babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

Ex-FBI Agent: Why I Support a New 9/11 Investigation

NorthReport
Online
Joined: Jul 6 2008

Makes sense to me.

 

Ex-FBI Agent: Why I Support a New 9/11 Investigation

 

In the absence of my being there in New York City to stand with the 9/11 families, first responders and survivors, I offer the following statement in support of your goal of a new investigation into the attacks of September 11th and the NYC CAN campaign to place it on the ballot for November.

 

http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/07/ex-fbi-agent-why-i-support-a-new-911-in...


Comments

NorthReport
Online
Joined: Jul 6 2008

Triple Cross should be an excellent book if it ever gets to print.

 

I wonder if Ali too will soon mysteriously die, just like that fellow in the UK who said there were no WMD in Iraq, who apparently did not commit suicide after all. Surprise. Surprise.

 

Author on book exploring 9/11 failures dares Patrick Fitzgerald to sue him for libel

 

http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/07/15/author-dares-fitzgerald-to-sue-him-for-libel/

 

I used to think all these 9/11 alternative theory advocates were crackpots, but now, I'm just not so sure about that any more. Laughing


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Thanks, North Report. I havent read the book. Sounds interesting. It sounds like AM will have a brand new life and identity by now. And I'll bet Lance meets his maker accidentally on purpose before Fitzgerald ever sues him.

 

Ignore At Your Peril Forbes

 

Quote:

The book also details how a former Egyptian army officer, Ali Mohamed, a radical Islamist linked to the unit that assassinated President Anwar Sadat, slowly penetrated U.S. intelligence. At first, from 1987 to 1989, he worked as a supply sergeant at Fort Bragg. But in 1992, as Lance says, Mohamed "is opened as an informant by the FBI's San Francisco office." From there he began his career as a double agent, traveling often to the Middle East to advise Bin Laden and others. He even organized Bin Laden's move from Sudan to Afghanistan. He planned the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. He arranged meetings between Bin Laden and Hezbollah terror master Imad Mughniyeh. He was arrested by the Canadian Mounties but freed upon FBI intervention. On and on the horrifying story goes.

 

Sadat, too? My god theyre a treacherous bunch of bastards.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

This is what caught my eye about 9/11 a couple of years ago. Canadian investigative news journalist, Barry Zwicker, said back in 2002:

Quote:

What bugs me to no end is that mainstream media journalists operate as if these books - written by the most professional of their ranks - they operate as if these books don't exist! Fellow journalists, the dots exist. For goodness' sake, connect them, while you can.

 

There are plenty of what we call in the news biz "pegs." Solid current evidence. New dots. But these dots, past and present, are never connected. Take this November 22nd front page story in The Globe and Mail. I almost missed the startling information in this myself because the headline indulges a stereotypical Canadian self-putdown: us stupid Canadians, we let a terrorist -- one Ali Mohamed -- get away.

 

The real story is buried. "Mr. Mohamed ... was a U.S. Army sergeant...but trained bin Laden's bodyguards."

 

Ali Mohamed was a double agent in their midst, and they knew it. Sure the RCMP let him go, but it was on the FBI's orders for them to do so. And so which two North American governments are not even searching for AM and a few more interesting characters since the very slip-shod and unaccountable 9/11 Commission has come and gone? It's fubar.

 


ennir
Offline
Joined: Feb 8 2009

When many on a  progressive board such as babble ridicule questioning 911 I have little hope that anything will change.  And if Jane Burgermeister (the journalist accusing WHO and others of the greatest crime against humanity) is correct then it is all a moot point in any case as most of us simply won't be alive.


NorthReport
Online
Joined: Jul 6 2008

Huh?


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

I'm afraid our progressive lackeys for the American inquisition are studying this new thread and planning how they will continue to disrupt thread discussions on "false flag terrorism as a pretext for warfiteering and imperialism",   and  to bully others with their derisive commentary. Keep in mind there's only one way to deal with bullies.


Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005
ennir wrote:

When many on a  progressive board such as babble ridicule questioning 911 I have little hope that anything will change.  And if Jane Burgermeister (the journalist accusing WHO and others of the greatest crime against humanity) is correct then it is all a moot point in any case as most of us simply won't be alive.

Are you saying the swine flew into the towers?

Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Unionist wrote:
Are you saying the swine flew into the towers?

 

Yes and no. Capitalists caught swine flu a long time ago leading up to this barrel of shit globalized economy. And the crises of capitalism leading to war and warfiteering does seem to be an established theme in recent history.

We're actually discussing a few key participants in 9/11 terrorism who, apparently, were working for al-Qa'eda as well as the FBI, CIA, and even the US military and have now disappeared off the face of the earth. And curious people want to know the truth. Sheeple and watchdogs for the babble house on unAmerican activities committee, otoh, will require no further explanation and are excused from participating in this thread.


ennir
Offline
Joined: Feb 8 2009

NorthReport wrote:

Huh?

LOL  Okay it was a leap, I apologize.

Here's the in between, while questions about 911 have been silenced and dismissed, those who engineered it have used it as an excuse to start a war and to implement laws to control us but according to Jane Burgermeister they are not content with that.  According to her research they have weaponized the flu and are planning to murder millions in order to gain control of the United States of America.  My point is that if this is so then all the talk about any investigation is pointless because most of us will be dead.


Snert
Offline
Joined: Nov 4 2008

Quote:
According to her research they have weaponized the flu and are planning to murder millions in order to gain control of the United States of America. 

 

I think that personal belief in an all-powerful, benevolent "creator" has been supplanted by personal belief in an all-powerful, malevolent shadow government. Either that or this author thinks the Austin Powers movies are documentaries.

 


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Okay that was funny.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

ennir wrote:
Here's the in between, while questions about 911 have been silenced and dismissed, those who engineered it have used it as an excuse to start a war and to implement laws to control us but according to Jane Burgermeister they are not content with that.  According to her research they have weaponized the flu and are planning to murder millions in order to gain control of the United States of America.  My point is that if this is so then all the talk about any investigation is pointless because most of us will be dead.

I dont think a flu pandemic would be enough to murder enough people all at once to be considered an obvious plot to cull the herd. Their largest weapon on that front is monopolizing and controlling food supplies through neoliberalized trade institutions, the banking cabal, and supranational agribusinesses, trading companies, vicious trade sanctions amounting to medieval sieges etc. Over a billion human beings are chronically hungry today and tens of millions continue to die agonizing deaths by starvation as a result of the planned and enforced genocide by capitalism's visible hand free market diktats. Malnutrition is the largest factor contributing to weakened populations, related diseases and imminent death. A mild infection can be deadly under the right circumstances

If they wanted to step-up the rate at which the herd is culled, that would mean increasing the use of WMD by wars where feasible around the world without conflagrating to world war. That's the tricky part. Generally the size of the war is proportional to some degree to the extent and duration of the capitalist economic crisis. Apparently all it would take is for some third rate royal family member to be assassinated in a second rate city on the edge of Europe, and all hell could break loose.


NDPP
Online
Joined: Dec 28 2008

9/11 and Cyberterrorism

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14418

"the real reason behind the invocation of 9/11 in the context of "cyber terror" was revealed last year by Harvard law professor Lawrence Lessig. He told a technology conference that former cyberterrorism czar Richard Clarke admits there is a cyber equivalent of the constitution-destroying Patriot Act ready to be rubber stamped into law; all it requires is a "cyber 9/11 to make such legislation politically viable. In effect, the cyber security establishment - the advisers, agents and experts in the newly-minted multi-billion dollar cyber security industry - are waiting for a spectacular cyber terrorist attack to go ahead with plans for "identity management" schemes like fingerprints, for internet access which would put an end to free internet as we have known it.."


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

It was only a matter of time before cyber-gladio happened.

Obama backs spying on the lives of others crazy George style

9/11 and Cyberterrorism

Quote:
The real reason behind the invocation of 9/11 in the context of "cyber terror" was revealed last year by Harvard law professor Lawrence Lessig. He told a technology conference that former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke admits there is a cyber equivalent of the constitution-destroying Patriot Act ready to be rubber stamped into law; all it requires is a "cyber 9/11" to make such legislation politically viable.[7] In effect, the cyber security establishment-the advisors, agents and experts in the newly-minted multi-billion dollar cyber security industry[8]-are waiting for a spectacular cyber terrorist attack to go ahead with plans for 'identity management' schemes like fingerprinting for internet access which would put an end to the free Internet as we have known it.[9] . . .

The 9/11 Commission Report, obviously, does not mention Ptech. Given the incredible information about this company and its links to Specially Designated Global Terrorist Yassin al-Qadi, this is perhaps surprising. This startling omission becomes more ominous however, when it is understood that the 9/11 Commission co-chair, Thomas Kean, made $24 million dollars off a land deal with al-Qadi linked organization BMI.[45]

For over a decade, investigations into Ptech, its employees and its investors have been stifled, suppressed or derailed by people in key positions. But all of that finally changed this week.


A Break in the Case
On Wednesday, the Boston Field Office of the FBI unsealed a 2007 indictment of Oussama Ziade, Ptech's former CEO, and Buford George Peterson, the former CFO and COO.[46] The indictment charges that the pair knowingly lied to investigators about the extent of al-Qadi's investments and ties with Ptech. Another unsealed indictment, this one from 2005, alleges Ziade attempted to engage in transactions involving al-Qadi's property, a federal offence as al-Qadi was a Specially Designated Global Terrorist at the time. If the pair are convicted on the charges, they face 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine. . .


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Clinton says 9/11 ringleaders are in Pakistan

 

But I thought they were in Afghanistan? Tora Bora? Iraq?

Next up the Obama admin will accuse Sideshow Bob of masterminding 9/11.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

9/11 Mind Swell Scientific evidence refutes the official story

Quote:
As we approach the eighth anniversary of 9/11 consider this paradox.  In the post 9-11 years the scientific evidence for disbelieving the official government story has mounted incredibly.  And the number of highly respected and credentialed professionals challenging the official story has similarly expanded.  Yet, to the considerable disappointment of the international 9/11 truth movement, the objective fact is that there are no widespread, loud demands for a new government-backed 9/11 investigation.  The 9/11 truth movement is the epitome of a marginalized movement, one that never goes away despite not achieving truly meaningful results, which in this case means replacing official lies with official truth.  What has gone wrong? . . .

This can be explained in several ways.  The 9/11 movement has not been able to articulate enough benefits to the public from disbelieving the official government story and pursuing a new investigation.  What might ordinary Americans gain?  Would proof-positive of government involvement make them feel better, more secure, and more patriotic?  Apparently not.  In fact, just the opposite.  By its very nature, the 9/11 issue threatens many things by discovering the truth: still less confidence in the US political system, government and public officials.  Still more reason to ponder the incredible loss of life and national wealth in pursuing the Iraq war.  In other words, revealing 9/11 truth offers the specter of a huge national bummer.  Conversely, it would show the world that American democracy has integrity. . .

The tenth anniversary of 9/11 will come fast.  The opportunity is making 9/11 an issue in the 2012 presidential campaign.  The least delusional and defensive in the truth movement should think deeply and seriously on what needs to change to accomplish the prime goal: having an official investigation that compels most people and history to accept the truth, no matter how painful it is, including the possibility that it finds no compelling evidence for government involvement

And not just for the importance of proving or disproving government involvement, what about the fact that 9/11 is the basis for America's global war on terror? How significant is that wrt the historical record not to mention international law concerning war and aggression? In fact, the Obama administration is paying people to come up with a more compelling catch phrase than GWOT in order to support the war on terror ie. war on democracy


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Who was Osama bin Laden? GlobalResearch.ca

 

 

Quote:

The myth of the "outside enemy" and the threat of "Islamic terrorists" was the cornerstone of the Bush adminstration's military doctrine, used as a pretext to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, not to mention the repeal of civil liberties and constitutional government in America.

Without an "outside enemy", there could be no "war on terrorism". The entire national security agenda would collapse "like a deck of cards". The war criminals in high office would have no leg to stand on.

It was consequently crucial for the development of a coherent antiwar and civil rights movement, to reveal the nature of Al Qaeda and its evolving relationship to successive US adminstrations. Amply documented but rarely mentioned by the mainstream media, Al Qaeda was a creation of the CIA going back to the Soviet-Afghan war. This was a known fact, corroborated by numerous sources including official documents of the US Congress. The intelligence community had time and again acknowledged that they had indeed supported Osama bin Laden, but that in the wake of the Cold War: "he turned against us".



After 9/11, the campaign of media disinformation served not only to drown the truth but also to kill much of the historical evidence on how this illusive "outside enemy" had been fabricated and transformed into "Enemy Number One".

 

VIDEO: How The WTC Towers Fell Blue Print for 911 Truth
by Richard Gage

 

 

 


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Dead or Alive? Osama bin Laden: A Marketing Tool for US-NATO Military Operations

 

Quote:
Many Americans may recall that no messages have been intercepted between bin Laden and his followers since mid-December 2001, which was precisely the time of an unconfirmed funeral announcement, covered by Fox News, that bin Laden had died and been buried in the Tora Bora region of Afghanistan[10].

 

A deeper question should be inspired by the fact that the US Department of Justice has never indicted bin Laden for the attacks, nor does the FBI's "Most Wanted Terrorist" page list him as wanted for 9/11. A spokesman openly admitted that "the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11." [11]

 

It appears that bin Laden may be no more than a marketing tool for imperialistic military operations. A brilliant tool indeed, if the obsessive hunt for him were not blocking our response to the foundational issue of global warming.

 

It is vital to all nations that the many 2001-02 reports of bin Laden's end-stage renal disease [12], and subsequent death, be resurrected to urge an investigation into who has been issuing fake audio and videotapes since 2001[13].

 

Indeed world governments should press the United States for an impartial, transparent investigation into the events of 9/11, with subpoena power to interview witnesses who were never called in the travesty that passes as the "9/11 Commission Report" (2004). The Commissioners themselves have publicly condemned C.I.A. obstruction to key witnesses[14]...


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

The Mysterious Collapse of WTC Seven(VIDEO) Why NIST's Final 9/11 Report is Unscientific and False  Prof. David Ray Griffin


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Osama bin Laden Responsible for the 9/11 Attacks? Where is the Evidence?

 

Quote:
The idea that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 attacks has been an article of faith for public officials and the mainstream media. Calling it an "article of faith" points to two features of this idea. On the one hand, no one in these circles publicly challenges this idea. . .

 

Colin Powell's Withdrawn Promise Two weeks after 9/11, Secretary of State Colin Powell, speaking to Tim Russert on Meet the Press, said that he expected "in the near future . . . to put out . . . a document that will describe quite clearly the evidence that we have linking [bin Laden] to this attack."3

 

Powell reversed himself, however, at a press conference with President Bush in the White House Rose Garden the next morning, saying that, although the government had information that left no question of bin Laden's responsibility, "most of it is classified." . . .

Tony Blair's Weak Document

The task of providing such proof was taken up by Bush's chief ally in the "war on terror," British Prime Minister Tony Blair. On October 4, 2001, Blair made public a document entitled: "Responsibility for the Terrorist Atrocities in the United States." Listing "clear conclusions reached by the government," it stated: "Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda, the terrorist network which he heads, planned and carried out the atrocities on 11 September 2001." Blair's report, however, began by saying: "This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Osama Bin Laden in a court of law."8 Although the case was not good enough to go to court, Blair seemed to be saying, it was good enough to go to war. . .

 

The 9/11 Commission

What about the 9/11 Commission? Its report gave the impression that it was in possession of solid evidence of bin Laden's guilt. But the Commission's co-chairs, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, undermined this impression in their follow-up book, which they subtitled: "The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission."

 

Canadians troops are there in Afghanistan due to a false pretext for war. We've been lied to constantly. There is no war on terror.

 

 


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

New York trial for 9/11 suspects

They're guilty, they've beaten confessions out of all of them over half a dozen years in captivity, and now comes the trial to prove it beyond a doubt.

And just as soon as the alleged 9/11 masterminds are found guilty a second time, they will be executed.


Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004
Senators Clash Over Worst Scenario: What If 9/11 Masterminds Go Free?
Quote:
Holder told Kohl, "Failure is not an option. These are cases that have to be won." ... Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.), agreed. "With all due respect, the attorney general does not have a clue." Cornyn then warned, "If I were the attorney general, I would worry about being the fall guy if this heads south, which it will."
The guilty must be tried and executed. Phony war will be legitimized for the sake of heretics and the unfaithful.

Fidel
Offline
Joined: Apr 29 2004

Pentagon Opened Doors to 9/11 Attack
by grtv

Whistleblowers are gagged and punished by the American inquisition. War on democracy continues.

 


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments