The Afghan People Will Win Part 25

Fidel played a cool hand during his visit to the states in 1959. He was wildly popular as far the Americans were concerned. Only when Fidel began speaking of expropriating land and giving it to Cubans and needing money for poverty relief did Nixon realize Fidel wasn't someone they could control. Tricky Dick told Eisenhower that Fidel was a communist and that they couldn't work with him. Fidel approached the Americanos at first and not the Soviets. And when Washington turned their backs on Fidel, Fidel went to those who would help Cuba.

In Afghanistan it's been a similar story. The CIA, Brits and Saudis etc bypassed moderates in Afghanistan in favour of right wing extremists, like Hekmatyar, Rabbani etc. Only the most ruthless would do and preferably those who had little support from Afghan people themselves. This was the CIA's insurance that they could be controlled from Washington with taxpayer dollars and weapons shipments as they waged anticommunist jihad in Central Asia. Of course, they did have some cleanup work to do with Ahmed Shah Massood, the "lion of Panjsir" when he declared war on the Taliban in 1992. Massood had switched sides to the SCO alliance by that time. And by 1992 the CIA had allegedly broken covert ties with the militant Islamic terror network. And it was a lie. "Blowback" is an imperialist lie.

Well, I think you are suggesting that if the CIA, US military government and Brits can't have it ALL their way 121% of the time, then they have no alternative but to cash in their chips and sit on the sidelines for a round or two of the great game. But I don't think it works that way. Imperialism and central planning is not as one dimensional as you're letting on here, imo. The US certainly did support the Shah's brutal dictatorship up to about 1978. The Carter administration also recommended that the Shah be replaced by the Ayatollah who was living in France at the time. The so-called Liberal Democrats in the U.S. have been just as supportive of militant Islam since the 1950s as the elephant party. Right wing extremists prefer dealing with other right wing fundamentalists not social democrats, and certainly not religious and political moderates as demonstrated by the the CIA-ISI-Saudi's Talibanization of Afghanistan and Pakistan since the 1980s. They have not succeeded in creating purely ideologically driven Islamic states in either country, or at least not yet. Not like Iran since Khomeini. The name of the Gladio game is democracy prevention, dirty tricks, assassinations and even election rigging where possible as usual. As Obama likes to say sometimes, everything is on the table when waging either covert or direct warfare on democracy around the world.

The whole world wants social democracy including hundreds of millions of human beans in Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, Iran etc, M. Most of them do not want militant Islam. I would think maybe 50% of them benig women are not wanting it and prolly more than we know. Who would want to impose such a violently misogynist, theocratic feudal ideology on hundreds of millions of people living there and in regions surrounding a vast oil basin in Central Asia? Tell us, please. And it's the imperialists' job to make sure that social democracy doesn't happen plain and simple. Democracy prevention is not rocket science. It's what they do, and they are damn good at it long time.

The PDF download is 82 pages long. I had to download it then read it. One of the parts near the very end which I agree with...

I don't care if the Taliban "re-take" Afghanistan... as long as the keep al-Qaeda out they can do whatever they want with the country.

Gladio Gang propping for their best friends forever, the Taliban, by burning Qurans Oops they did it again.

CIA's "former" proxies, the Taliban, poised to re-take power in Kabul, says U.S. Military Government  Everything unfolding according to Mackinderan-Brzezinskian plan for the Stan, man. 

Continue HERE