Report: Obama administration prepared to talk to Hamas

josh
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 3938
Joined: Aug 5 2002

"The incoming Obama administration is prepared to abandon George Bush's ­doctrine of isolating Hamas by establishing a channel to the Islamist organisation, sources close to the transition team say.

The move to open contacts with Hamas, which could be initiated through the US intelligence services, would represent a definitive break with the Bush ­presidency's ostracising of the group. The state department has designated Hamas a terrorist organisation, and in 2006 ­Congress passed a law banning US financial aid to the group.

The Guardian has spoken to three ­people with knowledge of the discussions in the Obama camp. . . . 

Another potential contender for a ­foreign policy role in the Obama administration suggested that the president-elect would not be bound by the Bush doctrine of isolating Hamas.

"This is going to be an administration that is committed to negotiating with ­critical parties on critical issues," the source said."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jan/08/barack-obama-gaza-hamas

 


Comments

thirusuj
rabble-rouser
Member: 16950
Joined: Jan 8 2009

If this really happens, it would definitely bring in a positive result.


M. Spector
rabble-rouser-for-life
Member: 9273
Joined: Feb 19 2005

Anyone who imagines this is some kind of breakthrough is crazy.

All Obama wants to talk to Hamas about is the terms of their surrender.


Unionist
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 12323
Joined: Dec 11 2005

That's correct. It's the same crap as Obama's willingness to talk to Cuba. He wants to open channels for Miami subsersives to gain influence there.

Why would anyone see any hope in such stories, when Obama has never uttered a critical word about ongoing Israeli war crimes?


Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser-supreme
Member: 9312
Joined: Feb 23 2005

I posted a link to this in another thread but I think it recognizes the direction of Obama's policy:

Quote:
It is instructive that when Ross accompanied Obama to the Middle East last spring, he sat in on a meeting the future president had with the man he may well have to deal with as the next Israeli prime minister: the hard-line Netanyahu. According to an account given to me by Netanyahu's national-security adviser, Uzi Arad, the irrepressible Bibi lectured Obama on how the problem of Iran must be solved first. Then, and only then, could the Israeli-Palestinian issue be addressed. Obama did not agree with this "sequencing," but he knows that the best course is to try to grapple with all these interrelated issues at the same time, and with America front and center at the negotiating table. Ross is also aware that one of the flaws of the Clinton approach was not to have done a more thorough job in bringing the Arab leaders in the region into the process sooner, applying more pressure on Arafat in 2000 to accept what was clearly the best deal he was ever going to get from the Israelis for the creation of a Palestinian state.

Michael Hirsch, Newsweek 

In other words, nothing changes but packaging.

 


KenS
rabble-rouser-for-life
Member: 2174
Joined: Aug 6 2001

It does ratchet down somewhat the degree of licence Israel feels it has in Gaza.

Nothing less than the end of effectively unconditional support for Israel is going to really work.

But Hamas is not going to surrender and the realists know that. Israel is going to have to pull back out of Gaza just like it did Lebanon, and will face a very strengthened Hamas.

If you are in Gaza, it matters that Israel has that much less rope in how long it holds Gaza under full scale attack.

This is also yet another step in the international credibility Hamas is gaining. That has long term impact in Gaza, for Hamas' long term international support, and with Israel [regardless they won't admitt it].

I'd say about the last nail in the coffin of Israel's attempt to isolate Hamas.


Hoodeet
rabble-rouser
Member: 16793
Joined: Dec 8 2008

An interesting op ed by Jackson Diehl, which summarizes a number of important points:   www.washingtonpost.com

January 9 2009


Login or register to post comments