Obama's first 100 days of hope and change

Unionist
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 12323
Joined: Dec 11 2005

Naomi Klein:

Hopebroken and hopesick, Obama fans need a new start

Quote:

All is not well in Obamafanland. It's not clear exactly what accounts for the change of mood. Maybe it was the rancid smell emanating from the US treasury's latest bank bailout. Or the news that the president's chief economic adviser, Larry Summers, earned millions from the very Wall Street banks and hedge funds he is protecting from re-regulation now. Or perhaps it began earlier, with Obama's silence during Israel's Gaza attack.

Whatever the last straw, a growing number of Obama enthusiasts are starting to entertain the possibility that their man is not, in fact, going to save the world if we all just hope really hard. This is a good thing. If the superfan culture that brought Obama to power is going to transform itself into an independent political movement, one fierce enough to produce programmes capable of meeting the current crises, we are all going to have to stop hoping and start demanding.


Comments

Ghislaine
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 15957
Joined: Feb 15 2008

Your thread title wouldn't be sarcastic would it, unionist?

Thank you for posting that Klein piece - loved it.

I was skeptical/cynical etc. from the start, so I haven't really had any expectations dashed, however I do empathize with Americans who are "hopebroken' and 'hopesick' - to a point. I know that so many were extremely anxious to be rid of Bush and really believed all of the promises. Once Rev. Wright (Obama's pastor of 20 years) was thrown under the bus, I knew for certain that this guy was not going to be about any significant change. I found it hard to believe that people did not see through him at that time. With all of his talk about invading Pakistan, etc. - his continuation of Bush's war policies was a give in. It is really, really, really too bad! I think Canada probably would have left Afghanistan for sure had a real hope and change President taken power and left that "war theater".  

It is almost worse than the Bush years. At that time, one could hope of a credible, principled and effective challenger in 2008. Now that person has come, has been elected and I don't really see any hope anywhere.


Unionist
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 12323
Joined: Dec 11 2005

Ghislaine wrote:

Your thread title wouldn't be sarcastic would it, unionist?

Moi? Innocent

Quote:
Thank you for posting that Klein piece - loved it.

Pas de quoi.

 


al-Qa'bong
rabble-rouser-for-life
Member: 4807
Joined: Feb 27 2003

Quote:
Barack Obama has squandered his presidency. He had a fleeting moment to challenge the casino capitalism and financial recklessness of our economic and political elite. He could have orchestrated a state socialism that would have provided a safety net for tens of millions of Americans faced with dislocation and misery. The sums he has doled out to Wall Street could have been used to force companies to keep workers on the job or create new banks to open up credit. But he lacked the foresight and the courage to challenge entrenched power. And now we are headed down one of two frightening roads-massive deflation or hyperinflation. Neither will be pleasant.

    Obama Has Missed His Moment I still have people call me cynical for thinking Obama is just a repackaged version of the same old POTUS. Apparently some folks still think he stands for some sort of substantive change in US politics.


al-Qa'bong
rabble-rouser-for-life
Member: 4807
Joined: Feb 27 2003

Is anything being done about the new frikking babble?

 

This formatting nonsense is ridiculous!


josh
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 3938
Joined: Aug 5 2002

It is almost worse than the Bush years.

Oh please.  On domestic issues, Obama has done some good things.  I think he's blowing a golden opportunity to remake the economy, but I'm hoping there's a method to his deliberativeness.  There will be "invasion" of Pakistan.  Obama said during the campaign that he was commited to Afghanistan, so there should be no surprise that he would try to cut off support coming from Pakistan for the Taliban.  I think he should have, and should, move faster to get all combat troops out of Iraq, but I'm not surprised that he's taking a slower course.


Unionist
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 12323
Joined: Dec 11 2005

josh wrote:

Oh please.  On domestic issues, Obama has done some good things.  I think he's blowing a golden opportunity to remake the economy, but I'm hoping there's a method to his deliberativeness.  There will be "invasion" of Pakistan.  Obama said during the campaign that he was commited to Afghanistan, so there should be no surprise that he would try to cut off support coming from Pakistan for the Taliban.  I think he should have, and should, move faster to get all combat troops out of Iraq, but I'm not surprised that he's taking a slower course.

John Pilger has a rather different take:

Quote:
In his first 100 days, Obama has excused torture, opposed habeas corpus and demanded more secret government. He has kept Bush's gulag intact and at least 17,000 prisoners beyond the reach of justice. On 24 April, his lawyers won an appeal that ruled Guantanamo Bay prisoners were not "persons", and therefore had no right not to be tortured. His national intelligence director, Admiral Dennis Blair, says he believes torture works. One of his senior US intelligence officials in Latin America is accused of covering up the torture of an American nun in Guatemala in 1989; another is a Pinochet apologist.[...]

All over the world, America's violent assault on innocent people, directly or by agents, has been stepped up. During the recent massacre in Gaza, reports Seymour Hersh, "the Obama team let it be known that it would not object to the planned resupply of 'smart bombs' and other hi-tech ordnance that was already flowing to Israel" and being used to slaughter mostly women and children. In Pakistan, the number of civilians killed by US missiles called drones has more than doubled since Obama took office. [...]

Perhaps the biggest lie - the equivalent of smoking is good for you - is Obama's announcement that the US is leaving Iraq, the country it has reduced to a river of blood. According to unabashed US army planners, as many as 70,000 troops will remain "for the next 15 to 20 years". On 25 April, his secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, alluded to this. It is not surprising that the polls are showing that a growing number of Americans believe they have been suckered - especially as the nation's economy has been entrusted to the same fraudsters who destroyed it. Lawrence Summers, Obama's principal economic adviser, is throwing $3trn at the same banks that paid him more than $8m last year, including $135,000 for one speech. Change you can believe in. [...]

In advertising terms, Bush was a "brand collapse" whereas Obama, with his toothpaste advertisement smile and righteous clichés, is a godsend. At a stroke, he has seen off serious domestic dissent to war, and he brings tears to the eyes, from Washington to Whitehall.

I left out the part about Aghanistan and some others. Read it, please.


thorin_bane
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 7194
Joined: Jun 19 2004

I was happy with Obamas noon hour presser on Chrysler. He gave the Hedge Fund a good drubbing. While it isn't much at least people will start to get upset at hedge funds instead of the workers who aren't at fault.


Doug
rabble-rouser-supreme
Member: 1044
Joined: Apr 17 2001

President Barack Obama proposed raising about $190 billion over the next decade by outlawing three offshore tax-avoidance techniques used by U.S. companies such as Caterpillar Inc. and Procter & Gamble Co.

Obama’s plan also would make it riskier for Americans to stash money in tax-havens...The proposal, combined with a $60.1 billion plan to limit many expense deductions for American companies that take advantage of laws allowing them to defer tax on foreign profits and a $43 billion crackdown on abusive foreign tax credits, would be the biggest tax increase on U.S. corporations since 1986. Obama also would shift the burden of proof to individuals when the IRS alleges assets are being hidden in certain offshore bank accounts, the White House said in a statement.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a4.7CIfqd5h0&refer=home



Login or register to post comments