babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

Poll: Four out of five Britons repudiate creationism

Snuckles
Offline
Joined: Jun 13 2002

Quote:
The east of England may be the most godless region of the UK, according to a "belief map" published by a theology thinktank today. Almost half of adults there believe the theory of evolution makes God obsolete, and more than 80% disagree with creationism and intelligent design, which propose that humans were created by God in the past 10,000 years, and that life owes its complexity to divine intervention.

The map was drawn up by the thinktank Theos following a survey of 2,060 people across the country who were chosen to be representative of the adult population.

The survey, which was conducted to mark the 200th anniversary of Charles Darwin's birth, found that nearly half of the British adult population could not name the country's greatest naturalist as the author of On the Origin of Species, the 1859 book that introduced evolution through natural selection to a sceptical Victorian society.

The poll also revealed some extraordinary views on more recent writings, with 5% of adults thinking Darwin wrote A Brief History of Time, a bestseller on the science of spacetime, which was written by the Cambridge physicist Stephen Hawking and is widely regarded as the most popular science book never to be completed by its readers.

A further 3% of those surveyed thought Darwin wrote The God Delusion, by the arch-atheist and Oxford biologist Richard Dawkins, while 1% thought Darwin was the author of The Naked Chef by Jamie Oliver.

 

Read it here.

Comments

Cueball
Offline
Joined: Dec 23 2003
Why?

RevolutionPlease
Offline
Joined: Oct 15 2007
Hehe.  Good to see you around Cueball.  Smile

Snuckles
Offline
Joined: Jun 13 2002

Cueball wrote:
Why?

 

Why not?

 


Cueball
Offline
Joined: Dec 23 2003

Why not read the menu at McDonalds? I already know what's in that too, which is not much. So unless you can come up with some explanation of how this story is interesting or relevant I will refrain.

 Is there something I am missing? If so, feel free to elucidate whatever discoveries you made when reading the full piece.

 Thanks!Smile


George Victor
Offline
Joined: Oct 28 2007
Pretty frightening read eh, Snuckles?

M. Spector
Offline
Joined: Feb 19 2005

Quote:

The research was widely reported earlier this week as showing that "half of Britons do not believe in evolution". In fact, the poll asked two separate questions about evolution, neither of which presented the option of simply agreeing with the scientific theory of natural selection.

The survey first asked whether respondents believed in "theistic evolution". This was confusingly defined as "the idea that evolution is the means that God used for the creation of all living things on earth." The survey then asked whether respondents believed in "atheistic evolution", again reflexively defined as "the idea that evolution makes belief in God unnecessary and absurd."

Andrew Copson, BHA Director of Education, said, "There are very many non-religious people in Britain who understand and accept natural selection, and who may even agree that belief in God is unnecessary, but who would not necessarily subscribe to this idiosyncratic definition of ‘atheistic evolution'."

The interpretation that Theos layered on their data went even further, suggesting that atheists were to blame for the spread of "Intelligent Design" and Creationism because they associate evolution with nihilism and the view that there is "no purpose" in life.

"Like the religious critics of Darwin's own day, Theos are trying to tell us that evolution without God is degrading and demeaning," said Mr Copson. "There is no evidence for this view. In fact many people today would subscribe to Darwin's own view that a proper understanding of evolution contributes greatly to an enlargement of humane feeling. As Darwin said in The Descent of Man (1871):

Quote:
As man advances in civilisation, and small tribes are united into larger communities, the simplest reason would tell each individual that he ought to extend his social instincts and sympathies to all members of the same nation, though personally unknown to him. This point once reached, there is only an artificial barrier to prevent his sympathies extending to the men of all nations and races."

British Humanist Association

 

 Link to the actual Theos report

 


N.R.KISSED
Offline
Joined: Aug 22 2001
If only we could get the same number to repudiate the neo-liberalism of Thathcer/Blair and Brown maybe then we would have something to talk about.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments