babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

Politically charged children's books

jrose
Offline
Joined: Oct 24 2006
 

Comments

jrose
Offline
Joined: Oct 24 2006
Well, I guess I wasn't a progressive enough thinker as a child, but I had no idea that the Lorax was infact a tale of environmental justice. I mean, I knew this little guy really liked trees, and was trying to save them, but I'd never actually given the book or movie much thought, as far as its role in teaching children environmentalism. Now I'm wondering what other children's books I read, and missed the political mandate or social message of.

It was even banned in some part of the United States, for being an allegorical political commentary.

Excuse my quoting of Wikipedia, since I usually avoid it, but I thought this was interesting:

quote:The Lorax is arguably Seuss' most controversial work, having been banned in some schools and libraries for its anti-forestry industry content.[4] Several timber industry groups sponsored the creation of a book called The Truax, [5] offering a logging-friendly perspective to an anthropomorphic tree known as the Guardbark. Just as in The Lorax, the book consists of an argument between two persons. The logging industry representative emphasises their efficiency and re-seeding efforts whereas the Guardbark, a straw man of the environmentalist movement much like the Once-ler is for big business, refuses to listen and repeatedly lashes out.

The line "I hear things are just as bad up in Lake Erie" was removed in 1974 following the clean-up of Lake Erie.[6]


quelar
Offline
Joined: Jun 7 2002
Well one book series that has been given lots of attention but not for that reason is the Harry Potter Books

*** WARNING - MILD SPOILER AHEAD ***

In some of the later books Harry and his underground group of friends actively work against the government and the establishment. I found this to be very interesting as it's teaching kids realy not to trust authority all the time. It's a great message but everyones after them over the witchcraft piece, so the anti-establishment thread gets lost in the shuffle.


jeff house
Offline
Joined: May 7 2001
The bad guys in Harry Potter are quasi-nazis. They call others "mudbloods" because they are of mixed descent. As well, the bad guys are generally Aryan-nation looking.

Jabberwock
Offline
Joined: May 10 2007
(Mild spoiler if you haven't read all the books) The thing I love about Harry Potter is that it shows that evil does not always show up in a cape with glowing eyes. It comes in the most banal forms- in fact these forms (the Dursleys and Dolores Umbridge)are in many ways harder to fight then the standard villains.
I am sure I will also be born out in my prediction that Snape, despite being an asshole, will turn out to be loyal to the Order of the Phoenix. [img]wink.gif" border="0[/img]

I think all of Seuss' books had messages that may have been considered political at the time of publishing, since his books advocate for equality and cooperation and against bigotry.


Ken Burch
Offline
Joined: Feb 26 2005
I've just been reading HOME IS A PLACE CALLED NOWHERE, by Leon Rosselson. It's a story about a young refugee girl in Britain finding out where she arrived from and dealing with the anti-refugee hatred in that country(not that we have ANYTHING like that in the States, of course [img]rolleyes.gif" border="0[/img] ).

I'd strongly recommend it.


jrootham
Offline
Joined: Jun 14 2001
Sounds good. I know him as a singer/songwriter. He wrote "The World Turned Upside Down" about the Diggers (the originals).

jrose
Offline
Joined: Oct 24 2006
There are actually quite a few lists out there in the world of the internet about children's books that have been banned, both in the past, and currently. Harry Potter, anyone?

torontoprofessor
Offline
Joined: Jun 20 2007
We should be careful what we mean by "banned".

1. "Banned" could mean "made illegal by the governing authorities to own or distribute." In this sense, certain kinds of pornography are banned in many countries as are certain kinds of hate literature.

2. Sometimes people say that a book was "banned" by a certain library or bookstore if that library or bookstore decided not to carry that book for political reasons. Similarly, people sometimes say that a book was "banned" by a school board, if the school board decided, for political reasons, not to teach the book or to make it available to its students. If a book is banned in the second sense, then people can, of course, legally own and distribute the book.

I assume that the Lorax was banned only in the weaker sense, i.e. sense #2. No school or library has the power to "ban" books in the stronger sense, i.e. sense #1.


torontoprofessor
Offline
Joined: Jun 20 2007
By the way, aren't all children's books politically charged?

jrose
Offline
Joined: Oct 24 2006
A subversive film treatment of a Dr. Seuss classic

quote: Dr. Seuss’s much-loved book Horton Hears a Who! has every appearance of innocence. It’s the story of a large animal — Horton — compelled to protect the Whos, a tiny civilization that lives in a speck on a clover and that only he can hear. Horton’s allegiance to the miniature people of Whoville is now a matter of public record. But who, we may ask, is Horton? An elephant of an irrepressibly plucky disposition — yes. An inhabitant of the Jungle of Nool — true. The subject of harassment, assault and forced confinement for his devotion to the Whos – definitely. One of the most cherished creations of Theodor Seuss Geisel, and now the star of a major animated feature – you betcha.

Yet what do we really know about this pachyderm and his sympathies? Is he the big-eared naпf that he appears to be, or does his sweet nature hide a secret agenda? Chances are, most of the viewers of the new film adaptation Dr. Seuss’ Horton Hears a Who! will not struggle with these questions — seeing as many of them will only recently have mastered tying their shoelaces and making solo forays to the bathroom, judgments of the movie’s value as political allegory may be beyond them, anyhow.


N.Beltov
Offline
Joined: May 25 2003
I think Theodor Seuss Geisel worked on US military propaganda films back in WW2. However, they were anti-Nazi productions.

lagatta
Offline
Joined: Apr 17 2002
Many generally progressive writers and other artists took part in the anti-Nazi war effort.

What is sad then is that even Seuss, who did a lot of antiracist stuff after the war as well, fell into horrific racist stereotyping of the Japanese.


Maysie
Offline
Joined: Apr 21 2005
Remember when the Vancouver School Board banned "Heather Has Two Mommies", "Asha's Mums" and "One Dad, Two Dads, Brown Dads, Blue Dads"?

M. Spector
Offline
Joined: Feb 19 2005
Seuss's most political book was the Cold-war allegory The Butter Battle Book.

And The Sneetches was about racism.

[ 02 April 2008: Message edited by: M. Spector ]


a lonely worker
Offline
Joined: Jul 17 2005
Another great children's book is Click, clack, moo

Its a great story about cows and other animals working together to demand improvements in their living conditions from the farmer. In the end they strike and win.

Probably the only children's book with a pro-labour message and very funny. Its still our daughter's favourite.


M. Spector
Offline
Joined: Feb 19 2005

Ken Burch
Offline
Joined: Feb 26 2005
quote:Originally posted by lagatta:
Many generally progressive writers and other artists took part in the anti-Nazi war effort.

What is sad then is that even Seuss, who did a lot of antiracist stuff after the war as well, fell into horrific racist stereotyping of the Japanese.

Seuss acknowledged the wrong of this in later years, according to a PBS(U.S. pubic broadcasting special) on his life that ran a few years ago.

They also quoted the wonderful moment when, near the bitter end of Watergate, Art Buchwald asked(and received)permission from Seuss to quote in it's entirety Seuss' text for his book "Marvin K. Mooney, will you please go away?", while replacing the name "Marvin K. Mooney" with Richard M. Nixon". All the "talking heads" on the show had a great time reciting this.

Another political Dr. Seuss note: "Yertle The Turtle" was a direct slam on Hitler.


Ken Burch
Offline
Joined: Feb 26 2005
Another book I'd recommend was the children's book adaptation of "Brundibar" , with text by Tony Kushner and illustrations by Maurice Sendak.

For those who don't know, "Brundibar" was originally a children's opera produced in the Terezin(Theresienstadt)concentration camp in occupied Czechoslovakia by adult and child camp detainees. Operating under extreme constraints(as you might imagine)they created a story of children standing up to and defeating a horrible villain(guess who?). Apparently, none of the camp guards or wardens picked up on what they were talking about.

Here's the Wikipedia link to give you a better sense of the story.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brundib%C3%A1r

[ 03 April 2008: Message edited by: Ken Burch ]


kimi
Offline
Joined: Jul 24 2003
A friend recently published a little book called "From Seattle to Palestine, Becoming Neighbours and Friends. Children's storybook on Israel and Palestine" It is based on her own experiences of working in Palestine and Israel, and traveling back to the US to the questions of her grandchildren. The publisher has created a workbook to accompany it too.

As you can imagine, she is getting vilified in predictable corners. (If you google this book you'll find the critiques quicker than a link to the actual book). I wonder how long before the book gets banned?


Michelle
Offline
Joined: May 10 2001
Heh. Like these guys?

Whine whine.

And check out these promoters of "fair" reporting of the middle east:

quote:These activists also believe in an alternative universe in which Israeli concessions and withdrawals bringing about an end to Palestinian violence – a fairy tale that has been proven false on numerous occasions in the past decade.

Wow, but they're not biased at all, are they? Lying pricks.

[ 07 April 2008: Message edited by: Michelle ]


Alexa28
Offline
Joined: Feb 1 2010

spam and spammer gone


G. Muffin
Offline
Joined: Sep 28 2008

Take some acai berry and fuck off, spammer.


George Victor
Offline
Joined: Oct 28 2007

Just learned there is a chaildren's edition of Three Cups of Tea just out, aimed at beginning readers.  Teachers must be promoting a work that  shows kids hungering for knowledge.  : D   


RosaL
Offline
Joined: Mar 4 2007

Ok, this isn't about books but - when I was a kid, we used to watch "The Wonderful World of Disney" on Sunday nights and my dad would keep up a running commentary, pointing out the American/capitalist propaganda aspects of whatever they were showing. I suppose I could have ended up resenting this but he made a compelling case! It's not a bad way to educate kids politically (and arm them). 


j.m.
Offline
Joined: Dec 20 2009

What about "It's Just a Plant"?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%27s_Just_a_Plant

jrose
Offline
Joined: Oct 24 2006

And who could forget the PETA's attempts at getting kids while they're young! I'm a vegetarian and strongly support teaching children about animal welfare, but these ones take it too far. 


G. Muffin
Offline
Joined: Sep 28 2008

PETA takes everything too far.  Do you remember when they sent Obama a "humane fly catcher"? Jesus, Get a grip.


Catchfire
Offline
Joined: Apr 16 2003
M. Spector
Offline
Joined: Feb 19 2005

The Kids' Book of Freedom

Quote:
A colouring book about the events of 9/11, complete with pictures of the burning twin towers and the execution of a cowering Osama bin Laden for children to fill in, has provoked outrage among American Muslims.

We Shall Never Forget 9/11: The Kids' Book of Freedom has just been released by the Missouri-based publisher Really Big Coloring Books, which says it is "designed to be a tool that parents can use to help teach children about the facts surrounding 9/11". Showing scenes from 9/11 for children to colour in and telling the story of the attacks and the subsequent hunt for Osama bin Laden, "the book was created with honesty, integrity, reverence, respect and does not shy away from the truth", according to its publisher, which says that it has sold out of its first print run of 10,000 copies.


Catchfire
Offline
Joined: Apr 16 2003

Wow. Gross.

And why is this only causing outrage among American Muslims?


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments