babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

TODAY: Nathan Cullen answers your questions on his candidacy for NDP Leader

Catchfire
Offline
Joined: Apr 16 2003

Skeena-Bulkley Valley MP and NDP Leadership candidate Nathan Cullen will be dropping by babble today, February 16, at 2:30 PST/5:30 EST to answer your questions on his quest for the keys to Stornoway.

Potential interview questions have already been submitted here and here, and a list of those submissions has been assembled by the editorial staff of rabble.ca. Each selected question will be posed by a moderator (i.e. me) and then Nathan will offer his response. Once Nathan has responded to the initial question, babblers are welcome to offer comments and follow-up questions in this thread; although, Nathan may not be able to get to them all.

For an idea of how this session will run, see our previous discussion with Libby Davies last fall.

Unlike other threads on babble, abusive posts will be deleted immediately. In the interest of tidyness and readability, superfluous or digressive posts may be removed as well.

Come back at 2:30 PST/5:30 EST to read what Nathan has to say!

 


Comments

Catchfire
Offline
Joined: Apr 16 2003

Just a quick reminder that Nathan Cullen will be here in a little over twenty minutes to answer your questions!


Catchfire
Offline
Joined: Apr 16 2003

Hi Everyone! I'm here with Nathan Cullen and he's ready to answer your questions. So please join me in welcoming Nathan to babble!


Nathan Cullen
Offline
Joined: Nov 30 2011

Thanks for the welcome Catchfire. I'm keen to try out new politics in real time! Let the conversation begin

 


stephen elliott...
Offline
Joined: Nov 30 2004

[withdrawn] :)


Catchfire
Offline
Joined: Apr 16 2003

Hi Stephen, thanks for your question, but please read the terms of engagement at the top of the page. Hopefully we can get to your question later!

 

Our first question is about your much-discussed cooperation plan with other progressive parties as a strategy to defeat the Conservatives.

 

dacckon wrote:
Why should we be having this conversation when we achieved our greatest electoral victory and when other social democratic governments dominate the political stage in other countries without this plan? Are there any other parties in other jurisdictions that have used this plan and achieved a successful result?

 


NDP_MEMBER
Offline
Joined: Feb 16 2012

Hey I want to know more about your stance on Marijuana decriminalization because they're all sorts of levels this can be done. Are you talking about the way the Liberals did it a while back or more like Holland because both are classified as decriminalization?


Nathan Cullen
Offline
Joined: Nov 30 2011

I believe the incredibly strong showing on May 2nd allows us to lead a conversation that is most urgent right now. The Harpe gouvernement is fundamentally altering our nation and our ability to have a voice in our country's future. The crisis of climate change, growing inequality and the dominance of oil industry interests demands that we rise to the crisis and be more generous in our politics. The progressive majority of Canadians deserve a progressive government and we will bring in voting reform once government to ensure that this is the future.


algomafalcon
Offline
Joined: Oct 14 2011

If Canada were to become a republic (as you suggest as a possibility), how would we choose the head of state? What powers would the Head of State have over the PM and parliament?

 


Catchfire
Offline
Joined: Apr 16 2003

Hi everyone -- thanks for your interest, but we have a protocol outlined in the opening post. Our first question is on the board, and open for discussion. To keep the flow going, please wait with your questions until the end. Nathan may not respond otherwise (although I think NDP_MEMBER managed to squeek one in!


Howard
Offline
Joined: Aug 31 2011

Thanks for joining us Nathan.


Nathan Cullen
Offline
Joined: Nov 30 2011

Hey NDP_Member - thanks for the question. Answer in two parts. One is that for the next 3.5 years our efforts are to hold back the worst of the worst of the "war on drugs" crusade from the government. I believe that that war has been an unmitigated failure and when you're in a hole you shouldn't keep digging. 

Decriminilization seems to be the place we can get to but first things first - a progressive government who's willing to have a real conversation 


Catchfire
Offline
Joined: Apr 16 2003

Nathan, we have one follow-up question to your co-operation plan. Many babblers have been wondering if your co-operation plan includes the Bloc Québecios. Considering the vast support the NDP recieved in Quebec this past May, why not include progressives from the BQ in your plan?


theleftyinvestor
Offline
Joined: Jun 6 2008

I hope this is related enough to constitute a follow-up. If you do not win leadership, will you continue advocating for this plan within the party? And if you are not leader, what else do you think can be your greatest contributions to beating Harper in 2015?


Ryan1812
Offline
Joined: May 20 2010

Hi Nathan. First, thanks for joining us. We spoke a while back (podcast from China) on developing a green strategy and not putting the economy at risk. You made some excellent points about the fault of this binary: it's either the environment or the economy. I wonder though how it is possible, in your opinion, to engage with a trading partner like China when all they really want are our natural resources? How do we go about dealing with China without sacrificing our principles (environment and human rights concerns included). Thank you and good luck.

Ryan


Nathan Cullen
Offline
Joined: Nov 30 2011

To the leftyinvestor - yes, absolutely I will continue to advocate for a strategy that I see as worthy of conversation and potential unifier for the country. With Avaaz and Leadnow advocating it has gained some real strength. In terms of the Bloc, that while I acknowledge they have progressive policies we are focused on Conservative seats and want to build on the progressive federalist vote from the last campaign. Talk of the Bloc brings us into another conversation that isn't helpful


NDP_MEMBER
Offline
Joined: Feb 16 2012

Ok because just trying to clarify what is meant be decrimnalization? because its a term many politicians just throw around when there all tons of different levels of decriminalization.


Catchfire
Offline
Joined: Apr 16 2003

 

Thanks for those responses, Nathan.

Time is flying so we should move to our second question, which concerns the NDP's rural policies:

 

Stuart Parker wrote:
Currently, the NDP has been successful in winning and holding rural ridings like yours: northerly, wet, forested, based around mill towns and dependent on the forest and fishing sectors but has not enjoyed the same kind of success in other rural ridings, particularly those based around farming, ranching and petroleum that are drier and located in the southern part of the country. As an MP who has worked on rural issues generally, how would you go about making the party more appealing in the rural areas where it currently lacks representation?

ETA. Again, please re-read the opening post! We have a series of questions on themes that have already been submitted by babblers. We will try to get to all of your questions later, time permitting.


Howard
Offline
Joined: Aug 31 2011

Catchfire wrote:

Nathan, we have one follow-up question to your co-operation plan. Many babblers have been wondering if your co-operation plan includes the Bloc Québecios. Considering the vast support the NDP recieved in Quebec this past May, why not include progressives from the BQ in your plan?

Good follow-up Catchfire!


Nathan Cullen
Offline
Joined: Nov 30 2011

Stuart Parker wrote:
Currently, the NDP has been successful in winning and holding rural ridings like yours: northerly, wet, forested, based around mill towns and dependent on the forest and fishing sectors but has not enjoyed the same kind of success in other rural ridings, particularly those based around farming, ranching and petroleum that are drier and located in the southern part of the country. As an MP who has worked on rural issues generally, how would you go about making the party more appealing in the rural areas where it currently lacks representation?

This is a great question and fundamental both to the future success of New Democrats and Canadians more broadly. The heart of the answer lies in policies that drive the creation of a value-added economy. The rural community relies on this kind of economy to be healthy and strong. Respect for the differences that exist in rural Canada is what all of our policies (from First Nations rights and title to food security) is at the foundation of my work. 


Nathan Cullen
Offline
Joined: Nov 30 2011

Hey Ryan1812 - thanks for the question and as we've just come out of Mr Harper's "Pandas for Pipelines" trip it's a critical question for both countries. Trade can (but not always) enhance cultural exchange and the improvement of rights on both sides. But this hasn't been at the heart of our trade policy for more than a generation. We can talk trade, human rights and the environment all at the same time ... but only if we create a government who cares about those things. We will.

 

 


Howard
Offline
Joined: Aug 31 2011

-

Can't say I agree. Bloc voters were very helpful to the NDP winning Conservative seats in Québec and they will be essential to defeating the remaining Conservatives in the province. The NDP has already united most of the Liberal + Green support outside of Liberal-held seats. We need the Bloc to help us dislodge the remaining Conservatives.


NDP_MEMBER
Offline
Joined: Feb 16 2012

Do you have a plan to improve the internet quality/cost in rural locations, because It's quite a joke in some locations...to get a half decent connection I have to pay over $140  a month to companies like Rogers and it is still subpar (drops, etc).


Catchfire
Offline
Joined: Apr 16 2003

 

Nathan, we also have a secondary question on the same topic: 

Life, the Universe and Everything wrote:
How do you propose to get southern rural Canadians, in places outside the west, to abandon the Conservatives (and non-voting) and begin to move towards electing New Democrats?

 


Nathan Cullen
Offline
Joined: Nov 30 2011

I've met folks on this campaign paying as much as $300 per month for bad high-speed

We had a rural infrastructure fund meant for this exact purpose. Some of the money was badly (read - to friends of the past government) spent and we must focus on areas of need. We have some of the highest rates in the world and this particularly hurts those out of the city

 


Catchfire
Offline
Joined: Apr 16 2003

By the way, if the page seems slow, it's only because we have a huge spike in traffic right now. So please be patient.


Nathan Cullen
Offline
Joined: Nov 30 2011

Life, the Universe and Everything wrote:
How do you propose to get southern rural Canadians, in places outside the west, to abandon the Conservatives (and non-voting) and begin to move towards electing New Democrats?

I think we need both. Our gains in western Canada in the last election were decidedly not strong. Mr. Harper now takes the west for granted and we have incredible opportunity for growth here. In southern rural communities the issues are much aligned to what's happening in all parts of rural Canada. With a strong value-added manufacturing strategy and revamped trade strategy we can speak to all Canadians about creating the kind of progressive economy that will pay for the services that we need. 


Catchfire
Offline
Joined: Apr 16 2003

On to our third question, then, since we're getting a bit behind schedule:

 

Our very own Unionist has a series of three questions on your policy toward Quebec sovereignty:

 

Unionist wrote:
1. Do you recognize Québec's right to secede from Canada based solely on a 50% + 1 vote on a referendum question determined by the Assemblée Nationale? 

 

2. Do you support the amendment of the Canada Labour Code to incorporate the same anti-scab provisions as the Québec code? 

 

3. Do you support the application of Bill 101 to enterprises under federal jurisdiction in Québec?

 


NDP_MEMBER
Offline
Joined: Feb 16 2012

Thanks for the answer Mr.Cullen.


Howard
Offline
Joined: Aug 31 2011

Nathan Cullen wrote:

Life, the Universe and Everything wrote:
How do you propose to get southern rural Canadians, in places outside the west, to abandon the Conservatives (and non-voting) and begin to move towards electing New Democrats?

I think we need both. Our gains in western Canada in the last election were decidedly not strong. Mr. Harper now takes the west for granted and we have incredible opportunity for growth here. In southern rural communities the issues are much aligned to what's happening in all parts of rural Canada. With a strong value-added manufacturing strategy and revamped trade strategy we can speak to all Canadians about creating the kind of progressive economy that will pay for the services that we need. 

I like this answer. How can we show Canadians that "Mr. Harper now takes the west for granted" and how do we make that message resonate in rural ridings that the NDP does not currently hold?


MMASK
Offline
Joined: Feb 16 2012

Mr Cullen I have been told that you have had a surpising lack of people in Kitimat willing to sign up as members in the NDP in order to vote for you in the leadership campaign. I believe the community has turned to the right and is now a conservative stronghold community and will not look favorably on you in the future if you faill in your bid to become leader. What are your thoughts on this.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments