(*especially* with the vapid nitwit celebrity they have at their helm).
Lol..that may very well be but I'll take a vapid nitwit any time of the day before I'd vote for the degenerate militaristic SoCon war crminal currently seated as Emporer.
You are absolutely free to make that choice, however much I believe it to be a false choice. Personally, I'd rather have a PM with the intellectual capability to be calling the shots (however much I disagree with them) than a pampered twit with supposedly great "advisors". Not enough to vote for either of them, mind you, but then I'm sure many other voters may make the same assessment I did and choose to actually vote "strategically" for the Tories.
My point was simply that limiting voter's choices, either by limiting the ballot choices à la Cullen or by creating the PERCEPTION of a limited choice with "red door/blue door" nonsense, may have the perverse effect of raising the Tories' fortunes. Most voters are not the sophisticated strategists that Unifor and Babble posters might wish them to be.