NDP Wins With Bold BC Budget, and in the process, might be launching a seismic shift in provincial politics

10 posts / 0 new
Last post
NDP Wins With Bold BC Budget, and in the process, might be launching a seismic shift in provincial politics

It's not perfect but what a refreshing change from the last 16 years.

NDP Wins With Bold BC Budget

And in the process, might be launching a seismic shift in provincial politics.

It’s a big new tax; corporate income tax, for example, is only expected to bring in $4.1 billion this year.

But while business groups aren’t happy, they haven’t taken to the barricades. The Greater Vancouver Board of Trade still gave the balanced budget a C-plus rating.

Partly, that’s because larger businesses know they got a windfall when the BC Liberals halved MSP premiums. About 40 per cent of premiums had been paid by businesses on behalf of their employees, either as company policy or as a result of a union contract. When the Liberals cut the premiums, the companies saved money. Now they will pay a new tax in its place.

And partly, businesses knew some form of payroll tax was coming to make up for MSP premiums. The government set up an MSP task force to consult widely and come up with a proposal on replacing the revenue. The three-person panel’s interim report, delivered Feb. 1, suggested it was heading to a recommendation that the money be raised through a payroll tax and personal income tax increases, in roughly equal proportions.

It was a bit of a slap to make the decision before the group had completed its work, both to the members and the 1,500 people and organizations that made submissions on how the money should be raised. “This is not the direction we were going,” tweeted task force chair Lindsay Tedds, a University of Victoria professor.

Still, the business community knew a payroll tax would cover a significant portion of the costs.

The other tax measures are less dramatic, though the government forecasts that property tax changes, including measures to curb speculation, will bring in $521 million once fully implemented in the next fiscal year.

And the $5 annual increase in the carbon tax for the each of the next four years will bring in an additional $726 million a year by 2020/21.

All in, revenue is forecast to be $58.7 billion in 2020/21, up $6.6 billion from this year — about 12.6 per cent.

That’s not out of line with population and GDP growth, and it gives the government room to deliver on some of its campaign promises around child care, housing and better conditions for seniors in residential care.

The health budget, for example, is slated to increase 4.5 per cent this year and 4.4 per cent in the following year, largely to support improvements to seniors care. Those are badly needed. The former government’s inaction meant 85 per cent of B.C. seniors’ residences fail to meet minimum provincial staffing guidelines, a shameful betrayal of a whole generation.

The ministries of children and families and social development and poverty reduction also get big increases that should allow the government to address issues neglected by the former government.

And the budget left the government with a lot of room to address other issues. Between the contingency allowance and an account for “Priority spending initiatives and caseload pressures” the government has $2 billion in reserve to spend in 2020/21. (Perhaps not coincidentally, as the next election approaches.)

image atom

Child Care, Housing Funding Boosted in Budget


Based on the first 24 hours of reaction, Premier John Horgan should be pretty happy. The government found a way to raise money to address critical needs and deliver on promises without getting gored for tax increases or running deficits. Its Green party allies are happy.

And the response may indicate a big shift in politics in the province. The Liberals governed for 16 years on the basis that taxes were bad and that British Columbians weren’t willing to pay for services like health care, child care, support for people with disabilities or education. They acknowledged as much in their bizarre pre-defeat throne speech repudiating almost every policy the party had claimed to believe in.

The NDP government’s first real budget offered a very different approach, one that assumed services that made life better were worth paying for. So far, the public seems to agree.  [Tyee]



Yes, basically.

Will BC Get the Bold Budget We Badly Need?

Smart tax increases could allow overdue investment and a stronger future.



NDP ignores elites and tables budget for those who need help



Left Turn Left Turn's picture

The BC NDP are not attempting to reverse the seismic shift that Gordon Campbell and the BC Liberals made in 2001 when they cut the provincial income tax rate by 25%. This budget maintains provincial government spending at the same level of GDP as it was under the BC Liberals.

While I'm not suggesting an across the board 25% income tax increase -- Most people have seen their tax cut from 17 years ago eaten up in higher housing costs, or they are young enough that they never payed this rate and most of these folks could not afford to -- surely those folks with incomes over $1 million could afford to have their taxes increased back to 2001 levels. This would give the provincial government significant extra cash to work with.

The child care funding is nice, and will help a lot of lower income families. However, it also ammounts to a subsidy to private child-care providers, who remain free to overcharge for child-care service -- including that which wil be subsidized -- and to underpay child-care workers (I saw a statistic on one of my friends FB posts that many child-care workers make less money than parking attendants).

The speculation tax is a good move, but the budget continues to fail renters. Rent increases of 2% plus the rate of inflation continue to be allowed, and this rent control continues to be applied only to the person and not the unit. Which means that when tenants get evicted -- because although the BC NDP has closed the major loopholes that allowed landlords to evict tenants, legitimate cases where landlords need to evict tenants will still exist -- rents in the unit can still be increased to the average for the neighbourhood. And evicted tenants will still have a hard time finding another decent rental within a reasonable distance at a price they can afford.

The Vancouver Tenants Union is calling for the province to freeze rents for four years. This could be done immediately by the Residential Tenancy Branch with no need for new legislation.

The other piece that is badly needed to address the housing crisis is renewed investment in social housing, somthing which is not in this budget. 22 percent of renters in BC are spending over 50% of their incomes on rent, and any new market rental units will not be affordable to the majority of BC renters. Large scale investments in social housing are necessary to solve the rental housing crisis.

In Vienna, two thirds of all housing is publicly owned. In Vancouver, only 8% of housing stock is non-market housing. Increasing this ammount ought to be a high level priority for our provincial government, with a view to providing affordable non-market housing not just for homeless people, but for low and moderate income people as well.

It looks to me as though this budget does not prevent a future in which most* low and modest income individuals in Metro Vancouver will all be forced out of the Vancouver/Burnaby/New Westminster urban core into the exurbs, or will move to a different part of the country alltogether.

*Existing social housing may enable some low/modest income folks to remain in the urban core after the rest of these folks have been forced out to the exurbs or to a different part of the country.


Did John Horgan just do more to fight poverty and rebalance the taxation system in BC in less than a year than the Doer/Selinger crowd did in Manitoba for 17 years?


Truly amazin’ What a difference a change in government has made in BC



Getting the seniors vote is huge as they vote in higher percentages than other demographic groups