Lend Us Your Vote

KeyStone
rabble-rouser
Member: 16158
Joined: Apr 23 2008

Many of us agree that the Conservatives should be stopped. In past elections, the NDP (Ed Broadbent) has stepped aside, so that the Liberals could defeat the Conservatives. Almost every election, the Liberals  have asked NDP voters to join the Liberals in recognizing the imminent danger to Canada, and to vote against the Conservatives - and many NDP supporters have answered that call.

This election is no different, in fact, perhaps even more important. The Conservatives once again need to be stopped. People need to put aside their party loyalties and band together.

Although, there may be one slight difference this time around. With the NDP surging, and with polls putting them higher than the Liberals, perhaps this time around it is the Liberals who should lend their votes to the NDP. After all, many NDP voters have lent their votes to the Liberals, isn't it about time, it was paid back?

So much of the Liberal support has been based from progressive Canadians who viewed the Liberals as the only alternative. Well, now it would seem that the NDP are the only alternative to the Liberals.


Comments

Searosia
rabble-rouser
Member: 22397
Joined: Dec 30 2010

We need a strategic voting thread pointing out where Liberals should be supporting NDP.  hehe


Aristotleded24
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 10327
Joined: May 24 2005

Searosia wrote:
We need a strategic voting thread pointing out where Liberals should be supporting NDP.  hehe

Nova Scotia:

Central Nova

South Shore-St Margarets

Ontario:

Oshawa

Huron-Bruce

Brant

Essex

Kenora

Welland

Sault-Ste Marie

Thunder Bay-Superior North

Thunder Bay-Rainy River

Manitoba:

Selkirk-Interlake

Elmwood-Transcona

Dauphin-Swan River-Marquette

Brandon-Souris

Saskatchewan:

Saskatoon-Rosetown-Biggar

Saskatoon-Humboldt

Palliser

Desenethe-Misinippi-Churchill River

Alberta:

Edmonton-Strathcona

Edmonton-East

BC:

Burnaby-Douglas

Nanaimo-Cowachin

BC Southern Interior

Vancouver Island North

Nanaimo-Alberni

Esquimalt-Juan De Fuca

New Westminister-Coquitlam

Burnaby-New Westminister

Kootenay-Columbia

Kamloops-Thomspon-Cariboo

Surrey North

Chiliwak-Fraser Canyon

Okanagan-Coquihalla

Prince George-Peace River


Malcolm
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 6168
Joined: Mar 14 2004

Searosia wrote:

We need a strategic voting thread pointing out where Liberals should be supporting NDP.  hehe

 

There is not a single constituency in all of Canada where it makes sense for a progressive to vote Liberal.  The Liberals are not a progressive party in any sense of the word.

There are 308 constituencies where it makes sense for a progressive voter to vote NDP.


Paulitical Junkie
rabble-rouser
Member: 23513
Joined: Mar 25 2011

Even if it means the Con candidate wins? Nah.

In my riding here in NB it's either Cons or Libs, and it's usually close. I can't risk the Cons winning this seat.


bagkitty
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 16443
Joined: Aug 27 2008

Attempting to organize strategic voting on a national scale is a joke. Not a particularly funny one. Individual ridings and individual campaigns can go that route, but discussing it in broad stroke terms is really just an exercise in an entirely different kind of stroking.


Searosia
rabble-rouser
Member: 22397
Joined: Dec 30 2010

Interesting Paul...for some reason the liberal atlantic vote has really been the only regional liberal vote to remain decently stable.  I wonder why this is...


knownothing
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 23490
Joined: Mar 24 2011

The NDP is going to win a Majority. The Liberal vote will collapse behind the NDP, as will the Bloc and Greens. The NDP have never won the air war and now it is happening. Strategic voting is regressive not progressive. Let's make real change and get rid of that Senate. We can't have Liberals in the House if we want to do that.


bekayne
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 12876
Joined: Jan 23 2006

knownothing wrote:

The Liberal vote will collapse behind the NDP, as will the Bloc and Greens. ..Strategic voting is regressive not progressive. 

The first part advocates it, then the second part condemns it


Login or register to post comments