babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

What is heaven like?

101 replies [Last post]

Comments

absentia
Offline
Joined: Jun 5 2010

Rebecca West wrote:

I'd like to believe in an afterlife, but I suspect that when we die, that's it.  Maybe there's a bit of a light show put on by our dying brains, but heaven as a reward for earthly suffering doesn't enter into my concept of the universe.

Earthly heaven is something else entirely.  Sitting in my yard reading a good book, while the cat plays with butterflies in the garden.  I remember a time when my most vigorous outdoor activity was walking to the food bank and not even contemplating having a yard, never mind the time to relax and enjoy a good book in it.  It's that difficult time in life that makes the simple things so sweet - that's heaven.  Pedestrian and bourgeois as it is, I can think of nothing better.

I don't believe it, either. This is just a mental game i play: furnish heaven. Moments like that - a perfect sunset, a beautiful tree, a warm night breeze in Vegas, a pebly beach on Vancouver Island, a red fleece vest,  the bluejay outside my window doing that pleasant little warble instead of his usual racous call, chocolate mousse, Mozart, irises, a good joke - i collect them to take into the next world.

Of course if i'm destined to start over as a baby dinasour on an orange/purlple planet, it'll probably all get confiscated at the exit.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Spectrum wrote:

See that's the thing, no matter what you choose to believe, it is what you believe that sets the reality for you. That's just the way it is.

I "got" your post about materialism at #20 btw. I realize some people think of reality in the old scientific way. Newtonian atomic theory had to be scrapped sometime after turn of the last century. 

I think there are many possibilities for reality in the scientific sense. Apparently M-theory says there are 10^500 different universes, each with its own set of laws for the way things are. Could there be a god or god-like beings residing in one of them? Are we able to experience some of these parallel worlds by our dream states, imaginations, creativity and even on psychic levels as Fritjof Capra suggests? Apparently the possibilities are more than we knew. Atheists say no, but mathematicians and leading edge theoretical physicists say yes, it is possible and more probable than at any time since the overthrow of Newtonian atomic theory.


absentia
Offline
Joined: Jun 5 2010

Heaven doesn't have a ruling class. No god(s), no seraphim or cherubim or saints. Pure, sweet anarchy.

 


Spectrum
Offline
Joined: Sep 27 2008

Fidel wrote:
Apparently M-theory says there are 10^500 different universes, each with its own set of laws for the way things are. Could there be a god or god-like beings residing in one of them?

The probability outcome is a deviation from what was perfect(asymmetrical). You can call it heaven if you like too?:) In a Platonist kind of view. It is speaking to an outcome situated in the valley from such an expression, as to what can reside in that valley. Think of a pencil pointed standing on end and asking which way it will fall. It is a example of the geometrical demonstration of "degrees of freedom" as to the model of a calabi yau in expression. Which one?


Sven
Offline
Joined: Jul 22 2005

al-Qa'bong wrote:

Worms crawling through my eyesockets.

Ha!  That is almost precisely what I was thinking!


Spectrum
Offline
Joined: Sep 27 2008

Fidel wrote:
I "got" your post about materialism at #20 btw. I realize some people think of reality in the old scientific way. Newtonian atomic theory had to be scrapped sometime after turn of the last century.

 

I am glad you got to know me. It also present the opportunity for understanding a model of approach that is as old as time itself in terms of the densities of matter perspectives as a overarching description in the expression of the geometrical proponents of the Pyramid itself.

The earth discipleship based on the square and the direction viewed from above(triangle and arch), as to perfection within the body itself?

An ascent with mind as to what can transpire in reaching toward the inductive/deductive approach as to what can enter mind when raised from the lower centers of our evolution,  to avenues of mind with body.  Not just from reaction of body alone. This is an emotive correlation with overcoming this primitive based expressions,  as ever the struggle toward such perfection. No one is perfect, but of awareness about choice, then such evolution is of a choice recognized as being retained in our quest toward truth and understanding, allocates our place in the reality of our expressions?


Northern Shoveler
Offline
Joined: Feb 17 2011

I have read some stuff on bio-centrism and I think the model they are working within is extremely interesting.  I believe that matter and energy are not separate.  What does animate all animals and life forms?  Does the energy that is a part of my whole exist after this body dies?  I think it is obvious that in a physical sense it does.  Heaven myths seem to me to all be attempts to capture that reality.  Although we die our bodies both as mass and energy get recycled in new forms. 

Quote:

In modern everyday life, however, we’ve come to regard space as sort of a vast container that has no walls. In it, we cognize separate objects that were first learned and identified. These patterns are blocked out by the thinking mind within boundaries of color, shape or utility. Human language and ideation alone decide where the boundaries of one object end and another begins.

Multiple illusions and processes routinely impart a false view of space. Shall we count the ways? 1. Empty space is in fact not empty. 2. Distances between objects can and do mutate depending on a multitude of conditions like gravity and speed, so that no bedrock distance exists anywhere, between anything and anything else. 3. Quantum theory casts serious doubt about whether even distant individual items are truly separated at all, and 4. We “see” separations between objects only because we have been conditioned and trained, through language and convention, to draw boundaries.

Now, space and time illusions are certainly harmless. A problem only arises because, by treating space as something physical, existing in itself, science imparts a completely wrong starting point for investigations into the nature of reality. In reality there can be no break between the observer and the observed.  If the two are split, the reality is gone.  Space, like time, is not an object or a thing.  Space and time are forms of our animal sense perception. We carry them around with us like turtles with shells.  Thus, there is no absolute self-existing matrix in which physical events occur independent of life.

Where do we go from here? 


Biocentrism offers a springboard to make sense of aspects of biological and physical science which are currently insensible. Natural areas of biocentric research include the realm of brain-architecture, neuroscience, and the nature of consciousness itself.  Another is the ongoing research into artificial intelligence. Though still in its infancy, few doubt that this century, in which computer power and capabilities keep expanding geometrically, will eventually bring researchers to confront the problem in a serious way. A “thinking device” will need the same kind of algorithms for employing time and developing a sense of space that we enjoy.

Finally, one must consider the endless ongoing attempts at creating “grand unified theories.” Currently such efforts in physics have typically stretched for decades without much success. Incorporating the living universe — and allowing the observer into the equation as the late John Wheeler insists is necessary — will at minimum produce a fascinating amalgam of the living and non-living in a way that should make everything work better. It should provide stronger bases for solving some of the problems associated with quantum physics and the Big Bang. Accepting space and time as forms of animal sense perception (as biologic), rather than as external physical objects, offers a new way of understanding everything from the microworld (for instance, the reason for Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle and the two-hole experiment) to the forces, constants, and laws that shape the universe.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31393080/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/biocentrism-how-life-creates-universe/

 


absentia
Offline
Joined: Jun 5 2010

Spectrum wrote:

 It also present the opportunity for understanding a model of approach that is as old as time itself in terms of the densities of matter perspectives as a overarching description in the expression of the geometrical proponents of the Pyramid itself.

The earth discipleship based on the square and the direction viewed from above(triangle and arch), as to perfection within the body itself?

An ascent with mind as to what can transpire in reaching toward the inductive/deductive approach as to what can enter mind when raised from the lower centers of our evolution,  to avenues of mind with body.  Not just from reaction of body alone. This is an emotive correlation with overcoming this primitive based expressions,  as ever the struggle toward such perfection. No one is perfect, but of awareness about choice, then such evolution is of a choice recognized as being retained in our quest toward truth and understanding, allocates our place in the reality of our expressions?

Aside from "Huh?" in generaL, i have a question in particular:

"a model of approach that is as old as time itself"

Who was approaching and modeling at the beginning of time? Itself?


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

absentia wrote:

Spectrum wrote:

 It also present the opportunity for understanding a model of approach that is as old as time itself in terms of the densities of matter perspectives as a overarching description in the expression of the geometrical proponents of the Pyramid itself.

The earth discipleship based on the square and the direction viewed from above(triangle and arch), as to perfection within the body itself?

An ascent with mind as to what can transpire in reaching toward the inductive/deductive approach as to what can enter mind when raised from the lower centers of our evolution,  to avenues of mind with body.  Not just from reaction of body alone. This is an emotive correlation with overcoming this primitive based expressions,  as ever the struggle toward such perfection. No one is perfect, but of awareness about choice, then such evolution is of a choice recognized as being retained in our quest toward truth and understanding, allocates our place in the reality of our expressions?

Aside from "Huh?" in generaL, i have a question in particular:

"a model of approach that is as old as time itself"

Who was approaching and modeling at the beginning of time? Itself?

Omega Point   is a term coined by the French Jesuit Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881-1955) to describe a maximum level of complexity and consciousness towards which the universe appears to be evolving.

David Deutsch(atheist) has done a lot of work with the Church-Turing thesis and has suggested that universal quantum computers exist at the end of space-time in every universe and operated/controlled by "sentient beings". Deutsch suggests that information, as opposed to raw data, is part of an ever evolving complex and increasingly conscious universe(s).


absentia
Offline
Joined: Jun 5 2010

Oh. I know some words and could define most of those individually, but can find no meaning in this configuration. Well, i'm uneducated - the most esoteric thing i studied in tech school was blood-spatter.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Oh believe me when I say that I only vaguely understand what they are talking about in general. They are only theories for now, but the math seems to be pointing them in the direction of Hugh Everett's multiple worlds theory. Deutsch and Greene and Kaku and Witten etc are people at the leading edge of theoretical physics. This string theory stuff used to be considered only at the fringes of theoretical physics back in the 1970s. Today it's mainstream. Standard model theorist Larry Krauss is one of string theory's biggest critics. He wrote recently, though, that it seems as if metaphysics is on the verge of becoming science WRT new discoveries at CERN and Hubble etc.


Spectrum
Offline
Joined: Sep 27 2008

absentia wrote:

Spectrum wrote:

 It also present the opportunity for understanding a model of approach that is as old as time itself in terms of the densities of matter perspectives as a overarching description in the expression of the geometrical proponents of the Pyramid itself.

The earth discipleship based on the square and the direction viewed from above(triangle and arch), as to perfection within the body itself?

An ascent with mind as to what can transpire in reaching toward the inductive/deductive approach as to what can enter mind when raised from the lower centers of our evolution,  to avenues of mind with body.  Not just from reaction of body alone. This is an emotive correlation with overcoming this primitive based expressions,  as ever the struggle toward such perfection. No one is perfect, but of awareness about choice, then such evolution is of a choice recognized as being retained in our quest toward truth and understanding, allocates our place in the reality of our expressions?

Aside from "Huh?" in generaL, i have a question in particular:

"a model of approach that is as old as time itself"

Who was approaching and modeling at the beginning of time? Itself?

Platonic Solids..... Plato?

Quote:
Plato’s theory combines elements of the views of many of his predecessors.Plato’s Cosmology: The Timaeus

An attempt, at a foundational approach to understanding the world.

 


Caissa
Offline
Joined: Jun 14 2006

WinkNothing like babble.


Slumberjack
Offline
Joined: Aug 8 2005

absentia wrote:
Heaven doesn't have a ruling class. No god(s), no seraphim or cherubim or saints. Pure, sweet anarchy. 

I don't know about that.  The last time there was a hint of revolt, we ended up with expulsions, eternal hell, and a talking snake that fucked us over royally.  The literature suggests somebody's in charge of something.


Lard Tunderin Jeezus
Offline
Joined: Aug 27 2001
Spectrum
Offline
Joined: Sep 27 2008

Plato Pointing toward ideas

Quote:
And thus, Glaucon, the tale has been saved and has not perished, and will save us if we are obedient to the word spoken; and we shall pass safely over the river of Forgetfulness and our soul will not be defiled. Wherefore my counsel is that we hold fast ever to the heavenly way and follow after justice and virtue always, considering that the soul is immortal and able to endure every sort of good and every sort of evil. Thus shall we live dear to one another and to the gods, both while remaining here and when, like conquerors in the games who go round to gather gifts, we receive our reward. And it shall be well with us both in this life and in the pilgrimage of a thousand years which we have been describing.Plato's Republic-Book X, end: The Myth of Er

Babble Heaven :)


absentia
Offline
Joined: Jun 5 2010

Slumberjack wrote:

absentia wrote:
Heaven doesn't have a ruling class. No god(s), no seraphim or cherubim or saints. Pure, sweet anarchy. 

I don't know about that.  The last time there was a hint of revolt, we ended up with expulsions, eternal hell, and a talking snake that fucked us over royally.  The literature suggests somebody's in charge of something.

Oh, that literature! Read another book. Ra knows, there are plenty of models to choose from. But maybe i'll pass on Plato's.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Cool music. However, Michio Kaku(YouTube) says it's a foregone conclusion that we are not alone in the heavens. It would be supremely arrogant to believe that we are the most significant beings in the whole universe, or even just the Milky Way. Unfortunately even some of us lefties are not immune to thinking in terms of dominant culture and Euro-centrism on a more subtle level.

 Earth-centric thinking will one day give way to the realization that our own galaxy is teeming with life. Evolutionary theory now says that life proliferates in environments that were previously thought to be impossible for life. Sightings of visitors to the new world have been occurring for a long time. Like the pre-Columbian inhabitants of the new world, people all over the world have reported sightings of the newcomers' mainsails approaching on the horizon. 

Biologists visit CERN for help with the origins of life.

And, the evidence that we are being observed by extraterrestrial intelligence is everywhere all around us. There are photographs of UFOs which pre-date Adobe's line of computer based photo and video editing software. 

The problem today is not that people aren't willing to blow the whistle on every kind of written and unwritten government-corporate policy for secrecy and non-accountability to the public whom they serve - the problem is actually that of deep-seated corruption and lack of transparency and accountability in government and their corporate owners. The problem is a lack of democracy in countries professing to be the torch-bearers of democracy. The struggle for democracy and truth continues.


Sven
Offline
Joined: Jul 22 2005

When I saw Fidel's name on the AT page next to this thread, I thought his would be a one-word answer to the query posed by this thread's title:

CUBA!!!

Tongue out


Snert
Offline
Joined: Nov 4 2008

If I'm not mistaken, Gammy and Gampy will be there, and so will Rusty, who I haven't seen since he went to live with that nice farmer.  We'll walk on clouds and it's always summer, and everything smells like cookies.


remind
Offline
Joined: Jun 25 2004

ewhat kinda cookies, maybe I am interested then?


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Snert wrote:

If I'm not mistaken, Gammy and Gampy will be there, and so will Rusty, who I haven't seen since he went to live with that nice farmer.  We'll walk on clouds and it's always summer, and everything smells like cookies.

 

Sounds like youre describing the ideologues' free market utopia. Keynesians refer to it as the political right's solemn promise that things will be better for a still significantly large and desperate humanity ... in the economic long run.  Yes, there are some who actually do believe in the strangest things without demanding a shred of proof. At least religionists have the promise of an eternal afterlife as a reward for keeping the faith. Neoliberals promise only the economic long run which never seems to deliver for half to two-thirds of the world's population.


absentia
Offline
Joined: Jun 5 2010

I asked you guys to share your childish, original, picturesque fantasies, not to present proofs.

Cuba could be an approximation of heaven on earth.* Fine climate, lovely people, a pretty okay social structure, plenty of brains, some decent attitude. Maybe on another thread we could explore how they should proceed.  

*which is all right, but leaves little room for musical instruments, esoteric means of propulsion, chromatic idisyncrasy and puffy clouds.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Sven wrote:

When I saw Fidel's name on the AT page next to this thread, I thought his would be a one-word answer to the query posed by this thread's title:

CUBA!!!

Tongue out

I think it must be you and about 36% of Americans/Republican Party supporters who are obssessed with a tiny country in the Caribbean. Because I haven't mentioned Cuba in quite a while. Try turning yourself off of the omnipresent right wing radio/TV/newsprint propaganda for a time, and tell us how you feel then. Wink


Uncle John
Offline
Joined: Feb 8 2008

Taurean Scatology has always been one of my favorite subjects. I am glad to see it is alive and well on rabble.ca


Freedom 55
Offline
Joined: Mar 14 2010

6079_Smith_W wrote:

And really, even if you think of the cornyest idea of heaven, can you imagine anyone who would want to be in ANY completely static environment for all eternity?

 

Exactly. Even during the most devout period of my youth I always felt deeply unsettled by the thought of spending eternity in heaven.


bagkitty
Online
Joined: Aug 27 2008

absentia wrote:

[...] (A heaven without dogs is unthinkable.)

 

If there are dogs, you are in purgatory.

If there are squirrels, you are in hell.

If there are cats, then, and only then, you are in heaven.


Uncle John
Offline
Joined: Feb 8 2008

So Paul Martin winds up at the Pearly Gates and St. Pete says "Because you were a famous person you get to choose whether you want to go to heaven or hell". Martin opts to try heaven first, and it was very quiet, nice and bright, and full of people talking about Theology and praising the Lord. So after a few days of that he asks St. Pete to send him down to hell to check it out. Down he goes, and although the place is done up like Cherry Cola's Rock & Rollers bar, hell has nice ladies who look like Marilyn Monroe walking around serving nice drinks, cigars, cocaine and giving out their phone numbers. Not only that, but Trudeau and Nixon are down there too, and the conversation is amazing! After a few days of that he goes back to St. Pete to give him the final decision, and he opts for Hell.

Down he goes, and suddenly Hell is as depicted by Heironymous Bosch, with endless suffering, pain and torment, gnashing of teeth, wailing... Already in pain, he pleads with the Devil... "What happened to the place with the girls and the cigars and the drinks?"

"Oh you should know, Mr. Martin.... Promises...."


Slumberjack
Offline
Joined: Aug 8 2005

Fidel wrote:

Keynesians refer to it as the political right's solemn promise that things will be better for a still significantly large and desperate humanity ... in the economic long run.  Yes, there are some who actually do believe in the strangest things without demanding a shred of proof. At least religionists have the promise of an eternal afterlife as a reward for keeping the faith. Neoliberals promise only the economic long run which never seems to deliver for half to two-thirds of the world's population.

You're describing different flavours of the same snake oil.  Well done.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Slumberjack wrote:

Fidel wrote:

Keynesians refer to it as the political right's solemn promise that things will be better for a still significantly large and desperate humanity ... in the economic long run.  Yes, there are some who actually do believe in the strangest things without demanding a shred of proof. At least religionists have the promise of an eternal afterlife as a reward for keeping the faith. Neoliberals promise only the economic long run which never seems to deliver for half to two-thirds of the world's population.

You're describing different flavours of the same snake oil.  Well done.

Well no because with the new science since Durac, Einstein, Bohr, and Heisenberg etc there is the possibility for both in a parallel universe or whatever the case may be. Both the capitalist economic long run and religion require faith to be believed, but religionists have always held that their utopia exists somewhere else. Capitalists are running the same shell game except with fewer rewards in the here and now for the large majority of humanity. At least one of these groups has been lying, and without any great scientific effort we know which of them is lying right off the bat without having to investigate infinity in all directions. 

IOWs one of these man-made belief systems promises equality for all and everlasting life, punishment for the wicked, and barred entry into heaven for those who refuse to part from faith in materialism and personal wealth.

Evolution says that technically, anything is feasible given long enough periods of time. Immortality and scientific victories over hunger, disease, ignorance and material poverty are theoretically possible. Perhaps it's been done by some advanced species out there somewhere. We're too busy fighting one another and enslaving one another with debt servitude to afford serious space exploration and alternative energy sources in order to avoid ending ourselves. It's a stupid species, or at least a technologically adolescent species that designs a global economic system around dead plants and non-renawables as energy sources. Talk about bad central planning.

For capitalists this is heaven. Things couldn't be much better for them. There is little incentive for them to part with personal wealth and investing in the future. Capitalism is all about investing the least and extracting the most ASAP without much thought for the future. Predatory capitalism and aggressive behaviours in general are throwbacks in human evolution. We will probably not evolve into much until we change our ways. Capitalism is month-to-month balance sheet planning and quarterly earnings projections. It's short term with no regard for advancing evolution. It's threatening every living thing on earth by pollution, resource stripping, and an economic system designed around artificial scarcity or using up and wasting resources. Wars of aggression and resource depletion whichever comes first will end us before we have a chance to develop technologies of the future.

But this is how the world is run by a mafia-like hierarchy of thundering nit wits and evil-clever monkeys with highly evolved senses of self-interest and appalling greed. And democracy is the cure for economic and evolutionary stagnation caused by these low forehead types monopolizing power. Democracy is the holy grail for us socialists who believe that heaven has to exist in our own minds before it can be realized. Anything is possible according to the new science and socialists alike. I believe that the new science since turn of the last century and old world religious ideas are merging in a way. We have to believe though, because there is a spark of divinity in every one of us. We have the capability for achieving great things larger than ourselves and contributing to a greater good. We can't allow these supreme idiots in power to hold back human evolution for much longer. We have to outsmart them and beat them at their own game for the sake of the future. Our future that is and not their's because the right doesn't believe in promoting or investing in any viable future for humanity. Predatory capitalism is a dead end for humanity, and the challenge is to try to change the path we're on.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments