babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.
Harper tours Afghan front line
May 23, 2007 - 8:08am
Harper tours Afghan front line
Prime Minister Tough Guy. What. An. Ass. [img]redface.gif" border="0[/img]
Harper is a National Embarassment (TM)
Still, didn't Karzai look stylish in his cape, fez and so on? He really is the most elegant puppet leader in all of the US Empire. Give Harper credit - he wants to be seen with the most dashing and stylish quisling!
Much as I dislike this PM I hope he doesn't get his ass blown off. It would reflect badly on all Canadians.
"We will keep our soldiers here for as long as I need cheap photo opportunities!"
Pathetic. [img]rolleyes.gif" border="0[/img]
ETA: the CBC's Paul Hunter, by the way, usually pulls no punches when it comes to criticism of Harper. He tried to hold back a cynical smile when he said that line (above) but you could see it plainly. I think Paul Hunter is one of the good guys in the CBC.
[ 23 May 2007: Message edited by: Boom Boom ]
Harper may be a US sycophant but goddam it why can't he be a stylish one?
Hat Trick: Selling Brand Karzai
[ 23 May 2007: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]
I believe we should leave personalities out of this, epecially when the facts are so solidly on our side.
If Harper stayed in Canada and actually had his MINORITY govt. co-operate with the other parties and reflect the will of the reported 60% of the public who don't want us in this stupid corporate greed war (can you say pipeline?), he might actually improve his popularity.
but, we have nothing to worry about there. all Harper cares about now is boosting his warmonger image because nothing else at home is working. This trip is an insult to the troops, not a morale boosting exercise. And if the Canadian Forces personell can't see themselves being used transparently by a meglomaniac, then they are just as bad as Harper is.
You have to hand it to Harper.
He is trying. He really is trying.
He has the hockey reference with the Ottawa Senators Jersey FOR A BABY, the lovable president Hamid Karzai *gag*, a camp out and breakfast with the army, as well as a dashing *gag gag* picture of him with a flak vest on!
Sorry Steve. The war is lost. Time to pack it in and call it a day.
"Get them outta there immediately" is a good idea. But how is another matter.
In order not to be a chicken hawk he would have to actually have to put himself at considerable risk in combat. Touring the theater of operations in safe zones under security doesn't qualify.
He is a chicken hawk, risking other people's lives in situations he has never put himself at risk in.
FOB Masum Ghar is not in a safe zone.
G.I. Steve
Con Thien was not a safe zone. Khe Sanh was not a safe zone, the beaches of Normandy on D-Day were not a safe zone. Relatively speaking every FOB in Afghanistan is a safe zone, particularly if you are a national leader with tons of security precautions in play. [img]smile.gif" border="0[/img]
Of course chicken hawk in the Canadian context isn't quite the same as in the US. This generation of Canadians did not have the obligation of fighting in a war that their counterparts in the US did.
"Does your husband have to go to Afghanistan?"
"Probably next year. The families don't want them to go but they're pretty anxious to go. They want to use their training. It would be a shame not to use all their training. (my italics)
Yeah, it would be real sad if Canadians don't get to shoot those live targets. What a waste of training.
I didn't say it, but I wanted to tell her that if her husband was killed, she shouldn't be too upset. After all, he was training for it. It would be a shame for a soldier to fail in his mission of dying for his New Government.
[ 23 May 2007: Message edited by: Jingles ]
Yep, it is all about their "training"!
[ 23 May 2007: Message edited by: remind ]
I don't recall too many stories about how native hollanders where bombing the canadians as we came through to "liberate" them. So I highly doubt we will see statues or memorials with elderly 40 years old in afghanistan saying how great the canadians where liberating them 30 years in the past. No it is all a Pipe dream, an oil pipe to be exact.
[ 24 May 2007: Message edited by: thorin_bane ]
this was the part in the CTV news piece that really offended me. Harper hands the jersy to Karzai and says "this doesn't represent the members of our upper house, but respected hockey players.
so, here's our PM who rails against "partisanship" at every opportunity, showing his contempt for and insulting our Senate to the leader of the country he is visiting, and supposedly helping set up a democratic system of government.
I don't care what you think of the Senate, when you are Prime Minister, you are expected to be Prime Ministerial, not some juvenille ideological prat. [img]mad.gif" border="0[/img]
It looks like harper want to get in the ring and rastle someone!
Maybe he can use former PM Jean the "french strangler" chretiens patented neck lock to protesters move!
[ 24 May 2007: Message edited by: thorin_bane ]
Wonder how our commander in chief looks upon this photo opt political stunt. At least if the GG goes she is doing a part of her job that she is paid to do.
Madame Jean where are you when we need you.
How do you think that this insults the senate?
More to the point, what's wrong with insulting the senate? Aside from the dubious character of the insulter.