China

117 posts / 0 new
Last post
kropotkin1951 kropotkin1951's picture

Mr. Magoo wrote:

Ah.  What's the "issue" du jour?

I thought it was how Chinese corporations work for the people?

I would have thought you'd be ecstatic to hear that (?!)

They exist for THE PEOPLE, kropotkin.

ed'd to ask:

1.  are Canadians actually emigrating to China, and if not, why not?  WWWTT has been making it clear for a while that China is totally awesome, and their government is totally awesome, and if their corporations work for the people then that's just gravy on the cake!

2.  I've never had the sense that you care for Canadian corporations -- you can say, if I got that wrong -- so isn't it at least tempting to move to China, where the corporations will work for YOU?  If you'd rather stay here and bemoan... well, why?  That's like saying "I don't want to move under that awning; I'd rather gripe about the rain", yes?

Magoo I do not agree with any of your stupid statements. I know, I know I just have to understand that in your world view any country not dominated by US banksters is a rogue nation and must be vilified.

Carry on with  your Cold War posts since you seem to be incapable of any other kind of thinking.

 

WWWTT

1.  are Canadians actually emigrating to China, and if not, why not? 

China just increased their family child limit from one to two. Our friends from Bei Hai in southern Guangxi province(fastest growing city in the world by the way) just gave birth to a daughter. Their second child. They now have a boy and girl. 

China isn’t looking for immigrants. Increasing the population isn’t an issue like in Canada or Australia and other countries. That says something in itself now doesn’t it!

Mr. Magoo Mr. Magoo's picture

Quote:
I know, I know I just have to understand that in your world view any country not dominated by US banksters is a rogue nation and must be vilified.

Have I actually said any such thing, tho?

If I google "site:rabble.ca magoo rogue nation" will I really get to read about all those countries that I think need to be dominated by "US banksters"?

Quote:
Carry on with  your Cold War posts since you seem to be incapable of any other kind of thinking.

OK.  And you carry on yammering about "Russophobia", which is just the cold war from the other point of view.

Quote:
China isn’t looking for immigrants. Increasing the population isn’t an issue like in Canada or Australia and other countries. That says something in itself now doesn’t it!

My question wasn't actually about China wanting population increase, it was about Canadians, who don't care for Canadian corporations trying to rob them, and whether they might rather live in a country in which the corporations work for the people!

I'm glad Chinese parents are free to have TWO children now, though.  The Chinese government is not just wise, but generous!  I yearn for the day that people unfortunate enough to live in a country other than China can similarly have a second child -- even if it's another girl!  Why can't all countries permit two children like China??

WWWTT

Actually your comment is a good example of trolling and baiting. 

You keep changing around “what it is you mean”

if I actually tried to answer your question, I would be just taking the bait you set. 

So let ma ask you this Mr. Magoo, how many Chinese people do you think chairman Mao killed?

Mr. Magoo Mr. Magoo's picture

Quote:
So let ma ask you this Mr. Magoo, how many Chinese people do you think chairman Mao killed?

With his own two hands?  I'll go with 'none'.

That's an old "Trivial Pursuit" strategy, though.  When the question is "how many... [whatever]" the answer probably isn't "twenty three" or "one hundred, forty eight" -- it's probably either "zero" or "all of them".  Those are the best guesses, anyway.

kropotkin1951 kropotkin1951's picture

Mr. Magoo wrote:

Quote:
I know, I know I just have to understand that in your world view any country not dominated by US banksters is a rogue nation and must be vilified.

Have I actually said any such thing, tho?

When have you ever posted anything that was not obtuse and subject to change when anyone calls you on its implied contents? Your style is boring, repetitive and annoying but not really all that hard to see through. I just have to call you on it sometimes because it is just so f'ing constantly discussion killing.

Mr. Magoo Mr. Magoo's picture

Quote:
I just have to call you on it sometimes because it is just so f'ing constantly discussion killing.

Then discuss around it.  Think of my posts as an ad, and ignore them like you would an ad.  Don't be fragile if you want to change the world.

Jeez, Louise.

kropotkin1951 kropotkin1951's picture

LMAOFROF Thanks Magoo your response made my day. I love it when people prove my point.

Mr. Magoo Mr. Magoo's picture

I didn't prove your point.  You proved it yourself by typing "LMAOFROF" -- that makes it clear to all that you must have bested me in rhetorical combat or whatever.  It's the Royal Flush of discussion boards.

Anyway... slow day??

WWWTT

I didn't prove your point.  You proved it yourself by typing "LMAOFROF" --

ya actually you did, and you’re proving his point again because what you’re writing makes no sense. 

Just like when I asked you how many people chairman Mao killed. 

Mr. Magoo Mr. Magoo's picture

Quote:
ya actually you did, and you’re proving his point again because what you’re writing makes no sense.

It makes sense, WWWTT.  You just don't agree with it, and that's not the same.

Quote:
Just like when I asked you how many people chairman Mao killed.

And now that you mention it, I'm still waiting on your authoritative answer.  Allow me to guess again:  he killed a million, but Xi Jinping brought them all back to life, and now they're prosperous and happy.

His statue isn't going to carve itself, WWWTT.  Back to work!

WWWTT

It makes sense, WWWTT.  You just don't agree with it, and that's not the same.

lol! You would think that if someone didn’t agree with something, then they would just say “hey I don’t agree with what you’re writing”. But I gues that’s just too easy? Or or or, like kopotkin mentioned earlier, your just playing your games again. 

And now that you mention it, I'm still waiting on your authoritative answer.

The only thing you’re waiting for is the next opportunity to say I’m carving a statue of Xi Jin Ping. After all that’s the only reason you come to this thread. 

I find it kind of funny that there’s Europe descended people that are so jealous and envious of a non European or European descent country of communist China. You have spun this one around so many times that you’ve actually developed your writing style here on babble in this China thread. At least the dark side of your style anyways. 

NDPP

Sick & Tired of US Foreign Policy, Germany is Pushed into the Open Arms of China

https://on.rt.com/962d

"Germany has had enough of American foreign policy. Angela Merkel's visits to Russia and China are a testament to that..."

NDPP

"US goal in Korea is to maintain its military presence and if possible transform DPRK into an extension of its economic/military posture. US decades-long goal is to encircle/contain/conquer China - not promote peace and stability."

https://twitter.com/LandDestroyer/status/999741170849738752

NDPP

President of Russia Interview with China Media Group

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/57684

"... Russia and China are neighbours. We have been interacting for centuries and our historical ties and roots go very deep. It is not by chance that in recent decades as neighbors, we have built a relationship that probably cannot be compared with anything in the world. It is truly built on consideration of each other's interests.

He [President Xi] is a very accessible and sincere person. But at the same time he is a very reliable partner. I look forward to good positive relations.

We are not surprised by any restrictions or sanctions. This does not frighten us and will never force us to abandon our independent, sovereign path of development. I believe Russia will be sovereign, or it will not exist at all. And, of course, the Russian people will always choose the first. I think the Chinese people feel the same."

Sean in Ottawa

I think there are some opportunities being missed with China. The Chinese governement is of the opinion that a prosperous middle income group is essential to stability in the country and is bringing its industrial policy in line with higher wages. Many of its interests are more aligned with developed countries than they have been previously.

There was an opportunity to change the direction with Russia 20 years ago and I think this was blown. I beleive there is an opportunity now with China. Shutting out China will create a nationalism and aggression from that government that might be avoided if a different path were to be taken now. Part of the problem here is that the western allies cannot simply address these countries by denying all their security concerns and economic ambitions. Before this gets to a severe stage these could be moderated -- especially where they can be seen to be responses to provocations and aggression from those western allies.

Pages