West's criminal "deal" for Israeli criminal attack on Iran
July 17, 2009 - 11:49am
Even if this "deal" (ie "criminal conspiracy") for "concessions" is made in lieu of Israel actually complying with UN resolutions to withdraw from illegally occupied lands, there will be, as usual, no one to hold Israel to account.
From The Times
July 16, 2009
Sheera Frenkel in Jerusalem
Israeli navy in Suez Canal prepares for potential attack on Iran
Two Israeli missile class warships have sailed through the Suez Canal ten days after a submarine capable of launching a nuclear missile strike, in preparation for a possible attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities.
The deployment into the Red Sea, confirmed by Israeli officials, was a clear signal that Israel was able to put its strike force within range of Iran at short notice. It came before long-range exercises by the Israeli air force in America later this month and the test of a missile defence shield at a US missile range in the Pacific Ocean.
....
The exercises come at a time when Western diplomats are offering support for an Israeli strike on Iran in return for Israeli concessions on the formation of a Palestinian state.
If agreed it would make an Israeli strike on Iran realistic “within the year” said one British official....
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6715412.e...
I presume that any Israeli attack upon Iranian nuclear facilities would be the death-knell of the Iranian opposition movement.
I presume that any Israeli attack upon Iranian nuclear facilities would be the death-knell of the Iranian opposition movement.
I would guess so.
Blasts which scattered fissionable material over wide areas making them uninhabitable would be an eternal reminder to all Iranians of the terrorism of Israel and its complicit allies.
Not much room for rapprochement there, but, not an issue as far the West is concerned--no doubt they'll wait till the prevailing winds are away from israel and Europe--and of course the oil will still be uncontaminated.