Like the Grinch who stole Christmas, the Conservative government of Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper has just left a lump of coal in Canadian workers' stockings. A cover story in the Globe and Mail of December 22, 2011 announces that federal public pension programs are being targeted for cuts to reduce the federal deficit.1 The previous day the Globe and Mail ran a cover story announcing that the federal government will be reducing funding for health care programs and eliminating national standards for health care.2 In essence, this will gut the Canadian Medicare system. Mr. Harper has been pushing a series of recent neoliberal economic and socially conservative policy changes designed to undo the last elements of post-WWII Keynesianism in Canada....
But we can't vote NDP because they cast token votes for a UN-sanctioned no-fly zone over Libya. Goodbye oil profits funding free health care, free education etc for Libyans, and it's NO THANKS TO THE NDP RUNNING NATO!!
You know what they say, a corrupt US-stooge in Ottawa dismantling your health care system is worth more than an unknown quantity in the NDP and exercising our democratic right on election day every time.
We'll have shitty national health statistics like those of our NAFTA partners before we can say Yanqui doodle.
Next thing we know we'll be laying in emergency rooms and relying on crooked insurance companies like Kaiser Permanent to decide if we have lives worth living Nazi style.
But at least some of us will be comforted in knowing they never voted NDP.
Federal bureaucrats worry about jobs as cuts draw near
Treasury Board president Tony Clement is leading the strategic review that is searching for $1 billion in cuts in the upcoming 2012-13 spring budget, $2 billion for 2013-14, and $4 billion annually by 2014-15 and beyond.
Nearly 70 government departments and agencies have submitted scenarios for a five and 10 per cent cut to their budgets as part of an examination of about $80 billion in direct program spending. More than 600 proposals are being considered.
quote:
The Conservative government is paying Deloitte Consulting nearly $20 million — almost $90,000 a day — to advise the cabinet and senior officials until next spring on how to find savings to balance the books in the coming years....
These are political considerations that have nothing to do with managing anything effectively. They've already forecast a deficit reduction in the years ahead, which can't be accomplished if they're still propping up corporatism at home, and with their talk now about participating in European 'stability' fund arrangements on top of the continuing requirement to purchase US bonds.
Provinces get more autonomy to drive health-care reform
Canada's provinces are being granted more autonomy to reshape health care as Ottawa moves to end 50 years of using its funding power to coerce provinces to adopt national standards.
With federal funding now set, Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq sent a letter on Tuesday to her provincial and territorial counterparts urging them to focus on how to reduce escalating health costs and to “put the divisive issue of funding behind us.”
The letter is a sequel to the most important change in half a century to how Ottawa and the provinces run Canada. Prime Minister Stephen Harper is inviting provinces, with some federal guidance, to do as they see fit in their own jurisdictions while inviting them to co-operate in establishing national benchmarks for delivering health services....
I predict a surge in Quebec for sovereignty as a result of Harper's, Flaherty's, and Clement's policies.
Perhaps we could first observe the reaction to what New Democrats will have to say after March 24 - the message that there is a greater likelihood of defeating the globalists with a pan-Canadian defence from social democracy, defending the social safety net AND an economic system that can pay for it?
Public service workers strike against government austerity measures
By The Associated Press | December 19, 2011
ROME - Thousands of government workers staged strikes Monday and joined demonstrations across Italy to protest tax and pension changes that are part of the government's austerity package.
The strike hobbled services in hospitals, post offices and government offices for the entire day. Unions guaranteed emergency services in hospitals.
Union leader Susanna Camusso told a rally in front of the Parliament building that the reforms put an unfair burden on the working class and do little to fight tax evasion.
"It is not acceptable for the workers, it is not acceptable for the pensioners, it is not acceptable for those who already struggled to get to the end of the month," Camusso said.
"The government should come down from its teaching chair and join the real world," she said, alluding to the university background of Premier Monti and many of the ministers in his government of technocrats.
The government package of €30 billion ($39 billion) in new taxes and pension reforms has already been approved by the lower house of Parliament and final approval by the Senate is expected by Friday.
Monti is counting on the support of the major political parties in his efforts to protect Italy from becoming the next victim of Europe's debt crisis.
Former Premier Silvio Berlusconi, who has been backing Monti's program, denied Monday that he intended to "pull the plug" on Monti next month.
"I don't believe there is anybody who can predict how long the government can last," Berlusconi told reporters during a pause in his trial in Milan on corruption charges,
Austerity measures driving Canada into recession, opposition says
Compare Harper to U.S. president Herbert Hoover
Prime Minister Stephen Harper met with his finance minister and the Bank of Canada governor Tuesday amid predictions from opposition parties that the Conservative government's focus on austerity could drive the country into a recession.
It was a charge immediately rejected by Harper, who told the House of Commons the Tories are pursuing an economic plan that is widely respected. Moreover, he said that while his government is now implementing an "expansionary" spending policy, it is determined to eventually cut costs so that the deficit can be eliminated.
But the NDP and Liberals dismissed that defence, citing economic experts who have compared Harper to Herbert Hoover, the U.S. president who helped plunge his country into the Great Depression through austerity measures.
The political battle is being played out on Parliament Hill as Harper has identified the economy as his priority issue this fall and in the wake of his recent warnings that Canada's economic stability could be imperilled in the face of a looming global economic slowdown.
Harper met with Finance Minister Jim Flaherty and Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney. Flaherty and Carney attended meetings with their international counterparts last week in Washington, D.C.
They briefed Harper on those sessions as he plans for a crucial gathering of G20 leaders in France in early November. Harper is calling for a coordinated international approach to deal with the looming global economic storm....
"Flaherty and Carney attended meetings with their international counterparts last week in Washington DC"
including those formerly associated with Goldman Sachs - like Carney. The fix is in, batten down the hatches it's going to be a bumpy ride with their 'looming global economic storm'
Neo-Liberalism won't be rolled back by masses in the street being pepper sprayed and beaten by the police, nor will it be arrested by parliamentary question periods or at the ballot box. Corporatism made some if its greatest strides under European social democratic governance. It's been some time since the economy based power had any reason to fear anything from the street or from politics. In our case we have more to fear from the chicanery of the NDP than the Conservatives do from their willingness to seriously oppose anything.
No, social democrats have to make use of saved capital to save the welfare state.
Haven't they saved capital for long enough? [ducking...]
There is plenty of money that could be available for funding social democracy in Canada. Don't believe neoliberal lies that say otherwise. This is a policy induced crisis emanating from the U.S. and Europe, and with Ottawa declaring impotence as usual. It doesn't have to be this way.
No one is saying the NDP is perfect, but I'd much rather have them in power in Ottawa than the Cons or Libs any day.
That seems to be their most compelling argument against voting NDP - that if they are not perfect, then why vote for them when we have a perfectly good rotten federal government running the country into the ground as usual? Why give up all of this forsome wild notion of creating an advanced social democracy here as is proven to be a valid alternative to neoliberal ideology in several other real world countries?
Some people claim to be against the neoliberalism and current state of affairs created over the last 30 years or so. But they refuse to actually vote against it all on the one day that counts for anything every four years, or whenever the next undemocratic snap election call for short-term political gain happens to be. We might conclude certain things by their lack of interest in actually standing up to be counted in opposition to neoliberal ideology slowly but surely rolling back 50 and 60 year's worth of social gains made by the left and civil society groups in Canada. And they neglect to mention how imperfect the actually existing current situation is.
Neo-Liberalism won't be rolled back by masses in the street being pepper sprayed and beaten by the police, nor will it be arrested by parliamentary question periods or at the ballot box. Corporatism made some if its greatest strides under European social democratic governance. It's been some time since the economy based power had any reason to fear anything from the street or from politics. In our case we have more to fear from the chicanery of the NDP than the Conservatives do from their willingness to seriously oppose anything.
..the spanish experiment does not call for a traditional revolution. the tradition revolution being massive battling with the police/military forces and if successful the popular political party of the day takes power. the indignados are instead calling for transition. my understanding of this is building a new world within the old. this begins by organizing at a community level and yes, on the street. the self contained occupy is a rudimentary vehicle that creates the space for this to be done. what does not need to be is a continuous confrontation with military forces but requires going to the edge then pulling back and avoiding being crushed.
..this gives breathing space to create their own political candidates that are accountable in a very direct way. to collaborate with environmentalist, labour and other peoples to implement ways that work to transform at a community level. it's true that the powers can crush it all if they so desire but this becomes more difficult for them when it is done incrementally. and against occupies that are organized in small pockets all over the country. things can be done for example transferring bank accounts to local credit unions. feeding and housing the homeless, preventing foreclosures, one house at a time. being global certain governments can be targeted to force them not to sign that trade deal. or any other economic/environmental pacts. it does though mean reclaiming public space and using it to build a direct democracy. all imho.
edit to add:
..as the global economy begins to collapse it's grip on local communities weakens. for example, a factory shuts down causing much distress. it is taken over by the workers. the determination of a collapsing corporation to hang on to it is diminished as is the opposition to the take over by local or provincial governments facing rising unemployment numbers and declining revenue. corporate power may very well remain at a federal gov level but that power is also diminished as the politics begin to change at the local levels where there is a demand for a quality of life different from a mad max type world.
..the spanish experiment does not call for a traditional revolution ..... the indignados are instead calling for transition. my understanding of this is building a new world within the old. this begins by organizing at a community level and yes, on the street. the self contained occupy is a rudimentary vehicle that creates the space for this to be done. what does not need to be is a continuous confrontation with military forces but requires going to the edge then pulling back and avoiding being crushed.
They may very well have something going there. When attention is directed at power by the masses, it's frankly more than power deserves at this point. It provides them with justification, a rationale for their continuing existence through self perpetuating violence.
Quote:
..this gives breathing space to create their own political candidates that are accountable in a very direct way. to collaborate with environmentalist, labour and other peoples to implement ways that work to transform at a community level...
Hasn't corporatism nearly completed the project of co-opting environmentalism and labour? I think collaborating with groups who are accustomed to collaborating every day with the existing economic and social order is the quickest way to loose ones breath, which would likely be the result of having to hold ones nose in their presence. Creating candidates to partake and apply within the existing political apparatus has demonstratably only meant having principles and minimum ideals gradually stripped away one by one...until one is granted a relative position of trust and servitude within the apparatus...and the ones who've made it can look back if they even bother to describe the ones left behind as feckless and self-righteous.
Everything that is mapped out globally by corporatism is put into practice locally. It is through the practice of local corporatism that everything is sewn together, community by community, nation by nation, until everyone has been fitted out with their own personal straight jackets. This is where the political class and its supporting institutions has to be first toppled through the spread of active indifference and contempt in all of its subtle forms. The police institutions would have to be avoided at all costs, until the critical mass has grown to such an extent that they no longer dare take to the streets, at which point they would largely be dismantled on their own through defections.
Yep, there are only 18 countries ahead of Canada in terms of social spending. In Sweden the program is so successful that social democrats can afford to take four year holidays at a time and still be in strong opposition.
..this gives breathing space to create their own political candidates that are accountable in a very direct way. to collaborate with environmentalist, labour and other peoples to implement ways that work to transform at a community level...
Hasn't corporatism nearly completed the project of co-opting environmentalism and labour? I think collaborating with groups who are accustomed to collaborating every day with the existing economic and social order is the quickest way to loose ones breath, which would likely be the result of having to hold ones nose in their presence. Creating candidates to partake and apply within the existing political apparatus has demonstratably only meant having principles and minimum ideals gradually stripped away one by one...until one is granted a relative position of trust and servitude within the apparatus...and the ones who've made it can look back if they even bother to describe the ones left behind as feckless and self-righteous.
Everything that is mapped out globally by corporatism is put into practice locally. It is through the practice of local corporatism that everything is sewn together, community by community, nation by nation, until everyone has been fitted out with their own personal straight jackets. This is where the political class and its supporting institutions has to be first toppled through the spread of active indifference and contempt in all of its subtle forms. The police institutions would have to be avoided at all costs, until the critical mass has grown to such an extent that they no longer dare take to the streets, at which point they would largely be dismantled on their own through defections.
..keep in mind that people are working at a grassroots level. collaborations are not with the leadership per say. first the militant unions come forward such as the transit workers in new york and their physical and financial support of OWS. this can be postal workers here. also the vancouver & district labour council is far more progressive than the bc fed or the clc. ditto re the environmental movement. another example is the collaboration and participation of the native community at the van occupy where it was described by a native activist as numbers that haven't been seen in a long time. this does not mean we collaborate with atleo. collaborations need to be connected and relevant to the occupy participants and the direction they are moving in which is direct democracy.
..i am confident that support for corporations were at an all time low let alone after the messages coming out of the occupies began. let alone after canadians begin to feel the brutal cuts while the military and financial sectors prosper while our social services are gutted. i believe there is a possibility to pull this off. we need patience and we must not be acting in anger. and that we watch out for provocateurs and distractions.
The statistics backup SJ's argument as long as he isn't referring to Nordic social democracies. And from what I can tell, the French and Germans still have socialized medicine, free or inexpensive post-secondary education and less inequality in general. Even the very neoliberal USA spends more on social housing than Ottawa does.
Apparently their biggest concern is that Canadians will not see through social democrats' "hidden agenda" for neoliberalism, or something. They should wait until the neoliberals really do privatize health care and life in general in this country. If they thought they were having fun now, they should advocate not voting NDP some more because the fun is only just beginning.
..in 2008 i spent a couple months in marseilles. while there i went to a demonstration, joining around 100,000 others in their disgust over the cuts sarkozy was making to pensions and other social benefits.
Corporatism made some if its greatest strides under European social democratic governance. It's been some time since the economy based power had any reason to fear anything from the street or from politics.
Yes, Nordic social democracies still rank higher than neoliberal Canada in terms of economic competitiveness.
Compare Norway's oil fund savings to neoliberal Alberta's Heritage Fund worth a piddling $14 billion after years of being robbed blind by foreign oil companies. Neoliberal Alberta has one of the highest costs of living in the country and little to show for decades worth of conservative government "shenanigans."
Meanwhile net creditor Norwegians are enjoying high incomes on average, free post-secondary education, well funded socialized medicine and generous social benefits.
Yes, the neoliberal ideology has been working its magic in Nordic social democracies same as in Canada as SJ says. Canada and the social democracies are virtually indistinguishable by direct comparison. Much more of the neoliberal baloney and Canada will look EXACTLY LIKE those social democratic hell holes in the Nordic countries, we can be sure. Let this be a warning to anyone foolish enough to consider voting for Canada's social democrats and treacherous tricksters, the NDP!
..this austertity shit is happening everywhere fidel. it's not accurate to say that social democracy will save us from capital. capital has no master and is out of control raveging the earth. social democracy did not protect the population in greece nor spain nor portugal. and it won't save canada. what is needed is massive mobalization and fightback plan if there any hope at all. waiting four years for an election is totally inappropriate. i sense you are trying to compete when we need to find common ground and come together.
Well if there will be nothing more than the usual begging and pleading with us, and not so far removed from BY GOD! Please don't NDP whatever you do!', then I'm outa here.
. social democracy did not protect the population in greece nor spain nor portugal. and it won't save canada. what is needed is massive mobalization and fightback plan if there any hope at all. waiting four years for an election is totally inappropriate. i sense you are trying to compete when we need to find common ground and come together.
Spain aside, Greece, Portugal, Iceland, Ireland etc are microscopic economies compared to Canada and easy targets for the neoliberal financial regime. They are much more vulnerable to the financial bullies' blackmail for rollbacks and lower corporate taxes than Canada.
We have everything we need here in the Northern colony to wage a proper challenge to marauding international capital. Meanwhile our impotent ones in Ottawa will try to hold themselves hostage with the equivalent of holding a knife to their own throats and threatening to do themselves in unless Canadians bow to their voodoo.
I do' know about you guys, but I'll be voting NDP every chance I get. I know that our neoliberal ideologues are playing lame duck as usual. It doesn't have to be this way. Unlike the cult of impotence stinking up Ottawa for far too long, Canadians are not powerless. In fact we the people are all powerful and possess the ability to change things for the better.
Well if there will be nothing more than the usual begging and pleading with us, and not so far removed from BY GOD! Please don't NDP whatever you do!', then I'm outa here.
..i've read this over several times but i don't understand it. sorry. could you reword it?
..in my mind i want to believe that the ndp will not do what has been done in europe. i read an article yesterday where canada was a signatory to a letter to europe to stay on the austerity track. it was co-signed by a few countries that included australia. why? questions like how will the ndp behave towards those that protest the cuts and changes to our medical plans the provinces will face. so all will become clear in time.
..my overall position is that all governments fuck us over. i'm sick and tired of being fucked over and i may have come to agree with chomsky's view that all governments are illegitimate. having said that i am very much wanting to participate with others in defeating these austerity measures.
The wage restraint consultations between the Ontario government and public sector unions that has been going on since the release of the 2010 Budget suggests a trap may be set for organized labour. This trap has been put in place by the language of the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) in its recent, although quite particular, recognition that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects from government intervention workers' ability to organize and to collectively bargain. Since the Charter's enactment in 1982, the absence of any protection for labour rights was generally seen as a major limit and contradiction in setting a framework for modern liberal rights. The recent recognition of labour rights seemed as if it could be a straightforward labour victory. But it is now clear that governments might be able to engage in even more repressive restraint measures because, paradoxically, labour rights are now constitutionally enshrined via the Charter ruling.
This peculiar ‘legal trap' was created in a decision of the SCC called "BC Health Services" (cited as Health Services and Support - Facilities Subsector Bargaining Assn. v. British Columbia, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 39).[1] In this decision, the SCC, perhaps in an attempt to remedy the contradiction of the exclusion of Canadian workers from the Charter, founded an even deeper contradiction because of the way the Court had to limit the recognition of labour rights in order to make it consistent with Canadian capitalism.
Legal traps. And there have been more than 170 repressive pieces of anti-labour legislations enacted in Canada since 1982.
. social democracy did not protect the population in greece nor spain nor portugal. and it won't save canada. what is needed is massive mobalization and fightback plan if there any hope at all. waiting four years for an election is totally inappropriate. i sense you are trying to compete when we need to find common ground and come together.
Spain aside, Greece, Portugal, Iceland, Ireland etc are microscopic economies compared to Canada and easy targets for the neoliberal financial regime. They are much more vulnerable to the financial bullies' blackmail for rollbacks and lower corporate taxes than Canada.
We have everything we need here in the Northern colony to wage a proper challenge to marauding international capital. Meanwhile our impotent ones in Ottawa will try to hold themselves hostage with the equivalent of holding a knife to their own throats and threatening to do themselves in unless Canadians bow to their voodoo.
I do' know about you guys, but I'll be voting NDP every chance I get. I know that our neoliberal ideologues are playing lame duck as usual. It doesn't have to be this way. Unlike the cult of impotence stinking up Ottawa for far too long, Canadians are not powerless. In fact we the people are all powerful and possess the ability to change things for the better.
..yes, and capital owns the us government.
eta:
..to have a serious scrap with capital a goverment needs the support of active social movements, as is the case in venuzuala and bolivia.
I should correct myself. Harper is an impotent duck who would prefer to be totally paralyzed in allowing capital to have it all their way. Steve would love nothing better than to be doing a Brian Mulroney of things. But it's a balancing act for Harper with the NDP standing over his shoulder. He is still governing like he has a minority and not the phony majority they actually won last year. The Harpers and their Bay Street handlers fear ceding anything to the NDP between now and Steve's next undemocratic snap election call for short-term political gain in or around 2015 or so. 2015 should be a kind of 1988 election deja vu with a right wing government threatening to win another phony majority and four more years of Bay Street-friendly government while the economy is mired by stagnation. Canadians will have to vote strategically for the NDP if we want to stop the Harpers.
..this austertity shit is happening everywhere fidel. it's not accurate to say that social democracy will save us from capital. capital has no master and is out of control raveging the earth. social democracy did not protect the population in greece nor spain nor portugal. and it won't save canada. what is needed is massive mobalization and fightback plan if there any hope at all. waiting four years for an election is totally inappropriate. i sense you are trying to compete when we need to find common ground and come together.
"Capital has no master" in a globalized world, where nations have no sovereignty.
But an attempt to bring discussion about nationalism and globalism in a neighbouring thread winds up with this posting, onthe last day of 2011: "Some dogs are more intelligent than some humans, so where do you draw the line on sentience? We kill other species, as they kill yet others. What makes us so special? We are just more efficient at destroying the world for our own selfish purposes. A neuron is a neuron, whether it is in the head of a cat or a human being. Humans just happen to have more of them, which makes them particularly well-adapted for survival."
Folks just don[t want to bother giving serious attention to the question of regaining our sovereignty, fall back in their ignorance on national socialism as the only manifestation of nationalism, and then revert to social Darwinism. Somehow they passed by cosmology.
..this austertity shit is happening everywhere fidel. it's not accurate to say that social democracy will save us from capital. capital has no master and is out of control raveging the earth. social democracy did not protect the population in greece nor spain nor portugal. and it won't save canada. what is needed is massive mobalization and fightback plan if there any hope at all. waiting four years for an election is totally inappropriate. i sense you are trying to compete when we need to find common ground and come together.
Thanks for your continuing insight, epaulo13. And don't let the petty partisanship get you down.
..this austertity shit is happening everywhere fidel. it's not accurate to say that social democracy will save us from capital. capital has no master and is out of control raveging the earth. social democracy did not protect the population in greece nor spain nor portugal. and it won't save canada. what is needed is massive mobalization and fightback plan if there any hope at all. waiting four years for an election is totally inappropriate. i sense you are trying to compete when we need to find common ground and come together.
"Capital has no master" in a globalized world, where nations have no sovereignty. But an attempt to bring discussion about nationalism and globalism in a neighbouring thread winds up with this posting, onthe last day of 2011: "Some dogs are more intelligent than some humans, so where do you draw the line on sentience? We kill other species, as they kill yet others. What makes us so special? We are just more efficient at destroying the world for our own selfish purposes. A neuron is a neuron, whether it is in the head of a cat or a human being. Humans just happen to have more of them, which makes them particularly well-adapted for survival." Folks just don[t want to bother giving serious attention to the question of regaining our sovereignty, fall back in their ignorance on national socialism as the only manifestation of nationalism, and then revert to social Darwinism. Somehow they passed by cosmology
.
..i'm all in favour of sovereignty as long as it is from the bottom up. corporations have the sovereignty to employ people at minimum wage with zero benefits or use our privatized debt to fleece the population many times over. while governments have the sovereignty to pass laws that protect polluters or send us into immoral wars. there is no sovereignty for the minimum wage class. there is no sovereignty for the homeless. there is no sovereignty for the population if governments can sell off the country. there is no sovereignty if only the powerful and wealthy benefit from the term.
..this austertity shit is happening everywhere fidel. it's not accurate to say that social democracy will save us from capital. capital has no master and is out of control raveging the earth. social democracy did not protect the population in greece nor spain nor portugal. and it won't save canada. what is needed is massive mobalization and fightback plan if there any hope at all. waiting four years for an election is totally inappropriate. i sense you are trying to compete when we need to find common ground and come together.
Thanks for your continuing insight, epaulo13. And don't let the petty partisanship get you down.
"Capital has no master" in a globalized world, where nations have no sovereignty.
..your statement and mine really go together well. it's very powerful and needs to be said often. to understand this statement one can begin to see the enormity of the task before us. in the end it's the human race that will loose and all the other creatures it takes with it. there are no saviours out there, at least that is my life experience. there is no avoiding it, we come together at the grass roots with a whole new world or we bite the dust. there is no reform and it is a battle to our death almost.
Unions are bracing for potentially tens of thousands of federal job cuts from the Conservative government's operating review, as Treasury Board president Tony Clement argued Thursday he's not getting much help from labour groups in finding savings.
quote:
Unions, however, are bracing for potentially thousands of additional layoffs and are urging Clement to tread carefully in his search for billions in savings.
"We know that there are going to be job reductions. I think they're going to be in the executive level as well," said Gary Corbett, CEO of the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada.
"It's in the thousands - maybe even tens of thousands," added Corbett, whose group represents approximately 58,000 scientists and other professionals employed mostly at the federal level.
The union wants to work together with Clement on austerity measures, he said, but is cautioning the government against across-theboard cuts that purge built-up expertise that's necessary for an efficient and effective public service....
Harper is presiding over the biggest government in Canadian history. Some of us do not like the idea of forcing our children to pay for our debts, which is what he has been doing. It is likely that if Harper does not deliver on balanced budgets, many of us will vote Liberal. This includes his ill-conceived plans to buy new fighter aircraft and super-prisons.
Harper is presiding over the biggest government in Canadian history.
And Harper's government is up against the largest opposition party ever elected to oppose phony majority rule in Ottawa. I think it will be one of the tamest conservative governments we've ever had.
I think it will be one of the tamest conservative governments we've ever had.
Aw, I think it's just Fidelese. I think he means they'll be tame lapdogs of Washington. I really don't think he could possibly mean that they will heel, sit, and roll over at Tom Mulcair's Nycole Turmel's command. Give him some credit!!
Given what I have read on MSM message boards, I think the public sector workers are political low hanging fruit. You get the odd post from a public sector worker, but most of them say a bunch of predictable expletives about how the taxes from their $11 an hour job are going to pay for bla bla bla. Oh, and don't even mention pensions. They don't have any, except for what they will get from the government, however ironical and LOLz-worthy that is. Government by Kevin O' Leary. LIKE A BOSS!
Oh and someone mentioned I was being what they called Social Darwinist, so I read up on Social Darwinism using the totally-unbiased Wikipedia. It does say somewhere in there that collective action by a species can be a good survival trait, and I am all for that. I do not however believe that whole segments of the population should be herded into gas chambers, whether you call them Jews or enemies of your Revolution. So if your calling me a Social Darwinist is an attempt to call me a Nazi, I will take it as an insult, which will mean I have won the argument, as I do most of the time any way.
I don't think Harper will be putting the kibosh to the economy with tight money policies the way Mulroney did.
And we won't see a major policy flip-flop on anything as controversial as NAFTA because there is no Liberal Party waiting in the wings to finish the job for them.
The Harper Government of Canada, with less than a quarter of the electorate under them, will be a politically neutered conservative government until 2015. They are still acting like they have a minority. Very quiet and low key. They are scared shitless of going down in history as the first Bay Street government to hand national power to the people.
During this year’s protests against the Eurozone’s austerity measures—in Greece and, on a smaller scale, Ireland, Italy and Spain—two stories have imposed themselves. [1] The predominant, establishment story proposes a de-politicized naturalization of the crisis: the regulatory measures are presented not as decisions grounded in political choices, but as the imperatives of a neutral financial logic—if we want our economies to stabilize, we simply have to swallow the bitter pill. The other story, that of the protesting workers, students and pensioners, would see the austerity measures as yet another attempt by international financial capital to dismantle the last remainders of the welfare state. The imf thus appears from one perspective as a neutral agent of discipline and order, and from the other as the oppressive agent of global capital.
There is a moment of truth in both perspectives. One cannot miss the superego dimension in the way the imf treats its client states—while scolding and punishing them for unpaid debts, it simultaneously offers them new loans, which everyone knows they will not be able to return, thus drawing them deeper into the vicious cycle of debt generating more debt. On the other hand, the reason this superego strategy works is that the borrowing state, fully aware that it will never really have to repay the full amount of the debt, hopes to profit from it in the last instance....
One thing is clear: after decades of the welfare state, when cutbacks were relatively limited and came with the promise that things would soon return to normal, we are now entering a period in which a kind of economic state of emergency is becoming permanent: turning into a constant, a way of life. It brings with it the threat of far more savage austerity measures, cuts in benefits, diminishing health and education services and more precarious employment. The left faces the difficult task of emphasizing that we are dealing with political economy—that there is nothing ‘natural’ in such a crisis, that the existing global economic system relies on a series of political decisions—while simultaneously being fully aware that, insofar as we remain within the capitalist system, the violation of its rules effectively causes economic breakdown, since the system obeys a pseudo-natural logic of its own. So, although we are clearly entering a new phase of enhanced exploitation, rendered easier by the conditions of the global market (outsourcing, etc.), we should also bear in mind that this is imposed by the functioning of the system itself, always on the brink of financial collapse.
Capitalism seems to be characterized by exponential growth followed by a crash. The bacteria, as it were, reach the rim of the petri dish, having consumed all the agar. It would be easier if we all wanted to listen to the same 10 pop songs and watch the same programs on the TV every night. Those days are long gone.
Unfortunately it is no longer just Daddy Warbucks capitalism. We now have this electronic "High Frequency Trading" Casino Banking system which is pumping the same money around the world at ever increasing speeds. Like a hovercraft, this is providing a significant lift to stock values which are still trading at 250% - 350% above Price:Book ratios as seen in the last 100 years. The HFT scam is causing central banks to issue currency in unprecedented amounts, so that corporate balance sheets can be filled with "profits" which were never really made.
I suppose there is some solace to the consideration that if HFT is not profit, it should not be taxed. It is simply proceeds from hi-tech wash trading, which should be disgorged completely.
A government-commissioned review of Ontario’s public services is set to deliver a grim diagnosis of the province’s financial prospects, and propose a sweeping overhaul of the way it spends money.
At the heart of the new spending model would be a much tighter clampdown on health costs than Dalton McGuinty’s government has previously forecast. And among the roughly 400 recommendations for spending reforms are changes to some of the Premier’s signature education policies, including a shift away from mandated smaller classes....
The Harper Government of Canada, with less than a quarter of the electorate under them, will be a politically neutered conservative government until 2015. They are still acting like they have a minority. Very quiet and low key. They are scared shitless of going down in history as the first Bay Street government to hand national power to the people.
You seem to think the Conservatives are bothered by a guilty conscience because they don't have a majority of the popular vote.
If they are "still acting like a minority" it's because they have been acting like a majority for the past five years, in the face of an ineffectual opizishin, so that now they have a majority their behaviour simply continues in the same vein.
You also attribute to the Conservatives the same self-defeating, ineffectual mode of thinking that the NDP would adopt if they ever get a majority government:
NDP: "We must do what Bay Street and the military want us to do, otherwise we'll get voted out at the next election, and won't that be a huge tragedy for the working class!" (a.k.a. the Bob Rae approach to governing Ontario)
Harper: "OMG! We've got a majority at last. But let's make sure we tone down the neoliberal austerity and war agenda or else we might lose the next election in five years' time! We have to keep the opizishin happy."
>>Passes the spliff>>Ya he's been a real dictator non-stop. I can hardly stand it. Harper was forced to spend a little on stimulus since lying to Canadians about the state of the economy two weeks before the 2008 election. Let's see them make abortion or SSM an election issue. I highly doubt it. The Harpers are walking on pins and needles from now to 2015. Let's get wide...
Really? I'm actually a little surprised at how aggressive they've been in a short time (since getting their majority) when it comes to crime and punishment, on hawkish and hyper-pro-Israel foreign policy, on absolute jaw-dropping abandonment of the environment, on the Wheat Board, even on ridiculous shit like requiring that women remove their niqab to swear their citizenship. Where I used to think the Canadian centre was so far left of the American centre that our Conservatives were equivalent to their liberals, I now feel like Canadian politics is becoming fairly closely aligned with the US spectrum.
Barclays Capital downgraded the Canadian financial services sector to neutral from positive in anticipation of slower earnings growth in 2012.
Analyst John Aiken warned clients that both domestic and global headwinds will likely weigh on valuations.
“It appears that the steam is dissipating from the Canadian economic engine, with greater downside risk than upside surprise to current forecasts likely,” he said in a research note....
As the bus pulls up on the empty road to let me off, the driver smiles at me. "This is rush hour," he jokes. "This is the most exciting thing to happen here all day." If there is one thing people know about Ballyhea, it seems, it's that it is in the middle of nowhere and nothing much happens. The taxi driver who drove me to Cork warned me of its sleepiness, and the woman sitting next to me can't understand why I am here. But the reason is simple: Ballyhea may be quiet, but it's angry.
Residents have started marching in the hamlet – a smattering of farms and a small housing estate, pulled together by a church, petrol pump and school. The demonstration isn't long – starting from the church they walk along the main road, which connects Cork to Limerick, for a little over 10 minutes, turning back when they reach the speed-limit sign. Yet it has happened every Sunday, through rain and sun, with rising then dwindling numbers, for 43 weeks....
I think it will be one of the tamest conservative governments we've ever had.
Aw, I think it's just Fidelese. I think he means they'll be tame lapdogs of Washington. I really don't think he could possibly mean that they will heel, sit, and roll over at Tom Mulcair's Nycole Turmel's command. Give him some credit!!
Yes, Fidel's observation fits right in with the "logic" displayed in the perceptive postings about a neo-liberal economic position in this thread, with all of their concrete ideas for a way out of our politico-economic pickle. :)
As someone recently observed: " The proposition is that politics as usual doesn't work anymore..not being nearly up to the task of confronting what desperately needs confronting "
But they leave one dangling as to what it means to confront "what desperately needs confronting," having already said that it won't be solved in the streets, and demonstrating no knowledge of the economic levers needed. Such observations can only be met with the sound of one hand clapping.
Well Gaian, it is normally the case that when a proposition is tabled, ideally the next step is for a debate to ensue on the merits of such a proposal. In defining what it means to oppose something, there should also be an assessment of its effectiveness. Examples can be brought in to support one contention or another...either the prospects for opposing the march of neo-liberalism appear hopeful, or not. For instance, I would bring in the European examples...social democratic governments...various shades of opposition...the current levels of unrest in the street etc; and weigh them as they might pertain to the North American situation, or more specifically here in Canada. In all cases it would appear that we'd be talking about speed bumps in the best case scenarios. In our situation, a collective approach seems to represents the best and only way forward, but we can hardly rely on honesty or initiative from the traditional sources of opposition, where in the distant past they were able to mobilize their resources in certain circumstances. The street is made up of handfuls of refugees that few seem to care about anymore, which is why it is increasingly difficult to imagine how this will work in our context. What is really needed, before contemplating anything else, is a sustained general strike from coast to coast...a grand coalition of First Nations, communities everywhere, unions, opposition, communists, anarchists, occupy groups....open to all efforts and persuasions. The question is whether something is worth saving or not, and in this it should be made explicit that we are talking about humanity and their wars against people and the environments we live in. The current path of opposition suggests to us every day that the people we entrust with confrontation on our behalf fully believe it is not worth the effort, when all we see are dress rehearsals practicing the motions, and sickening, never ending displays of superficial leadership pageants. In which case I would say the nihilists should be put on speed dial as well, just to get things over with.
"Hang around Parliament long enough and you come to the vivid conclusion that the institution is falling apart. Let me count the ways..
Samara Canada, a public policy group, last year asked a group of former MPs from all parties and all positions about Parliament's problems. Most of them agreed Parliament is in trouble because it has become hyper-partisan.
They blamed the political parties who bossed them around. Many said they had voted for legislation they had never read. In question period they were expected to be 'potted plants' or 'trained seals'.."
It's the backroom table where competing business interests are hashed out. The public is not dealt in around that one. Instead, we're treated to the daily theatre of the absurd during question period, where the only real question involves how much more of this play act can we tolerate.
After initially applauding federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty’s plan for health funding, the B.C. government is now demanding changes to the formula to prevent “devastating” cuts to seniors’ care.
“It’s just not going to work,” said B.C. Premier Christy Clark, who will host Canada’s provincial premiers for a three-day conference that starts Sunday....
Capitalism Is The Crisis: Radical Politics in the Age of Austerity examines the ideological roots of the "austerity" agenda and proposes revolutionary paths out of the current crisis. The film features original interviews with Chris Hedges, Derrick Jensen, Michael Hardt, Peter Gelderloos, Leo Panitch, David McNally, Richard J.F. Day, Imre Szeman, Wayne Price, and many more!...
Canadians want feds to play strong role in health care: poll
quote:
Among the poll's findings:
- 97 per cent of Canadians think the federal government's responsibility for the Canada Health Act is important. In return for receiving federal money, provinces must adhere to the principles of medicare as outlined in the Act. Those principles include accessibility to services, universal availability, and portability from province to province.
- 70 per cent say they are "worried that without accountability to the federal government, provinces will have no incentive to achieve health care efficiencies."
- 88 per cent are worried that "without national standards, Canadians will have different levels of health care depending on where they live."
- 74 per cent believe that health care is a shared responsibility between the provincial and federal governments. Few believe it is solely a provincial (13 per cent) or federal (11 per cent) responsibility.
- 56 per cent are not confident that the premiers will be able to agree on a plan to improve health care in Canada.
- 69 per cent "strongly agree" that they would encourage their premier to "adopt a series of principles that make the health-care system more concentrated on the needs of the patient."
The telephone poll of 1,000 Canadian adults was conducted Jan. 4-9. With a sample of this size, it has a margin of error of 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.
CANADA: Tax Cuts, Privatization and Deregulation: Is it a Debt Crisis or a Distribution of Wealth Crisis?
quote:
While everyone else's wages have stagnated over the last 30 years the top 1 per cent have seen their pay and wealth increase dramatically but didn't like paying all those extra taxes. Governments have been all too happy to accommodate them. In 1980, the top federal tax rate was almost 50 per cent higher than it is today.
In terms of fiscal deficits, according to the latest figures the combined federal and provincial shortfalls are running at about $65-billion annually. To put this in perspective, since 1980 the top 1 per cent has increased its share of the national income from 8.1% to 13.3%. A shift of $67-billion. If taxes had kept their at the 1980 level, there would be no deficit national.
Tax cuts have created this mess. Privatization and deregulation of our public services and assets is presented as a painless way to solve the debt crisis. Politicians promise ‘increased efficiencies’ and lower taxes. What really happens is that public wealth and profit making opportunities get transferred to the private few. The private sector has been drooling to get its hands on public assets for a long time. Since the crash of 2008 there has been a ‘flight to quality’ for investors and now is their big chance to get public assets at fire sale prices....
quote: "The private sector has been drooling to get its hands on public assets for a long time."
Right on. And farther back than 2008. The Chicago School in the 1970s demonstrated for neo-conservatism how finance capital could co-opt entire nations with their own savings, the gradual "destruction of the liberal state," as Lady Barbara Amiel Black used to love describing the process, was a foregone conclusion.
But nothing's really been done about it because folks really don't want to give up on their pensions: "Growth - and investment capital - is good" (to paraphrase that infamous Hollywood character on the subject of greed. Was is Gekko?) So those "public assets" are now the safest, soundest investments for everyone's pension, worker and WAll Street denizen. And until people realize that their own savings are driving the vehicle, we'll continue to just bemoan our fate.(Like, we really COULD be creating sovereign pension plans, building the CPP, etc. rather than just carrying on in gormless protest).
Yes, one can almost imagine that happening in Canada. And accomplishing boo-all in Rome or Athens or ...... No, social democrats have to make use of saved capital to save the welfare state.
We need democracy first. A financial oligarchy sabotaged ancient Rome's economy, and a modern day oligarchy is doing it around the western world today with debt slavery. Eventually, according to economist Michael Hudson, the creditor class will have to support democracy in order for their debts to be honoured. Eventually the oligarchs and warring kings who they lend money to have a falling out period. It's a vicious cycle throughout history. But until democracy is achieved and unpayable debts are wiped, the western world is headed for a new dark ages.
I would like to see New Democrats work toward handing powers of money creation and credit back to democratically elected governments if only at rates that existed between 1938 and 1974. Until then money creation and credit in the hands of non-elected bankers and financial oligarchy is a weapon of mass destruction.
quote:"But until democracy is achieved and unpayable debts are wiped, the western world is headed for a new dark ages."
Jeez, Fidel, posing a possible descent to a "new dark ages" and salvation from that fate handicapped by debt and need for democracy? Can't you be more optimistic than that? :)
quote:"But until democracy is achieved and unpayable debts are wiped, the western world is headed for a new dark ages." Jeez, Fidel, posing a possible descent to a "new dark ages" and salvation from that fate handicapped by debt and need for democracy? Can't you be more optimistic than that? :)
Well, Hudson is not very optimistic himself about the fate of Europe. Their neoliberal experiment has been even more dictatorial and fascist than our's apparently.
And he says the only way out of this mess in the states has to begin with cleaning up the corruption in Washington and and the Justice Department. This is the country Canada tied its economic wagon of fortunes to in 1989 and 1994.
Maybe not a dark ages with rampant plagues, warring factions with saboteurs, sword play and catapult siege machines and the like but something pretty close I imagine. I dunno. It seems to me that Hudson is right - the financial oligarchy overthrew industrial capitalism by the 1990s. Marx never saw that coming. He thought banksterism could only end in disaster for capitalism. I think he was right. How could capitalists be so dumb, Gaian?
Roger L.Martin has a partial answer in his Fixing the Game, Fidel. He's a bit of an apologist, but if the market can go "bad" as easily as he suggests, it seems to me a corrective is only a detmined re-regulationist and honest government away. But of course positing such a rational remedy in a world of such complete ignorance and gullibility is a bit rich, eh?
But of course positing such a rational remedy in a world of such complete ignorance and gullibility is a bit rich, eh?
Oh sure, fixing is easy. The average babbler could fix everything. We would simply draw up a list of economic adivsors, like Martin and Hudson included, and we'd be on the road to recovery and fixing the environment by the week end.
Unfortunately, appalling greed and corruption go hand in hand with ignorance and gullibility. It's out of control. Neoliberalism is proven to be one long war on democracy and sanity in general.
Unemployed outnumber jobs more than 3 to 1: StatsCan
OTTAWA — There were an average of 3.3 unemployed people for every available position in Canada in the three months ending in September, according to a new Statistics Canada job vacancies report.
There were approximately 248,000 job vacancies in the period, the federal agency reported Tuesday, with the highest number of unemployed in educational services (a ratio of 10 people per vacancy) and the lowest in wholesale trade, and health care and social assistance (1.4 to one in each sector)....
Can I say that I'm incredibly happy that this forum can distinguish between Neo-liberal and Neo-conservative? I read the graduate thesis of a now shadow cabinet minister who shall remain nameless who was calling Brian Mulroney a Neo-conservative and I spent two hours muttering that Mulroney was by any sane metric a (neo)-liberal, just one with a blue button.
Anyway, yes, at some point it'd be nice to get a bit of economic statism and redistribution back in here... As far as jobs go, we have a problem: We're getting better at making things and thus involving people in the making of those things is often busywork. Not everyone is going to be able to have a full-time job anymore. Labour force participation among 18-55s has fallen by 5%, the best social program is no longer going to be, despite what the demagouges are so fond of asserting, a job. We actually need to guarantee a level below which nobody can fall instead of schoolmarmishly looking over their shoulders to make sure their workfare is done correctly. But for that to happen the cultural right will have to get over the idea that everyone is an island and the cultural left (sisters, siblings, brothers!) will have to get over their disdain for the lumpen, including perhaps making class central to a rubric of privilege (says the trans lesbian...), and the serious center will have to stop being so conventional and muddled and 'serious' and actually look for solutions instead of dimissing bold action.
Easy, right? ^_^ Actually, probably easier than we think, but that's a story for another post.
Stephen Harper says 'major' changes coming to Canada's pension system: speech
DAVOS, Switzerland — Prime Minister Stephen Harper has signalled his government will bring forward "major transformations" to the country in the coming months — in areas such as the retirement pension system, immigration, science and technology investment and the energy sector.
Of those reforms, Harper said, getting a grip on slowing the rising costs of the country's pension system is particularly critical.
In the wake of Harper's speech, it now appears that the Conservative government could be poised to gradually change the Old Age Security system so that the age of eligibility is raised to 67 from 65.....
"Cancelling the corporate income tax cut scheduled to take place January 1, 2012 and investing the $3 billion in revenue that would be lost to a tax cut in affordable housing instead could increase GDP by $4.5 billion, create more than 47,000 new jobs and create 155,550 new affordable housing units and 200,000 repaired existing homes over the next ten years." (Citizens for Public Justice)....(hit link for more)
#15MGlobalStrike – Italian Grassroots syndicalist general strike on 27 January
quote:
This rescue will not cost anything for our entrepreneurs, financers, bankers and the tax-evasion economy, whose profits and goods have not suffered loss of any kind. The so-called Phase 1 of the Monti techno-government has now come to a close with an enormous draining of financial resources, taken from waged workers, pensioners and home-owners (of a single house). In the meantime any chance for an increase in wages has been blocked with a freeze on public sector agreements, despite rising inflation, and with the cancellation of the national collective agreement by FIAT and the metalworkers sector.
This unilateral, parallel and interconnected action on the part of Marchionne and Confindustria introduces into the context of acute crisis an element that is not so much simply the taking of our money, but the taking of our freedom and the dignity of workers, our right to organize ourselves in the workplace, to protest, to strike. Punishment and dismissals will be the fate of anyone who does not buckle down. And this is the basis on which the government’s so-called Phase 2 lies....
"Cancelling the corporate income tax cut scheduled to take place January 1, 2012 and investing the $3 billion in revenue that would be lost to a tax cut in affordable housing instead could increase GDP by $4.5 billion, create more than 47,000 new jobs and create 155,550 new affordable housing units and 200,000 repaired existing homes over the next ten years." (Citizens for Public Justice)....(hit link for more)
Economic historian Michael Hudson on how the banks convinced governments that they needed "brokers" to decide whether a loan is responsible, and that private money creation would make economies more efficient and passing on savings to citizens and governments. And basically the opposite has occurred.
It's a very good essay, and I'm sure Rabble's Duncan Cameron et al would agree.
Emil Boc, Romania's prime minister, has resigned after weeks of nationwide protests against a slew of austerity measures and months before a parliamentary election.
"It is the moment for important political decisions. From this point of view, I took the decision to give up the government's mandate," Boc said in a speech after a government meeting on Monday.
Boc enforced the cuts, including slashing public salaries by a quarter and raising sales tax, to complete a $26.24bn International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailout deal and boost the economy after a deep and bitter recession.
Thousands of Romanians have braved freezing temperatures in the last month to protest against Boc and his ally, President Traian Basescu....
"Capital has no master" in a globalized world, where nations have no sovereignty.
..your statement and mine really go together well. it's very powerful and needs to be said often. to understand this statement one can begin to see the enormity of the task before us. in the end it's the human race that will loose and all the other creatures it takes with it. there are no saviours out there, at least that is my life experience. there is no avoiding it, we come together at the grass roots with a whole new world or we bite the dust. there is no reform and it is a battle to our death almost.
And if you begin to focus on this problem from a position where we can do something about it - setting aside Romania in its frozen state for a moment - deciding how we can free ourselves from capital's grip, would be a good start. Right now, everyone's scared shitless about the possibility of losing their pensions - their savings that are now so depeendent upon the market. Any ideas about how that could be corrected for a start? Because if you can't begin to answer that one, outlining events in Romania won't begin to solve diddly squat, just display more depressing news. That's easy to come by, takes no thought at all, really.
..i see no made in canada fix. this is global capitalism out of control. king kong is coming at us with a club in it's hand and all i can think of is that we need to be preparing ourselves to resist or we will be crushed. this is a political problem that of using the economic system to suck everything from almost everyone. no amout of legislation can deter what is coming even if there was a will to do so. what i see as "the answer" is that the work has already begun to create a new world within this global disaster and it will be there to pick up the pieces after an economic collapse. in the mean time resist resist resist in order to salvage as much as we can.
..this article represents some of the thinking going on re building a new world.
Take the City – Toma la Ciudad (Video)
quote:
We have realized business and state production ways do not respond to either our wishes or our needs, and, instead, it generates corrupt and unjust structures and is hugely damaging for the environment.
What would happen if we started managing the world ourselves, from below, in a different way?
Let’s imagine, for instance, a transformed city, more natural, where, instead of so much tarmac, paving stones and sterile gardens, we grew aromatic herbs or plants from which we could extract natural remedies; where, instead of ornamental parks, we had orchards and ecological vegetable gardens, looked after by all together, children, grown ups, elders and youths.
What would happen if, instead of maintaining a highly expensive and often inefficient state public sector, we built a network of people’s services, autonomous, where the labour that supported it was managed by people’s assemblies and not according to the profit of a few; where each of us would contribute as we can and where we can; where we could develop in a wholly way as persons, both to give and to receive, not being mere passive consumers anymore?...
Jim Flaherty, Mark Carney step up to object to U.S. banking rule
Jim Flaherty, Canada’s federal finance minister, added his voice Monday to a chorus of complaints about a key plank of banking reform in the United States.
In a strongly worded letter to U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Mr. Flaherty said the Volcker rule “could have material adverse effects on Canadian financial institutions and markets.”
The finance minister said he is “particularly concerned that the proposed rule could severely impact the liquidity of Canadian government debt markets and interfere with the risk management practices of banks in Canada.”
Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney also stepped forward on the last day of a comment period on the controversial Volcker Rule, which has drawn sharp criticism from senior officials around the world.
quote:
The Volcker Rule is intended to curb proprietary trading, or the trading banks do on their own accounts and through sponsored relationships with hedge funds and private equity players. Its intended purpose is to remove some of the risky behaviour that led to the financial crisis of 2008.
But during an extended comment period on the proposed reform, the rule has drawn sharp criticism from jurisdictions including the United Kingdom, Japan and Canada....
..i see no made in canada fix. this is global capitalism out of control. king kong is coming at us with a club in it's hand and all i can think of is that we need to be preparing ourselves to resist or we will be crushed. this is a political problem that of using the economic system to suck everything from almost everyone. no amout of legislation can deter what is coming even if there was a will to do so. what i see as "the answer" is that the work has already begun to create a new world within this global disaster and it will be there to pick up the pieces after an economic collapse. in the mean time resist resist resist in order to salvage as much as we can.
I guess I'm always concerned about what to tell the electorate, 13. I resist the finance capitalists, those folks now calling the shot from the Cat-bird's Seat, by trying to direct challenges at that sector of capitalism. We have to amass enough saved capital to be able to break free of the internationals. Sovereign funds NOT dependent on the sale of oil would be good.
But right now, everyone's savings hereabouts are being used to control and manipulate people around the world in the name of personal security in everyone's old age, and I can only make noises about "slow money" or some other bloody agrarian use for savings, apre le deluge.
I guess I'm always concerned about what to tell the electorate, 13. I resist the finance capitalists, those folks now calling the shot from the Cat-bird's Seat, by trying to direct challenges at that sector of capitalism. We have to amass enough saved capital to be able to break free of the internationals. Sovereign funds NOT dependent on the sale of oil would be good.
..i don't see it gaian. if somehow there was a gov that wanted to create legislation how would it stand up to capital that has the wto, imf, g8-6, rating agencies, nato, the us gov and much much more..behind it. in s. america there is mass movements behind those changes. even there not enough integration with the grass roots is going on. the system is not changing deeply enough and it can all go away once the popular leader is removed from the equation. as for the electorate here they're already at the table saying they want a say. look at the students in que and the occupations of the mp offices.
..if i may, i believe there is a global political consciousness that is greater than it's parts. i can, sorta, see that direct democracy is inspiring engagement like i've never seen before. it's time to consider this as a realistic option and above all a force for real change. i don't want capitalism to do better. i want capitalism to go away. it's rotten to the very core and everybody knows this.
PSAC asks Senate committee examining hiring practices to investigate.
OTTAWA, ON, February 13, 2012: What impact will the Conservative government's plans for across-the-board cuts have on the employment of workers with disabilities and Aboriginal and racialized workers?
That's the question PSAC will put to the Senate human rights committee, which is examining employment equity and hiring practices in the federal public service.
"Once again, we're asking for information and transparency," said PSAC national executive vice-president Patty Ducharme. "Canadians have a right to know the whole story about the proposed cuts and their impact."
During the last round of severe cuts to the public service in the 1990s, Aboriginal workers and workers with disabilities left the public service at rates that were significantly higher than other workers....
PSAC seems to have adopted the general Canadian opizishin strategy of pleading for "information and transparency" from the Harper government, rather than aggressively advancing an alternative vision for Canada.
We know what the Harper agenda is; we don't need more windows on his corrupt and brutal machine. We need to smash it and build a new one. Who will show us how to do that?
PSAC seems to have adopted the general Canadian opizishin strategy of pleading for "information and transparency" from the Harper government, rather than aggressively advancing an alternative vision for Canada.
Yeah who needs transparency or accountability to the public?
I much prefer being lied to, misled, and-or officially misinformed of the pro-Washington, pro-conservative nanny state agenda in Ottawa. Personally speaking, I don't mind the long-time stoogery in Ottawa. Truth is overrated anyway. They are only following orders from Washington.
Our's is not to question why only to trust and obey - it's the only way. The NDP should stop asking so many questions of our corporate stooges in Ottawa. And besides, the NDP are only delaying government biznesss by asking questions on behalf of Canadians kept in the dark and fed sheep manure as a rule. The lack of transparency and accountability to the official opposition party is basically telling Canadians that what we don't know can't hurt us. Lies and half-truths and misleading comments to the NDP in Parliament is the same as lying and witholding information from Canadians in general. That's bad for democracy.
Neoliberal Rampage in Canada
Like the Grinch who stole Christmas, the Conservative government of Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper has just left a lump of coal in Canadian workers' stockings. A cover story in the Globe and Mail of December 22, 2011 announces that federal public pension programs are being targeted for cuts to reduce the federal deficit.1 The previous day the Globe and Mail ran a cover story announcing that the federal government will be reducing funding for health care programs and eliminating national standards for health care.2 In essence, this will gut the Canadian Medicare system. Mr. Harper has been pushing a series of recent neoliberal economic and socially conservative policy changes designed to undo the last elements of post-WWII Keynesianism in Canada....
http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2011/broad231211.html#_edn1
But we can't vote NDP because they cast token votes for a UN-sanctioned no-fly zone over Libya. Goodbye oil profits funding free health care, free education etc for Libyans, and it's NO THANKS TO THE NDP RUNNING NATO!!
You know what they say, a corrupt US-stooge in Ottawa dismantling your health care system is worth more than an unknown quantity in the NDP and exercising our democratic right on election day every time.
We'll have shitty national health statistics like those of our NAFTA partners before we can say Yanqui doodle.
Next thing we know we'll be laying in emergency rooms and relying on crooked insurance companies like Kaiser Permanent to decide if we have lives worth living Nazi style.
But at least some of us will be comforted in knowing they never voted NDP.
http://thetyee.ca/
Federal bureaucrats worry about jobs as cuts draw near
Treasury Board president Tony Clement is leading the strategic review that is searching for $1 billion in cuts in the upcoming 2012-13 spring budget, $2 billion for 2013-14, and $4 billion annually by 2014-15 and beyond.
Nearly 70 government departments and agencies have submitted scenarios for a five and 10 per cent cut to their budgets as part of an examination of about $80 billion in direct program spending. More than 600 proposals are being considered.
quote:
The Conservative government is paying Deloitte Consulting nearly $20 million — almost $90,000 a day — to advise the cabinet and senior officials until next spring on how to find savings to balance the books in the coming years....
http://www.canada.com/business/Federal+bureaucrats+worry+about+jobs+cuts...
I predict a surge in Quebec for sovereignty as a result of Harper's, Flaherty's, and Clement's policies.
These are political considerations that have nothing to do with managing anything effectively. They've already forecast a deficit reduction in the years ahead, which can't be accomplished if they're still propping up corporatism at home, and with their talk now about participating in European 'stability' fund arrangements on top of the continuing requirement to purchase US bonds.
Provinces get more autonomy to drive health-care reform
Canada's provinces are being granted more autonomy to reshape health care as Ottawa moves to end 50 years of using its funding power to coerce provinces to adopt national standards.
With federal funding now set, Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq sent a letter on Tuesday to her provincial and territorial counterparts urging them to focus on how to reduce escalating health costs and to “put the divisive issue of funding behind us.”
The letter is a sequel to the most important change in half a century to how Ottawa and the provinces run Canada. Prime Minister Stephen Harper is inviting provinces, with some federal guidance, to do as they see fit in their own jurisdictions while inviting them to co-operate in establishing national benchmarks for delivering health services....
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/provinces-get-more-autonomy...
I predict a surge in Quebec for sovereignty as a result of Harper's, Flaherty's, and Clement's policies.
Perhaps we could first observe the reaction to what New Democrats will have to say after March 24 - the message that there is a greater likelihood of defeating the globalists with a pan-Canadian defence from social democracy, defending the social safety net AND an economic system that can pay for it?
Before folding the tents.
..and our youngin's can be fearless and oh so creative.
It'll be great if the NDP can mobilize widespread resistance (including a General Strike?) against Harper's policies, but I ain't holding my breath.
The same government that wants to gut Medicare and the Canada Pension Plan has no problem pissing away money on stealth fighter jets and the navy.
Public service workers strike against government austerity measures
By The Associated Press | December 19, 2011
ROME - Thousands of government workers staged strikes Monday and joined demonstrations across Italy to protest tax and pension changes that are part of the government's austerity package.
The strike hobbled services in hospitals, post offices and government offices for the entire day. Unions guaranteed emergency services in hospitals.
Union leader Susanna Camusso told a rally in front of the Parliament building that the reforms put an unfair burden on the working class and do little to fight tax evasion.
"It is not acceptable for the workers, it is not acceptable for the pensioners, it is not acceptable for those who already struggled to get to the end of the month," Camusso said.
"The government should come down from its teaching chair and join the real world," she said, alluding to the university background of Premier Monti and many of the ministers in his government of technocrats.
The government package of €30 billion ($39 billion) in new taxes and pension reforms has already been approved by the lower house of Parliament and final approval by the Senate is expected by Friday.
Monti is counting on the support of the major political parties in his efforts to protect Italy from becoming the next victim of Europe's debt crisis.
Former Premier Silvio Berlusconi, who has been backing Monti's program, denied Monday that he intended to "pull the plug" on Monti next month.
"I don't believe there is anybody who can predict how long the government can last," Berlusconi told reporters during a pause in his trial in Milan on corruption charges,
http://www.canadianbusiness.com/article/62665--public-service-workers-strike-against-government-austerity-measures
General Strike!
Yes, one can almost imagine that happening in Canada. And accomplishing boo-all in Rome or Athens or ......
No, social democrats have to make use of saved capital to save the welfare state.
It'll be great if the NDP can mobilize widespread resistance (including a General Strike?) against Harper's policies, but I ain't holding my breath.
The NDP's idea of "mobilizing widespread resistance" is asking some tough questions in Question Period.
Haven't they saved capital for long enough? [ducking...]
Apparently not. It seems we have to be "defending...an economic system that can pay for" medicare, etc.
In other words, no capitalism, no social safety net.
Austerity measures driving Canada into recession, opposition says
Compare Harper to U.S. president Herbert HooverPrime Minister Stephen Harper met with his finance minister and the Bank of Canada governor Tuesday amid predictions from opposition parties that the Conservative government's focus on austerity could drive the country into a recession.
It was a charge immediately rejected by Harper, who told the House of Commons the Tories are pursuing an economic plan that is widely respected. Moreover, he said that while his government is now implementing an "expansionary" spending policy, it is determined to eventually cut costs so that the deficit can be eliminated.
But the NDP and Liberals dismissed that defence, citing economic experts who have compared Harper to Herbert Hoover, the U.S. president who helped plunge his country into the Great Depression through austerity measures.
The political battle is being played out on Parliament Hill as Harper has identified the economy as his priority issue this fall and in the wake of his recent warnings that Canada's economic stability could be imperilled in the face of a looming global economic slowdown.
Harper met with Finance Minister Jim Flaherty and Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney. Flaherty and Carney attended meetings with their international counterparts last week in Washington, D.C.
They briefed Harper on those sessions as he plans for a crucial gathering of G20 leaders in France in early November. Harper is calling for a coordinated international approach to deal with the looming global economic storm....
Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Austerity+measures+driving+Canada+into+recession+opposition+says/5467629/story.html#ixzz1iEkmvaGM"Flaherty and Carney attended meetings with their international counterparts last week in Washington DC"
including those formerly associated with Goldman Sachs - like Carney. The fix is in, batten down the hatches it's going to be a bumpy ride with their 'looming global economic storm'
Does Harper even have a mandate to change Medicare and Canada Pension? Did his election platform include changing those?
Neo-Liberalism won't be rolled back by masses in the street being pepper sprayed and beaten by the police, nor will it be arrested by parliamentary question periods or at the ballot box. Corporatism made some if its greatest strides under European social democratic governance. It's been some time since the economy based power had any reason to fear anything from the street or from politics. In our case we have more to fear from the chicanery of the NDP than the Conservatives do from their willingness to seriously oppose anything.
How is running a $20 billion deficit "austerity"? People are still getting their cheques.
What a strange variety of takes on the political economy of one's country and planet. (ducking)
It would be a refreshing change if you'd offer up some wisdom toward viable solutions Gaian.
Haven't they saved capital for long enough? [ducking...]
There is plenty of money that could be available for funding social democracy in Canada. Don't believe neoliberal lies that say otherwise. This is a policy induced crisis emanating from the U.S. and Europe, and with Ottawa declaring impotence as usual. It doesn't have to be this way.
No one is saying the NDP is perfect, but I'd much rather have them in power in Ottawa than the Cons or Libs any day.
No one is saying the NDP is perfect, but I'd much rather have them in power in Ottawa than the Cons or Libs any day.
That seems to be their most compelling argument against voting NDP - that if they are not perfect, then why vote for them when we have a perfectly good rotten federal government running the country into the ground as usual? Why give up all of this for some wild notion of creating an advanced social democracy here as is proven to be a valid alternative to neoliberal ideology in several other real world countries?
Some people claim to be against the neoliberalism and current state of affairs created over the last 30 years or so. But they refuse to actually vote against it all on the one day that counts for anything every four years, or whenever the next undemocratic snap election call for short-term political gain happens to be. We might conclude certain things by their lack of interest in actually standing up to be counted in opposition to neoliberal ideology slowly but surely rolling back 50 and 60 year's worth of social gains made by the left and civil society groups in Canada. And they neglect to mention how imperfect the actually existing current situation is.
Neo-Liberalism won't be rolled back by masses in the street being pepper sprayed and beaten by the police, nor will it be arrested by parliamentary question periods or at the ballot box. Corporatism made some if its greatest strides under European social democratic governance. It's been some time since the economy based power had any reason to fear anything from the street or from politics. In our case we have more to fear from the chicanery of the NDP than the Conservatives do from their willingness to seriously oppose anything.
..the spanish experiment does not call for a traditional revolution. the tradition revolution being massive battling with the police/military forces and if successful the popular political party of the day takes power. the indignados are instead calling for transition. my understanding of this is building a new world within the old. this begins by organizing at a community level and yes, on the street. the self contained occupy is a rudimentary vehicle that creates the space for this to be done. what does not need to be is a continuous confrontation with military forces but requires going to the edge then pulling back and avoiding being crushed.
..this gives breathing space to create their own political candidates that are accountable in a very direct way. to collaborate with environmentalist, labour and other peoples to implement ways that work to transform at a community level. it's true that the powers can crush it all if they so desire but this becomes more difficult for them when it is done incrementally. and against occupies that are organized in small pockets all over the country. things can be done for example transferring bank accounts to local credit unions. feeding and housing the homeless, preventing foreclosures, one house at a time. being global certain governments can be targeted to force them not to sign that trade deal. or any other economic/environmental pacts. it does though mean reclaiming public space and using it to build a direct democracy. all imho.
edit to add:
..as the global economy begins to collapse it's grip on local communities weakens. for example, a factory shuts down causing much distress. it is taken over by the workers. the determination of a collapsing corporation to hang on to it is diminished as is the opposition to the take over by local or provincial governments facing rising unemployment numbers and declining revenue. corporate power may very well remain at a federal gov level but that power is also diminished as the politics begin to change at the local levels where there is a demand for a quality of life different from a mad max type world.
They may very well have something going there. When attention is directed at power by the masses, it's frankly more than power deserves at this point. It provides them with justification, a rationale for their continuing existence through self perpetuating violence.
Hasn't corporatism nearly completed the project of co-opting environmentalism and labour? I think collaborating with groups who are accustomed to collaborating every day with the existing economic and social order is the quickest way to loose ones breath, which would likely be the result of having to hold ones nose in their presence. Creating candidates to partake and apply within the existing political apparatus has demonstratably only meant having principles and minimum ideals gradually stripped away one by one...until one is granted a relative position of trust and servitude within the apparatus...and the ones who've made it can look back if they even bother to describe the ones left behind as feckless and self-righteous.
Everything that is mapped out globally by corporatism is put into practice locally. It is through the practice of local corporatism that everything is sewn together, community by community, nation by nation, until everyone has been fitted out with their own personal straight jackets. This is where the political class and its supporting institutions has to be first toppled through the spread of active indifference and contempt in all of its subtle forms. The police institutions would have to be avoided at all costs, until the critical mass has grown to such an extent that they no longer dare take to the streets, at which point they would largely be dismantled on their own through defections.
Yep, there are only 18 countries ahead of Canada in terms of social spending. In Sweden the program is so successful that social democrats can afford to take four year holidays at a time and still be in strong opposition.
Hasn't corporatism nearly completed the project of co-opting environmentalism and labour? I think collaborating with groups who are accustomed to collaborating every day with the existing economic and social order is the quickest way to loose ones breath, which would likely be the result of having to hold ones nose in their presence. Creating candidates to partake and apply within the existing political apparatus has demonstratably only meant having principles and minimum ideals gradually stripped away one by one...until one is granted a relative position of trust and servitude within the apparatus...and the ones who've made it can look back if they even bother to describe the ones left behind as feckless and self-righteous.
Everything that is mapped out globally by corporatism is put into practice locally. It is through the practice of local corporatism that everything is sewn together, community by community, nation by nation, until everyone has been fitted out with their own personal straight jackets. This is where the political class and its supporting institutions has to be first toppled through the spread of active indifference and contempt in all of its subtle forms. The police institutions would have to be avoided at all costs, until the critical mass has grown to such an extent that they no longer dare take to the streets, at which point they would largely be dismantled on their own through defections.
..keep in mind that people are working at a grassroots level. collaborations are not with the leadership per say. first the militant unions come forward such as the transit workers in new york and their physical and financial support of OWS. this can be postal workers here. also the vancouver & district labour council is far more progressive than the bc fed or the clc. ditto re the environmental movement. another example is the collaboration and participation of the native community at the van occupy where it was described by a native activist as numbers that haven't been seen in a long time. this does not mean we collaborate with atleo. collaborations need to be connected and relevant to the occupy participants and the direction they are moving in which is direct democracy.
..i am confident that support for corporations were at an all time low let alone after the messages coming out of the occupies began. let alone after canadians begin to feel the brutal cuts while the military and financial sectors prosper while our social services are gutted. i believe there is a possibility to pull this off. we need patience and we must not be acting in anger. and that we watch out for provocateurs and distractions.
The statistics backup SJ's argument as long as he isn't referring to Nordic social democracies. And from what I can tell, the French and Germans still have socialized medicine, free or inexpensive post-secondary education and less inequality in general. Even the very neoliberal USA spends more on social housing than Ottawa does.
Apparently their biggest concern is that Canadians will not see through social democrats' "hidden agenda" for neoliberalism, or something. They should wait until the neoliberals really do privatize health care and life in general in this country. If they thought they were having fun now, they should advocate not voting NDP some more because the fun is only just beginning.
..in 2008 i spent a couple months in marseilles. while there i went to a demonstration, joining around 100,000 others in their disgust over the cuts sarkozy was making to pensions and other social benefits.
Yes, Nordic social democracies still rank higher than neoliberal Canada in terms of economic competitiveness.
And Norway ruled by social democrats for many years was a net creditor nation when neoliberal Alberta raided a "Heritage Fund" to pay down highest per capita debts in Canadian provincial history. The socialist bastion of Norway has an oil fund worth more than $570 billion USD. Meanwhile neoliberal Canada is up to its eyeballs in national debt by the same amount.
Compare Norway's oil fund savings to neoliberal Alberta's Heritage Fund worth a piddling $14 billion after years of being robbed blind by foreign oil companies. Neoliberal Alberta has one of the highest costs of living in the country and little to show for decades worth of conservative government "shenanigans."
Meanwhile net creditor Norwegians are enjoying high incomes on average, free post-secondary education, well funded socialized medicine and generous social benefits.
Yes, the neoliberal ideology has been working its magic in Nordic social democracies same as in Canada as SJ says. Canada and the social democracies are virtually indistinguishable by direct comparison. Much more of the neoliberal baloney and Canada will look EXACTLY LIKE those social democratic hell holes in the Nordic countries, we can be sure. Let this be a warning to anyone foolish enough to consider voting for Canada's social democrats and treacherous tricksters, the NDP!
Fidel, why don't you ask the taunting crew where they expect their pensions to come from?
Yes, good question. Jimmy "Flip-flop" Flaherty betrayed Canadians on pension reform
Give us more neoliberal shenanigans, for sure. We can't get enough.
..this austertity shit is happening everywhere fidel. it's not accurate to say that social democracy will save us from capital. capital has no master and is out of control raveging the earth. social democracy did not protect the population in greece nor spain nor portugal. and it won't save canada. what is needed is massive mobalization and fightback plan if there any hope at all. waiting four years for an election is totally inappropriate. i sense you are trying to compete when we need to find common ground and come together.
Well if there will be nothing more than the usual begging and pleading with us, and not so far removed from BY GOD! Please don't NDP whatever you do!', then I'm outa here.
Spain aside, Greece, Portugal, Iceland, Ireland etc are microscopic economies compared to Canada and easy targets for the neoliberal financial regime. They are much more vulnerable to the financial bullies' blackmail for rollbacks and lower corporate taxes than Canada.
We have everything we need here in the Northern colony to wage a proper challenge to marauding international capital. Meanwhile our impotent ones in Ottawa will try to hold themselves hostage with the equivalent of holding a knife to their own throats and threatening to do themselves in unless Canadians bow to their voodoo.
I do' know about you guys, but I'll be voting NDP every chance I get. I know that our neoliberal ideologues are playing lame duck as usual. It doesn't have to be this way. Unlike the cult of impotence stinking up Ottawa for far too long, Canadians are not powerless. In fact we the people are all powerful and possess the ability to change things for the better.
How is running a $20 billion deficit "austerity"? People are still getting their cheques.
My cheque's been reduced by 19% within the last 6 months. It sure feels like austerity to me.
Well if there will be nothing more than the usual begging and pleading with us, and not so far removed from BY GOD! Please don't NDP whatever you do!', then I'm outa here.
..i've read this over several times but i don't understand it. sorry. could you reword it?
fidel:
..in my mind i want to believe that the ndp will not do what has been done in europe. i read an article yesterday where canada was a signatory to a letter to europe to stay on the austerity track. it was co-signed by a few countries that included australia. why? questions like how will the ndp behave towards those that protest the cuts and changes to our medical plans the provinces will face. so all will become clear in time.
..my overall position is that all governments fuck us over. i'm sick and tired of being fucked over and i may have come to agree with chomsky's view that all governments are illegitimate. having said that i am very much wanting to participate with others in defeating these austerity measures.
How is running a $20 billion deficit "austerity"? People are still getting their cheques.
My cheque's been reduced by 19% within the last 6 months. It sure feels like austerity to me.
Public Sector Unions and Canada's Austerity Measures 2010
This peculiar ‘legal trap' was created in a decision of the SCC called "BC Health Services" (cited as Health Services and Support - Facilities Subsector Bargaining Assn. v. British Columbia, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 39).[1] In this decision, the SCC, perhaps in an attempt to remedy the contradiction of the exclusion of Canadian workers from the Charter, founded an even deeper contradiction because of the way the Court had to limit the recognition of labour rights in order to make it consistent with Canadian capitalism.
Legal traps. And there have been more than 170 repressive pieces of anti-labour legislations enacted in Canada since 1982.
Spain aside, Greece, Portugal, Iceland, Ireland etc are microscopic economies compared to Canada and easy targets for the neoliberal financial regime. They are much more vulnerable to the financial bullies' blackmail for rollbacks and lower corporate taxes than Canada.
We have everything we need here in the Northern colony to wage a proper challenge to marauding international capital. Meanwhile our impotent ones in Ottawa will try to hold themselves hostage with the equivalent of holding a knife to their own throats and threatening to do themselves in unless Canadians bow to their voodoo.
I do' know about you guys, but I'll be voting NDP every chance I get. I know that our neoliberal ideologues are playing lame duck as usual. It doesn't have to be this way. Unlike the cult of impotence stinking up Ottawa for far too long, Canadians are not powerless. In fact we the people are all powerful and possess the ability to change things for the better.
..yes, and capital owns the us government.
eta:
..to have a serious scrap with capital a goverment needs the support of active social movements, as is the case in venuzuala and bolivia.
I should correct myself. Harper is an impotent duck who would prefer to be totally paralyzed in allowing capital to have it all their way. Steve would love nothing better than to be doing a Brian Mulroney of things. But it's a balancing act for Harper with the NDP standing over his shoulder. He is still governing like he has a minority and not the phony majority they actually won last year. The Harpers and their Bay Street handlers fear ceding anything to the NDP between now and Steve's next undemocratic snap election call for short-term political gain in or around 2015 or so. 2015 should be a kind of 1988 election deja vu with a right wing government threatening to win another phony majority and four more years of Bay Street-friendly government while the economy is mired by stagnation. Canadians will have to vote strategically for the NDP if we want to stop the Harpers.
Highest-paid Canadian CEOs got 27 per cent pay hike
Canada's highest paid CEOs got a 27 per cent pay raise in 2010, while ordinary workers earned just 1.1 per cent more, report says.
How much longer will this country tolerate this inequality?
..this austertity shit is happening everywhere fidel. it's not accurate to say that social democracy will save us from capital. capital has no master and is out of control raveging the earth. social democracy did not protect the population in greece nor spain nor portugal. and it won't save canada. what is needed is massive mobalization and fightback plan if there any hope at all. waiting four years for an election is totally inappropriate. i sense you are trying to compete when we need to find common ground and come together.
"Capital has no master" in a globalized world, where nations have no sovereignty.
But an attempt to bring discussion about nationalism and globalism in a neighbouring thread winds up with this posting, onthe last day of 2011: "Some dogs are more intelligent than some humans, so where do you draw the line on sentience? We kill other species, as they kill yet others. What makes us so special? We are just more efficient at destroying the world for our own selfish purposes. A neuron is a neuron, whether it is in the head of a cat or a human being. Humans just happen to have more of them, which makes them particularly well-adapted for survival."
Folks just don[t want to bother giving serious attention to the question of regaining our sovereignty, fall back in their ignorance on national socialism as the only manifestation of nationalism, and then revert to social Darwinism. Somehow they passed by cosmology.
..this austertity shit is happening everywhere fidel. it's not accurate to say that social democracy will save us from capital. capital has no master and is out of control raveging the earth. social democracy did not protect the population in greece nor spain nor portugal. and it won't save canada. what is needed is massive mobalization and fightback plan if there any hope at all. waiting four years for an election is totally inappropriate. i sense you are trying to compete when we need to find common ground and come together.
Thanks for your continuing insight, epaulo13. And don't let the petty partisanship get you down.
..this austertity shit is happening everywhere fidel. it's not accurate to say that social democracy will save us from capital. capital has no master and is out of control raveging the earth. social democracy did not protect the population in greece nor spain nor portugal. and it won't save canada. what is needed is massive mobalization and fightback plan if there any hope at all. waiting four years for an election is totally inappropriate. i sense you are trying to compete when we need to find common ground and come together.
.
..i'm all in favour of sovereignty as long as it is from the bottom up. corporations have the sovereignty to employ people at minimum wage with zero benefits or use our privatized debt to fleece the population many times over. while governments have the sovereignty to pass laws that protect polluters or send us into immoral wars. there is no sovereignty for the minimum wage class. there is no sovereignty for the homeless. there is no sovereignty for the population if governments can sell off the country. there is no sovereignty if only the powerful and wealthy benefit from the term.
..this austertity shit is happening everywhere fidel. it's not accurate to say that social democracy will save us from capital. capital has no master and is out of control raveging the earth. social democracy did not protect the population in greece nor spain nor portugal. and it won't save canada. what is needed is massive mobalization and fightback plan if there any hope at all. waiting four years for an election is totally inappropriate. i sense you are trying to compete when we need to find common ground and come together.
Thanks for your continuing insight, epaulo13. And don't let the petty partisanship get you down.
..txs for your support!
Gaian:
"Capital has no master" in a globalized world, where nations have no sovereignty.
..your statement and mine really go together well. it's very powerful and needs to be said often. to understand this statement one can begin to see the enormity of the task before us. in the end it's the human race that will loose and all the other creatures it takes with it. there are no saviours out there, at least that is my life experience. there is no avoiding it, we come together at the grass roots with a whole new world or we bite the dust. there is no reform and it is a battle to our death almost.
Unions brace for job cuts
Ottawa slashing public service positions
Unions are bracing for potentially tens of thousands of federal job cuts from the Conservative government's operating review, as Treasury Board president Tony Clement argued Thursday he's not getting much help from labour groups in finding savings.
quote:
Unions, however, are bracing for potentially thousands of additional layoffs and are urging Clement to tread carefully in his search for billions in savings.
"We know that there are going to be job reductions. I think they're going to be in the executive level as well," said Gary Corbett, CEO of the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada.
"It's in the thousands - maybe even tens of thousands," added Corbett, whose group represents approximately 58,000 scientists and other professionals employed mostly at the federal level.
The union wants to work together with Clement on austerity measures, he said, but is cautioning the government against across-theboard cuts that purge built-up expertise that's necessary for an efficient and effective public service....
Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Unions+brace+cuts/5799496/story.html#ixzz1iQwp5Mff
Harper is presiding over the biggest government in Canadian history. Some of us do not like the idea of forcing our children to pay for our debts, which is what he has been doing. It is likely that if Harper does not deliver on balanced budgets, many of us will vote Liberal. This includes his ill-conceived plans to buy new fighter aircraft and super-prisons.
Uncle John's truth really is stranger than fiction.
Harper is presiding over the biggest government in Canadian history.
And Harper's government is up against the largest opposition party ever elected to oppose phony majority rule in Ottawa. I think it will be one of the tamest conservative governments we've ever had.
I think it will be one of the tamest conservative governments we've ever had.
I think it will be one of the tamest conservative governments we've ever had.
Aw, I think it's just Fidelese. I think he means they'll be tame lapdogs of Washington. I really don't think he could possibly mean that they will heel, sit, and roll over at
Tom Mulcair'sNycole Turmel's command. Give him some credit!!Given what I have read on MSM message boards, I think the public sector workers are political low hanging fruit. You get the odd post from a public sector worker, but most of them say a bunch of predictable expletives about how the taxes from their $11 an hour job are going to pay for bla bla bla. Oh, and don't even mention pensions. They don't have any, except for what they will get from the government, however ironical and LOLz-worthy that is. Government by Kevin O' Leary. LIKE A BOSS!
Oh and someone mentioned I was being what they called Social Darwinist, so I read up on Social Darwinism using the totally-unbiased Wikipedia. It does say somewhere in there that collective action by a species can be a good survival trait, and I am all for that. I do not however believe that whole segments of the population should be herded into gas chambers, whether you call them Jews or enemies of your Revolution. So if your calling me a Social Darwinist is an attempt to call me a Nazi, I will take it as an insult, which will mean I have won the argument, as I do most of the time any way.
I don't think Harper will be putting the kibosh to the economy with tight money policies the way Mulroney did.
And we won't see a major policy flip-flop on anything as controversial as NAFTA because there is no Liberal Party waiting in the wings to finish the job for them.
The Harper Government of Canada, with less than a quarter of the electorate under them, will be a politically neutered conservative government until 2015. They are still acting like they have a minority. Very quiet and low key. They are scared shitless of going down in history as the first Bay Street government to hand national power to the people.
SLAVOJ ŽIŽEK
July-August 2010
A PERMANENT ECONOMIC EMERGENCY
During this year’s protests against the Eurozone’s austerity measures—in Greece and, on a smaller scale, Ireland, Italy and Spain—two stories have imposed themselves. [1] The predominant, establishment story proposes a de-politicized naturalization of the crisis: the regulatory measures are presented not as decisions grounded in political choices, but as the imperatives of a neutral financial logic—if we want our economies to stabilize, we simply have to swallow the bitter pill. The other story, that of the protesting workers, students and pensioners, would see the austerity measures as yet another attempt by international financial capital to dismantle the last remainders of the welfare state. The imf thus appears from one perspective as a neutral agent of discipline and order, and from the other as the oppressive agent of global capital.
There is a moment of truth in both perspectives. One cannot miss the superego dimension in the way the imf treats its client states—while scolding and punishing them for unpaid debts, it simultaneously offers them new loans, which everyone knows they will not be able to return, thus drawing them deeper into the vicious cycle of debt generating more debt. On the other hand, the reason this superego strategy works is that the borrowing state, fully aware that it will never really have to repay the full amount of the debt, hopes to profit from it in the last instance....
http://newleftreview.org/?view=2853
eta:
A new period
One thing is clear: after decades of the welfare state, when cutbacks were relatively limited and came with the promise that things would soon return to normal, we are now entering a period in which a kind of economic state of emergency is becoming permanent: turning into a constant, a way of life. It brings with it the threat of far more savage austerity measures, cuts in benefits, diminishing health and education services and more precarious employment. The left faces the difficult task of emphasizing that we are dealing with political economy—that there is nothing ‘natural’ in such a crisis, that the existing global economic system relies on a series of political decisions—while simultaneously being fully aware that, insofar as we remain within the capitalist system, the violation of its rules effectively causes economic breakdown, since the system obeys a pseudo-natural logic of its own. So, although we are clearly entering a new phase of enhanced exploitation, rendered easier by the conditions of the global market (outsourcing, etc.), we should also bear in mind that this is imposed by the functioning of the system itself, always on the brink of financial collapse.
Capitalism seems to be characterized by exponential growth followed by a crash. The bacteria, as it were, reach the rim of the petri dish, having consumed all the agar. It would be easier if we all wanted to listen to the same 10 pop songs and watch the same programs on the TV every night. Those days are long gone.
Unfortunately it is no longer just Daddy Warbucks capitalism. We now have this electronic "High Frequency Trading" Casino Banking system which is pumping the same money around the world at ever increasing speeds. Like a hovercraft, this is providing a significant lift to stock values which are still trading at 250% - 350% above Price:Book ratios as seen in the last 100 years. The HFT scam is causing central banks to issue currency in unprecedented amounts, so that corporate balance sheets can be filled with "profits" which were never really made.
I suppose there is some solace to the consideration that if HFT is not profit, it should not be taxed. It is simply proceeds from hi-tech wash trading, which should be disgorged completely.
Austerity czar sees pain ahead in Ontario
A government-commissioned review of Ontario’s public services is set to deliver a grim diagnosis of the province’s financial prospects, and propose a sweeping overhaul of the way it spends money.
At the heart of the new spending model would be a much tighter clampdown on health costs than Dalton McGuinty’s government has previously forecast. And among the roughly 400 recommendations for spending reforms are changes to some of the Premier’s signature education policies, including a shift away from mandated smaller classes....
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/austerity-czar-sees-pain-ah...
The Harper Government of Canada, with less than a quarter of the electorate under them, will be a politically neutered conservative government until 2015. They are still acting like they have a minority. Very quiet and low key. They are scared shitless of going down in history as the first Bay Street government to hand national power to the people.
You seem to think the Conservatives are bothered by a guilty conscience because they don't have a majority of the popular vote.
If they are "still acting like a minority" it's because they have been acting like a majority for the past five years, in the face of an ineffectual opizishin, so that now they have a majority their behaviour simply continues in the same vein.
You also attribute to the Conservatives the same self-defeating, ineffectual mode of thinking that the NDP would adopt if they ever get a majority government:
NDP: "We must do what Bay Street and the military want us to do, otherwise we'll get voted out at the next election, and won't that be a huge tragedy for the working class!" (a.k.a. the Bob Rae approach to governing Ontario)
Harper: "OMG! We've got a majority at last. But let's make sure we tone down the neoliberal austerity and war agenda or else we might lose the next election in five years' time! We have to keep the opizishin happy."
I'd like to have some of what you're smoking.
>>Passes the spliff>>Ya he's been a real dictator non-stop. I can hardly stand it. Harper was forced to spend a little on stimulus since lying to Canadians about the state of the economy two weeks before the 2008 election. Let's see them make abortion or SSM an election issue. I highly doubt it. The Harpers are walking on pins and needles from now to 2015. Let's get wide...
Really? I'm actually a little surprised at how aggressive they've been in a short time (since getting their majority) when it comes to crime and punishment, on hawkish and hyper-pro-Israel foreign policy, on absolute jaw-dropping abandonment of the environment, on the Wheat Board, even on ridiculous shit like requiring that women remove their niqab to swear their citizenship. Where I used to think the Canadian centre was so far left of the American centre that our Conservatives were equivalent to their liberals, I now feel like Canadian politics is becoming fairly closely aligned with the US spectrum.
Canadian financials downgraded
Barclays Capital downgraded the Canadian financial services sector to neutral from positive in anticipation of slower earnings growth in 2012.
Analyst John Aiken warned clients that both domestic and global headwinds will likely weigh on valuations.
“It appears that the steam is dissipating from the Canadian economic engine, with greater downside risk than upside surprise to current forecasts likely,” he said in a research note....
http://business.financialpost.com/2012/01/05/canadian-financials-downgra...
The Irish village that said 'no' to austerity
quote:
As the bus pulls up on the empty road to let me off, the driver smiles at me. "This is rush hour," he jokes. "This is the most exciting thing to happen here all day." If there is one thing people know about Ballyhea, it seems, it's that it is in the middle of nowhere and nothing much happens. The taxi driver who drove me to Cork warned me of its sleepiness, and the woman sitting next to me can't understand why I am here. But the reason is simple: Ballyhea may be quiet, but it's angry.
Residents have started marching in the hamlet – a smattering of farms and a small housing estate, pulled together by a church, petrol pump and school. The demonstration isn't long – starting from the church they walk along the main road, which connects Cork to Limerick, for a little over 10 minutes, turning back when they reach the speed-limit sign. Yet it has happened every Sunday, through rain and sun, with rising then dwindling numbers, for 43 weeks....
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jan/05/irish-village-ballyhea
That only accounts for so much you know.
I think it will be one of the tamest conservative governments we've ever had.
Aw, I think it's just Fidelese. I think he means they'll be tame lapdogs of Washington. I really don't think he could possibly mean that they will heel, sit, and roll over at
Tom Mulcair'sNycole Turmel's command. Give him some credit!!Yes, Fidel's observation fits right in with the "logic" displayed in the perceptive postings about a neo-liberal economic position in this thread, with all of their concrete ideas for a way out of our politico-economic pickle. :)
As someone recently observed: " The proposition is that politics as usual doesn't work anymore..not being nearly up to the task of confronting what desperately needs confronting "
But they leave one dangling as to what it means to confront "what desperately needs confronting," having already said that it won't be solved in the streets, and demonstrating no knowledge of the economic levers needed. Such observations can only be met with the sound of one hand clapping.
Well Gaian, it is normally the case that when a proposition is tabled, ideally the next step is for a debate to ensue on the merits of such a proposal. In defining what it means to oppose something, there should also be an assessment of its effectiveness. Examples can be brought in to support one contention or another...either the prospects for opposing the march of neo-liberalism appear hopeful, or not. For instance, I would bring in the European examples...social democratic governments...various shades of opposition...the current levels of unrest in the street etc; and weigh them as they might pertain to the North American situation, or more specifically here in Canada. In all cases it would appear that we'd be talking about speed bumps in the best case scenarios. In our situation, a collective approach seems to represents the best and only way forward, but we can hardly rely on honesty or initiative from the traditional sources of opposition, where in the distant past they were able to mobilize their resources in certain circumstances. The street is made up of handfuls of refugees that few seem to care about anymore, which is why it is increasingly difficult to imagine how this will work in our context. What is really needed, before contemplating anything else, is a sustained general strike from coast to coast...a grand coalition of First Nations, communities everywhere, unions, opposition, communists, anarchists, occupy groups....open to all efforts and persuasions. The question is whether something is worth saving or not, and in this it should be made explicit that we are talking about humanity and their wars against people and the environments we live in. The current path of opposition suggests to us every day that the people we entrust with confrontation on our behalf fully believe it is not worth the effort, when all we see are dress rehearsals practicing the motions, and sickening, never ending displays of superficial leadership pageants. In which case I would say the nihilists should be put on speed dial as well, just to get things over with.
Appears We Get The Parliament We Deserve - by Tom Ford
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/westview/appears-we-get-the-par...
"Hang around Parliament long enough and you come to the vivid conclusion that the institution is falling apart. Let me count the ways..
Samara Canada, a public policy group, last year asked a group of former MPs from all parties and all positions about Parliament's problems. Most of them agreed Parliament is in trouble because it has become hyper-partisan.
They blamed the political parties who bossed them around. Many said they had voted for legislation they had never read. In question period they were expected to be 'potted plants' or 'trained seals'.."
that's pretty much what they look like to me
It's the backroom table where competing business interests are hashed out. The public is not dealt in around that one. Instead, we're treated to the daily theatre of the absurd during question period, where the only real question involves how much more of this play act can we tolerate.
Anyone know what this is about?
Well, this could be interesting: Le Devoir is reporting that a joint press conference this morning by Interim Liberal Leader Bob Rae and Quebec Caucus Chair Denis Coderre -- which, for the record, most of us had been assuming would just be a standard pre-winter caucus teaser -- may have a surprise twist: namely, that the duo will reveal that an NDP MP has crossed the floor (or, to be geographically precise, moved a few rows down the aisle). At the moment, neither party is saying a word, so we'll just have to tune in at 10:30 to find out.
ETA: never mind, I see someone has started a new thread on this.
B.C. balks at federal health-funding plan
After initially applauding federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty’s plan for health funding, the B.C. government is now demanding changes to the formula to prevent “devastating” cuts to seniors’ care.
“It’s just not going to work,” said B.C. Premier Christy Clark, who will host Canada’s provincial premiers for a three-day conference that starts Sunday....
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/bc-politic...
Capitalism Is The Crisis (Full Movie)
Capitalism Is The Crisis: Radical Politics in the Age of Austerity examines the ideological roots of the "austerity" agenda and proposes revolutionary paths out of the current crisis. The film features original interviews with Chris Hedges, Derrick Jensen, Michael Hardt, Peter Gelderloos, Leo Panitch, David McNally, Richard J.F. Day, Imre Szeman, Wayne Price, and many more!...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYFw3O--2R0&feature=player_embedded
Canadians want feds to play strong role in health care: poll
quote:
Among the poll's findings:
- 97 per cent of Canadians think the federal government's responsibility for the Canada Health Act is important. In return for receiving federal money, provinces must adhere to the principles of medicare as outlined in the Act. Those principles include accessibility to services, universal availability, and portability from province to province.
- 70 per cent say they are "worried that without accountability to the federal government, provinces will have no incentive to achieve health care efficiencies."
- 88 per cent are worried that "without national standards, Canadians will have different levels of health care depending on where they live."
- 74 per cent believe that health care is a shared responsibility between the provincial and federal governments. Few believe it is solely a provincial (13 per cent) or federal (11 per cent) responsibility.
- 56 per cent are not confident that the premiers will be able to agree on a plan to improve health care in Canada.
- 69 per cent "strongly agree" that they would encourage their premier to "adopt a series of principles that make the health-care system more concentrated on the needs of the patient."
The telephone poll of 1,000 Canadian adults was conducted Jan. 4-9. With a sample of this size, it has a margin of error of 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.
Read more: http://www.canada.com/health/Canadians+want+feds+play+strong+role+health+care+poll/6000586/story.html#ixzz1jmFaZflJ
CANADA: Tax Cuts, Privatization and Deregulation: Is it a Debt Crisis or a Distribution of Wealth Crisis?
quote:
While everyone else's wages have stagnated over the last 30 years the top 1 per cent have seen their pay and wealth increase dramatically but didn't like paying all those extra taxes. Governments have been all too happy to accommodate them. In 1980, the top federal tax rate was almost 50 per cent higher than it is today.
In terms of fiscal deficits, according to the latest figures the combined federal and provincial shortfalls are running at about $65-billion annually. To put this in perspective, since 1980 the top 1 per cent has increased its share of the national income from 8.1% to 13.3%. A shift of $67-billion. If taxes had kept their at the 1980 level, there would be no deficit national.
We don't have a debt crisis. We have a distribution of wealth crisis.
Tax cuts have created this mess. Privatization and deregulation of our public services and assets is presented as a painless way to solve the debt crisis. Politicians promise ‘increased efficiencies’ and lower taxes. What really happens is that public wealth and profit making opportunities get transferred to the private few. The private sector has been drooling to get its hands on public assets for a long time. Since the crash of 2008 there has been a ‘flight to quality’ for investors and now is their big chance to get public assets at fire sale prices....
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28760
quote: "The private sector has been drooling to get its hands on public assets for a long time."
Right on. And farther back than 2008. The Chicago School in the 1970s demonstrated for neo-conservatism how finance capital could co-opt entire nations with their own savings, the gradual "destruction of the liberal state," as Lady Barbara Amiel Black used to love describing the process, was a foregone conclusion.
But nothing's really been done about it because folks really don't want to give up on their pensions: "Growth - and investment capital - is good" (to paraphrase that infamous Hollywood character on the subject of greed. Was is Gekko?) So those "public assets" are now the safest, soundest investments for everyone's pension, worker and WAll Street denizen. And until people realize that their own savings are driving the vehicle, we'll continue to just bemoan our fate.(Like, we really COULD be creating sovereign pension plans, building the CPP, etc. rather than just carrying on in gormless protest).
We need democracy first. A financial oligarchy sabotaged ancient Rome's economy, and a modern day oligarchy is doing it around the western world today with debt slavery. Eventually, according to economist Michael Hudson, the creditor class will have to support democracy in order for their debts to be honoured. Eventually the oligarchs and warring kings who they lend money to have a falling out period. It's a vicious cycle throughout history. But until democracy is achieved and unpayable debts are wiped, the western world is headed for a new dark ages.
I would like to see New Democrats work toward handing powers of money creation and credit back to democratically elected governments if only at rates that existed between 1938 and 1974. Until then money creation and credit in the hands of non-elected bankers and financial oligarchy is a weapon of mass destruction.
quote:"But until democracy is achieved and unpayable debts are wiped, the western world is headed for a new dark ages."
Jeez, Fidel, posing a possible descent to a "new dark ages" and salvation from that fate handicapped by debt and need for democracy? Can't you be more optimistic than that? :)
Well, Hudson is not very optimistic himself about the fate of Europe. Their neoliberal experiment has been even more dictatorial and fascist than our's apparently.
And he says the only way out of this mess in the states has to begin with cleaning up the corruption in Washington and and the Justice Department. This is the country Canada tied its economic wagon of fortunes to in 1989 and 1994.
Maybe not a dark ages with rampant plagues, warring factions with saboteurs, sword play and catapult siege machines and the like but something pretty close I imagine. I dunno. It seems to me that Hudson is right - the financial oligarchy overthrew industrial capitalism by the 1990s. Marx never saw that coming. He thought banksterism could only end in disaster for capitalism. I think he was right. How could capitalists be so dumb, Gaian?
Roger L.Martin has a partial answer in his Fixing the Game, Fidel. He's a bit of an apologist, but if the market can go "bad" as easily as he suggests, it seems to me a corrective is only a detmined re-regulationist and honest government away. But of course positing such a rational remedy in a world of such complete ignorance and gullibility is a bit rich, eh?
Oh sure, fixing is easy. The average babbler could fix everything. We would simply draw up a list of economic adivsors, like Martin and Hudson included, and we'd be on the road to recovery and fixing the environment by the week end.
Unfortunately, appalling greed and corruption go hand in hand with ignorance and gullibility. It's out of control. Neoliberalism is proven to be one long war on democracy and sanity in general.
Unemployed outnumber jobs more than 3 to 1: StatsCan
OTTAWA — There were an average of 3.3 unemployed people for every available position in Canada in the three months ending in September, according to a new Statistics Canada job vacancies report.
There were approximately 248,000 job vacancies in the period, the federal agency reported Tuesday, with the highest number of unemployed in educational services (a ratio of 10 people per vacancy) and the lowest in wholesale trade, and health care and social assistance (1.4 to one in each sector)....
http://business.financialpost.com/2012/01/24/unemployed-outnumber-jobs-m...
Can I say that I'm incredibly happy that this forum can distinguish between Neo-liberal and Neo-conservative? I read the graduate thesis of a now shadow cabinet minister who shall remain nameless who was calling Brian Mulroney a Neo-conservative and I spent two hours muttering that Mulroney was by any sane metric a (neo)-liberal, just one with a blue button.
Anyway, yes, at some point it'd be nice to get a bit of economic statism and redistribution back in here... As far as jobs go, we have a problem: We're getting better at making things and thus involving people in the making of those things is often busywork. Not everyone is going to be able to have a full-time job anymore. Labour force participation among 18-55s has fallen by 5%, the best social program is no longer going to be, despite what the demagouges are so fond of asserting, a job. We actually need to guarantee a level below which nobody can fall instead of schoolmarmishly looking over their shoulders to make sure their workfare is done correctly. But for that to happen the cultural right will have to get over the idea that everyone is an island and the cultural left (sisters, siblings, brothers!) will have to get over their disdain for the lumpen, including perhaps making class central to a rubric of privilege (says the trans lesbian...), and the serious center will have to stop being so conventional and muddled and 'serious' and actually look for solutions instead of dimissing bold action.
Easy, right? ^_^ Actually, probably easier than we think, but that's a story for another post.
Stephen Harper says 'major' changes coming to Canada's pension system: speech
DAVOS, Switzerland — Prime Minister Stephen Harper has signalled his government will bring forward "major transformations" to the country in the coming months — in areas such as the retirement pension system, immigration, science and technology investment and the energy sector.
Of those reforms, Harper said, getting a grip on slowing the rising costs of the country's pension system is particularly critical.
In the wake of Harper's speech, it now appears that the Conservative government could be poised to gradually change the Old Age Security system so that the age of eligibility is raised to 67 from 65.....
http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Stephen+Harper+says+major+changes+coming+Canada+pension+system+speech/6054610/story.html..scroll down to the 2nd article on this page.
NDP to focus on budget cuts as Parliament resumesquote:
NDP Proposals for Budget 2012
Making the Economy work for all Canadian Families
"Cancelling the corporate income tax cut scheduled to take place January 1, 2012 and investing the $3 billion in revenue that would be lost to a tax cut in affordable housing instead could increase GDP by $4.5 billion, create more than 47,000 new jobs and create 155,550 new affordable housing units and 200,000 repaired existing homes over the next ten years." (Citizens for Public Justice)....(hit link for more)
http://peterjulian.ndp.ca/post/in-the-news-ndp-will-shift-focus-to-budge...
..italy, just a few short manouevers ahead of us.
#15MGlobalStrike – Italian Grassroots syndicalist general strike on 27 Januaryquote:
This rescue will not cost anything for our entrepreneurs, financers, bankers and the tax-evasion economy, whose profits and goods have not suffered loss of any kind. The so-called Phase 1 of the Monti techno-government has now come to a close with an enormous draining of financial resources, taken from waged workers, pensioners and home-owners (of a single house). In the meantime any chance for an increase in wages has been blocked with a freeze on public sector agreements, despite rising inflation, and with the cancellation of the national collective agreement by FIAT and the metalworkers sector.
This unilateral, parallel and interconnected action on the part of Marchionne and Confindustria introduces into the context of acute crisis an element that is not so much simply the taking of our money, but the taking of our freedom and the dignity of workers, our right to organize ourselves in the workplace, to protest, to strike. Punishment and dismissals will be the fate of anyone who does not buckle down. And this is the basis on which the government’s so-called Phase 2 lies....
http://takethesquare.net/2012/01/27/15mglobalstrike-italian-grassroots-s...
Canada's Harper Outlines Class War Agenda at Davos Forum..
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/jan2012/harp-j28.shtml
"The Harper government class war agenda will be bitterly opposed by the working class..."
On their behalf it won't.
..scroll down to the 2nd article on this page.
NDP to focus on budget cuts as Parliament resumesquote:
NDP Proposals for Budget 2012
Making the Economy work for all Canadian Families
"Cancelling the corporate income tax cut scheduled to take place January 1, 2012 and investing the $3 billion in revenue that would be lost to a tax cut in affordable housing instead could increase GDP by $4.5 billion, create more than 47,000 new jobs and create 155,550 new affordable housing units and 200,000 repaired existing homes over the next ten years." (Citizens for Public Justice)....(hit link for more)
http://peterjulian.ndp.ca/post/in-the-news-ndp-will-shift-focus-to-budge...
Here we come! I think Canadians will choose the politics of hope over those of fear and powerlessness.
How the Banks Broke the Social Compact, Promoting their Own Special Interests by Prof. Michael Hudson
Economic historian Michael Hudson on how the banks convinced governments that they needed "brokers" to decide whether a loan is responsible, and that private money creation would make economies more efficient and passing on savings to citizens and governments. And basically the opposite has occurred.
It's a very good essay, and I'm sure Rabble's Duncan Cameron et al would agree.
Romania's PM resigns over austerity protests
Emil Boc, Romania's prime minister, has resigned after weeks of nationwide protests against a slew of austerity measures and months before a parliamentary election.
"It is the moment for important political decisions. From this point of view, I took the decision to give up the government's mandate," Boc said in a speech after a government meeting on Monday.
Boc enforced the cuts, including slashing public salaries by a quarter and raising sales tax, to complete a $26.24bn International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailout deal and boost the economy after a deep and bitter recession.
Thousands of Romanians have braved freezing temperatures in the last month to protest against Boc and his ally, President Traian Basescu....
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/europe/2012/02/20122693818556854.html
Gaian:
"Capital has no master" in a globalized world, where nations have no sovereignty.
..your statement and mine really go together well. it's very powerful and needs to be said often. to understand this statement one can begin to see the enormity of the task before us. in the end it's the human race that will loose and all the other creatures it takes with it. there are no saviours out there, at least that is my life experience. there is no avoiding it, we come together at the grass roots with a whole new world or we bite the dust. there is no reform and it is a battle to our death almost.
And if you begin to focus on this problem from a position where we can do something about it - setting aside Romania in its frozen state for a moment - deciding how we can free ourselves from capital's grip, would be a good start. Right now, everyone's scared shitless about the possibility of losing their pensions - their savings that are now so depeendent upon the market. Any ideas about how that could be corrected for a start? Because if you can't begin to answer that one, outlining events in Romania won't begin to solve diddly squat, just display more depressing news. That's easy to come by, takes no thought at all, really.
gaian
..i see no made in canada fix. this is global capitalism out of control. king kong is coming at us with a club in it's hand and all i can think of is that we need to be preparing ourselves to resist or we will be crushed. this is a political problem that of using the economic system to suck everything from almost everyone. no amout of legislation can deter what is coming even if there was a will to do so. what i see as "the answer" is that the work has already begun to create a new world within this global disaster and it will be there to pick up the pieces after an economic collapse. in the mean time resist resist resist in order to salvage as much as we can.
..this article represents some of the thinking going on re building a new world.
Take the City – Toma la Ciudad (Video)
quote:
We have realized business and state production ways do not respond to either our wishes or our needs, and, instead, it generates corrupt and unjust structures and is hugely damaging for the environment.
What would happen if we started managing the world ourselves, from below, in a different way?
Let’s imagine, for instance, a transformed city, more natural, where, instead of so much tarmac, paving stones and sterile gardens, we grew aromatic herbs or plants from which we could extract natural remedies; where, instead of ornamental parks, we had orchards and ecological vegetable gardens, looked after by all together, children, grown ups, elders and youths.
What would happen if, instead of maintaining a highly expensive and often inefficient state public sector, we built a network of people’s services, autonomous, where the labour that supported it was managed by people’s assemblies and not according to the profit of a few; where each of us would contribute as we can and where we can; where we could develop in a wholly way as persons, both to give and to receive, not being mere passive consumers anymore?...
http://takethesquare.net/2012/02/07/take-the-city-toma-la-ciudad-video/
Jim Flaherty, Mark Carney step up to object to U.S. banking rule
Jim Flaherty, Canada’s federal finance minister, added his voice Monday to a chorus of complaints about a key plank of banking reform in the United States.
In a strongly worded letter to U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Mr. Flaherty said the Volcker rule “could have material adverse effects on Canadian financial institutions and markets.”
The finance minister said he is “particularly concerned that the proposed rule could severely impact the liquidity of Canadian government debt markets and interfere with the risk management practices of banks in Canada.”
Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney also stepped forward on the last day of a comment period on the controversial Volcker Rule, which has drawn sharp criticism from senior officials around the world.
quote:
The Volcker Rule is intended to curb proprietary trading, or the trading banks do on their own accounts and through sponsored relationships with hedge funds and private equity players. Its intended purpose is to remove some of the risky behaviour that led to the financial crisis of 2008.
But during an extended comment period on the proposed reform, the rule has drawn sharp criticism from jurisdictions including the United Kingdom, Japan and Canada....
http://business.financialpost.com/2012/02/13/jim-flaherty-steps-up-to-ob...
gaian
..i see no made in canada fix. this is global capitalism out of control. king kong is coming at us with a club in it's hand and all i can think of is that we need to be preparing ourselves to resist or we will be crushed. this is a political problem that of using the economic system to suck everything from almost everyone. no amout of legislation can deter what is coming even if there was a will to do so. what i see as "the answer" is that the work has already begun to create a new world within this global disaster and it will be there to pick up the pieces after an economic collapse. in the mean time resist resist resist in order to salvage as much as we can.
I guess I'm always concerned about what to tell the electorate, 13. I resist the finance capitalists, those folks now calling the shot from the Cat-bird's Seat, by trying to direct challenges at that sector of capitalism. We have to amass enough saved capital to be able to break free of the internationals. Sovereign funds NOT dependent on the sale of oil would be good.
But right now, everyone's savings hereabouts are being used to control and manipulate people around the world in the name of personal security in everyone's old age, and I can only make noises about "slow money" or some other bloody agrarian use for savings, apre le deluge.
gaian
I guess I'm always concerned about what to tell the electorate, 13. I resist the finance capitalists, those folks now calling the shot from the Cat-bird's Seat, by trying to direct challenges at that sector of capitalism. We have to amass enough saved capital to be able to break free of the internationals. Sovereign funds NOT dependent on the sale of oil would be good.
..i don't see it gaian. if somehow there was a gov that wanted to create legislation how would it stand up to capital that has the wto, imf, g8-6, rating agencies, nato, the us gov and much much more..behind it. in s. america there is mass movements behind those changes. even there not enough integration with the grass roots is going on. the system is not changing deeply enough and it can all go away once the popular leader is removed from the equation. as for the electorate here they're already at the table saying they want a say. look at the students in que and the occupations of the mp offices.
..if i may, i believe there is a global political consciousness that is greater than it's parts. i can, sorta, see that direct democracy is inspiring engagement like i've never seen before. it's time to consider this as a realistic option and above all a force for real change. i don't want capitalism to do better. i want capitalism to go away. it's rotten to the very core and everybody knows this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9F8QM3tjkTE
Conservatives' cuts will harm employment equity
PSAC asks Senate committee examining hiring practices to investigate.
OTTAWA, ON, February 13, 2012: What impact will the Conservative government's plans for across-the-board cuts have on the employment of workers with disabilities and Aboriginal and racialized workers?
That's the question PSAC will put to the Senate human rights committee, which is examining employment equity and hiring practices in the federal public service.
"Once again, we're asking for information and transparency," said PSAC national executive vice-president Patty Ducharme. "Canadians have a right to know the whole story about the proposed cuts and their impact."
During the last round of severe cuts to the public service in the 1990s, Aboriginal workers and workers with disabilities left the public service at rates that were significantly higher than other workers....
http://www.publicvalues.ca/ViewArticle.cfm?Ref=001157
PSAC seems to have adopted the general Canadian opizishin strategy of pleading for "information and transparency" from the Harper government, rather than aggressively advancing an alternative vision for Canada.
We know what the Harper agenda is; we don't need more windows on his corrupt and brutal machine. We need to smash it and build a new one. Who will show us how to do that?
Yeah who needs transparency or accountability to the public?
I much prefer being lied to, misled, and-or officially misinformed of the pro-Washington, pro-conservative nanny state agenda in Ottawa. Personally speaking, I don't mind the long-time stoogery in Ottawa. Truth is overrated anyway. They are only following orders from Washington.
Our's is not to question why only to trust and obey - it's the only way. The NDP should stop asking so many questions of our corporate stooges in Ottawa. And besides, the NDP are only delaying government biznesss by asking questions on behalf of Canadians kept in the dark and fed sheep manure as a rule. The lack of transparency and accountability to the official opposition party is basically telling Canadians that what we don't know can't hurt us. Lies and half-truths and misleading comments to the NDP in Parliament is the same as lying and witholding information from Canadians in general. That's bad for democracy.
CFL