"Will Washington kill us" Paul Craig Roberts

22 posts / 0 new
Last post
indigo 007 indigo 007's picture
"Will Washington kill us" Paul Craig Roberts
bekayne

So how do the Paul Craig Roberts fanboys feel about his latest?

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/08/11/tyranny-at-nuremberg/

Ken Burch Ken Burch's picture

bekayne wrote:

So how do the Paul Craig Roberts fanboys feel about his latest?

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/08/11/tyranny-at-nuremberg/



​Bad enough he's defending David Irving...but he misspells the word "Holocaust" while doing so.

bekayne

Ken Burch wrote:

bekayne wrote:

So how do the Paul Craig Roberts fanboys feel about his latest?

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/08/11/tyranny-at-nuremberg/



​Bad enough he's defending David Irving...but he misspells the word "Holocaust" while doing so.

I think he was trying to be clever. "Holocause"

voice of the damned

bekayne wrote:

Ken Burch wrote:

bekayne wrote:

So how do the Paul Craig Roberts fanboys feel about his latest?

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/08/11/tyranny-at-nuremberg/



​Bad enough he's defending David Irving...but he misspells the word "Holocaust" while doing so.

I think he was trying to be clever. "Holocause"

Actually, I think it's a typo, because it appears in quotation marks, to indicate what Zionists say about Irving. A few lines down, Roberts uses the word "Holocaust", correctly spelled, in his own voice. 

But yeah. How a guy who was a veteran of the Reagan administration can complain about the current leadership demonizing the Russians is beyond laughable. Remember "The Russian language does not have a word for peace"? 

Ken Burch Ken Burch's picture

voice of the damned wrote:

bekayne wrote:

Ken Burch wrote:

bekayne wrote:

So how do the Paul Craig Roberts fanboys feel about his latest?

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/08/11/tyranny-at-nuremberg/



​Bad enough he's defending David Irving...but he misspells the word "Holocaust" while doing so.

I think he was trying to be clever. "Holocause"

Actually, I think it's a typo, because it appears in quotation marks, to indicate what Zionists say about Irving. A few lines down, Roberts uses the word "Holocaust", correctly spelled, in his own voice. 

But yeah. How a guy who was a veteran of the Reagan administration can complain about the current leadership demonizing the Russians is beyond laughable. Remember "The Russian language does not have a word for peace"? 

"The Russian language does not have a word for peace"?

I'm not sure I can make Мир with that assertion.

It's like the time George W. told somebody that "the French have no word for 'entrepreneur'".

 

 

Mr. Magoo Mr. Magoo's picture

I was curious whether or not "holocause" is a dog-whistle word, so I googled it and (happily) did not need to bleach my browser history of any odious crap.  But it does appear that the CBC misspelled holocaust similarly.  Huh.

But ya, Paul Craig Roberts??  The same moron who insists that every mass shooting in the U.S. is some kind of government fiction carried out by actors?  That same guy?  When a six year old "actor" "playing" a Sandy Hook victim is still playing dead years later, that's some serious commitment to the role.

bekayne

Not much of this documentary has to be true in order to reach the conclusion that what the Americans, British, and above all the Soviets did to Germans during the war and in the war’s final days and, worse, after the war, dwarfs in its inhumanity and illegality everything the Nazis did.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/08/14/hellstorm-the-documentary/

voice of the damned

bekayne wrote:

Not much of this documentary has to be true in order to reach the conclusion that what the Americans, British, and above all the Soviets did to Germans during the war and in the war’s final days and, worse, after the war, dwarfs in its inhumanity and illegality everything the Nazis did.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/08/14/hellstorm-the-documentary/

It's funny to see isolationist gun-nuts like Paul Craig Roberts cited approvingly by Canadian nationalists like Billyard and globalresearch.ca. Roberts is pretty much the modern manifestation of what the United Empire Loyalists were fleeing. 

bekayne

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/08/14/charlottesville/

If white males are so powerful, how can they be so easily fired by feminist thought control czars for “expressing harmful gender stereotypes.” Harmful to who? How harmful is getting fired?

As Faith Goldy and Stefan Molyneux predict http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-08-12-best-explanation-yet-of-what-happened-in-charlottesville-stefan-molyneux-and-faith-goldy-report-the-truth-you-wont-hear-in-the-media.html , white males have had enough of their demonization and the demonization of our country’s heros. They see the writing on the wall and are organizing to defend themselves.

As anti-white male propaganda is apparently the only mental activity of which the liberal/progressive/left is capable, Faith Goldy and Stefan Molyneux are probably correct that America, broken into pieces by Identity Politics, is heading into civil war.

I wonder which side will control the nukes and bio-chemical weapons.

If the white heterosexual males lose, I wonder who will protect the white women. Are they destined for the same rape and butchery as befell German women from the Russians and Americans once the Wehrmacht surrendered?

bekayne

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/08/15/america-propaganda-vanquished...

Lincoln’s purpose was not to free slaves but to provoke the slave rape of Southern women and murder of Southern children that would pull the Southern troops his generals could not defeat off the front lines and impel them home to protect their families from Lincoln’s slave revolt.

But the slaves did not revolt even though there was no one there to conrol them but women and children. So what kind of oppression was this?

...

Of course, the abolitionist created all the hatred of the South that they possibly could. Indeed, during my entire life, lived almost exclusively outside the South, I have observed the liberals foment racial hatred of blacks toward whites, and I have watched feminists foment gender hatred of women toward men. Hatred is the great cause of the liberals. It is what defines them.

The stupid liberals have sowed social enmity between races and genders. The destruction of America will be the result.

 

Perhaps we will fall apart, occupied in racial and gender warfare, before the Russians and Chinese have to blow us off the face of the earth.

voice of the damned

 

Lincoln’s purpose was not to free slaves but to provoke the slave rape of Southern women and murder of Southern children that would pull the Southern troops his generals could not defeat off the front lines and impel them home to protect their families from Lincoln’s slave revolt.

 

Boy, ya never saw THAT on Professor Kitzel! Goddam globalist cuck.

bekayne

Now he wants to start a racist book club:

The white liberal/progressives should read Jean Raspail’s book, The Camp of the Saints and discover that the world does not differentiate them from white nationalists. Whites—not “some whites”—are seen as a plague on the world.

voice of the damned

I read the first few pages of that book, where the old aristocrat kills the obnoxious multiculturalist hippie. The dialogue was pretty funny, in an unintentional way, at least in the bad translation from the French.

Mr. Magoo Mr. Magoo's picture

Quote:
Lincoln’s purpose was not to free slaves but to provoke the slave rape of Southern women and murder of Southern children that would pull the Southern troops his generals could not defeat off the front lines and impel them home to protect their families from Lincoln’s slave revolt.

Wow.  I guess all the newly freed slaves couldn't wait to rape all those white women and murder their children, or whatever.  And the Southern generals would naturally leave their post and head home to box them, or whatever.

Another fascinating bit of wisdom and analysis from Mr. Roberts.  I'm glad that rabble.ca is still happy to hand him -- albeit, indirectly -- a microphone.  Some truths need to be heard.

 

Rev Pesky

From the Paul Craig Roberts article:

But the slaves did not revolt even though there was no one there to conrol them but women and children. So what kind of oppression was this?

I happened to notice this because I was reading of Jefferson Davis in Wikipedia, and saw this statement:

At the start of the war, nearly 21 million people lived in the North compared to 9 million in the South. While the North's population was almost entirely white, the South had an enormous number of black slaves and people of color.

...becoming a soldier was seen as the prerogative of white men only. Many Southerners were terrified at the idea of a black man with a gun. Excluding old men and boys, the white males available for Confederate service were less than two million. There was also the additional burden that the near four million black slaves had to be heavily policed as there was no trust between the owner and "owned".

So the slaves were policed, and it deepened the disadvantage of the Confederacy facing the Union.

Mr. Magoo Mr. Magoo's picture

I guess you can't be in two places at once.  That's a low-down, dirty shame.

Ken Burch Ken Burch's picture

Is this now the "Let's Watch Paul Craig Roberts Rapidly Lose His Grip On Reality" thread?

bekayne

Ken Burch wrote:

Is this now the "Let's Watch Paul Craig Roberts Rapidly Lose His Grip On Reality" thread?

Yes!

Rev Pesky

From Mr. Magoo:

I guess you can't be in two places at once.  That's a low-down, dirty shame.

Or, as the old song said,

"How can you be two places at once, where you're not anywhere at all."

Extra marks for being able to name that album.

Ken Burch Ken Burch's picture

"Don't Crush That Dwarf, Hand Me The Pliers!" by the Firesign Theatre.

 

progressive17 progressive17's picture

Why is this thread even on this website?