babble Hall of Fame: version X.2.1
February 1, 2009 - 7:12pm
I tried finding the old babble hall of Fame, but could go back only to October, 2008.
In any case, skarredmunkey's response to genstrike's question here,
"Who exactly sees Ignatieff as the second coming of Trudeau?" here is a beaut.A classist, priveleged twit and an ostensible liberal with delusions of grandeur who goes back and forth between ideas and policies that are everything from "centrist" to outright fascist, and will probably, sadly, become Prime Minister some day by attempting to look young fresh and new?
I'd say the comparison is fair.
I'd say the comparison is fair.
Say, why can't I edit that first post? There's an extra "here" there.
"will probably, sadly, become Prime Minister some day "
Not if Quebec can help it.
NorthReport on Liberal Party of Canada "I also notice Warren Kinsella has bowed out or got the boot, not sure which. Not that it matters, as he usually does more harm than good to whoever he is promoting, which is usually himself." -NothReport (November 21, 2009) in http://www.rabble.ca/babble/canadian-politics/wife-former-leader-stephane-dion-lambastes-liberal-party-facebook
Tommy Paine on gun control:
You want gun control? Start a website devoted to arming the left. Education on weapons, how to purchase, how to navigate the regulations, etc.
You'd have gun control faster than Flaherty at a blind man kicking contest.
Fidel, taking a creative pause from the usual toadies and lapdogs routine...
Contrarianna succinctly wrapping a long thread with finesse:
"Defenders of the large population, (of the future, and current) are correct when they point out 2 realities--but when these truths are considered simultaneously, they do not give cause for environmental complacency, or hardly reason for hope.
The first is that truth that as societies move from "developing" status to "developed", it usually entails decreasing family size.
The second is that consumption and eco-footprint of individuals in "developed" countries are many times that of "developing" societies.
The coupling of global capitalism, (with its appetite for cheap, plentiful, disposable labour) with the universal human desire for self-advancement and "getting things", both needed--and ultimately unneeded, will continue the current mass extinction event and result in the desertification of the planet."
On his timeless album wich included "the seven words you can't say on T.V." the late and very much missed George Carlin also treated us to combinations of words that you just don't hear, like "hand me that piano".
But Oldgoat found one that Carlin missed:
-DUCK! It's a flying buttress!
http://www.rabble.ca/babble/international-news-and-politics/berlusconi-hit-face-church#comment-1092775
Bagkitty shadow moderating the personal attack thread...
oldgoat, uniting discussions from a couple of threads, while displaying the comedic eye and timing of a virtuoso:
Fotheringay-Phipps:
"It's all well and good to wag a finger at sinners, but virtue gets harder every day simply because of the way the Almighty Market is constructing our society. You can exhort people to live a healthy life and get the righteous thrill of being Jeremiah in a jogging suit. Or you can actually help them by trying to build a healthier society."
("Jeremiah in a jogging suit" will be placed in a frame.)
Sweet Jeremiah in Sneakers!
Bagkitty shadow moderating the personal attack thread...
Good call, Polly!!!
Tommy Paine on gun control:
You want gun control? Start a website devoted to arming the left. Education on weapons, how to purchase, how to navigate the regulations, etc.
You'd have gun control faster than Flaherty at a blind man kicking contest.
Want gun control? Listen to Nada Stotland (former director of the American Psychiatric Association) say that keeping guns away from crazies is all discriminatory and harsh and judgmental and unfair, like. Anybody think EFA should carry a gun?
Sven,
I think the individualism you promote would have been very sensible in the 18th century, when the state of philosophical knowledge was as it was. The simple fact is that a lot of these individualist theories have been comprehensively discredited by reasoned arguments and detailed research. They simply don't hold. I don't buy into the environmental determinism of a few on this thread but they very much have a point and they're closer to reality than you are. I'll address some of your points.
In reality, many problems require a combination of systemic solutions and personal initiative. If a society has poor roads and a virtually non-existent transportation infrastructure, even Herculean personal efforts will not result in a competitive economy. If laws don't prohibit hiring and firing for discriminatory reasons, both society and the individuals effected by those discriminatory actions will suffer.
This for example is a completely false dichotomy. The example that immediately comes to mind is the 1960s USian civil rights act, which a lot of charlatan libertarians like to argue forced a behavioral system on innocent business owners by government fiat. It was nothing like that... it was the business owners forcing their backwards way of mind onto African Americans for hundreds of years. The nominal change that there was was not brought in "by government", but actually by the collective individual actions of millions of people who were actively fighting the system and bringing tremendous pressure on the Johnson administration.
You're failing in school? Huh. It must be that the school's fault. The fact that you spend hours every day playing video games instead of cracking open your books couldn't possibly be the cause of your failure. Instead, the school needs more money - that is "the solution"!!
Blaming video games is a nice populist theory but it doesn't hold up to scrutiny. There simply are better schools, better learning environments and better teachers and these make a tremendous difference. There's an excellent article in this month's The Atlantic which investigates 20 years of data that Teach for America has collected on the rrecent graduates it sends to inner city schools. They try and select for better teachers, and now they find that 44% of their teachers succeed in raising their students test scores by over 1.5 grade levels. If teachers didn't matter as you imply then that wouldn't be the case.
In all schools, there's a distribution of the amount of time kids spend on video games, as there is between schools as well. It's not the games. It's everything. Teachers, schools, home environment, etc.
************
************
If anything, going after simple explanations like "video games" is not jut false, it's lazy. You're being frightened away from the underlying complexity of reality, because you don't want to think that hard and you might not like the answers.
Thank you very much.
Actually, some of those simple explanations do work. Video games ... ADHD ... Ritalin ... crystal meth ... violence is a progression that makes sense to me. It's not the answer to the whole problem, by any means.
Same with mental illness. Instability ... drug dabbling ... further instability ... 911 ... bad experience ... more drugs ... more instability ... and then pretty soon the police all know your name.
Beacause they are "simple explanations", they are used by the Bushies and Harpers on their law and order crusades...without doin' a damned thing about causation.
But let's leave this thread open for babbler's famous phrases, GM.
Tommy Paine on gun control:
You want gun control? Start a website devoted to arming the left. Education on weapons, how to purchase, how to navigate the regulations, etc.
You'd have gun control faster than Flaherty at a blind man kicking contest.
Happiness Is A Warm Gun.
I need a firearm like I need a hole in my head.
Well, there is the thousand David Frum rule, I'll give you that.
But without mummy, and unless marrying astutely is a journalistic skill, there's not much between him and "would you like fries with that?"
From here:
http://rabble.ca/babble/canadian-politics/next-liberal-leader-political-...
I read a piece today from a guy who sat down and carefully read the Revelations part of the bible. He said if you read it close there's certain things that become clear. According to that stuff in order to get "raptured" you have to be a male Jewish virgin and there's only 144,000 tops that are going. Period. No women. No gentiles. No men who have been "defiled" (sic) by women (that's what it says.)
There's an awful lot of hillbillies that are going to be very disappointed. I 'spect they'll try to get their money back.
Don't worry, I changed my mind on that when I realized I was going to have to spend eternity with Ezra Levant!
from here
Who the fuck is Ezra Levant?
I only wish that I was unaware of the existence of the fat little fascist that goes by the name of Ezra, GM. This is definitely a case where ignorance is bliss.
From here:
A very good point about those who defend Israeli aggression hereabouts:
Open apologists of the former South African apartheid system, defenders of everyday systemic forms of oppression in this country, and those who excuse and support violent colonialism in other places traditionally have been ushered to the exits here. Can anyone explain the lenient standard applied in terms of the level of tolerance for hate against Palestinians and support for tyranny against them in threads of this nature? What any sensible person can clearly define as brutal oppression apparently is a matter of debate and merely comes down to ones point of view.
Instead of isolating them from meaningful dialogue as the pariahs they are, spitting distain without regret through the act of expelling their reprehensible excuses and ideology from a community which speaks of valuing human decency over the monstrosity that these interlopers pathetically represent, they are continuously permitted to assault reason, honesty, justice, and dignity with every fetid post that documents not only their shame, but our own in not calling for their immediate removal whenever they rear their ugly heads on this board.
permalink
al-Qa'bong , on March 21 observed:'
"If one takes the steamengine of thought that runs from Rousseau through Kant to Hegel, one sees that the state is an expression of the will of either God or The People (or the two are the same). One state (or the manifestation of the will of one people) is no better than another state, nor is one people any better than another. There may be regimes that at any time may be qualitatively better or worse than another, but we're all peoples of the world, and none of us is better than another."
Genstrike cuts through the bullshit, in the I support Cheri Dinovo thread:
OK, so Cheri isn't perfect. Who is?
And so, not every one of her views aligns perfectly with the self annointed progressive left.
She's still better than most of the other politicians out there, by a long shot...
I don't understand these kinds of comments. They're portraying the people who are crticial of DiNovo with all these stereotypes of people on the left. That we're purists who denounce anyone who strays from the party line, that we're doctrinaire, wtc.
We need to remember, that it was DiNovo who denounced us and called people nasty things on facebook and whatnot. Why aren't people saying "Okay, so the IAW folks aren't perfect. Who is? But so, not every one of their views aligns perfectly with the self-anointed adjudicator of what is acceptable on the left, Cheri DiNovo"
I mean, this is really showing some messed up and unbalanced power relations between activists and politicians on the left. It's almost saying that we need to quickly forgive them for their transgressions, while they are free to constantly denounce us for our principles.
FrmrSldr is Harry Patch.
You can accomplish far greater things through trust, dialogue and cooperation than by fear, mistrust and antagonism.
Really, is there anything left to say after this one?
Well the problem with a monument to the victims of capitalism is that you need to put an electronic ticker on it to keep tallying up the victims...
I love this one by Lou Arab in the Guys Being Confused thread:
"Guys being confused"???
Might as well call the thread "sky being blue."
What a moron.
Responding to this:
found here: North Korea
One of the best running pun jokes (don't stop, Unionist!):
http://www.rabble.ca/comment/1128533/Viking77-wrote-Unionist
http://www.rabble.ca/comment/1128627/Fidel-wrote-George
Slumberjack, nominated by Boom Boom, reflecting upon the latest round of advance-guard rationalization in case the NDP supports the next Harper budget:
Apparently there's such a clamour out there for making parliament work with the harpocrites, that it compels opposition parties through the sheer weight of public opinion to bend their entire ideology to the task.
Take your time responding, though; I have to take my zoot suit to the cleaners now and won't be back for a while.
A little Wednesday afternoon burlesque, starring George and al-Q.
http://www.rabble.ca/babble/international-news-and-politics/latest-obama-thread
N. Beltov, on solidarity.
Those who preach cynicism about social change are worse enemies than the "real" enemies. Their efforts demoralize others and poison them with the same virus that they are infected with.
[Billy Bragg and Woody Guthrie have some excellent quotes, better than mine and worth looking up, that address cynicism in politics.]
For North Report and I liked it too:
Relax trippie this is a party of one.
From over here:
Btw, just because you put the word "radical" in front of something, doesn't actually make it radical.
Ergo:
"The magical, chocolate-dipped, groovy, most excellent, fabulous, innovative centre."
See? And I got nauseous while typing that.
P.S. I think I said what Slumberjack just said. Only wittier.
Love it!
Yeah, but what about my spit in the face one...eh?
The Hens were fed up. Fox lay in the corner of the henhouse, and grinned through bloody teeth. "We must rise up and defeat Fox", said Hen, "for we shall never be free while he's in here, and our chicks will never be safe!"
Fox grinned through bloody teeth. "Sister Hen" he said, "Don't concern yourself with such matters. Lay eggs, see that I am fed, and I will protect you from harm"
Hen had had enough. One morning, while Fox slept, the hens attacked. But what could they do, with stunted beak and wing, to defeat Fox, whose teeth gnashed and spit blood and feathers?
"We must have help", said Hen.
"Someone help Sister Hen!" cried Rat, looking through the boards at the fight inside. "Fox will kill them all!" Rat gnashed his teeth with worry, but his beady eyes beheld the eggs.
"We must help Sister Hen!" cried Badger. "There is much we can do to stop Fox". She shed tears and gnashed her teeth, and her black eyes beheld the chicks.
"We will help Sister Hen" cried Wolf. "My pack and I have the tools to stop it. We shall ask our Sister Bobcat, and our Brother Eagle to help us save the coop! For Hen shall live in freedom, and never more fear Fox's gnashing teeth." And their cold, white eyes beheld the warm nests within.
So Fox was vanquished. And Wolf, and Bobcat, and Eagle, and Badger, and Rat, rested contentedly and righteously, their teeth red with blood, and their beds soft with feather.
Cluck, cluck.
Jingles!! Thank you for being here!!
ya. beauty.
500 Apples says what needs to be said, and does so succinctly, here:
We should have a special section on babble for whining.
You could have cited some Alanis Morrisette, which would have given that quote some context.
Alan -- I agree.
The media, owned by big business love him, and enough voters either want a tax cut because they are doing well; hope to do well and use the tax cut later; or are stupid enough to think that policies designed to help those better off than them are somehow in the end going to help them and the apathetic.
We already have a coalition of sorts: the greedy, the stupid and the apathetic and the currency is propaganda.
Sean in Ottawa nails the difference between Tunisian and Canadian democracy here:
If everyone on the left just lit themselves on fire the Cons would buy marshmallows.
Walkom's whole thesis fails because of a faulty premise. It wasn' t vote splitting in Ontario that was responsible; it was Liberals voting Conservative.
This is true. Liberals seem to believe they are "entitled" to the support of NDP voters in close races with the Cons.
In my riding, Etobicoke Centre, the incumbent Liberal lost to the Conservative by 26 votes (there will be a recount). The Liberal blames the NDP, who ran third. In actual fact, the Conservative vote increased by 2,822 and the Liberal vote decreased by 2,902; those Con votes didn't come from the NDP, but from the Liberals.
Personally, I blame the Marxist-Leninists for the Con win. Their 149 votes exceeds the Conservative margin of victory!
post #25, here
Doug, helping the Liberal Party find an Intrim Leader:
"They may as well make Dr. Kevorkian the interim leader."
http://rabble.ca/babble/canadian-politics/chretien-pushing-rae-interim-l...
Here's ghoris on the hasty re-write of a canned, puff piece by The Province (Vancouver) following BC Premier Clark's narrow victory over NDPer David Eby ...
Vancouver-Point Grey By-Election thread
In a discussion of debt-financed consumerism:
it's the "company store" on a national level.
from here
"DSK is about as threatening to global imperialism as Tony Blair."
genstrike, throwing the truth around with wild abandon, # 38, here:
http://rabble.ca/babble/international-news-and-politics/head-internation...
They don't like the idea that a non-conservative party might ever take power.
I'm not sure why these big "L" Liberals went on anhd on about how we all needed to "stop Harper" - when its clear that they agree with him about 98% of the time. i guess its what's called the narcissism of small difference. I think I saw some election research that showed that the only and only "issue" that unites Liberal supporters is personal dislike of Stephen Harper - but none of them mind his actual policies.
Anyways, rightwing liberals have as much right to exist as anyone - but don't come here trying to pretend to be "progressive" and then approvingly quote a red-baiting editorial from the calgary Herald!
[Generic troll name], you've been warned about displaying contempt for leftist politics through your baiting before. I think you know what's wrong with post 7 and you're smart enough to be more precise in your smearing off the left, this board and it's politics. Be more judicious in the future.
Yup thats the way to do.
ETA
Sorry Snert but this has nothing much to do with you. I quoted Catchfire and that was my focus. I have taken your name out of it so you get that you are not my focus.
Where did this happen?
Actually in what used to be the feminist forum.
http://rabble.ca/babble/feminism/boss-assaults-four-women-gets-unconditi...
Not that I'm complaining about being censured by a mod, but doesn't it sort of cheapen the Hall of Fame if it's just a place to gloat when someone you don't like gets warned?
kropotikin1951, was that rather ordinary post REALLY that exciting for you?
I don't know that using [Generic troll name] improves anything either.
"DSK is about as threatening to global imperialism as Tony Blair."
genstrike, throwing the truth around with wild abandon, # 38, here:
http://rabble.ca/babble/international-news-and-politics/head-internation...
Yeah that was pretty good. And especially when no one in that thread was suggesting DSK is a champion of democracy or that he is not a sexual predator.
When in doubt, lynch first and ask questions later.
oldgoat? It's time.
Sorry Snert but this has nothing much to do with you. I quoted Catchfire and that was my focus. I have taken your name out of it so you get that you are not my focus.
Wow. Speaking of passive-aggressive postings, it's funny that you replaced my name with [Generic troll name]. Also funny that you edited Catchfire's post down to just the part addressing me.
If you've got something to say, say it.
Please don't import personal vendettas into the hall of fame thread. This thread is for happy feelings only.
Meanwhile, back to hall of fame-worthy things...
Caissa, in the CRACKDOWN on conspiracy theorism thread
Didn't an US Supreme Court justice say he couldn't define pornography but he could recognize it when he saw it? I feel in a similar manner about conspiracy theories. The almost always fly in the face of Occam's Razor.
Tommy_Paine, on the difference between Bigfoot and religion:
So I'm not so sure it's us being rude, so much as the awakening.
Lovely! From here.
ottawaobserver, writing about the appointment of Nycole Turmel as interim federal NDP leader
But the commentary on Nycole Turmel is really moronic, because they've settled on this idiotic line that she is a three-month old rookie MP, and thus knows nothing about "politics", whereas every business man who ever walked Bay Street (or prof from Harvard) is assumed to be instantly qualified to be Prime Minister.
Oldgoat - who else? - explaining U.S. politics:
I've been following US politics since Eisenhower, and, if you'll exuse my use of the vulgate, it gets more fucking nuts every year. Exponentially so I might add. Like really it's gone from Dr. Strangelove to a bad Coen brothers movie way past anything The Onion could imagine as satire, right into the realm of methyl alchohol induced nightmares.
They should replace bloody Washington on their money with Edvard Munch's 'the Scream"!
Very worthy of discussion. Sadly, before our time.
AnonymousMouse was pretty funny in one of the last NDP leadership threads:
Mulcair made a serious mistake by announcing his new pension plan and the important endorsement of Don Davies while Rabble was rife with discussion of Malcolm's ban.
Talk about letting yourself get up staged!