Canada's quagmire: The war in Afghanistan
Couldn't resist adding my 2 cents to a discussion that had closed after I read through it.
Several people commented on Sweden, the social-democratic model. Look/listen to Amy Goodman's interview with Swedish pacifists, December 10 or 11, democracynow.org, to get a better understanding of the degree of involvement of Sweden in the global arms manufacturing and exporting sector. It is No. 2 producer of weapons, on a per capita scale, i.e., proportionate to its population). (I assume Israel is No. 1.)
The domestic peace and economic well-being have a dirty price tag, it seems.
Of the 652 babble threads about Afghanistan, are you by any chance referring to this one?
As René Magritte would say, "This is not a tag line". Only he'd say it in French. You may find it rather annoying to have to discipline yourself to ignore parts of certain other people's posts - but not everyone's. Wouldn't it be better to abolish them?
Apparently Sweden has its own conservative political contigent. Who knew? Are we supposed to be shocked by this?
Three more Canadian soldiers killed - one wounded
I'm no military genius, but I would say, they should either stay indoors, or maybe go back home. That way, they might leave fewer bereaved families to mourn their useless "sacrifice".
========================== Join M. Spector's tagline Satyagraha!
Unionist, I have started another "Still Losing the War" thread with a post about this latest evidence that "we" are losing the war.
This present thread is a continuation of the thread entitled, "NDP Embrace War in Afghanistan" which was in the Canadian Politics section.
Please don't ask me why this thread is in the "Introductions" section.
Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true. - Homer Simpson
Why is this thread in the "Introductions" section?
Ouch, sorry...
========================== Join M. Spector's tagline Satyagraha!
Since this is the continuation of the "NDP Embrace War in Afghanistan" thread, this item goes here:
Read more
Well, it seems that thread titles can be edited after all.
Unfortunately, whoever decided to rename this one has no idea what this thread is about.
It is Part 2 of the thread entitled NDP Embrace War in Afghanistan, and the name ought to have been amended to reflect that fact.
Derrick O'Keefe has written an article for Rabble about the recent Canadian Peace Alliance convention, called Keeping the War in Afghanistan On the Table, a reference to the fact that the ill-conceived and now-defunct Liberal-NDP coalition notoriously took Afghanistan "off the table" - which was of course the topic of this thread and its predecessor as mentioned above. The Canadian Peace Alliance resolved to continue organizing protest rallies, to shame the politicians into acknowledging the unpopularity of the war and to fight to end it. Paul Kellogg's article, which I quoted in my preceding post, is a much better summary of the convention, actually.
Why stop with the "NDP embraces phony war on terror in the Stan"?
Why not follow that logic to its full conclusion with, "NDP supports 9-11 snow job and the phony war on terror in Iraq" as well?
It all makes so much sense to us now. The NDP is infiltrated by the CIA. It had to happen.
We should then conclude that: the NDP supports herr Harper's U.S. style spending on military buildup and kowtowing to Crazy Jorge de la Yayo's war on democracy in general.
I might even be tempted to think that NDP is for all this neoliberal mumbo jumbo since Brian Baloney's time in the sun. Who knew?
Of course and while we're on a roll here, let's also not mention that the NDP's parliamentary request to restart a federal study on electoral reform was quashed by Whigs and Tories in May of 2007.
The NDP doesnt quit on Canadians - that's Harper's job - when he does show up for work in Ottawa.
veritas? I think that's the strangest motto for such an organization