Gun Registry - back in the news (thread #2)

400 posts / 0 new
Last post
NorthReport
Gun Registry - back in the news (thread #2)

;;

NorthReport

Toews is losing it. His excesses will help do the Cons in.

 

Holster 'back-door' gun registries

http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/straighttalk/archives/2012/05/20120...

NorthReport
Unionist

[Just repeating my post from the other obsolete thread - let's use this one for continuity...]

[url=http://www.torontosun.com/2012/05/09/council-demands-gun-registry-data]T... City Council demands Ontario registry data be preserved[/url]

Quote:

Councillors voted 39-5 to urge the province to ask the federal government for the data in the registry before it is scrapped.

Councillors also reaffirmed their long-standing support for the gun registry and directed city lawyers to look for ways to intervene to stop the deletion of data on the nearly 290,000 non-restricted firearms which are registered in the Greater Toronto Area.

Mayor Rob Ford, Deputy Mayor Doug Holyday and Councillors Giorgio Mammoliti, Denzil Minnan-Wong and John Parker registered the five votes against the motion brought forward by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam.

Doug Ford voted with the majority against Rob Ford. Luckily Council regulations bar handguns from meetings.

Unionist

Court grants Québec's injunction request, and gives feds 30 days to hand over the data!

And here's an English language story:

[url=http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/montreal/Ottawa+ordered+hand+over+lo... ordered to hand over long-gun registry data collected in Quebec[/url]

 

Bärlüer

Unionist wrote:

Court grants Québec's injunction request, and gives feds 30 days to hand over the data!

And here's an English language story:

[url=http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/montreal/Ottawa+ordered+hand+over+lo... ordered to hand over long-gun registry data collected in Quebec[/url]

A gutsy decision (that I wholeheartedly support) that will in all likelihood go all the way up to the Supreme Court.

EDIT: BTW, the Canadian Press story is incorrect. The court did not grant an injunction. It declared the provision of the Act to abolish the long-gun registry that provided for destruction of registry data to be of no force and effect as far as it relates to Quebec (to keep things simple).

Unionist

Thanks, Bärlüer. Meanwhile, Harper continues to stroke the gun-fetishists:

[url=http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Conservatives+repeal+longdeferred+guns... repeal long-deferred gun-show regulations aimed at sponsors [/url]

Unionist

For those who are interested, here is the [url=http://www.jugements.qc.ca/ID=26A2A56D3D79FC0108F0AC039E8DB834]full text[/url] of the court decision (en français).

 

Unionist

[url=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-will-appeal-quebec-c... will appeal Quebec court ruling on the long-gun registry[/url]

I'll simply adopt one of the comments following the article:

DGC Traveler... wrote:
Did not see that one coming at all... And in other news, the earth continues to rotate though with a slight lean to the right north of the 49th.

 

Unionist

[url=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/mounties-cant-explain-proje... can’t explain projected savings of scrapping the long-gun registry[/url]

Fidel

Yeah I'm not wild about the gun registry as it is. But I do agree with someone who said that the registry belongs to all Canadians and not the "Harper Government of Canada." Hands off, eh.

Sandy Dillon

Vic Toews quote::The savings of scrapping the long gun registry are north of a billion dollars!

TOTAL BS!!!! An audit was done in march of 2005 at that point the total 10 year cost of the WHOLE gun control program was 946 million.

The long gun registry"" PART "" of the gun control program DID NOT COST A BILLION GD DOLLARS!! THAT IS A TOTAL BAREFACED GD LIE!!!

Serviam6

Most police I've dealt with don't even understand Canadian firearm laws and regulations.

Unionist

[url=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/on-anniversary-of-shooting-... anniversary of shooting, Quebec vows to create its own gun registry[/url]

Quote:

The Quebec government is pushing ahead with its plan to set up its own a gun registry in the province after a unanimous support from the National Assembly.

The announcement was made on the anniversary of the 1989 mass shooting at the University of Montreal’s École Polytechnique when gunman Marc Lépine killed 14 women before taking his own life.

Serviam6

Quote:
In August 1989, Lépine picked up an application for a firearms-acquisition certificate and he received his permit in mid-October.[36] On November 21, 1989, Lépine purchased a Ruger Mini-14 semi-automatic rifle at a local sporting goods store.

">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_L%C3%A9pine

Forgive me for using wikipedia as a quick reference but I believe it will still illustrate my point.

Marc Lepine aquired a licence and legally bought a firearm. He could have very well registered this firearm.

 

A firearm registery will not stop someone from committing a henious act such as this.  What needs to happen is a more indepth look into someone applying for the firearm licence itself- the act of being allowed to buy firearms in the first place.  This way people with a criminal history, history of violence and abuse or any other red flags will be stopped before legally buying firearms and not just sending the information away to tell the government that they did indeed buy it.

 

We need to make the act of buying a firearm come under better review and remove licences and firearms from criminals with violent histories.

Sadly I do not think there is anything we can really do to stop someone with no red flags from purchasing a weapon and then using it.

Unionist

Thanks for your input, Serviam6. You're quite right, a registry is far from being enough. But if you think that's why the federal government and all provinces except Québec kissed it goodbye - because they are looking for more effective gun control - I've got news for you.

The use, possession, and storage of all firearms in appropriately defined municipal areas should be banned. That will be a good start. No? And, of course, the registry should be kept as well.

In any event, we Quebecers are more or less unanimous on the need to keep guns under very strict control. We will continue in that direction. Whether others follow is naturally their business.

 

Serviam6

Unionist wrote:

Thanks for your input, Serviam6. You're quite right, a registry is far from being enough.

Thank you Unionist.  I actually never had a problem with registering my firearms. I was happy to do so. My only two points of contention with it is the security risk it poses to me and my family should a criminal hack into the polices computers and the fact that over the dozen plus firearms I registered not a single registry card of mine was without some sort of mistake. Some fairly small, others gaping- including wrong make/model numbers and wrong serial numbers.  At one point I was told it would cost me $10 for each new (hopefulyl correct?) cards..

 

 

Quote:

But if you think that's why the federal government and all provinces except Québec kissed it goodbye - because they are looking for more effective gun control - I've got news for you.

Why do you think they kissed it goodbye? I honestly never stopped to consider it.

Quote:
The use, possession, and storage of all firearms in appropriately defined municipal areas should be banned. That will be a good start. No?

I disagree here.

Quote:

In any event, we Quebecers are more or less unanimous on the need to keep guns under very strict control. We will continue in that direction. Whether others follow is naturally their business.

I think it's pretty cool that Quebec decided they want to keep it to the point where they are doing their own thing. Good on them for sure.

Unionist

Serviam6 wrote:

 

Quote:
The use, possession, and storage of all firearms in appropriately defined municipal areas should be banned. That will be a good start. No?

I disagree here.

 

Because... ?

Serviam6

Unionist wrote:

Serviam6 wrote:

 

Quote:
The use, possession, and storage of all firearms in appropriately defined municipal areas should be banned. That will be a good start. No?

I disagree here.

 

Because... ?

 

How come you didn't respond to any of my other questionsor comments?

6079_Smith_W

On this of all days, I really have no stomach for picking over this issue.

Good on Quebec for building a registry of their own.

 

Unionist

Serviam6 wrote:

 

How come you didn't respond to any of my other questionsor comments?

Your only question:

Quote:
Why do you think they kissed it goodbye?

1. The gun lobby - extremely powerful and wealthy.

2. The politics of division - playing to the Harperite base by telling them that urbanites and Frenchies want to disarm them.

3. In the case of the provinces - fear, cowardice, and see #1 and #2.

If there was something else you wanted me to respond to, let me know.

Now, if you would kindly explain why you think citizens need to have guns in cities, I'd appreciate pursuing that discussion.

 

Serviam6

Unionist wrote:

Serviam6 wrote:

 

How come you didn't respond to any of my other questionsor comments?

Your only question:

Quote:
Why do you think they kissed it goodbye?

1. The gun lobby - extremely powerful and wealthy.

2. The politics of division - playing to the Harperite base by telling them that urbanites and Frenchies want to disarm them.

3. In the case of the provinces - fear, cowardice, and see #1 and #2.

If there was something else you wanted me to respond to, let me know.

Now, if you would kindly explain why you think citizens need to have guns in cities, I'd appreciate pursuing that discussion.

 

 

Appreciate that thank you.

 

To answer your question why I think citizens should have guns in cities it's basically for the same reason citizens have guns outside the city.

 

Citizens in cities, like those not in cities, use firearms for;

Hunting game which provides their family food or a source of income if they sell the food.

For the enjoyment of target practice.

Competition shooting.

Collecting.

A hobby (buying firearms, modifying them and possibly reselling at a higher cost)

 

The only additional reason I can phatom for citizens to have firearms outside of cities is protection from wild animals.

 

Why do you think citizens in cities shouldn't have firearms?

kropotkin1951 kropotkin1951's picture

Because they are dangerous and there is no hunting allowed in any city or exurban area.  That leaves no reason to have a gun of any kind in an urban area.  You want to target shoot then pay for a locker at a shooting range and leave your deadly toys there.

6079_Smith_W

I see the point on the urban rule, but I don't see it as a priority, or even workable and on the whole I don't agree.

Never mind that there are a whole range of storage and registry regulations what would probably be of higher priority, I can hardly think of a tastier target for thieves or abuse than a huge (and probably private) armoury sitting out in the middle of nowhere.

And Serviam6, not just protection from wild animals, but controlling pests and injured and sick animals.

 

Unionist

6079_Smith_W wrote:

I see the point on the urban rule, but I don't see it as a priority, or even workable and on the whole I don't agree.

Well, I see it as a priority, and workable, and I agree.

Quote:
Never mind that there are a whole range of storage and registry regulations what would probably be of higher priority, I can hardly think of a tastier target for thieves or abuse than a huge (and probably private) armoury sitting out in the middle of nowhere.

I see your point. We shouldn't store weapons at police stations or military bases either, for the same reason. Or money at the mint or banknote companies. There must be a way to decentralize all that.

Quote:
And Serviam6, not just protection from wild animals, but controlling pests and injured and sick animals.

Yeah, I didn't get that wild animal thing. Lots of domesticated animals can be dangerous as well. And calling the authorities to help with pest control is just a waste of public funds. I think firearm ownership should be mandatory for all households within a certain radius (say, 100 km) of animals.