Trump's relationship with the media.

33 posts / 0 new
Last post
6079_Smith_W
Trump's relationship with the media.

I heard a piece on CBC last night about Trump using the press as a prop during his speeches - pointing at them and telling the crowd they were against him and lying to them.

CNN decided over the weekend to no longer run white house press conferences live because they want corroboration before running stuff that might be lies (I posted that piece in the Trump Administration thread)

Now two journalists - one from Vocativ and one from RT America - have been arrested and charged with felony riot charges for covering the inauguration. One of them had his camera taken by police.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/23/two-journalists-trump-in...

I'd post this as a spot piece, but I don't think this is going to be the last story on this topic.

 

6079_Smith_W

Well this is timely. Jenifer Ditchburn's take on the Harper years as it relates to Donald Trump:

http://www.poynter.org/2017/trump-vs-the-media-canadian-deja-vu/446279/

Michael Moriarity Michael Moriarity's picture

Josh Marshall reports that the Trump White House is already much more leaky than Obama's ever was.

Josh Marshall wrote:
The Trump White House not only leaks like crazy. It casually leaks the most intimate and humiliating details about the President - hurt feelings, ego injury, childlike behavior, self-destructive rages over tweets, media failure to credit his own grandiosity. We have simply never seen this level of leaking, with this little respect for the President's dignity or reputation, this early.
I can't imagine that this will make relations between Trump and the press any more cordial.

josh

Trump doesn't mind leaks.

alan smithee alan smithee's picture

Leaks get him off.

kropotkin1951 kropotkin1951's picture

I endured Harper to only see him replaced with Trudeau.  Nice smile but same misinformation and half truths in support of the same agenda.  I also live in BC and frankly Trump will have to go a ways before he reaches Clark's level of deliberate deceit in pursuit of hoodwinking the people into ignoring the theft of the public purse being committed by their corporate buddies. 

josh
6079_Smith_W

Four more journalists charged working on inauguration day.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/jan/24/journalists-charged-feloni...

bekayne

josh
Misfit Misfit's picture

Maybe the piranhas will eat Ann Coulter.

Michael Moriarity Michael Moriarity's picture

Misfit wrote:
Maybe the piranhas will eat Ann Coulter.
More likely the reverse. Laughing

Misfit Misfit's picture

Poor piranhas.

6079_Smith_W

Border agents try to search WSJ reporter's phones.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/07/21/media/wall-street-journal-reporter-phone...

 

 

bekayne

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/02/fake-news-gateway-pundit-...

Gateway Pundit, a conservative site known for spreading hoaxes, has hit the big time under President Trump.

abnormal

6079_Smith_W wrote:
Border agents try to search WSJ reporter's phones.

">http://money.cnn.com/2016/07/21/media/wall-street-journal-reporter-phone...

That story actually dates to the middle of last year (before the election) but this is more recent

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/02/a-nasa-engineer-i...

 

6079_Smith_W

Thx. Oops.

I was kind of wondering how she managed to get away.

6079_Smith_W

Brilliant piece by John Oliver.Watch the whole thing.

http://www.motherjones.com/media/2017/02/john-oliver-educate-donald-trum...

 

josh

Michelle Kosinski ‏@MichLKosinski

The two outlets called on today in Trump's presser: Christian Broadcasting Network, and a conservative blog. 

 

 

josh

Kudos to probably the only honest voice on Fox.

https://mobile.twitter.com/passantino/status/832338172478500864/video/1

alan smithee alan smithee's picture

Shepard Smith is probably the only fair and balanced anchor on Fox. (not sure that means anything) He's been on the ball a few times. Even Morning Joe is a reasonable Republican.

6079_Smith_W

Writers, artists targetted at U.S. border, according to PEN:

https://pen.org/interrogation-us-border/

6079_Smith_W

Only one media outlet got access to Trump's meeting with Sergei Lavrov today: TASS.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-russia-state-media_us_5...

NDPP

Do Not Trust the Intercept or How To Burn A Source

https://t.co/WeisPljhAR

Yesterday The Intercept published a leaked five-page NSA analysis about alleged Russian interference in the 2016 US elections. Its reporting outed the leaker of the NSA documents. That person, RL Winner, has now been arrested and is likely to be jailed for the rest of her life.

FBI search and arrest warrant applications unveil irresponsible behavior by the Intercept's reporters and editors which neglected all operational security trade-craft that might have prevented the revealing of the source..."

josh

NDPP wrote:

Do Not Trust the Intercept or How To Burn A Source

https://t.co/WeisPljhAR

Yesterday The Intercept published a leaked five-page NSA analysis about alleged Russian interference in the 2016 US elections. Its reporting outed the leaker of the NSA documents. That person, RL Winner, has now been arrested and is likely to be jailed for the rest of her life.

FBI search and arrest warrant applications unveil irresponsible behavior by the Intercept's reporters and editors which neglected all operational security trade-craft that might have prevented the revealing of the source..."

I doubt she'll be jailed for the rest of her life or anything close to that.  Meanwhile no comment on the substance of the Intercept piece?

josh
Mr. Magoo Mr. Magoo's picture

Quote:
I doubt she'll be jailed for the rest of her life or anything close to that.  Meanwhile no comment on the substance of the Intercept piece?

I'll be curious to see how this all plays out.

If you disclose documents supporting allegations of Russian interference in the U.S. election, can you still be a "whistleblower" and a "hero"?  Or just a "dupe" and a "traitor"?  I guess we'll see.

Noops

NDPP wrote:

Do Not Trust the Intercept or How To Burn A Source

https://t.co/WeisPljhAR

Yesterday The Intercept published a leaked five-page NSA analysis about alleged Russian interference in the 2016 US elections. Its reporting outed the leaker of the NSA documents. That person, RL Winner, has now been arrested and is likely to be jailed for the rest of her life.

From the Moon of alabama website:

"Only some 5% of the pages Snowden allegedly acquired and gave to reporters have been published."

I heard from Greenwald that it was more than 50%.

"The Intercept was funded with some $50 million from Omidyar. "

The number floating about at the beginning was $250 million.
https://thenextweb.com/media/2014/02/10/the-intercept-the-first-online-publication-from-ebay-founder-pierre-omidyar-is-now-live/

"Omidyar announced his foray into online news last October. The entrepreneur landed Greenwald as his ‘star’ signing, and says he is putting $250 million behind the First Look Media initiative."

Noops

"Top-Secret NSA Report Details Russian Hacking Effort Days Before 2016 Election"

Given the lack of "meat on the bones" with this entire leak story, it wouldn't surprise me if it was the NSA who first contacted The Intercept and provided them with the 'leak'.

Michael Moriarity Michael Moriarity's picture

I found this article on Slate interesting. It examines "Fox & Friends", the morning show on Fox News, and apparently Trump's fave. The lede:

Justin Peters wrote:

It was 6:07 a.m. on Tuesday, Oct. 10, and the three hosts of Fox & Friends were talking football—specifically, how much better the NFL was before Colin Kaepernick went and mucked things up. Just like its most prominent viewer, Fox News’ morning show is obsessed these days with the national anthem protests that Kaepernick ignited. “Someone who knows more about football than the average bear would be former Bear coach Mike Ditka, and he has this to say about what is going on in football right now,” said a grinning Steve Doocy, before playing a clip of Ditka’s insane claim that America has been oppression-free for 100 years and that dissenters should go play football in some other country.

“And Hillary Clinton supports the players taking a knee,” noted Brian Kilmeade, raising his hands for emphasis. “By the way, what a nightmare for coaches. They need to focus on the game. Their jobs are on the line, and everyone’s divided.”

“It’s interesting, though. The people who are fighting because of the division in our country are dividing the country,” Ainsley Earhardt chimed in after some cross-talk. “Football will never be the same. I just want to turn on the TV and watch a game, you know? And eat popcorn and pizza.”

And then came the inevitable contribution from the fourth voice in Fox & Friends’ early-morning chorus: “Why is the NFL getting massive tax breaks while at the same time disrespecting our Anthem, Flag and Country? Change tax law!” tweeted President Trump. It was 6:13 a.m.

voice of the damned

A federal judge in New York ruled Wednesday that U.S. President Donald Trump may not legally block Twitter users because doing so violates their rights under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald in Manhattan came in response to a lawsuit filed against Trump in July by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University and several Twitter users.

The First Amendment protects the right to freedom of expression.

I'm thinking those op-tative theatre people from Montreal might like this ruling. They always seemed to think that free-speech meant someone was obligated to give you a plaform.

Seriously, I'm not sure I agree with this decision. I would assume that who any tweeter decides to block is a decision between him and Twitter. But apparently the courts have a say in this as well.

I guess the argument is that being blocked by the POTUS prevents you from participating in the debate, because twitter won't allow you to respond to tweets by someone who has blocked you. But that's only on twitter, right? You can still discuss and debate someone's tweets in other venues.

https://tinyurl.com/y6udkvxv

 

Mr. Magoo Mr. Magoo's picture

I don't entirely disagree.  But I'll take counterpoint anyway, and suggest that if TheDonald can block anyone from replying to his tweet, that's a bit like, if I started a thread here on babble, I could arbitrarily block the posts of any other babblers who disagree with me.

It's true that they can go start a thread of their own, but it's not quite the same thing, particularly if people are commenting and participating on "my" thread and don't visit theirs.

I would add the very important caveat that TheDonald is the President, and I think that as such both has a duty to listen to every U.S. citizen, and also has the Twitter following that he does specifically because he's the President.  So I'm not suggesting that every tweeter has a similar duty to not "filter" their followers.  The Wendy's twitter account, or Ryan Reynolds, can go ahead and block whomever they want, because they don't serve the people.

voice of the damned

I don't entirely disagree.  But I'll take counterpoint anyway, and suggest that if TheDonald can block anyone from replying to his tweet, that's a bit like, if I started a thread here on babble, I could arbitrarily block the posts of any other babblers who disagree with me.

It's true that they can go start a thread of their own, but it's not quite the same thing, particularly if people are commenting and participating on "my" thread and don't visit theirs.

Yeah, but if you(ie. Mr Magoo) wanted to ban people from your thread, and babble allowed that feature, I don't think the Canadian courts would have anything to say about it. The matter would be entirely between you and babble.

I would add the very important caveat that TheDonald is the President, and I think that as such both has a duty to listen to every U.S. citizen, and also has the Twitter following that he does specifically because he's the President.

But all elected politicians represent certain groups of people. If babble hosts a column by an NDP health minister, let's say, and she writes a column defending her party's views on abortion access, does babble forfeit the right to ban anti-choice comments from the Disqus thingie at the bottom? Because that would be violating the anti-choicers right to free speech?