Relief Boats from Cyprus Break Israel's Gaza Blockade

NDPP
rabble-rouser-for-life
Member: 16891
Joined: Dec 28 2008

Relief Boats from Cyprus Break Israel's Gaza Blockade

http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_61005.shtml

"Two vessels carrying 46 international human rights activists reached the Gaza Strip, despite Israel's strict 14-month siege of the Palestinian territory.."


Comments

N.Beltov
rabble-rouser-supreme
Member: 5140
Joined: May 25 2003

NDPP
rabble-rouser-for-life
Member: 16891
Joined: Dec 28 2008

this story sure doesn't draw much of a crowd either in the MSM or elsewhere it seems...


writer
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 3513
Joined: Apr 11 2002

From Al Jazeera:

Quote:

The activists' group was comprised of people between 22 and 81, included students, lawyers, doctors, journalists and an online poker player, organisers said.

Mostly American and British, they included Lauren Booth, the sister-in-law of Tony Blair, the former British prime minister who is now a Middle East envoy.

Many of the activists said they had received death threats before they set sail, leading some to drop out.


Bec.De.Corbin
rabble-rouser
Member: 20070
Joined: Mar 17 2010

NoDifferencePartyPooper wrote:

this story sure doesn't draw much of a crowd either in the MSM or elsewhere it seems...

I'm thinking the Israelis didn't care neither: Two small boats loaded with people and no restricted supplies is hardly "breaking the blockade"... if they were cargo ships full of bags of cement you can bet they would have been stopped.


N.Beltov
rabble-rouser-supreme
Member: 5140
Joined: May 25 2003

If that's the case, I wonder if the Israeli regime didn't PAY them to "break" the blockade.


Ripple
rabble-rouser
Member: 19949
Joined: Mar 3 2010

The Free Gaza movement just marked two years of breaking the blockade.

 

http://www.middleeastmonitor.org.uk/articles/middle-east/1450-happy-birt...

Quote:
For those who say we have no right to challenge Israel, we say we do. If governments refuse to act, we, as citizens of the world, will sail. If Israel says it has the right to stop us, we say it does not. We sail from international waters into the waters of Gaza and never come near Israel. If Israel says it has the right to inspect our cargo, we say the cargo is inspected by certified inspectors at the point of embarkation and does not need further inspection. If Israel says the Palestinians have no right to rebuild their society after Israel bombed it to dust, we say they have every right to rebuild. International law is on our side, not on the side of the occupier.


Merowe
rabble-rouser
Member: 5020
Joined: Apr 16 2003

Bec.De.Corbin wrote:

NoDifferencePartyPooper wrote:

this story sure doesn't draw much of a crowd either in the MSM or elsewhere it seems...

I'm thinking the Israelis didn't care neither: Two small boats loaded with people and no restricted supplies is hardly "breaking the blockade"... if they were cargo ships full of bags of cement you can bet they would have been stopped.

Oh, I think the Israelis care a great deal. After the savaging their credibility took with the Marmara incident, there is no way they could stage a repeat without even greater repercussions. Their hand has been forced by this latest challenge and they've had to rely on the MSM's complicity to suppress the story. The new tactic, obviously, is to starve the blockade runners of the publicity which is so critical to their strategy and I do not doubt a great deal of backroom lobbying has gone down to bring the MSM onside.

That these blockade runners carried no significant materiel is irrelevant since it is the SYMBOLIC aspect of their gesture which signifies, drawing attention to the sordid nature of the Israeli siege.

No...it would be the first task of their propaganda machinery after the Marmara obscenity to redouble efforts to bring the - let's face it, already compliant - MSM onside and the fact that only Al Jazeera with its Arabist mandate has covered it internationally would seem to confirm that.

It could be that the latest blockade runners have exploited a weakness in Israel's position and it will be increasingly difficult for the Israeli state to bring the boom down again - at least while memories of the Marmara are still fresh. This story is just beginning.


Bec.De.Corbin
rabble-rouser
Member: 20070
Joined: Mar 17 2010

Merowe wrote:

That these blockade runners carried no significant materiel is irrelevant since it is the SYMBOLIC aspect of their gesture which signifies, drawing attention to the sordid nature of the Israeli siege.

 

 

Good points about the Marmara incident but I'm less optimistic than you are... it looks, as you have suggestedl, like Israel has learned from the incident as well and may have adjusted their strategy and are now focusing on a media blockade of sorts to supplement the physical one.

I'm sorry but blockades and sieges are broken by supplies flowing in and out of the besieged city; symbolic gestures, like this one, feed nobody, relieve no suffering and for reasons you mentioned, achieve very little on the MSM side of the house. With the MSM muzzled or disinterested in stories like this involving just activists in small boats real supply ships are needed to end this very real siege and it's probably going to take more violence to get it done; maybe even the threat of military action. That will get the MSMs interest again: unfortunately is it bleeds it leads... so you get stories about Hamas shooting up settlers (rightfully so or not the effects are negative in the MSM) and saying they oppose the talks with Israel instead.  

Breaking the media siege of Gaza might prove more difficult than the material siege... and it looks like that one will have to be broken first, which would make this Israel's counter move to the Marmara incident.  


Ripple
rabble-rouser
Member: 19949
Joined: Mar 3 2010

Quote:
I'm sorry but blockades and sieges are broken by supplies flowing in and out of the besieged city; symbolic gestures, like this one, feed nobody, relieve no suffering and for reasons you mentioned, achieve very little on the MSM side of the house. With the MSM muzzled or disinterested in stories like this involving just activists in small boats real supply ships are needed to end this very real siege

I think I agree with this.  Boats had been getting in for months, sometimes Israel stopped them, sometimes they got through.  It was when it was a supply ship that it became a real problem for Israel.  Maybe, though, another international flotilla, as is being planned, will get some attention.


Aalya
rabble-rouser
Member: 17902
Joined: Jun 29 2009

Ummm... the original article, from Al-Jazeera, was dated 2008, so to the best of my understanding, this happened well before the Mavi Marmara attacks.

I believe fundraising is underway for the Canadian boat to Gaza. It will be interesting to see who gets on board.


Bec.De.Corbin
rabble-rouser
Member: 20070
Joined: Mar 17 2010

Aalya wrote:

I believe fundraising is underway for the Canadian boat to Gaza. It will be interesting to see who gets on board.

More important is what is put on board that ship... as I've said before people, no matter who they are, in this case, are pretty much worthless.

 


Login or register to post comments