babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

Conservatives exploit Boston bombing to fast track 'anti-terror' legislation

derrick
Offline
Joined: May 8 2008

CBC.ca reports:

...the Chamber will devote the day to discussing the aforementioned S-7, which would restore certain provisions related to investigative hearings, security certificates and other procedural issues, as well as make 'technical amendments' related to future parliamentary review of the law, which would allow for either the extension, or, alternately, sunsetting of those measures.

Given the government's reported desire to turn the two days now allocated for report and third reading consideration of the bill into a discussion of Trudeau's comments on looking for the 'root causes' of terrorism following the Boston Marathon bombings, it's worth pointing out that the Liberals have actually supported the bill, with the caucus -- including Trudeau -- voting with the government in support thereof at second reading last fall, and backing the Conservatives at committee.

This timing is shameless exploitation of the tragedy in Boston.

 

 


Comments

janfromthebruce
Offline
Joined: Apr 24 2007

cross post from Trudeau thread:

The Combating Terrorism Act vs Justin Trudeau

Dear Libs : and this is why you can't be taken seriously as a credible opposition to Steve or a partner in any coalition against Steve. Prior to the last election, you expected to be given a pass for voting along with Steve hundreds of times owing to the fact you couldn't afford to bring down the government because you weren't ready to have an election. You don't have that excuse any longer. Really looking forward to hearing your cautious mousy noises against innocent citizens being incarcerated without trial before you all vote along with Steve once again, just so no one can call you soft on terrorism :

Liberal MP Francis Scarpaleggia said that the Liberals will be supporting Bill S-7 and noted that many of the original measures were first introduced by the Chretien government in 2001.

SNIP

which is merely a rehash of the language in :
2010 G8 Summit - Integrated Security Unit Joint Intelligence Group 

SNIP

The G8/G20 - in which thousands of people got locked up for days for no reason whatsoever.

So who wants to see the G8/G20 pilot project experiment in "terrorism" law enforcement expanded into law right across Canada?

Oh yes, let's do cooperation with the Liberal party (NOT) because they are so not progressive. And Trudeau Jr. will vote yes again, just like the the rest of Liberal members of govt. So, Trudeau's list of what he has done in the past just got a wee add on, between tweeting his thumbs on the back benches.


Slumberjack
Offline
Joined: Aug 8 2005

They'll eventually have us bent over in our skivvies touching our ankles as a prerequisite to heading out for work in the morning.


jerrym
Offline
Joined: May 30 2009

derrick wrote:

This timing is shameless exploitation of the tragedy in Boston.

 

 

Did you expect anything different?


josh
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2002
kropotkin1951
Offline
Joined: Jun 6 2002

What a coincidence. The timing would be funny if we were not talking about the erosion of the right to dissent.  This is preparation for the war against environmentalist and FN's opposed to pipelines.


NDPP
Offline
Joined: Dec 27 2008

Al Qaeda in Iran is a good one too. They must have thrown that one in as a sugar plum to their Israeli friends that may even be helping them with this little side-show in any case..


Michael Moriarity
Offline
Joined: Jul 27 2001

I think that all of us who care about civil liberties should note that the Conservative and Liberal Parties are supporting this bill, including Irwin Cotler, the former human rights advocate, while the NDP is opposing it. The choice couldn't be clearer.

 


janfromthebruce
Offline
Joined: Apr 24 2007

Pretty strange but than it was pretty strange when Liberals enacted the original terrorist legislation.


Brachina
Offline
Joined: Feb 15 2012

Michael Moriarity wrote:

I think that all of us who care about civil liberties should note that the Conservative and Liberal Parties are supporting this bill, including Irwin Cotler, the former human rights advocate, while the NDP is opposing it. The choice couldn't be clearer.

 

Agreed. Side note love your choice of nick name!

Michael Moriarity
Offline
Joined: Jul 27 2001

It isn't a nick name, it is my real name. Sorry to disappoint you.


kropotkin1951
Offline
Joined: Jun 6 2002

James Moriarty is close but no cigar Sherlock.

Wink


Albireo
Offline
Joined: Sep 5 2002

Michael Moriarity wrote:

It isn't a nick name, it is my real name. Sorry to disappoint you.

Well then, she was praising your parents.  Or your fine taste in parents. 


Albireo
Offline
Joined: Sep 5 2002

P.S. Aw crap, I've got the tiny font virus.


Albireo
Offline
Joined: Sep 5 2002

PPS: No I don't... whew!  Hmm, happens only from mobile (Android?) devices, and only when you quote...

*ahem*  Never mind,  carry on...


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments