there a camera Christy is sure to be. How do you spell former Port Moody Mayor Joe Trasolini and now BC NDP candidate ?
http://www.vancouversun.com/Christy+Clark+approval+rating+lowest+point+s...
The survey by Angus Reid Public Opinion also suggests that Clark trails NDP leader Adrian Dix for the first time in approval ratings.
Forty per cent of British Columbians approve of Clark’s performance compared to 51 per cent who disapprove, with nine per cent undecided, according to the poll.
Forty-seven per cent of British Columbians approve of opposition leader Dix’s performance compared to 35 per cent who disapprove, with 18 per cent undecided, the survey found.
Angus Reid vice-president Mario Canseco said the survey throws into question the earlier assumption that Clark has a personal appeal that Dix lacks.
“What’s fascinating is that the undecideds are breaking into the approval category for Adrian Dix,” said Canseco.
“And the problem for Christy now is that for the first time since she took over, her level of disapproval is over 50 per cent.”
Canseco cautioned that provincial politics can “turn in a heartbeat,” noting how Manitoba Conservative opposition leader Hugh McFadyen led the polls for much of the year but then lost to the NDP in the October provincial election.
The pollster said that Clark’s approval rating of 40 per cent is impressive, especially considering that former Premier Gordon Campbell’s rating slid to a dismal nine per cent.
Nevertheless, he added, the new data suggests that “the Opposition leader is being seen as the more capable manager, in a way, than the person who is now in charge.”
http://www.straight.com/article-560371/vancouver/former-port-moody-mayor...
And Jenny Kwan please take another bow.
Thank goodness for the real leaders instead of the party sychophants!!!
You go girl!
So when will Christy resign or be run out of town by her fellow Liberals?
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Conservatives+cannibalizing+Liberals/5891136/story.html
The survey by Forum Research Inc. found that 34 per cent of British Columbians support the NDP, with the governing B.C. Liberals and the Conservatives in a dead heat at 23 per cent. The Green party trails with 15 per cent.
Clark's backers in the B.C. Liberal nomination contest earlier this year believed she could revive the party's brand, which had been battered under her unpopular predecessor, former premier Gordon Campbell.
But the Forum Research survey found that Clark has been unable to stop a shift of previous B.C. Liberal voters to the resurgent B.C. Conservatives under new leader John Cummins.
I'm concerned with this poll... remember how well Carole James' NDP did in 2009? She had 42% of the vote. Now we're seeing 34% in a poll. That 8% disparity could perhaps be explained by an inflated Green vote, which may or may not settle down. But it suggests the NDP hasn't really cemented any gains at all aside from splitting the opposition. There is obviously a lot of work to be done.
Wouldn't it be weird if BC gets its first minority government since that time in the 60's? With poll numbers like these, the BCCons could snag a few seats, maybe the Greens would even take their first provincially (seeing as they've now broken that threshold municipally and federally). Dix would be in an awkward position, though, if he becomes a minority premier and has to cozy up to either Liberals or Conservatives to pass legislation. If enough right-wingers flee the Liberals, the shell of a party left over will probably be more of a centrist core, and might find some common ground with the NDP. Under such a scenario, Dix would be glad to have run a positive campaign all along, rather than shower them in attacks.
A Dix minority, without pulling some opposition support, would be liable to get overturned in favour of a Liberal-Conservative coalition, which would leave us... back where we started. In the 1960s.
Sounds like the pollster didn't really push leaners, I would say... both the BC Liberals and the NDP seem to be about 10% lower than what the other polls are saying (low 20's vs. low 30's, and mid 30's vs. mid 40's). I doubt the Greens will reach the mid-teens, especially if there's no discontent with the NDP to begin with.
Yes things can change on a dime in politics, but so far Adrian is doing just fine and if it continues like this we will have an NDP majority. The big political crisis ls now solidly within the Liberal camp, and Christy's days as leader may well be numbered. The loss of Trasolini may well be the final straw for her leadership. Thank goodness for visionary people like Jenny Kwan, Mable Elmore, and Don Davies who realize the significance of winning power in politics.
Christy is done but I'm sure she will try and hang on to the bitter end.
Falcon may well try and dislodge her though before the Cons become the NDP's main opposition in BC.
Shades of the Gordon Wilson situation.
http://thelinkpaper.ca/?p=12810
Dix And NDP At Top As Christy’s Liberals Slide Amidst Their Poor Performance And Corruption Baggagehttp://thelinkpaper.ca/wp-content/plugins/Viva-ThumbZoom/lib/v-zoom/grap...), pointer; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; " href="http://thelinkpaper.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/bc-110117-adrian-dix.jpg">
VANCOUVER – NDP Adrian Dix has position his party for a decisive win in the next election while Christy Clark led Liberals suffer under the party’s horrible performance, bad governance (HST while defeated is nowhere near being abolished) and corruption baggage stemming from the Basi-Virk corruption scandal that was covered up by the party through a $6 million deal with lawyers representing Dave Udhe Basi and Bob Virk, former BC Liberal insiders who pleaded guilty in exchange for a slap on the wrist.
Hopefully Eby will run again as he stands an excellent chance of winning Point Grey next time.
And then we get another poll released Friday by NRG Research:
NDP: 36%
Lib: 32%
Con: 19%
Other/Undecided: 13%
http://www.nrgresearchgroup.com/newsroom/documents/Prov%20Ballot%20News%...
Looks like the provincial scene is very fluid right now with all of these weird numbers coming out. BTW, both Forum Research and NRG Research don't have any track record polling the BC provincial scene. I'll still stick with ARS, Ipsos, and Mustel in that regard.
With numbers like that, it still suggests that a sizeable chunk of voters who did support the NDP in 2009 are still undecided as to whether they will again. A big part of the election strategy will have to be finding those voters, securing their support and getting them to the polls.
Raif often has his finger on the pulse and I think he is onto something here.
http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2011/12/26/BCTories/
Cummins' Conservatives Could Destroy BC LibsWhy the Tory factor gives Clark's party reason to fear for
In 1972, the BC Conservatives took nearly 30 per cent of the vote and the Dave Barrett NDP with 39 per cent had a near landslide.
In 1975, the Liberals and Tories garnered a shade over 10 per cent, the NDP again got 39 per cent and the Socreds who got the rest, at 49 per cent won the landslide.
You needn't be a master of mathematics to see what happens in B.C. when third parties do well.
Is it still the same way today?
I think it is. There are three schools of thought among voters -- Left, Right and a "pox on both your houses."
Things are different, of course. There is a bigger "ethnic vote" but it seems to break out in the usual division, especially if it's ethnic versus ethnic.
There is the Green vote, which may have an impact now that they've won a seat in Parliament and a seat on Vancouver City Council. I admit to being probably a closet Green. Alas, environmentalists, even if they distrust the NDP, will see them as the only way to stop the corporative takeover of our land and resources.
Eighteen months is a long time and a lot can happen. No point in asking the "If an election was held tomorrow" question. That is quickly answered, "It isn't going to happen tomorrow."
There comes a time when a government's debits so outnumber its credits that nothing will save it. That was the case with the NDP in 2001. And I believe that will determine the fate of the BC Liberals in 2013.
And if the Conservatives do well in the "marginals," the Liberals will be slaughtered.
"In 1972, the BC Conservatives took nearly 30 per cent of the vote and the Dave Barrett NDP with 39 per cent had a near landslide."
Um, really? It was NDP 39.6%, Socred 31.2%, Liberal 16.4%, PC 12.7%. And at the time anyway, the Liberals were still aligned with the (Trudeau) federals and calling themselves centrist.
In 1975, Gordon Gibson Jr. said: "What we saw happening today was a kind of a tidal wave that was sweeping over British Columbia. In 1972 there was a strong swing to the left. That was a reaction to a long time on the right. Now after a short time over on the left there's been a strong swing back to the right. Sometime, the people of British Columbia are going to find it, I think, to their advantage to stop in the centre on those swings. And the Liberal party's going to be around for that day."
Source: http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/provincial_territorial_politics/clips/11...
Snicker. Apparently they stuck around but swung along on the pendulum ride rather than waiting in the middle. But anyway, at least in the Barrett days the Liberals *saw* themselves as the centre, so to add those Liberal and PC votes together and arrive at almost 30% is not really truthful.
<sarcasm>I fully expect the RCMP to show up at the premier's house anyday now with BCTV in tow to arrest the premier on criminal charges... and then to call a snap election.</sarcasm>
http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2011/12/27/BCRail/
2013 is still a few years away before the PR campaign goes into full swing again.
Yes things can change on a dime in politics, but so far Adrian is doing just fine and if it continues like this we will have an NDP majority. The big political crisis ls now solidly within the Liberal camp, and Christy's days as leader may well be numbered. The loss of Trasolini may well be the final straw for her leadership. Thank goodness for visionary people like Jenny Kwan, Mable Elmore, and Don Davies who realize the significance of winning power in politics.
Mable Elmore was a Carole James "loyalist". She was not one of the "baker's dozen" that forced her ouster, so I think you can lump her in with the "party sychophants" you so eloquently refer to in post #3. She's the same loyalist that the great "visionary" Nicholas Simons was overheard by Global News' Keith Bauldrey, asking if she wanted to "take it outside", because of her support for Carole James.
Quite frankly who gives a tinker's damn what Keith Bauldry says, does, or thinks.
Mable's was wrong about James, but Mable's efforts helped to secure the Leadership for Adrian.
And Mable will get re-elected.
Snicker. Apparently they stuck around but swung along on the pendulum ride rather than waiting in the middle. But anyway, at least in the Barrett days the Liberals *saw* themselves as the centre, so to add those Liberal and PC votes together and arrive at almost 30% is not really truthful.
He's probably referring to the Socred vote. The Socreds were the de facto conservatives for most conservative voters in those days. The Campbell Liberals were also basically Socreds. I know Babblers know this, but it's shocking how many people outside BC or the left do not.
"In 1972, the BC Conservatives took nearly 30 per cent of the vote and the Dave Barrett NDP with 39 per cent had a near landslide."
Um, really? It was NDP 39.6%, Socred 31.2%, Liberal 16.4%, PC 12.7%. And at the time anyway, the Liberals were still aligned with the (Trudeau) federals and calling themselves centrist.
In 1975, Gordon Gibson Jr. said: "What we saw happening today was a kind of a tidal wave that was sweeping over British Columbia. In 1972 there was a strong swing to the left. That was a reaction to a long time on the right. Now after a short time over on the left there's been a strong swing back to the right. Sometime, the people of British Columbia are going to find it, I think, to their advantage to stop in the centre on those swings. And the Liberal party's going to be around for that day."
Source: http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/provincial_territorial_politics/clips/11...
Snicker. Apparently they stuck around but swung along on the pendulum ride rather than waiting in the middle. But anyway, at least in the Barrett days the Liberals *saw* themselves as the centre, so to add those Liberal and PC votes together and arrive at almost 30% is not really truthful.
The B.C. PC's in the 1970s were very much a "Red Tory" party with leaders like Derril Warren, Dr. Scott Wallace & Vic Stephans. It could be argued that they were to the left of the BC Liberals, with Pat McGeer & Bill Vander Zalm.
Snicker. Apparently they stuck around but swung along on the pendulum ride rather than waiting in the middle. But anyway, at least in the Barrett days the Liberals *saw* themselves as the centre, so to add those Liberal and PC votes together and arrive at almost 30% is not really truthful.
He's probably referring to the Socred vote. The Socreds were the de facto conservatives for most conservative voters in those days. The Campbell Liberals were also basically Socreds. I know Babblers know this, but it's shocking how many people outside BC or the left do not.
They were conservatives, but if they won 31.2% of the vote, why did the Tyee author say "nearly 30%"?
The B.C. PC's in the 1970s were very much a "Red Tory" party with leaders like Derril Warren, Dr. Scott Wallace & Vic Stephans. It could be argued that they were to the left of the BC Liberals, with Pat McGeer & Bill Vander Zalm.
Interesting. But were they to the left of the 1970's BC Liberals, who had not yet severed formal ties with federal Liberals? I would have imagined that the BC Liberals of that decade were more in line with Art Phillips and TEAM. Yes, his wife Carole Taylor later went on to be a BC Liberal, but back in the day TEAM was in competition with the NPA. How did Phillips feel about provincial politics with the NDP and Socreds duking it out?
I had forgotten though that I'd read Vander Zalm was a Liberal first.
I suppose that with Bill Davis as Ontario's PC premier in the 70s, it's not hard to conceive of a similar bent to the BC PC banner.
I was not alive during that decade and I only moved to BC in 2006. But it is interesting for me to get a window into the politics of the day.
The B.C. PC's in the 1970s were very much a "Red Tory" party with leaders like Derril Warren, Dr. Scott Wallace & Vic Stephans. It could be argued that they were to the left of the BC Liberals, with Pat McGeer & Bill Vander Zalm.
Interesting. But were they to the left of the 1970's BC Liberals, who had not yet severed formal ties with federal Liberals? I would have imagined that the BC Liberals of that decade were more in line with Art Phillips and TEAM. Yes, his wife Carole Taylor later went on to be a BC Liberal, but back in the day TEAM was in competition with the NPA. How did Phillips feel about provincial politics with the NDP and Socreds duking it out?
I had forgotten though that I'd read Vander Zalm was a Liberal first.
I suppose that with Bill Davis as Ontario's PC premier in the 70s, it's not hard to conceive of a similar bent to the BC PC banner.
I was not alive during that decade and I only moved to BC in 2006. But it is interesting for me to get a window into the politics of the day.
I think the Liberals back then were seen as being closer to "big money" than the Tories, they usually represented the wealthiest ridings in the province. Though it should be noted that when McGeer was Liberal leader he took more liberal positions than as a Socred Cabinet minister. And David Anderson (who defeated Vander Zalm for the leadership) had a very "liberal" image at the time.
Politics has certainly made for strange bedfellows didn't it? Especially for people who define themselves as centrist in BC... you never know whose bed you're going to wake up in.
Warren Kinsella on Facebook is trying scare folks into believing that if BC elects Dix, the sky will fall. He's not getting much support.
I wonder why the Vancouver Sun left this part out of the Canadian Press story - just sayin'!
http://www.vancouversun.com/Liberals+launch+attack+website+aimed+leader/5929492/story.html
He's also blasted the Liberals' own economic record, pointing to the disaster with the harmonized sale tax.
Quite the system of justice we have in Canada eh!
How BC Rail Was Made to Disappear
http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2011/12/27/BCRail/
"No question is so difficult to answer as that to which the answer is obvious."
-- George Bernard Shaw
I love how the screenshot in the Vancouver Sun article quotes the BC Progress Board which Clark is quietly going to kill because it failed to prove that the Liberals had been better managers of the economy.
Yes, Christy's attack ads against the Cons have done wonders for the Cons.
My hunch is that we will be seeing a palace coup sometime this year.
http://www.straight.com/article-574381/vancouver/christy-clark-faces-big...
People who don't like the NDP will figure that the best way to stop them will be to transfer their allegiance to Cummins, and he'll probably start gaining more momentum.
This will convince some B.C. Liberal MLAs to sit out the next campaign, making it more difficult for Clark to hold onto existing seats. She'll also have trouble recruiting high-profile candidates, who won't want to be associated with any pending electoral disaster.
If this scenario plays itself out, B.C. Liberals funders will start hedging their bets by giving more money to the B.C. Conservatives.
Clark had better remain on good terms with the management at CKNW Radio because the way things are going for her now, she just might need her old job about 18 months from now.
Just laughing at Kinsella and his unpopularity in BC.
http://www.torontosun.com/2011/12/30/bc-politicking-will-put-new-democra...
Just laughing at Kinsella and his unpopularity in BC.
http://www.torontosun.com/2011/12/30/bc-politicking-will-put-new-democra...
And he can't keep track of the sequence of events either... the HST referendum was in August.
Kinsella might just be working for the BC Libs for $$ but I think he's been supported of Gordon Campbell in the past though. Given that the BC Libs aren't even a 50/50 split of Lib/Cons, this just goes to show how rather odious the Liberal establishment is. Kinsella is screaming racist!, reactionary! everywhere and talking about the progressive values of the Liberals are Canadian values, but will throw his lot in with the crypto-Socreds even if a BCNDP with a quickly moving to the centre Adrian Dix has a chance at power.
Anyone have a good link to Adrian Dix? I know nothing about him.
Many a small business owner are reaping what they sewed by their throwing their lot in with the BC Libs over the last 3 elections. Everything that has happened in the last year and coming about this year has solidified into the assured destruction of small and medium businesses. Also with the help of the Conservatives. Now that I think about it more.
* hydro rates going up 3+% along with the new billions of dollars smart meters allowing BC Hydro to charge them triple during their peak periods of consumption. Also hitting the working poor and fixed income peoples hard too.
* vehicle insurance rates going up
* building and property taxes going up significantly across the province today
* higher minimum wage now impacted larger on them for payroll costs because of the new added federally increased EI and CPP rates. Workers get it, the slap down, too of course. The badly needed minimum wage increase is all gone now.
Christy should have stayed at CKNW as she is going to take the fall for all of it.
Would the Chamber of Commerce people really flow to Cummins after all that the right of the BC Liberals have done?
NDP: 36%
Lib: 32%
Con: 19%
Other/Undecided: 13%
It sounds as if Dix could be the first BC NDP leader to actually *beat* the right.
that's super - yeah
NDP: 36%
Lib: 32%
Con: 19%
Other/Undecided: 13%
It sounds as if Dix could be the first BC NDP leader to actually *beat* the right.
And when Dix becomes Premier he could end up being allied with one of the most successful, and possibly the most powerful business person in BC.
http://www.timescolonist.com/news/other%2BClark%2Bsteps%2Bback%2Binto%2B...
Regarding the statement: "If I was criticizing myself, I'd say: Make less decisions but make the more significant decisions and make sure the execution is followed up better. I think that would make for better government."
Dix echoed that in his speech at the convention. He mentioned how Barrett's government passed bills at a rapid breakneck speed, but ultimately the implementation is up to the public service, and the overwhelming amount of change in a short time made it difficult to implement them all well.
http://www.ctvbc.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20120109/bc_convention_...
http://www.straight.com/article-581011/vancouver/coalition-could-foil-nd...
B.C. New Democrats are leading in the polls. The ruling B.C. Liberals are in trouble. Resurgent B.C. Conservatives are splitting the centre-right vote. If all this holds until next year’s general election, the NDP coasts to victory.
It’s a neat narrative that may work out that way. But if history repeats itself in May 2013, there could be a huge wrinkle. Think 1941.
Political scientist Dennis Pilon revisited B.C.’s electoral past when he contributed a chapter to a pan-Canadian academic book expected to be out sometime in the fall. In it, the former University of Victoria faculty member demonstrates how politics in the province has been largely defined by how the right has formed coalitions to keep the left out of power.
“In 1941, the Liberals and Conservatives joined together into a coalition government, and they ruled the province in a coalition from 1941 to 1952,” Pilon recalled in a phone interview with the Georgia Straight from Toronto’s York University, where he is now an associate professor.
Unless Adrian Dix’s New Democrats win a majority of the 85 seats in the legislative assembly, 1941 could happen again.
If Premier Christy Clark’s B.C. Liberals and John Cummins’s Conservatives have enough seats to form a majority, “no question, they’ll govern,” Pilon said.
In the 1941 election, the left-leaning Co-operative Commonwealth Federation won the popular vote with a 33-percent share. However, neither that precursor of the NDP nor the B.C. Liberals and B.C. Conservatives at that time won a majority of the 48 seats up for grabs.
“The various ruling elites said, ‘Holy Toledo, what’s going on here?’ ” Pilon said. “And they very quickly put together a coalition. They ran as a coalition in 1945 and 1949 and easily won both elections.”
Cummins’s Conservatives acknowledge 1941, devoting an entire subsection to it in the party’s history posted on its website. According to this material, the Conservatives got three cabinet posts to the Liberals’ five in their shared government.
Pilon explained that coalitions like these took the form of either alliances between parties, like the one that took shape in 1941, or, mostly, single parties like Social Credit and the modern-day B.C. Liberal Party. According to him, these coalitions won 17 of the 20 elections fought between 1941 and 2009.
Poll results released in December by Forum Research Inc. show that the B.C. Conservatives are tied at 23 percent with the B.C. Liberals. Both centre-right parties trail the NDP, which is at 34 percent.
B.C. Liberal woes may go from bad to worse in the two by-elections expected this year.
The NDP recruited a popular politician, Joe Trasolini, former mayor of Port Moody, to represent the party in the by-election for the Port Moody–Coquitlam seat vacated by B.C. Liberal MLA Iain Black.
In another by-election, John Martin, a well-known Fraser Valley newspaper columnist and criminologist, will run for the B.C. Conservatives in Chilliwack-Hope.
John Dyck, an assistant professor of political studies at Trinity Western University, noted that a deeply divided right serves the NDP well, as the party didn’t gain much above 40 percent of the vote in B.C. the three times it won and formed a government, in 1972, 1991, and 1996.
During these years, the NDP had its biggest share of the vote, almost 41 percent, when Mike Harcourt led the party in the 1991 election, winning 51 of the 75 legislative seats in contention. In that contest, the B.C. Liberals earned 33 percent of the vote, and Social Credit 24 percent.
“As much as the Liberals and Conservatives right now are fighting for the same base, the NDP only makes an inroad into that base if, in fact, the other two parties don’t do well,” Dyck told the Straight in a phone interview. “They [NDP] have to have a split opposition in order for them to do well.”
The Trinity academic sees the same result Pilon does if next year’s election leads to a minority outcome. “It certainly would be much easier for the Liberals and the Conservatives to cooperate,” Dyck said. “It would be more likely that you could have Liberal minority government supported by Conservatives.”
It is interesting to contemplate what would happen if the NDP comes first with only a plurality of seats followed by Con/Lib or Lib/Con. It's not an impossible situation, if the pieces fall in just the right places. Would Dix still get the first right to try and form government? And if so, what could he possibly do to maintain the confidence of the house?
The former government usually gets the first kick at the can, doesn't it?
Anyway you are talking about a right-winger's wet dream. Just not gonna happen.
And Christy Clark is probably now rated as a long shot to even get re-elected in her own seat.
The palace coup is coming.
Isn't it funny, how the BC political pundits call it right - splitting the right wing vote between Cons and Libs. Right on because we all know right across Canada that Libs are just so not progressive.
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/breakingnews/new-bc-liberal-chie...
Well, it's undeniable that there is a contingent of voters who define themselves as "progressive" or "relatively progressive" and vote Liberal. Even BC Liberal. I've met them and so have you, and some of them even get elected to office. And they usually have some particular reason why they aren't really into the NDP, and they manage to justify the actions of the right flank of the party as pragmatic.
But that little bloc is very critical to the survival of the BC Liberal party. If they break that delicate balance and reach too far right, that bloc could bolt. Maybe not all to the NDP mind you. Perhaps the same way that in 2001 many NDP voters went Green as a protest vote... perhaps we might see that BC Liberal voters who are not excited by the BCLs or the BCCs might be the ones to go Green as a protest vote.
Just saw Christy Clark on CTV's QP. She supports Harper on the Northern Gateway and on his new health care initiative his "(take it or leave it" offer). Ugh.
http://www.pqbnews.com/news/137298593.html
Christy Clark did express on P&P one concern with the health formula, namely that it funds per-capita, but seniors cost far more in annual health expenses than younger people. And BC, as a major retirement province, is in fact seeing that its fastest-growing population is the over-85 set. So she would advocate for an age-adjusted formula. Which is probably the only reasonable thing I heard her say in the interview.
Regarding the BCCons... it looks like Dix will start to have to push back himself against both parties. The NDP can't count on the Conservative vote only splitting the right.
A friend of mine made an interesting observation about Kevin Falcon breaking ranks to speak out in favour of Northern Gateway. Falcon's riding is in Surrey. The next federal redistribution is widely expected to add a new riding to Surrey. Perhaps Falcon is rehearsing for a run at the Conservative nomination in a new no-incumbent riding for 2015.
The former government usually gets the first kick at the can, doesn't it?
Anyway you are talking about a right-winger's wet dream. Just not gonna happen.
And Christy Clark is probably now rated as a long shot to even get re-elected in her own seat.
The palace coup is coming.
It's far more likely that we will win a majority with less than 40% of the popular vote.
Still I think it would be a sad irony for Dix if he wins a majority with less votes than the NDP got under Carole James. That would indicate she was just as good at pulling votes and her successor merely had the gift of good timing.
I'm sure Premier Adrian Dix would lose a lot of sleep over that. LOL
Members jostle to lead NDP, boost votes in Chilliwack
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Members+jostle+lead+boost+votes+Chilliwack/6060275/story.html
http://www.theprovince.com/news/select+Gwen+Mahony+lead+Chilliwack+elect...
I'm hoping a Dix NDP government would put the brakes on the Northern Pipeline. Is that likely to happen?
It's federal jurusdiction isn't it, or at least the current hearings are federal.
Trasolini expected to make transportation announcement
http://www.tricitynews.com/news/138229904.html
Yes, but it's provincial land - right? Thed feds can't run roughshod on a province against its will.
ETA: I wonder if the Cons are trying to speed up the Northern Gateway review process before Dix becomes PM?
You mean premier, right? :)
Dix hasn't personally said much. But his environment critic Rob Fleming and his energy critic John Horgan have.
http://www.pacificfreepress.com/news/1/10297-tar-sands-pipeline-not-wort...
“The pipeline would carry over 500,000 barrels of raw tar sands crude each day. The pipeline goes over mountains, across farmland, over the Fraser and Skeena rivers, and straight through the Great Bear Rainforest to the Pacific where it will be picked up by supertankers trying to navigate our inland coastal waters,” said New Democrat environment critic Rob Fleming.
“The opportunities for disaster are many, and the B.C. Liberals should re-assure British Columbians that it will not go through.”
...
Fleming said there have been many disasters in the oil industry recently, and this report clearly spells out how the tar sands pipeline project is high risk.
“British Columbians don’t want to see rivers and lakes killed, fisheries destroyed or towns and farmland contaminated,” said Fleming. “While Alberta oil companies have a lot to gain, the small benefits to British Columbia are far outweighed by the enormous risk to our northern industries, fisheries, communities and ecology.”
Fleming said the report highlights an incident in Michigan last year where another Enbridge tar sands pipeline ruptured, dumping three million litres of crude into the Kalamazoo River. The area and surrounding wetlands are expected to be contaminated for many years.
“There is a reason why First Nations oppose the pipeline and associated tanker traffic. There’s a reason why the Union of B.C. Municipalities voted against it. There’s a reason why British Columbians are against it,” said Fleming.
Fleming said that the report also underlines the need for a commitment from the B.C. Liberals to put pressure on the federal government to create a meaningful national plan on climate change.
That's Fleming. As for Horgan:
http://www.pipelinenewsnorth.ca/article/20111223/PIPELINE0118/312239952/...
Horgan was equally disappointed with Clark’s comments concerning Northern Gateway.
“Certainly, in British Columbia, we recognize the big contribution that the oil sands make to Canada and to our national economy,” said Clark.
“And in British Columbia, we’re watching the national environmental review process as it works its way through. So, we’re watching to see. And I think that we’ll be in a position in British Columbia to have a real fulsome, meaningful debate about it once we have all the facts on the table about the impacts for British Columbia and the benefits for British Columbia and for Canada as well. And so we’re watching this environmental review process very closely. Because that’s what’s going to get the facts out on the table for us.”
That wait-and-see approach is robbing British Columbia of its voice in the process because that voice will be heard too late, according to Horgan.
“British Columbians have to make their arguments now,” he said. “That’s what the tribunal and the assessment process and permitting process is all about. It’s not to wait and see what citizens feel and experts allege or argue. It’s about coming to a conclusion, making a case, and standing behind it. That’s what people expect from politicians. They don’t want them to wait and see where the wind is blowing. They want them to stand up and say, ‘Based on the evidence that I’ve seen, these are the conclusions that I’ve come to, and therefore my opinion is [this].
“But I didn’t get that sense. This is clearly an issue that the premier doesn’t want to touch while she’s in her re-creation mode going from talk show host to statesperson. It’s all well and good to stand beside the premier’s of Saskatchewan and Alberta and declare you’re a statesman, but statesmen make tough decisions and they stand by them. I haven’t seen that from Christy Clark.
“The issues are pretty clear,” he continued. “Northern Gateway has been on the table for some time now. We’re shaping our position. It’s pretty clear that many of the people in our party [aren’t interested]. Gary Coons representing Prince Rupert – not interested. The people that he represents – not interested. The Haida – not interested. And the confusion around where First Nations are, I think, only further muddies the water. And to have the premier then come up and say … it’s not for me to say what happens in British Columbia. Well, what are you the premier for? Perhaps you should go back to being a talk show host. In this business, you have to stand for something, and this is a very decisive issue for many people. There are those certainly that want to see this happen. And many, many more, based on my assessment that don’t. Our focus is on trying to continue to grow our natural gas sector, which is providing jobs, tax revenue, royalty revenue for the province of British Columbia. The pipeline moving Alberta commodity to market seems to me to be a lot of risk and not a lot of reward.”
I think we'll ultimately see the BCNDP take a stance against the pipeline, but I'm guessing they're biding their time to frame the message right. We may find that they put up a broad spectrum of arguments - not just environmental, but also labour, the interests of the First Nations and the local communities, and so forth. Perhaps they are looking for some prominent spokespeople to join them when they finally have a press conference about it. They know the stakes are high for the next election and they don't want to lose votes by putting out the message the wrong way.My bad! Thank you for your very informative post - it was a good one.
Music to my ears!
Liberals at 'point of no return'http://www.royalcityrecord.com/news/Liberals+point+return/6118607/story....
That's because the government is in such deep, deep trouble with the public that one has to wonder whether it's reached the point of no return.
There comes a point in any government's existence where nothing it does - no matter how popular or sensible it may be --can save it from demise the next time it faces the electorate.
The B.C. Liberals have to be wondering whether they've reached that point. I've long held that after roughly 10 years in power, a stench of sorts begins to envelope a government and it can be very hard to get rid of it.
The latest Angus Reid poll shows the steep uphill struggle facing the B.C. Liberals and their leader. The poll gives the NDP a whopping 14 point lead (42 per cent to 28 per cent) over the B.C. Liberals.
But two other numbers are equally as alarming for the ruling party. The upstart B.C. Conservatives' support is pegged at 19 per cent, which is roughly where it was three months ago.
That means the B.C. Conservatives are not a flash-in-the-pan party. Its support appears to be solidifying, which is disastrous news for the B.C. Liberals.
The other number is the 22 per cent Premier Christy Clark polled when respondents were asked who would make the best premier. That's a bit behind NDP leader Adrian Dix's level of 26 per cent.
In the last three months, in fact, voters' positive impressions of Dix have improved by seven points while positive impressions of Clark have dropped three points.
Thus, the one argument Clark could use when defending her performance against critics with-in her party - that she was more popular than the B.C. Liberal party itself - seems to be disappearing.
Also troubling for the B.C. Liberals is that they are losing ground on credibility in running
the economy and fighting crime, two issues that should be their bread and butter.
Finally, the poll shows that just 60 per cent of those who voted for the B.C. Liberals in the last election would do so today. More than a quarter of those former Liberal voters now say they would vote for the B.C.
Conservatives.
And another poll this one showing a shocking 10% shift from Clark to Cummings.
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/holds+point+lead+over+Liberals+poll+sho...
NDP - 44%
Libs - 32%, down 6%
Cons - 16%, up 4%
The new poll found gender played a role in the results. Among women, the NDP have a 26 point lead over the Liberals, taking 51 per cent of female voters, to the Liberals' 25 per cent.
Support for the two parties among B.C.'s male voters was nearly even.
While decided voters appear to be showing more support for the NDP, Clark continues to outpace Dix as the leader B.C. voters think would make the best premier moving forward, but that lead is shrinking.
Who would make best premier?
Clark - 31%, down 3%
Dix - 25%, up 2%
Cummings - 11%
Unsure - 30%
Would You Buy a Used Car from These Libs?Eight old dents in believability Clark's polish hasn't fixed.
http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2012/02/06/Libs-Believability/
So, Adrian Dix is higher in the polls than Christy Clark.
It comes as no surprise to me, who has said from the beginning that Christy Clark did not have what it takes to lead a party, much less a province. If she were not premier, I would call her an airhead.
It's interesting to note that only one person in her caucus supported her leadership bid, and he had to be shuffled into cabinet obscurity after screwing up his first minister's post. This is an important point because under the British system, when a prime minister goes, the caucus declares who the successor will be until the next party convention. A party-wide vote, democratic though it may be, is a popularity contest, while the caucus votes the most competent successor which they are best qualified to determine. At the very least, before a leadership convention, the caucus ought to be polled and the poll made public. As expected, Premier Clark refuses to face issues by changing the subject when she is asked tough questions to her amazing plan to make B.C. the most this or that, blah, blah, blah.
pretty grumpy this morning listening to the news that our 'Premier' Christy has passed all boundaries between business and government and happily landed in the mire of conflict of interest, breach of trust and downright stupidity...
what a joke she is by by-passing the throne speech and delivering the spring sitting agenda on CKNW with a call in portion no less.
BCers should be phoning in and screaming but I guess they would not let those "type" of callers through anyway!!!!!!!!!
Although I live in Quebec (22 years now), I really, really want Adian Dix to replace Clark as the next B.C. Premier.
The non-throne speech reminds me of the Ernie Eves government's "Magna Budget". It was one of the lowest points in his political career and it was essentially his swan song. By the time the election campaign began, he was calling McGuinty a "reptilian kitten-eater from outer space".
This article would be more accurately entitled "Lying Business Contractors who pimp for Christy Clark. What a pile of nonsense. And independent my ass. LOL
I wonder how many people realize what an absolute sleazeball Philip Hochstein is. And I wonder if Peter Gall had a hand in this.
http://www.vancouversun.com/sports/ICBA+poll+shows+Liberals+trailing+poi...
In a news release, ICBA President Philip Hochstein said he believes the poll shows people are beginning to warm to Clark, and to policies such as the B.C. Jobs Plan.
“These poll results confirm what I’ve been hearing over the past few months – the race is much closer than we thought. I talk to folks across the province, and I’ve been hearing support for the government that was much stronger than past polls indicated,” Hochstein said in a news release.
“What we see in our poll is a six-point difference – and that’s less of a margin than the BC Liberals faced a year before the 2005 election.”
The poll also showed 43 per cent of voters have a favourable impression of Clark, while only 30 per cent have a favourable impression of NDP leader Adrian Dix.
It also found that 35 per cent of people have an unfavourable impression of Clark, while only 20 per cent have an unfavourable impression of Dix.
Come on federales let's make it 2 for 2 an NDP Gov't both in BC and Ottawa
Christy will hang on to the bitter end but it's over for her.
BC Liberals are bleeding more supporters to the BC Cons - Go Cummins Go!!!
http://blogs.vancouversun.com/2012/02/20/falcon-backers-flee-to-bc-conse...
More Christy Clark Liberal sleaze.
Key Clark Backer Lobbied for Firm Seeking Public Liquor AssetsBudget surprise revealed after Lib insider Kinsella lobbied to privatize distribution.
http://thetyee.ca/News/2012/02/23/Public-Liquor-Lobby/
Under Christy Clark's leadership, the BC Liberals appear to even have a falling out with the business community, or at least with Telus, one of the province's largest employers.
Last week Telus had a ground-breaking ceremony for their new building - BC NDP Leader Adrian Dix was there but Christy Clark was nowhere to be found.
Now this debacle over the renaming of BC Place - the lost $35 or $40 million could have been used to support the teachers, help seniors, and pay for some roadwork, etc.
B.C. puts brakes on $40-million BC Place renaming deal with Telus http://www.timescolonist.com/sports/puts+brakes+million+Place+renaming+deal+with+Telus/6271370/story.html#ixzz1oYEQEFMDAmazin'
Buzz over Premier Photo Op’s snub by Telushttp://www.vancouversun.com/sports/Opinion+Buzz+over+Premier+Photo+snub+...
Not surprisingly, the B.C. Liberals are seething at the deliberate snub to the premier and the cavalier way the company handled the invitations to the other members of government.
Especially galling is the fact that a big part of Friday’s news — extending Internet service to 97 per cent of the province, installation of fibre-optic cable to 450 schools, wireless coverage along 1,700 kilometres of remote highways — was a direct result of a $1-billion, 10-year contract with the province, approved by the Clark government and announced last summer.
So what provoked the falling-out? Neither side would say anything on the record. But I gather that on the government side, Telus is thought to be engaging in payback for the company’s disappointment over negotiations on the naming of BC Place. The company thought it had the rights in the bag. Turned out it didn’t.
Still, hard to imagine a major corporate player would have chosen to embarrass Clark’s predecessor, Gordon Campbell, in such an obvious fashion. And in that sense, Friday’s event might be taken as a portent of a changing of the guard.
As Dix could not help observing, one of the things that made him happiest at the Telus announcement was Entwistle saying that the development would go ahead, irrespective of the outcome of the next provincial election. Hint, hint.
Says premier is making it too easy for feds to offload health, justice costs onto province.
http://thetyee.ca/News/2012/03/08/Stick-Up-For-BC/
Unbelievable sleaze politics - Bloy is the one Caucus member who supported Christy during her leadership run.
Fuck his apology - why did he do it is the question? He should at the very least be resigning and perhaps going to jail for his behaviour.
MLA Harry Bloy apologizes for leaking information related to Province investigation
http://www.theprovince.com/news/Harry+Bloy+apologizes+leaking+informatio...
'unbelievable sleaze policitics ' doesn't really capture the ugly corruption contained in that article's information. These are the sleazes that want to destroy the public school system because they the business people can do it so much better.
Fuckity fuck!
"Bloy" seems like it is just itching to become a word with some sort of offensive definition.
he resigned today so according to Christy we should shut up now and forget about it.
he resigned today so according to Christy we should shut up now and forget about it.
Bloy (v): To ignore a recent scandal because someone perceives that enough corrective action has been taken. E.g. So what you're saying about the leaked memo is, you expect us to just Bloy it off?
Has there been any indication that any of the sitting B.C. Liberals M.L.A.s are preparing to jump ship to the Conservatives?
I haven't heard any. Although a friend of mine thinks Kevin Falcon is setting his sights on getting a federal Conservative nomination for 2015.
This is really getting crazy! New Forum poll BC NDP 47%, BC Libs and BC Cons 21% each!! This would mean 75 seats out of 85 for the NDP!
It would be like 2001 in reverse!*
*Except that in 2001, Campbell's Liberals actually got a seriously crushing majority of the popular vote.
Hey wait... I just noticed... 21 + 21 = 42. Even if the Libs and Cons merged right on the spot... the NDP would still form a majority government?
And in the Justason poll 45 NDP 31 LIB 14 CON, even if they merged right on the spot, the right would be in a statistical dead-heat with the NDP.
This just got real. Now Clark faces the uncomfortable truth that chasing the right-wing vote is still not likely to be enough to get her re-elected.
Hey Stock thanks for posting this fabulous poll.
Christy is hooped.
I'm sure now even the business community will want her gone, sooner rather than later.
This is staggering - close to a 50% lead for the BC NDP in the latest poll
Christy Clark: B.C. Premier Poised To Be Swept From Office By Adrian Dix's NDP, According To New Polls
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/03/20/christy-clark-bc-polls-adrian-di...
Hey Stock thanks for posting this fabulous poll.
Christy is hooped.
I'm sure now even the business community will want her gone, sooner rather than later.
Well the business community does like predictability. Even if there are policies they don't like, they would prefer clarity over uncertainty. In that light I'm sure they'd rather see Christy just take off.
Not that I believe any polls, I am intrigued by this one. I have a couple of questions that perhaps other Babblers might answer about this poll. The poll states that nine seats would go to the Liberals and one to Vicki Huntington.
Which constituencies would go Liberal? The Abby's, some in the North? And second question, how does a poll like this come up with an independent such as Huntington. Does Forum record individual constituencies or regions?
Clark has called the by-elections for Port Moody-Coquitlam and Chilliwack-Hope, both to be held on April 19th. Here is an e-mail I just received from Jan O'Brien at the BCNDP.
In 2009, we lost Port Moody-Coquitlam to the Liberals by over 2000 votes. That same election, Chilliwack-Hope was more than 3000 votes out of our reach. It remains one of the constituencies in BC that has never had an NDP MLA. So it’s no surprise that the pundits think that we can’t win both by-elections in Port Moody-Coquitlam and Chilliwack Hope. I disagree. As our leader Adrian Dix has said, we are going to try and win in every constituency in the 2013 provincial election. This is our opportunity to show the BC Liberals that no seat is safe. It’s a chance for us to elect two great candidates, Joe Trasolini and Gwen O’Mahony. Joe has fought for the residents of Port Moody for four terms as mayor, and is respected across the province for his sustainability initiatives and good management practices. Gwen O’Mahony has been a passionate health care advocate for years, fighting for adults with developmental disabilities and working with various health care organizations to develop policy. Will you help prove the pundits wrong? We CAN win these by-elections and send a message the BC Liberals won't forget. Sincerely,
BC New Democratic Party
Toll-Free: 1-888-VOTE-NDP (1-888-868-3637)
Phone: 604-430-8600
Authorized by the Financial Agent for the BC NDP, 604-430-8600
So now that Topp is *not* going to lead the federal NDP...
Encourage him to come work on BC's election next year?
Yup!
Brian can always take a leave of absence for a bit as Tom has said he wants him as part of the federal team.
new
Former B.C. cabinet minister jumps to Conservatives Liberal MLA John van Dongen takes swipes at premier in announcement Mondayhttp://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/03/26/bc-van-dongen-to-conservatives.html
Adrian really needs to not be so absentminded. Did he give his ticket away to a homeless person? Jeesh!
1st the mayor, now this.
Tell Mulcair to never, ever, take public trasnsportsation in the Lower Mainland.
So the BC Cons now have a basse in the BC Legislature - good! Go John Cummins Go!
How many more defections need to take place before Christy loses her majority - the knives will be coming out now, and she will quickly be losing control of the government.
I love the timing of this. Maximum boost to the Conservative candidate running in the by-election next door. I'll bet he spends the next couple of weeks on the doorstep with his new BFF telling the people how corrupt the Liberals are.
Adrian really needs to not be so absentminded. Did he give his ticket away to a homeless person? Jeesh!
1st the mayor, now this.
Tell Mulcair to never, ever, take public trasnsportsation in the Lower Mainland.
Yeah and the first Conservative MLA is a dim bulb, who as Soliciter General and Minister of Public Safety, was caught speeding more than 41 Kph over the speed limit. This is a BFD moment in comparison.
In a way this defection is the best of both worlds for the NDP. On the one hand it gives the Conservatives some credibility, thus weakining the Liberals. On the other hand it doesn't give them that much credibility, since Van Dongen isn't the strongest of MLAs. There's the speeding issue, which actually led to his licence being suspended. There was the Fish Farming investigation from back in 2003. Then there's this issue:
Uh, I agree there are serious questions left unanswered. And yet, as a member of the government for the last eleven years you didn't see anything wrong with this until very recently, so excuse me while I question your intentions on this matter and dismiss your sudden objection to the even more unseemly aspects of the BC Rail debacle.
And this:
Integrity includes honesty, ethics and personal character. Integrity is non-negotiable. It is foundational for a strong organization. Most importantly, integrity includes accountability.
True, which is why crossing the house when the political winds are ebbing from the Liberals to the Conservatives, in a riding like Abbotsford, which is as Conservative as Alberta, makes me question his "core values", "honesty", "ethics" and "personal character." It seems to me as if this was done out of political expediency, since it would be easier to get re-elected as a Conservative if the polls are correct. It would be one thing to sit as an independent then run as a Conservative, but like it or not the people in that riding did elect him as a Liberal. Crossing the floor, while legal, isn't very indicative of someone with strong core values, honesty, ethics and personal character.
I actually agree with Rich Coleman (!), in so far as Van Dongen is probably bitter for having been kicked out of Cabinet and not let back in. At least this way, even though he's not part of an official party in the legislature, unofficially (since the Conservatives need 3 more seats for official party status) he is at least the floor leader of the BC Conservatives.