babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.
While you're among them, whoever you might be talking about, maybe you could try listening to what they have to say and why they respond to these media messages in the first place. The fact is that people in general, including you and I, make decisions for emotional reasons much moreso than logical ones. You might think you've got the greatest argument ever written and no rational mind could deny it, but you'd be ignoring the fact that humans don't really have rational minds. We have very complicated minds that are capable of rational thoughts. If what you're saying doesn't have some resonance on a deeper level than the rational, you might as well be talking another language.
So I think that's an element you're missing in your formulations of "show the masses how wrong they are". Knowledge is just a tool you give someone to get them where they're going, but the will to get there comes entirely from the person, and without it no amount of knowledge will help. Canadians aren't lacking left-wing polemics. Anyone who wants to find such stuff will have no trouble doing so. What they're lacking is the spirit to stand up and be counted, the courage to resist government and corporate tyranny, and the belief that their efforts can make an impact. It seems to me that you want to browbeat people when you should be seeking to inspire them, and you won't do that by talking down to them.
While you're among them, whoever you might be talking about, maybe you could try listening to what they have to say and why they respond to these media messages in the first place. The fact is that people in general, including you and I, make decisions for emotional reasons much moreso than logical ones. You might think you've got the greatest argument ever written and no rational mind could deny it, but you'd be ignoring the fact that humans don't really have rational minds. We have very complicated minds that are capable of rational thoughts. If what you're saying doesn't have some resonance on a deeper level than the rational, you might as well be talking another language.
So I think that's an element you're missing in your formulations of "show the masses how wrong they are". Knowledge is just a tool you give someone to get them where they're going, but the will to get there comes entirely from the person, and without it no amount of knowledge will help. Canadians aren't lacking left-wing polemics. Anyone who wants to find such stuff will have no trouble doing so. What they're lacking is the spirit to stand up and be counted, the courage to resist government and corporate tyranny, and the belief that their efforts can make an impact. It seems to me that you want to browbeat people when you should be seeking to inspire them, and you won't do that by talking down to them.
I know you are directing this at Gaian, and probably rightly so, but for goddess sakes do you not see this equally applies to a wide cross section of babblers? I read post after post from self-proclaimed defenders of the working class on this site yet they don't have a clue how the average person thinks, what their priorities are and how even to speak to them in ways that matter to the average person. Look at the way they talk about rural people, if it even occurs to them that there might be rural people, an issue that has been brought up by a number of rural babblers -most of whom seem to have all given up and left. Read about a bazillion posts in the NDP leadership threads for examples of people who don't know how to talk to the average non-politically obsessed. So I guess I wonder why one is condescending while many others are swell. It makes no logical sense.
On the Huff Po, Part 2 "Trudeau not ruling out eventual run for leader". Couldn't the Huff Po at least pretend that aren't a Lib propaganda tool even a little bit?
I have been slaggin rural folks. I know I shouldn't. It jiust galls me that guys in rural constituencies like Vic Toews, an obviously bad man, bad as a person man, keeps being re-elected. But as NR says J22, Bravo!
It must have been the CBC, or the networks, that insisted people like ADQ's Dumont and and Libera-lover Yaffe moderate the debates. Let's remember to remind the networks about that when other parties have their leadership debates, eh!
Actually I believe it was the NDP who approached them and wanted them to moderate to make the debate more entertaining and to increase ratings etc...I actually thought both Dumont and yaffe were very fair moderators, though the guy in Halifax did the best job of challenging people when they were being evasive.
Yes, somehow we must go among those who must be taught about the extent of right-wing propaganda in the mainstream press and help them to understand - without being preachie - that those messages are not in their best interest.
This, by the way, was written with tongue in cheek to underline the tensions building around an up-front statement about the level of political consciousness out there. But some, in their very angry state, are not up to trying to understand an attempt at bitterly wry humour. How's this? :) :)
------
As for this: "It seems to me that you want to browbeat people when you should be seeking to inspire them, and you won't do that by talking down to them."
Hell, in the Ontario forum I've only been trying to argue that those who don't eat well should be given food as a first consideration - and that the bloody revolution should, perhaps, not be fought over their bodies.
I'd have thought that Conservatives would have been more concerned with the vision of a tattooed, out of shape young Senator who will represent them in the Senate for another third of a century, ATBE.
I'd have thought that Conservatives would have been more concerned with the vision of a tattooed, out of shape young Senator who will represent them in the Senate for another third of a century, ATBE.
As opposed to this?
Yes, a good point, b, but he doesn't have a third of a century...
A small surprise birthday gathering was held during the convention for Olivia Chow, at which she was presented with a huge painting of her late husband, Jack Layton, by Montreal artist Christel Marchand. The trick to get Chow to the room was to tell her she had one more interview with rabble.ca, an alternative news website. Rabble publisher Kim Elliott, a friend, says she was surprised that Chow, after a long day of non-stop network and print interviews, still agreed to show up.
read this in the link to the article above - the road to govt for the NDP via the vaniety article
Ahead of the convention, Nova Scotia premier Darrell Dexter published an op-ed in the Globe and Mail touting his government’s many economic achievements. Indeed, Dexter’s government is one of the few in Canada to be running a budgetary surplus. New Democratic governments, past and present, in Manitoba and Saskatchewan have also enjoyed many successes. As the New Democrats look towards the 2015 election, they should aggressively recruit current and former cabinet ministers from these governments to run.
But but aren't those old outdated ND govts who were unprogressive NDP govts, especially in Sask., just can't understand why now we would trot them out as something to emulate - thought they were old, outdated and not modern, and anybody who would have been even remotely associated with them - why they are part of the old guard. Hmm, just a couple of weeks ago, that all I heard on these boards during the leadership race that those govts and those people/leaders associated with such needed to be discarded, and really they were not progressive. The negative association was constantly linked here by some posters, and now, why it's a different story - interesting that.
A small surprise birthday gathering was held during the convention for Olivia Chow, at which she was presented with a huge painting of her late husband, Jack Layton, by Montreal artist Christel Marchand. The trick to get Chow to the room was to tell her she had one more interview with rabble.ca, an alternative news website. Rabble publisher Kim Elliott, a friend, says she was surprised that Chow, after a long day of non-stop network and print interviews, still agreed to show up.
Well we know that trick would never work on Tom Mulcair.
A small surprise birthday gathering was held during the convention for Olivia Chow, at which she was presented with a huge painting of her late husband, Jack Layton, by Montreal artist Christel Marchand. The trick to get Chow to the room was to tell her she had one more interview with rabble.ca, an alternative news website. Rabble publisher Kim Elliott, a friend, says she was surprised that Chow, after a long day of non-stop network and print interviews, still agreed to show up.
Well we know that trick would never work on Tom Mulcair.
lol, forgot that NP runs the board on the NDP - so yeah, leadership is over and glad we are moving forward with all new and modern thought - and so we don't need all that old stuff. I'll look forward to postings with no reference to all that old stuff, now that we are going forward.
NP, please don't tell me what to do; would appreciate it. I find it rude and a bit uppity.
read this in the link to the article above - the road to govt for the NDP via the vaniety article
Ahead of the convention, Nova Scotia premier Darrell Dexter published an op-ed in the Globe and Mail touting his government’s many economic achievements. Indeed, Dexter’s government is one of the few in Canada to be running a budgetary surplus. New Democratic governments, past and present, in Manitoba and Saskatchewan have also enjoyed many successes. As the New Democrats look towards the 2015 election, they should aggressively recruit current and former cabinet ministers from these governments to run.
But but aren't those old outdated ND govts who were unprogressive NDP govts, especially in Sask., just can't understand why now we would trot them out as something to emulate - thought they were old, outdated and not modern, and anybody who would have been even remotely associated with them - why they are part of the old guard. Hmm, just a couple of weeks ago, that all I heard on these boards during the leadership race that those govts and those people/leaders associated with such needed to be discarded, and really they were not progressive. The negative association was constantly linked here by some posters, and now, why it's a different story - interesting that.
I apologize but I don't understand what you are trying to say here at all. First off Dexter has only been in since 2009. What exactly are you attempting to criticize here and who are you accusing as saying that the NDP governments in Manitoba and elsewhere should not be emulated. Is ANYONE saying that?
read this in the link to the article above - the road to govt for the NDP via the vaniety article
Ahead of the convention, Nova Scotia premier Darrell Dexter published an op-ed in the Globe and Mail touting his government’s many economic achievements. Indeed, Dexter’s government is one of the few in Canada to be running a budgetary surplus. New Democratic governments, past and present, in Manitoba and Saskatchewan have also enjoyed many successes. As the New Democrats look towards the 2015 election, they should aggressively recruit current and former cabinet ministers from these governments to run.
But but aren't those old outdated ND govts who were unprogressive NDP govts, especially in Sask., just can't understand why now we would trot them out as something to emulate - thought they were old, outdated and not modern, and anybody who would have been even remotely associated with them - why they are part of the old guard. Hmm, just a couple of weeks ago, that all I heard on these boards during the leadership race that those govts and those people/leaders associated with such needed to be discarded, and really they were not progressive. The negative association was constantly linked here by some posters, and now, why it's a different story - interesting that.
Touting former prominent Saskatchewan NDPers is the best way to ensure the federal NDP never wins a seat here again.
What about Mulcair's front bench? Do we need changes. I just watched David Christopherson on Power and Politics and again to me he seemed weak, and unable to really dominate the discussion. The Lib was much more polished. Is it simply we aren't used to being Oppostion or does Mulcair have to look at moving people around. I can tell you I have seem Christopherson 5 or 6 times and he hasn't impressed me at all. It's like his persona is one of "oh well, they won't let me talk, so ok". That is just not going to work in my opinon. Anyone have thoughts, or can you straghten me out on this? I am willing to listen but I would sure like to know what people think who know more about this then I do.
Ditto with mtm Jan, I didnt understand what you were saying about Dexter, etc.
What I understood was snark about the leadership race just passed. If I understand correctly, the fact that a certain candidate didn't win is indicative that the Party is not proud of its provincial governments' past accomplishments in Saskatchewan and, by extension, those of every other province which the Party has governed.
I agree with Angus about Twitter. I've never been able to get into it. I don't really get how people can have real conversations in nothing but 140 character soundbites. It's okay for following real-time events as they're happening with people reporting from them in quick bursts, but I don't find it a very friendly medium for political discussion.
I agree with Angus about Twitter. I've never been able to get into it. I don't really get how people can have real conversations in nothing but 140 character soundbites. It's okay for following real-time events as they're happening with people reporting from them in quick bursts, but I don't find it a very friendly medium for political discussion.
Yeah I had fun with the silly spin games played during the leadership race but without the pace of a campaign storyline I don't really see the point. I don't think I've looked at twitter, much less tweeted anything since the Convention.
While you're among them, whoever you might be talking about, maybe you could try listening to what they have to say and why they respond to these media messages in the first place. The fact is that people in general, including you and I, make decisions for emotional reasons much moreso than logical ones. You might think you've got the greatest argument ever written and no rational mind could deny it, but you'd be ignoring the fact that humans don't really have rational minds. We have very complicated minds that are capable of rational thoughts. If what you're saying doesn't have some resonance on a deeper level than the rational, you might as well be talking another language.
So I think that's an element you're missing in your formulations of "show the masses how wrong they are". Knowledge is just a tool you give someone to get them where they're going, but the will to get there comes entirely from the person, and without it no amount of knowledge will help. Canadians aren't lacking left-wing polemics. Anyone who wants to find such stuff will have no trouble doing so. What they're lacking is the spirit to stand up and be counted, the courage to resist government and corporate tyranny, and the belief that their efforts can make an impact. It seems to me that you want to browbeat people when you should be seeking to inspire them, and you won't do that by talking down to them.
Here here.
I know you are directing this at Gaian, and probably rightly so, but for goddess sakes do you not see this equally applies to a wide cross section of babblers? I read post after post from self-proclaimed defenders of the working class on this site yet they don't have a clue how the average person thinks, what their priorities are and how even to speak to them in ways that matter to the average person. Look at the way they talk about rural people, if it even occurs to them that there might be rural people, an issue that has been brought up by a number of rural babblers -most of whom seem to have all given up and left. Read about a bazillion posts in the NDP leadership threads for examples of people who don't know how to talk to the average non-politically obsessed. So I guess I wonder why one is condescending while many others are swell. It makes no logical sense.
Bravo!
On the Huff Po, Part 2 "Trudeau not ruling out eventual run for leader". Couldn't the Huff Po at least pretend that aren't a Lib propaganda tool even a little bit?
I have been slaggin rural folks. I know I shouldn't. It jiust galls me that guys in rural constituencies like Vic Toews, an obviously bad man, bad as a person man, keeps being re-elected. But as NR says J22, Bravo!
Actually I believe it was the NDP who approached them and wanted them to moderate to make the debate more entertaining and to increase ratings etc...I actually thought both Dumont and yaffe were very fair moderators, though the guy in Halifax did the best job of challenging people when they were being evasive.
As opposed to this?
Man that is some ugly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Come on, focus guys.
------------------------------
The road to 24 Sussex Dr.What the New Democrats will have to do to win the 2015 election
http://thevarsity.ca/2012/04/01/the-road-to-24-sussex-dr/
Humm...........while I may agree with some, I certainly don't agree with all of this
The NDP and me
http://www.theargus.ca/articles/opinion/op-ed/2012/04/the-ndp-and-me
What really swayed NDP voters on leadership
http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/02/mitchel-raphael-on-what-really-swayed...
Olivia’s big surprise
A small surprise birthday gathering was held during the convention for Olivia Chow, at which she was presented with a huge painting of her late husband, Jack Layton, by Montreal artist Christel Marchand. The trick to get Chow to the room was to tell her she had one more interview with rabble.ca, an alternative news website. Rabble publisher Kim Elliott, a friend, says she was surprised that Chow, after a long day of non-stop network and print interviews, still agreed to show up.
read this in the link to the article above - the road to govt for the NDP via the vaniety article
Ahead of the convention, Nova Scotia premier Darrell Dexter published an op-ed in the Globe and Mail touting his government’s many economic achievements. Indeed, Dexter’s government is one of the few in Canada to be running a budgetary surplus. New Democratic governments, past and present, in Manitoba and Saskatchewan have also enjoyed many successes. As the New Democrats look towards the 2015 election, they should aggressively recruit current and former cabinet ministers from these governments to run.
But but aren't those old outdated ND govts who were unprogressive NDP govts, especially in Sask., just can't understand why now we would trot them out as something to emulate - thought they were old, outdated and not modern, and anybody who would have been even remotely associated with them - why they are part of the old guard. Hmm, just a couple of weeks ago, that all I heard on these boards during the leadership race that those govts and those people/leaders associated with such needed to be discarded, and really they were not progressive. The negative association was constantly linked here by some posters, and now, why it's a different story - interesting that.
jftb - the leadership campaign is over. Please try and let it go and just get used to it.
This is probably why the Topp campaign didn't stand a realistic chance of winning.
Cullen Narrowly Won Convention, But Mulcair Victory Already Assuredhttp://www.punditsguide.ca/2012/04/cullen-narrowly-won-convention-but-mu...
http://www.newstalk650.com/story/politicians-need-embrace-mulcair/50533
Snerk
-
lol, forgot that NP runs the board on the NDP - so yeah, leadership is over and glad we are moving forward with all new and modern thought - and so we don't need all that old stuff. I'll look forward to postings with no reference to all that old stuff, now that we are going forward.
NP, please don't tell me what to do; would appreciate it. I find it rude and a bit uppity.
I apologize but I don't understand what you are trying to say here at all. First off Dexter has only been in since 2009. What exactly are you attempting to criticize here and who are you accusing as saying that the NDP governments in Manitoba and elsewhere should not be emulated. Is ANYONE saying that?
Touting former prominent Saskatchewan NDPers is the best way to ensure the federal NDP never wins a seat here again.
Ditto with mtm Jan, I didnt understand what you were saying about Dexter, etc.
What about Mulcair's front bench? Do we need changes. I just watched David Christopherson on Power and Politics and again to me he seemed weak, and unable to really dominate the discussion. The Lib was much more polished. Is it simply we aren't used to being Oppostion or does Mulcair have to look at moving people around. I can tell you I have seem Christopherson 5 or 6 times and he hasn't impressed me at all. It's like his persona is one of "oh well, they won't let me talk, so ok". That is just not going to work in my opinon. Anyone have thoughts, or can you straghten me out on this? I am willing to listen but I would sure like to know what people think who know more about this then I do.
‘Dumbed-down nature of the conversation’ forces NDP MP off Twitter
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/dumbed-down...
What I understood was snark about the leadership race just passed. If I understand correctly, the fact that a certain candidate didn't win is indicative that the Party is not proud of its provincial governments' past accomplishments in Saskatchewan and, by extension, those of every other province which the Party has governed.
I agree with Angus about Twitter. I've never been able to get into it. I don't really get how people can have real conversations in nothing but 140 character soundbites. It's okay for following real-time events as they're happening with people reporting from them in quick bursts, but I don't find it a very friendly medium for political discussion.
Yeah I had fun with the silly spin games played during the leadership race but without the pace of a campaign storyline I don't really see the point. I don't think I've looked at twitter, much less tweeted anything since the Convention.