Dwain Lingenfelter won the NDP leadership contest in Regina yesterday afternoon.
Lingenfelter won on the second ballot, taking 55% of the vote to Ryan Meili's 45%, MLA Deb Higgins having been eliminated on the first ballot, and Yens Pederson having dropped off voluntarily.
Any Saskababblers out there able to comment on this?
I'm kind of surprised that Meili did so well, seeing as he was pretty unknown before this campaign and had the air of an insurgent. Then again, I checked out his website and videos, they seemed pretty professional. Perhaps if he had a little more experience and a larger network he would've had more of a chance. In any case, good luck to Lingenfelter. Seeing the results from the last election he's going to need it.
New Sask. NDP leader Lingenfelter comments on nuclear power issue
Quote:
The new leader of the Saskatchewan NDP says he does not believe the issue of nuclear power has divided the party.
Dwain Lingenfelter, who won the leadership Saturday, says every NDP leader in the province has supported the development of Saskatchewan's uranium industry in some way. Lingenfelter says most recently there was support to study the idea of building a nuclear reactor. He says he too supports that idea, but also believes the party must review its energy policy and consider alternatives.
The comments come after party members passed a resolution stating that an NDP government would not pursue the building of a nuclear reactor, but would look at other energy sources.
Lingenfelter has noted that a couple of hundred people supported the resolution at a convention in Regina, but not all of the party's 13,000 members were in attendance.9/quote]
I'm surprised that Deb Higgins, the only candidate with a seat in the House, finished last on the first ballot.
Sounds like the Meili vote of 45% on the final ballot was pretty much an "anyone-but-Link" vote rather than a pro-Meili vote.
From what I've read and heard about Lingenfelter, I don't have any problem with his politics, but I question whether he's the person to spearhead an NDP renewal.
Not Being from Sask, its hard to comment on why Lingenfelter got the nod. Does anyone know why he won the leadership race, and why the NDP choose to back this person over the other candidates?
SaskaTories will shoot themselves in the feet at some point. Then it wont matter what his name is, and never mind who they'll actually be voting for in every other riding where Lingenfelter wont be a candidate.
Lingenfelter was endorsed by the majority of the party caucus, had strong support from a number of important trade unions, raised by far the most money, had the largest campaign team and signed up the most members. Higgins had the support of several members of the caucus but was hindered, in my opinion, by her close ties to Romanow and Calvert. In contrast, Pedersen and Meili represented a new generation of NDP activists who argued for a major party renewal. This contrast was very evident at the convention, broadcast by the NDP on their web site. ...
The Saskatchewan NDP chose to allow all party members to vote to select the new leader, using the preferential ballot. Many were surprised that Lingenfelter received only 46 per cent of the votes on the first ballot. Between them, the two young rebels received a surprising 40 per cent. On the second ballot Lingenfelter received 55 per cent and Meili 45 per cent.
This election demonstrated the flawed nature of this liberal individualist system of selecting a party leader. Votes are cast before the convention. Polls showed that most NDP members could only identify Lingenfelter. Given the momentum and enthusiasm at the convention, it is likely that a traditional delegate convention would have chosen Meili as the new leader.
The Saskatchewan NDP is in bad shape. Their membership has fallen from 46,000 in 1991 to 13,000 today. The party has been virtually invisible since the 2007 election. Two recent polls show that the Saskatchewan Party government enjoys an approval rating of around 70 per cent.
Few believe that selecting Dwaine Lingenfelter as their leader will make any difference. A missed opportunity.
While rummaging through some old papers on the weekend I came across an envelope containing my report cards from school. In 1966 I was "a high-spirited boy" who had to be "sat on" occasionally.
I also found an NDP membership card from 1978. It was black and green with the old non-stylized Peace Tower logo.
Lingenfelter seeems to come from that era. The Nude Ems had a chance to start anew, but fell back on the worn out and stale.
You may have heard that a few years ago the Conservatives and many Liberals merged into the Sask Party. They're the problem. The Liberal Party is irrelevant in Saskatchewan.
I think there was a question of ideology involved - it wasn't about age or style. It was the "third way" types who've had a stranglehold on the party for some time - and who constitute the party establishment - versus some people who wanted to return to "democratic socialism". The latter group lost - but barely - and if the voting had been live, they might have won. The Warnock article is good on all this.
You may have heard that a few years ago the Conservatives and many Liberals merged into the Sask Party. They're the problem. The Liberal Party is irrelevant in Saskatchewan.
Which further reinforces the increasingly obvious central idea that LiberTories and Conservabrals are interchangeable one for the other. It's a one-off stooge-off
I know what the SaskaTories are about. The previous crooks and liars in Devine's Conservative government ran the province into the ground and went to jail for thieving from the taxpayers. And that left a hole for some more crooks and liars to fill.
And the effin' Liberal Party is still on the outside looking in. And these SaskaTories will be tempted to dirty deal sooner or later. They have a tough act to follow with the NDP. An' that's the story in Saskatchewan.
You may have heard that a few years ago the Conservatives and many Liberals merged into the Sask Party. They're the problem. The Liberal Party is irrelevant in Saskatchewan.
Which further reinforces the increasingly obvious central idea that LiberTories and Conservabrals are interchangeable one for the other. It's a one-off stooge-off
gag puke, Ross Thatcher, he remains a lasting memory for me after all these years away, I can still see his piggy eyes buried in a red bloated face, almost running over us on election day, as he was screaming about the riding threatening people to vote for him. Followed by his walking out of a restaurant telling the waitress he did not have to pay his bill because he was premier, and she could just suck it up herself.
We left Saskatchewan because of Ross Thatcher. Dad was a cableman for SGT, and as a government employee, he felt rather oppressed by how he was treated. Mom was a nurse. I recall her telling one of her colleagues, who had emigrated here and was ready to leave Saskatchewan, and perhaps Canada as well because of her working conditions, "Don't judge Canada by Saskatchewan." You could say I grew up hearing how awful Thatcher was.
We moved back after Blakeney got in, although my parents had a hand in electing Dave Barrett in B.C. first.
Dad once said of the Thatcher régime: "That wasn't a government, that was a reich."
You shoulda tried living in the same district area as him, and knowing him and his murderous son your whole youthful life. My parents fought long and hard to get him out of power.
Colin, though much older than I and the same age as my oldest sister, and I, used to regularily get into verbal fights on Friday afternoons, he was good friends with my first employer and would stop by before the store closed Fridays for drinks and pickled herring. But the funny thing was he was so lacking in wits, it was like shooting fish in a barrel to have a political fight with him. Definite shadow of his father and nothingmore politically, but took his sense of privilege and misogyny to a whole other level than Ross.
I was young when all that went down, but Thatcher chills me to the bone. I met his son, once.
There truly is a current of Saskatchewan conservatives who believe it was all an RCMP frame-up. I had one explain to me that it was Romanow and his "commie-lawyer buddies" who put the RCMP up to it; I think they were supposed to be calling in a marker on some RCMP bigwig who they had got out of legal trouble at one point.
Yes, Fidel, but the point is that both Thatcher and Argue were CCF members who jumped to the Liberals, making everything you said above pretty well meaningless.
Yes, Fidel, but the point is that both Thatcher and Argue were CCF members who jumped to the Liberals, making everything you said above pretty well meaningless.
Except that far more floor crossings from Liberal to Tory and vice versa occur(and supporting the widely-held view that the two property parties' politicos are interchangeable) than from the NDP to the old line parties. In fact, the NDP has proposed legislation to stop the very undemocratic practice of floor-crossing. And guess which two very compatible and very similar old line parties voted it down. I dont expect you to answer that one seeing as youre full of baloney and all.
Liberals and Tories are so compatible they formed whole new parties together with the SaskaTories provincially and BQ federally. ReformaTories and Liberalers united on the right and are now in phony minority government with the Liberals propping them up with over 71 confidence votes in the House - further proof there's not a ray of sunshine between 'em.
And you can't be an NDP'er and aCanadian senator at the same time, which tends to support what I am saying while at the same time, not supporting your spurious claim against the NDP.
What spurious claim? I gave you examples to show that every political party does what you claim only the Liberals and Conservatives do.
So far all this discussion has proved is that talking with partisan political kooks is just as much a waste of time as talking to religious fundamentalist kooks.
Yes, Fidel, but the point is that both Thatcher and Argue were CCF members who jumped to the Liberals, making everything you said above pretty well meaningless.
I disagree with you here, in the case of Thatcher it was pretty much forced explusion and Argue's ego would not accept his defeat by Tommy and it also meant that he had lost the respect of those who formerly supported him.
Plus, the hegemony that the Orange Order had would not tolerate actual workers and farmers having control of themselves.
coyote, I was young too in the Thatcher years, and was just 16 when I would have those social political arguements with Colin.
As to the phoney charge that Colin was framed, there was no way in hell he was.
I disagree with you here, in the case of Thatcher it was pretty much forced explusion and Argue's ego would not accept his defeat by Tommy and it also meant that he had lost the respect of those who formerly supported him.
What's the difference between these two and Belinda Stronach or Paul Hellyer switching parties? Their reasons were much the same.
I understand that there is a feeling among NDP partisans that the party is a force of good in the face of political evil; I'm a born CCFer and was raised with that attitude. Nevertheless, simple human motivations are simple human motivations, and the NDP isn't populated by saints...at least it hasn't been since the days of Tommy and Stanley Knowles.
And, for example, despite the fact that 82% of voters in the riding of Vancouver-Kingsway voted not to have a Conservative Member of Parliament they were saddled with one anyway with David Emerson realizing only after the election that ReformaTories and he are totally compatible.
Quote:
OTTAWA - In his response to NDP MP Peter Julian's (Burnaby-New Westminster) request for an investigation into Prime Minister Harper's decision to appoint former Liberal MP David Emerson to his cabinet, Ethics Commissioner Bernard Shapiro today acknowledged that while there may be no direct conflict of the members' code, the issue of floor-crossing must be addressed:
"I believe the issues of addressing this 'gap' [between applying the rules and applying ethical principles themselves] and how to handle similar events in the future warrant an open, rigorous and political debate, so that the appropriate public policy can be developed through the political process....
"this particular instance seems to have given many citizens a 'sense' that their vote -- the cornerstone of our democratic system - was somehow devalued, if not betrayed." (Office of the Ethics Commissioner, The Harper-Emerson Inquiry, p. 14 )
What in hell is wrong with these people? It's a revolving door between the two dirty old line parties. And that's just the way they like things to be, too.
Quote:
"Our constituents should always have the last word on our political futures. That is who we work for, and this bill can help end voter cynicism and the feelings of betrayal that Mr. Shapiro's identified, bringing accountability back to our constituents."
And the two very compatible and indistinquishable old line parties voted down the NDP's proposal to end the very undemocratic maneuvering of floor crossing. Liberals and Tories think democracy is a game of hippity-hop at the barber shop. They should be horsewhipped
A membership scandal within the Saskatchewan New Democratic Party will be the focus of a criminal investigation, the RCMP announced Thursday.
Police had been looking into a complaint of forgery from a resident of a First Nation in the Meadow Lake area of Saskatchewan. During the provincial party's leadership race, supporters of Dwain Lingenfelter — who went on to win the contest — submitted 1,100 membership application forms, using names of people from reserves around Meadow Lake.
On the bright side, at least 45% of the NDP voted against him.
As for floor crossing, the Liberals who were kicked out of their own party after joining a coalition with the NDP after the '99 election decided to join the NDP. I don't recall any by-elections. But then, I hear there's little difference between the two... err, three old-line parties in Saskatchewan these days...
Great way to Kick off as leader of the opposition. With an RCMP investigation. I hear that Sask is 70% content with the New government. This is a great way to shape public opinion. I'm certain all the NDP members who choose the new leader, gave this alot of consideration. I's sure they all knew their was NDP forgeries in favour of the Leader. Reminds me of the nonsense of the Conservatives in Quebec and phoney memberships during Federal Leadership Races.
Getting back on track, it seems to me that Dwain Lingenfelter is the moderate choice which offers the only opportunity for the Saskatchewan NDP to take back power. Look where the NDP has been successful: Manitoba and Nova Scotia. Both victories were secured by the NDP moving away from ideology and toward bread and butter issues that people can relate to. That and running candidates who are reflective of that shift. Where the NDP gets in to trouble, ie in Ontario and BC is when it views elections as an opportunity for all special interest groups to have their say. At that point, the NDP ceases to be a party that is viewed as credible to govern and is viewed more as a collection of special interest groups. UNfortunately, that's just the way it is.
" Look where the NDP has been successful: Manitoba and Nova Scotia"
Agree on Manitoba but isn't it a little premature to put Nova Scotia in the same sentence - they haven't been sworn in - brought in a throne speech, presented a budget, dealt with an emergency or been hit by a scandal - after that and a re-election in 4 years it might be a fair summnation.
From out here in Lotus land Dexter might be perceived as a Gary Doer clone but until they take government that's all it is - a perception
Any old line party shananigans with putting them in a debt hole or pawning off public utilities to rich friends of the Devine-a-Tories or (gulp) thieving from the taxpayers again, and I think this SaskaTory government will be kicking stones down the road for another sixteen years. SaskaTories are on a short leash til next election.
I agree in part with Big Daddy, however my concern with Lingenfelter is not with his position on the ideological spectrum, it's that he seems to be a continuation of the existing 'establishment' that got old and tired after sixteen years in power. The Saskatchewan NDP needs to really renew itself (I know that's a tired cliche but I can't think of any other way to put it) and re-energize and re-connect with the grassroots, particularly in rural Saskatchewan. They really need to attack head-on the fallacy that right-wing politicians and the Saskatchewan Party are the only ones who can speak for rural people. I think to do all these things effectively, they needed a fresh face and some fresh blood, not a retread from four administrations ago. (The guy was in Blakeney's cabinet for goodness sake!)
Where the NDP gets in to trouble, ie in Ontario and BC is when it views elections as an opportunity for all special interest groups to have their say. At that point, the NDP ceases to be a party that is viewed as credible to govern and is viewed more as a collection of special interest groups. UNfortunately, that's just the way it is.
Could you give me an example of a "special interest group"?
Where the NDP gets in to trouble, ie in Ontario and BC is when it views elections as an opportunity for all special interest groups to have their say. At that point, the NDP ceases to be a party that is viewed as credible to govern and is viewed more as a collection of special interest groups. UNfortunately, that's just the way it is.
Could you give me an example of a "special interest group"?
With "Daddy", you're in a special interest group if you're not an uptight white guy who lives in the 'burbs. "Daddy's" clearly an "Only people like me are REAL Canadians" type(and most likely has to stop himself from saying "Americans" instead of "Canadians" when he says that). Probably dreams of beating up "hippies" "pinkos" and "welfare mothers".
What people like "Daddy" don't get is that the only way to beat the real enemy is for the "normal folks" like him to accept that they have much more in common with the people he so contemptuously refers to as "special interests" than they ever will with the millionaires he secretly worships, and to struggle shoulder to shoulder with them as your allies in the fight. "Daddy" would rather starve than admit he's not inherently superior. "Daddy" clings to a fantasy of middle class "mobility" that is gone and won't be coming back.
The truth is, "Daddy", most of the human race are members of groups you'd call "special interests" and you're not going to have any chance of a decent life if you're obsessed with seeing yourself as more deserving than them. Except for the rich, we're ALL on the outside looking in these days. Learn that and learn who you're true friends are, "Daddy". That is, if you don't want the machine to crush you along with the rest ot us.
"As for floor crossing, the Liberals who were kicked out of their own party after joining a coalition with the NDP after the '99 election decided to join the NDP. I don't recall any by-elections."
Those Liberals sat as Independents and then ran for NDP nominations and ran as New Democrats in the 2004 Saskatchewan election. When Buckley Belanger (who was first elected as a Liberal) wanted to switch to the NDP he had to resign and run in a byelection as a New Democrat (he won with 90% of the vote).
Where the NDP gets in to trouble, ie in Ontario and BC is when it views elections as an opportunity for all special interest groups to have their say. At that point, the NDP ceases to be a party that is viewed as credible to govern and is viewed more as a collection of special interest groups. UNfortunately, that's just the way it is.
Could you give me an example of a "special interest group"?
With "Daddy", you're in a special interest group if you're not an uptight white guy who lives in the 'burbs. "Daddy's" clearly an "Only people like me are REAL Canadians" type(and most likely has to stop himself from saying "Americans" instead of "Canadians" when he says that). Probably dreams of beating up "hippies" "pinkos" and "welfare mothers".
What people like "Daddy" don't get is that the only way to beat the real enemy is for the "normal folks" like him to accept that they have much more in common with the people he so contemptuously refers to as "special interests" than they ever will with the millionaires he secretly worships, and to struggle shoulder to shoulder with them as your allies in the fight. "Daddy" would rather starve than admit he's not inherently superior. "Daddy" clings to a fantasy of middle class "mobility" that is gone and won't be coming back.
The truth is, "Daddy", most of the human race are members of groups you'd call "special interests" and you're not going to have any chance of a decent life if you're obsessed with seeing yourself as more deserving than them. Except for the rich, we're ALL on the outside looking in these days. Learn that and learn who you're true friends are, "Daddy". That is, if you don't want the machine to crush you along with the rest ot us.
Gee, for someone who knows nothing about me you know a lot about me. Are you psychic? Or are you incapable of sustaining reasoned debate and, instead, set up little straw men that you can then whack down?
I stand corrected on the floor crossing point, Stockholm. That said, 3/4s of the Saskatchewan Liberal party, the party of Ross Thatcher, had no problem joining the Saskatchewan NDP. I think that's telling enough in its own right.
As for Big Daddy, whenever anyone dares criticize the status quo someone always seems to bring up the old canard about how only the "moderates" can "win". My question to that is, why should anyone besides partisan hacks care if the NDP wins power if they aren't going to do anything with it? Why should I care if the party slashing taxes for the rich calls itself "NDP" or "Conservative"? After 16 years of NDP government, the rich are richer, the poor are poorer and the environent is as screwed as ever.
If putting an oil executive in the premier's chair is your grand progressive project, count me out.
Where the NDP gets in to trouble, ie in Ontario and BC is when it views elections as an opportunity for all special interest groups to have their say. At that point, the NDP ceases to be a party that is viewed as credible to govern and is viewed more as a collection of special interest groups. UNfortunately, that's just the way it is.
Could you give me an example of a "special interest group"?
With "Daddy", you're in a special interest group if you're not an uptight white guy who lives in the 'burbs. "Daddy's" clearly an "Only people like me are REAL Canadians" type(and most likely has to stop himself from saying "Americans" instead of "Canadians" when he says that). Probably dreams of beating up "hippies" "pinkos" and "welfare mothers".
What people like "Daddy" don't get is that the only way to beat the real enemy is for the "normal folks" like him to accept that they have much more in common with the people he so contemptuously refers to as "special interests" than they ever will with the millionaires he secretly worships, and to struggle shoulder to shoulder with them as your allies in the fight. "Daddy" would rather starve than admit he's not inherently superior. "Daddy" clings to a fantasy of middle class "mobility" that is gone and won't be coming back.
The truth is, "Daddy", most of the human race are members of groups you'd call "special interests" and you're not going to have any chance of a decent life if you're obsessed with seeing yourself as more deserving than them. Except for the rich, we're ALL on the outside looking in these days. Learn that and learn who you're true friends are, "Daddy". That is, if you don't want the machine to crush you along with the rest ot us.
Gee, for someone who knows nothing about me you know a lot about me. Are you psychic? Or are you incapable of sustaining reasoned debate and, instead, set up little straw men that you can then whack down?
Just wondering.
Btw I'm not a "white guy".
Your attitude is pretty white male, which is why I naturally assumed you would be. It's only people like that that go on about "special interests" and "left wing activists". Everyone knows both of those phrases are code for "anybody who doesn't love the status quo"and "anyone who doesn't think politics should be left to the 'grown-ups'".
If you aren't of the patriarchy and the dominant race, why do you have such an antileft and antiactivist attitude? It's not like anyone else ever benefited from the non-right wing party being as close to right wing as possible, which is what you appear to advocate.
At best, your posts reflect a mindset that's deeply antidemocratic and elitist, an "only people like me deserve a say" mindset.
If that's not what you're about, what the hell are you talking about?
btw, in contrast to what you said about people at NDP conventions, "left wing activists" are just as committed to bread-and-butter issues as any pragmatist. And, with all the "pragmatists" in the NDP having joined the "we have to be just as tightfisted as the right" Third Way delusion, it's the left-wing activists, the ones who fight globalization, who are the only ones defending bread-and-butter issues like keeping the labour movement strong and protecting social services. Those who don't care about stopping "free trade" and don't mind having corporations dominate the economic discussion also aren't doing anything to protect ordinary workers. People who work for a living don't gain anything from "pro-business" economics.
And it's not like "left wing activists" or "special interests" could ever have done you any harm. Besides, if you're not a white male, you are by definition a member of at least one group that gets called a "special interest"(btw, you do realize only right wingers use that term these days, don't you?)
I stand corrected on the floor crossing point, Stockholm. That said, 3/4s of the Saskatchewan Liberal party, the party of Ross Thatcher, had no problem joining the Saskatchewan NDP. I think that's telling enough in its own right.
"3/4 of the Saskatchewan Liberal party" did not join the Saskatchewan NDP. Two MLAs did after they had been kicked out of the Liberal party. Not the same thing.
Ken Burch wrote:
Your attitude is pretty white male, which is why I naturally assumed you would be. It's only people like that that go on about "special interests" and "left wing activists".
Yep, 'cause that's the way all white males think, and only white males think that way. Stereotypes are such a timesaver, eh Ken?
Gee, for someone who knows nothing about me you know a lot about me. Are you psychic? Or are you incapable of sustaining reasoned debate and, instead, set up little straw men that you can then whack down?
Just wondering.
Btw I'm not a "white guy".
Again, what would be an example of a "special interest group"?
"3/4 of the Saskatchewan Liberal party" did not join the Saskatchewan NDP. Two MLAs did after they had been kicked out of the Liberal party. Not the same thing.
That was supposed to be Liberal caucus, not party. And it should have been 2/3, not 3/4.
No it doesn't. You were suggesting that there was no difference between the Saskatchewan NDP and the right-wing Liberal regime of Ross Thatcher. The fact that two exiled Liberals ended up running as NDPers in the next election hardly proves that point.
I took Dogbert's post about the Liberal members jumping to the Nude Ems in the way he says he meant it.
Anyway, I'm posting this article by Don Kossick here. I voted for him in the past, he's a community radio member, and has done a lot of activist work where I live.
Quote:
Lingenfelter's running for NDP leadership was to reaffirm a strong commitment to nuclear development and the linking of nuclear energy to the tar sands development in Alberta and Saskatchewan. His most recent job background reflected that as a senior vice president for Nexen Oil in Calgary.
This winning on the floor of a formal party anti-nuclear stance is a major challenge to his leadership. Right after the vote he challenged the validity of an official convention of the NDP to make this decision and said he would go to the 13,000 members of the NDP to get there opinion and direction.
And, this is where the continuing struggle will lie. Will the membership of the NDP embrace a progressive, pro-green, anti-nuclear approach or will Lingenfelter be able to shape his own agenda through a dominant influence on the party membership?
Still nothing from "Big Daddy" about who those "special interests" are.
And of course, ghoris, people who aren't white and male do, on rare occasions, hold the attitudes"Big Daddy" expresses here. I was talking about those that usually do. It's really ridiculous to try and twist that into something offensive when it wasn't. And, of course, as a white male who rejects "Big Daddy"'s elitist, exclusive and patriarchal views, I recognize that I'm in a historic minority(although one that may be changing as a result of the financial collapse.) Apparently, "Daddy" and I are both weird. So be it.
Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall has had a cake walk since defeating Lorne Calvert and the New Democratic Party (NDP) in the November 2007 provincial elections. After Calvert's resignation and as the NDP went through a leadership contest, Wall enjoyed a period of easy living. You can call this a honeymoon for the new Saskatchewan Party government, or you can admit that the NDP in opposition has been singularly pathetic. There are just no fundamental ideological differences on the big economic issues, and that will be even more true now that Dwain Lingenfelter, the former deputy premier under Roy Romanow, has been anointed NDP leader.
The Party of Tommy Douglas No More
In its final days the Calvert government, desperate to stave off defeat at the hands of the surging Saskatchewan Party, pretty well implemented the entire Saskatchewan Party pro-business economic program. There is really no fundamental disagreement on provincial economic policy - the business lobby demands; the government, whether NDP or Saskatchewan Party, implements. That is why former NDP finance minister Harry van Mulligan stated that the Saskatchewan Party's latest budget was pretty much a replay of earlier NDP budgets. And that is why, at the end of this year's session, former premier Lorne Calvert concluded that the Saskatchewan Party's legislative agenda was pretty much what an NDP government might have done, with the exception of the attacks on labour. In such a situation, when there is a bipartisan agreement on broad economic and social policy, politics in the Legislature becomes silly nit-picking and name calling. The deeper debate is really about which party can best administer the operation of capitalism in Saskatchewan - the NDP or the Saskatchewan Party?
The only real difference at this point between the NDP and the Saskatchewan Party is that the old Calvert government refused to give the business lobby everything it demanded, only most of it. The Wall government is the loyal toady of the business lobby, willing to do pretty much anything business demands.
According to the link I posted, "This is a revised, updated and expanded version of an article which first appeared in Briarpatch, Vol. 37, No. 8, December 2008, pp. 16-21 ("Wall's War on the Working Class")."
I just assumed it had been revised and updated to today.
Mr. Lingenfelter should never have won this race, there really was something strange going on in the party in this case. Lingenfelter was at the helm of a major political scandal and no one in Sask. really cared. I am from Regina and I have friends from Meadow Lake and the voter registration fraud took place in that Northern region (which is predominantly Aboriginal). The recruitment of 1,100 voters from the Meadow Lake area was not only mass voter fraud it was outright exploitation of people who had no participation in the party and in the process. Several constituents from Meadow Lake confirmed that no NDP member ever spoke to them personally and that it was near impossible to recruit over 1,100 members from the area in one fell swoop; most of these communities are disaffected with the provincial electoral process but that is another story. Lingenfelter was, of course, not held responsible for any wrongdoing citing that it was a rogue party member that put together this campaign in Meadow Lake and Lingenfelter had no connection to this mysterious person. This person then was disappeared and in fact this person was not even named. I guess it just did not happen at all. The local media ran with the story for a few days and the RCMP were ceremoniously brought-in and then nothing really happened. The investigation was over before it began. Lingenfelter was cleared of wrong-doing but the fact is that someone from his campaign was guilty. It was all surreal, as if this undemocratic and illegal political action did not even happen. Lingenfelter was at the helm and he was asked by certain members to leave the race but he refused and then ultimately he won.
The person that was held responsible was named Dennis Morin and he is some sort of volunteer with the party but if you ask me it all stinks.
You are right, Mr. Lingenfelter is in bed with big business, i.e. - mass resource extraction corps. It is easy to ascertain that Lingenfelter is a neo-con but in a social-democrat's outfit and this is overt. Let's not forget the nuclear reactor that was supposed to be going under review directly by the people in Sask. but it now appears as if all the hoopla is over. The SaskParty has simply degreed that it will go ahead with the reactor in partnership with the U of S. No referendum was even proposed on the idea because the people might shoot the idea down, which was very possible; Lingenfelter was always in favour of the nuclear reactor.
What I cannot understand is this - why are most of the Sask. NDP members uncaring about all of this? Their party has been overtaken by a leader who is not centre-minded he is right-wing minded in his action and in his words. I cannot explain it. Most valid NDP'ers that I speak to are against Lingenfelter, this includes professors, writers, and younger members. Then I guess the old-guard voted for him? Sad news for sure.
How badly will the NDP have to do in the next Sask election(and it now looks like we can assume it WILL do badly)before Mr. Lingenfelter has to resign.
No charisma, no speaking skills, no ideas-was there a REASON the bigs and the wigs in the Sask NDP INSISTED Link had to be the guy?
Oh great, from what I hear, he's as bad as you could possibly imagine from an ideological perspective.
And Saskatchewan's that other province where the Liberals are on the outside looking in. I love being overtly partisan.
Any Saskababblers out there able to comment on this?
I'm kind of surprised that Meili did so well, seeing as he was pretty unknown before this campaign and had the air of an insurgent. Then again, I checked out his website and videos, they seemed pretty professional. Perhaps if he had a little more experience and a larger network he would've had more of a chance. In any case, good luck to Lingenfelter. Seeing the results from the last election he's going to need it.
Well, he has a point.
New Sask. NDP leader Lingenfelter comments on nuclear power issue
Dwain Lingenfelter, who won the leadership Saturday, says every NDP leader in the province has supported the development of Saskatchewan's uranium industry in some way. Lingenfelter says most recently there was support to study the idea of building a nuclear reactor. He says he too supports that idea, but also believes the party must review its energy policy and consider alternatives.
The comments come after party members passed a resolution stating that an NDP government would not pursue the building of a nuclear reactor, but would look at other energy sources.
Lingenfelter has noted that a couple of hundred people supported the resolution at a convention in Regina, but not all of the party's 13,000 members were in attendance.9/quote]
http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5i9znFWKrpPC...
I'm surprised that Deb Higgins, the only candidate with a seat in the House, finished last on the first ballot.
Sounds like the Meili vote of 45% on the final ballot was pretty much an "anyone-but-Link" vote rather than a pro-Meili vote.
From what I've read and heard about Lingenfelter, I don't have any problem with his politics, but I question whether he's the person to spearhead an NDP renewal.
Yea, let's shoot down the new leader before he has even left the starting blocks.
Could somebody at least get the guy to change his name to something a little more charismatic?
I mean, could anyone imagine silkscreen posters that said "Be Like Dwain"?
This is a great choice if the polls showed that the NDP lost because the last guy was too cool and exciting.
Yeah, that was Lorne Calvert. Cool. Charismatic. Cutting-edge.
Not Being from Sask, its hard to comment on why Lingenfelter got the nod. Does anyone know why he won the leadership race, and why the NDP choose to back this person over the other candidates?
SaskaTories will shoot themselves in the feet at some point. Then it wont matter what his name is, and never mind who they'll actually be voting for in every other riding where Lingenfelter wont be a candidate.
Because they are foolish?
I'd say he won based on name recognition mostly.
The Saskatchewan NDP chose to allow all party members to vote to select the new leader, using the preferential ballot. Many were surprised that Lingenfelter received only 46 per cent of the votes on the first ballot. Between them, the two young rebels received a surprising 40 per cent. On the second ballot Lingenfelter received 55 per cent and Meili 45 per cent.
This election demonstrated the flawed nature of this liberal individualist system of selecting a party leader. Votes are cast before the convention. Polls showed that most NDP members could only identify Lingenfelter. Given the momentum and enthusiasm at the convention, it is likely that a traditional delegate convention would have chosen Meili as the new leader.
The Saskatchewan NDP is in bad shape. Their membership has fallen from 46,000 in 1991 to 13,000 today. The party has been virtually invisible since the 2007 election. Two recent polls show that the Saskatchewan Party government enjoys an approval rating of around 70 per cent.
Few believe that selecting Dwaine Lingenfelter as their leader will make any difference. A missed opportunity.
John Warnock, from rabble's front page
While rummaging through some old papers on the weekend I came across an envelope containing my report cards from school. In 1966 I was "a high-spirited boy" who had to be "sat on" occasionally.
I also found an NDP membership card from 1978. It was black and green with the old non-stylized Peace Tower logo.
Lingenfelter seeems to come from that era. The Nude Ems had a chance to start anew, but fell back on the worn out and stale.
The Liberals dont stand a snowball's chance in Sask, and that's what really matters.
No, the Liberal Party doesn't matter whatsoever.
You may have heard that a few years ago the Conservatives and many Liberals merged into the Sask Party. They're the problem. The Liberal Party is irrelevant in Saskatchewan.
I think there was a question of ideology involved - it wasn't about age or style. It was the "third way" types who've had a stranglehold on the party for some time - and who constitute the party establishment - versus some people who wanted to return to "democratic socialism". The latter group lost - but barely - and if the voting had been live, they might have won. The Warnock article is good on all this.
No, the Liberal Party doesn't matter whatsoever.
You may have heard that a few years ago the Conservatives and many Liberals merged into the Sask Party. They're the problem. The Liberal Party is irrelevant in Saskatchewan.
Which further reinforces the increasingly obvious central idea that LiberTories and Conservabrals are interchangeable one for the other. It's a one-off stooge-off
I think you should get your story straight first, and then stick to it.
I know what the SaskaTories are about. The previous crooks and liars in Devine's Conservative government ran the province into the ground and went to jail for thieving from the taxpayers. And that left a hole for some more crooks and liars to fill.
And the effin' Liberal Party is still on the outside looking in. And these SaskaTories will be tempted to dirty deal sooner or later. They have a tough act to follow with the NDP. An' that's the story in Saskatchewan.
No, the Liberal Party doesn't matter whatsoever.
You may have heard that a few years ago the Conservatives and many Liberals merged into the Sask Party. They're the problem. The Liberal Party is irrelevant in Saskatchewan.
Which further reinforces the increasingly obvious central idea that LiberTories and Conservabrals are interchangeable one for the other. It's a one-off stooge-off
Have you heard of Hazen Argue or Ross Thatcher?
gag puke, Ross Thatcher, he remains a lasting memory for me after all these years away, I can still see his piggy eyes buried in a red bloated face, almost running over us on election day, as he was screaming about the riding threatening people to vote for him. Followed by his walking out of a restaurant telling the waitress he did not have to pay his bill because he was premier, and she could just suck it up herself.
We left Saskatchewan because of Ross Thatcher. Dad was a cableman for SGT, and as a government employee, he felt rather oppressed by how he was treated. Mom was a nurse. I recall her telling one of her colleagues, who had emigrated here and was ready to leave Saskatchewan, and perhaps Canada as well because of her working conditions, "Don't judge Canada by Saskatchewan." You could say I grew up hearing how awful Thatcher was.
We moved back after Blakeney got in, although my parents had a hand in electing Dave Barrett in B.C. first.
Dad once said of the Thatcher régime: "That wasn't a government, that was a reich."
You shoulda tried living in the same district area as him, and knowing him and his murderous son your whole youthful life. My parents fought long and hard to get him out of power.
Colin, though much older than I and the same age as my oldest sister, and I, used to regularily get into verbal fights on Friday afternoons, he was good friends with my first employer and would stop by before the store closed Fridays for drinks and pickled herring. But the funny thing was he was so lacking in wits, it was like shooting fish in a barrel to have a political fight with him. Definite shadow of his father and nothingmore politically, but took his sense of privilege and misogyny to a whole other level than Ross.
I was young when all that went down, but Thatcher chills me to the bone. I met his son, once.
There truly is a current of Saskatchewan conservatives who believe it was all an RCMP frame-up. I had one explain to me that it was Romanow and his "commie-lawyer buddies" who put the RCMP up to it; I think they were supposed to be calling in a marker on some RCMP bigwig who they had got out of legal trouble at one point.
Have you heard of Hazen Argue or Ross Thatcher?
Yes, they say it's a small world. Argue was in the red chamber at the last - an even smaller world. He disowned the CCF-NDP and they him.
And Thatcher was a Liberal premier of Sask.
And his son Colin wasnt sure if he was a Liberal or Tory and prolly murdered his wife after deciding it didnt matter.
Yes, Fidel, but the point is that both Thatcher and Argue were CCF members who jumped to the Liberals, making everything you said above pretty well meaningless.
Yes, Fidel, but the point is that both Thatcher and Argue were CCF members who jumped to the Liberals, making everything you said above pretty well meaningless.
Except that far more floor crossings from Liberal to Tory and vice versa occur(and supporting the widely-held view that the two property parties' politicos are interchangeable) than from the NDP to the old line parties. In fact, the NDP has proposed legislation to stop the very undemocratic practice of floor-crossing. And guess which two very compatible and very similar old line parties voted it down. I dont expect you to answer that one seeing as youre full of baloney and all.
Liberals and Tories are so compatible they formed whole new parties together with the SaskaTories provincially and BQ federally. ReformaTories and Liberalers united on the right and are now in phony minority government with the Liberals propping them up with over 71 confidence votes in the House - further proof there's not a ray of sunshine between 'em.
And you can't be an NDP'er and a Canadian senator at the same time, which tends to support what I am saying while at the same time, not supporting your spurious claim against the NDP.
What spurious claim? I gave you examples to show that every political party does what you claim only the Liberals and Conservatives do.
So far all this discussion has proved is that talking with partisan political kooks is just as much a waste of time as talking to religious fundamentalist kooks.
I disagree with you here, in the case of Thatcher it was pretty much forced explusion and Argue's ego would not accept his defeat by Tommy and it also meant that he had lost the respect of those who formerly supported him.
Plus, the hegemony that the Orange Order had would not tolerate actual workers and farmers having control of themselves.
coyote, I was young too in the Thatcher years, and was just 16 when I would have those social political arguements with Colin.
As to the phoney charge that Colin was framed, there was no way in hell he was.
What's the difference between these two and Belinda Stronach or Paul Hellyer switching parties? Their reasons were much the same.
I understand that there is a feeling among NDP partisans that the party is a force of good in the face of political evil; I'm a born CCFer and was raised with that attitude. Nevertheless, simple human motivations are simple human motivations, and the NDP isn't populated by saints...at least it hasn't been since the days of Tommy and Stanley Knowles.
And, for example, despite the fact that 82% of voters in the riding of Vancouver-Kingsway voted not to have a Conservative Member of Parliament they were saddled with one anyway with David Emerson realizing only after the election that ReformaTories and he are totally compatible.
OTTAWA - In his response to NDP MP Peter Julian's (Burnaby-New Westminster) request for an investigation into Prime Minister Harper's decision to appoint former Liberal MP David Emerson to his cabinet, Ethics Commissioner Bernard Shapiro today acknowledged that while there may be no direct conflict of the members' code, the issue of floor-crossing must be addressed:
"I believe the issues of addressing this 'gap' [between applying the rules and applying ethical principles themselves] and how to handle similar events in the future warrant an open, rigorous and political debate, so that the appropriate public policy can be developed through the political process....
"this particular instance seems to have given many citizens a 'sense' that their vote -- the cornerstone of our democratic system - was somehow devalued, if not betrayed."
(Office of the Ethics Commissioner, The Harper-Emerson Inquiry, p. 14 )
What in hell is wrong with these people? It's a revolving door between the two dirty old line parties. And that's just the way they like things to be, too.
And the two very compatible and indistinquishable old line parties voted down the NDP's proposal to end the very undemocratic maneuvering of floor crossing. Liberals and Tories think democracy is a game of hippity-hop at the barber shop. They should be horsewhipped
NDP membership scandal to be investigated by RCMP
Police had been looking into a complaint of forgery from a resident of a First Nation in the Meadow Lake area of Saskatchewan. During the provincial party's leadership race, supporters of Dwain Lingenfelter — who went on to win the contest — submitted 1,100 membership application forms, using names of people from reserves around Meadow Lake.
On the bright side, at least 45% of the NDP voted against him.
As for floor crossing, the Liberals who were kicked out of their own party after joining a coalition with the NDP after the '99 election decided to join the NDP. I don't recall any by-elections. But then, I hear there's little difference between the two... err, three old-line parties in Saskatchewan these days...
Well that is good news!
Great way to Kick off as leader of the opposition. With an RCMP investigation. I hear that Sask is 70% content with the New government. This is a great way to shape public opinion. I'm certain all the NDP members who choose the new leader, gave this alot of consideration. I's sure they all knew their was NDP forgeries in favour of the Leader. Reminds me of the nonsense of the Conservatives in Quebec and phoney memberships during Federal Leadership Races.
Getting back on track, it seems to me that Dwain Lingenfelter is the moderate choice which offers the only opportunity for the Saskatchewan NDP to take back power. Look where the NDP has been successful: Manitoba and Nova Scotia. Both victories were secured by the NDP moving away from ideology and toward bread and butter issues that people can relate to. That and running candidates who are reflective of that shift. Where the NDP gets in to trouble, ie in Ontario and BC is when it views elections as an opportunity for all special interest groups to have their say. At that point, the NDP ceases to be a party that is viewed as credible to govern and is viewed more as a collection of special interest groups. UNfortunately, that's just the way it is.
" Look where the NDP has been successful: Manitoba and Nova Scotia"
Agree on Manitoba but isn't it a little premature to put Nova Scotia in the same sentence - they haven't been sworn in - brought in a throne speech, presented a budget, dealt with an emergency or been hit by a scandal - after that and a re-election in 4 years it might be a fair summnation.
From out here in Lotus land Dexter might be perceived as a Gary Doer clone but until they take government that's all it is - a perception
Any old line party shananigans with putting them in a debt hole or pawning off public utilities to rich friends of the Devine-a-Tories or (gulp) thieving from the taxpayers again, and I think this SaskaTory government will be kicking stones down the road for another sixteen years. SaskaTories are on a short leash til next election.
I agree in part with Big Daddy, however my concern with Lingenfelter is not with his position on the ideological spectrum, it's that he seems to be a continuation of the existing 'establishment' that got old and tired after sixteen years in power. The Saskatchewan NDP needs to really renew itself (I know that's a tired cliche but I can't think of any other way to put it) and re-energize and re-connect with the grassroots, particularly in rural Saskatchewan. They really need to attack head-on the fallacy that right-wing politicians and the Saskatchewan Party are the only ones who can speak for rural people. I think to do all these things effectively, they needed a fresh face and some fresh blood, not a retread from four administrations ago. (The guy was in Blakeney's cabinet for goodness sake!)
Where the NDP gets in to trouble, ie in Ontario and BC is when it views elections as an opportunity for all special interest groups to have their say. At that point, the NDP ceases to be a party that is viewed as credible to govern and is viewed more as a collection of special interest groups. UNfortunately, that's just the way it is.
Could you give me an example of a "special interest group"?
Cargill, Monsanto, Cameco, Husky, and Mosaic.
Good job al'q, and people need to start rebutting accusations of special interest groups within the NDP with that kinda response!
Where the NDP gets in to trouble, ie in Ontario and BC is when it views elections as an opportunity for all special interest groups to have their say. At that point, the NDP ceases to be a party that is viewed as credible to govern and is viewed more as a collection of special interest groups. UNfortunately, that's just the way it is.
Could you give me an example of a "special interest group"?
With "Daddy", you're in a special interest group if you're not an uptight white guy who lives in the 'burbs. "Daddy's" clearly an "Only people like me are REAL Canadians" type(and most likely has to stop himself from saying "Americans" instead of "Canadians" when he says that). Probably dreams of beating up "hippies" "pinkos" and "welfare mothers".
What people like "Daddy" don't get is that the only way to beat the real enemy is for the "normal folks" like him to accept that they have much more in common with the people he so contemptuously refers to as "special interests" than they ever will with the millionaires he secretly worships, and to struggle shoulder to shoulder with them as your allies in the fight. "Daddy" would rather starve than admit he's not inherently superior. "Daddy" clings to a fantasy of middle class "mobility" that is gone and won't be coming back.
The truth is, "Daddy", most of the human race are members of groups you'd call "special interests" and you're not going to have any chance of a decent life if you're obsessed with seeing yourself as more deserving than them. Except for the rich, we're ALL on the outside looking in these days. Learn that and learn who you're true friends are, "Daddy". That is, if you don't want the machine to crush you along with the rest ot us.
"As for floor crossing, the Liberals who were kicked out of their own party after joining a coalition with the NDP after the '99 election decided to join the NDP. I don't recall any by-elections."
Those Liberals sat as Independents and then ran for NDP nominations and ran as New Democrats in the 2004 Saskatchewan election. When Buckley Belanger (who was first elected as a Liberal) wanted to switch to the NDP he had to resign and run in a byelection as a New Democrat (he won with 90% of the vote).
Where the NDP gets in to trouble, ie in Ontario and BC is when it views elections as an opportunity for all special interest groups to have their say. At that point, the NDP ceases to be a party that is viewed as credible to govern and is viewed more as a collection of special interest groups. UNfortunately, that's just the way it is.
Could you give me an example of a "special interest group"?
With "Daddy", you're in a special interest group if you're not an uptight white guy who lives in the 'burbs. "Daddy's" clearly an "Only people like me are REAL Canadians" type(and most likely has to stop himself from saying "Americans" instead of "Canadians" when he says that). Probably dreams of beating up "hippies" "pinkos" and "welfare mothers".
What people like "Daddy" don't get is that the only way to beat the real enemy is for the "normal folks" like him to accept that they have much more in common with the people he so contemptuously refers to as "special interests" than they ever will with the millionaires he secretly worships, and to struggle shoulder to shoulder with them as your allies in the fight. "Daddy" would rather starve than admit he's not inherently superior. "Daddy" clings to a fantasy of middle class "mobility" that is gone and won't be coming back.
The truth is, "Daddy", most of the human race are members of groups you'd call "special interests" and you're not going to have any chance of a decent life if you're obsessed with seeing yourself as more deserving than them. Except for the rich, we're ALL on the outside looking in these days. Learn that and learn who you're true friends are, "Daddy". That is, if you don't want the machine to crush you along with the rest ot us.
Gee, for someone who knows nothing about me you know a lot about me. Are you psychic? Or are you incapable of sustaining reasoned debate and, instead, set up little straw men that you can then whack down?
Just wondering.
Btw I'm not a "white guy".
I stand corrected on the floor crossing point, Stockholm. That said, 3/4s of the Saskatchewan Liberal party, the party of Ross Thatcher, had no problem joining the Saskatchewan NDP. I think that's telling enough in its own right.
As for Big Daddy, whenever anyone dares criticize the status quo someone always seems to bring up the old canard about how only the "moderates" can "win". My question to that is, why should anyone besides partisan hacks care if the NDP wins power if they aren't going to do anything with it? Why should I care if the party slashing taxes for the rich calls itself "NDP" or "Conservative"? After 16 years of NDP government, the rich are richer, the poor are poorer and the environent is as screwed as ever.
If putting an oil executive in the premier's chair is your grand progressive project, count me out.
Where the NDP gets in to trouble, ie in Ontario and BC is when it views elections as an opportunity for all special interest groups to have their say. At that point, the NDP ceases to be a party that is viewed as credible to govern and is viewed more as a collection of special interest groups. UNfortunately, that's just the way it is.
Could you give me an example of a "special interest group"?
With "Daddy", you're in a special interest group if you're not an uptight white guy who lives in the 'burbs. "Daddy's" clearly an "Only people like me are REAL Canadians" type(and most likely has to stop himself from saying "Americans" instead of "Canadians" when he says that). Probably dreams of beating up "hippies" "pinkos" and "welfare mothers".
What people like "Daddy" don't get is that the only way to beat the real enemy is for the "normal folks" like him to accept that they have much more in common with the people he so contemptuously refers to as "special interests" than they ever will with the millionaires he secretly worships, and to struggle shoulder to shoulder with them as your allies in the fight. "Daddy" would rather starve than admit he's not inherently superior. "Daddy" clings to a fantasy of middle class "mobility" that is gone and won't be coming back.
The truth is, "Daddy", most of the human race are members of groups you'd call "special interests" and you're not going to have any chance of a decent life if you're obsessed with seeing yourself as more deserving than them. Except for the rich, we're ALL on the outside looking in these days. Learn that and learn who you're true friends are, "Daddy". That is, if you don't want the machine to crush you along with the rest ot us.
Gee, for someone who knows nothing about me you know a lot about me. Are you psychic? Or are you incapable of sustaining reasoned debate and, instead, set up little straw men that you can then whack down?
Just wondering.
Btw I'm not a "white guy".
Your attitude is pretty white male, which is why I naturally assumed you would be. It's only people like that that go on about "special interests" and "left wing activists". Everyone knows both of those phrases are code for "anybody who doesn't love the status quo"and "anyone who doesn't think politics should be left to the 'grown-ups'".
If you aren't of the patriarchy and the dominant race, why do you have such an antileft and antiactivist attitude? It's not like anyone else ever benefited from the non-right wing party being as close to right wing as possible, which is what you appear to advocate.
At best, your posts reflect a mindset that's deeply antidemocratic and elitist, an "only people like me deserve a say" mindset.
If that's not what you're about, what the hell are you talking about?
btw, in contrast to what you said about people at NDP conventions, "left wing activists" are just as committed to bread-and-butter issues as any pragmatist. And, with all the "pragmatists" in the NDP having joined the "we have to be just as tightfisted as the right" Third Way delusion, it's the left-wing activists, the ones who fight globalization, who are the only ones defending bread-and-butter issues like keeping the labour movement strong and protecting social services. Those who don't care about stopping "free trade" and don't mind having corporations dominate the economic discussion also aren't doing anything to protect ordinary workers. People who work for a living don't gain anything from "pro-business" economics.
And it's not like "left wing activists" or "special interests" could ever have done you any harm. Besides, if you're not a white male, you are by definition a member of at least one group that gets called a "special interest"(btw, you do realize only right wingers use that term these days, don't you?)
I stand corrected on the floor crossing point, Stockholm. That said, 3/4s of the Saskatchewan Liberal party, the party of Ross Thatcher, had no problem joining the Saskatchewan NDP. I think that's telling enough in its own right.
"3/4 of the Saskatchewan Liberal party" did not join the Saskatchewan NDP. Two MLAs did after they had been kicked out of the Liberal party. Not the same thing.
Yep, 'cause that's the way all white males think, and only white males think that way. Stereotypes are such a timesaver, eh Ken?
bravo, Ken!
Gee, for someone who knows nothing about me you know a lot about me. Are you psychic? Or are you incapable of sustaining reasoned debate and, instead, set up little straw men that you can then whack down?
Just wondering.
Btw I'm not a "white guy".
Again, what would be an example of a "special interest group"?
Attention Big Daddy:
Again, what would be an example of a "special interest group"?
bumped in hopes of a response...
Weyerhauser?
I've never even been to Saskatchewan but no one else has posted this:
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090617/saskatchewa...
Yep, and yet they elected him leader anyway! he will be the gift that keeps on giving to destroy the SK NDP.
Will the over zealous vollunteer fall on his own sword? Someone had to authorize the cash withdrawal from Links campaign fund to pay the memberships?
This could get rather uncomfortable for the Sask Dippers. Too bad.
That was supposed to be Liberal caucus, not party. And it should have been 2/3, not 3/4.
My point, however, remains.
No it doesn't. You were suggesting that there was no difference between the Saskatchewan NDP and the right-wing Liberal regime of Ross Thatcher. The fact that two exiled Liberals ended up running as NDPers in the next election hardly proves that point.
The new babble bites.
I took Dogbert's post about the Liberal members jumping to the Nude Ems in the way he says he meant it.
Anyway, I'm posting this article by Don Kossick here. I voted for him in the past, he's a community radio member, and has done a lot of activist work where I live.
This winning on the floor of a formal party anti-nuclear stance is a major challenge to his leadership. Right after the vote he challenged the validity of an official convention of the NDP to make this decision and said he would go to the 13,000 members of the NDP to get there opinion and direction.
And, this is where the continuing struggle will lie. Will the membership of the NDP embrace a progressive, pro-green, anti-nuclear approach or will Lingenfelter be able to shape his own agenda through a dominant influence on the party membership?
Saskatchewan NDP divided on nuclear power
Still nothing from "Big Daddy" about who those "special interests" are.
And of course, ghoris, people who aren't white and male do, on rare occasions, hold the attitudes"Big Daddy" expresses here. I was talking about those that usually do. It's really ridiculous to try and twist that into something offensive when it wasn't. And, of course, as a white male who rejects "Big Daddy"'s elitist, exclusive and patriarchal views, I recognize that I'm in a historic minority(although one that may be changing as a result of the financial collapse.) Apparently, "Daddy" and I are both weird. So be it.
The Party of Tommy Douglas No More
In its final days the Calvert government, desperate to stave off defeat at the hands of the surging Saskatchewan Party, pretty well implemented the entire Saskatchewan Party pro-business economic program. There is really no fundamental disagreement on provincial economic policy - the business lobby demands; the government, whether NDP or Saskatchewan Party, implements. That is why former NDP finance minister Harry van Mulligan stated that the Saskatchewan Party's latest budget was pretty much a replay of earlier NDP budgets. And that is why, at the end of this year's session, former premier Lorne Calvert concluded that the Saskatchewan Party's legislative agenda was pretty much what an NDP government might have done, with the exception of the attacks on labour. In such a situation, when there is a bipartisan agreement on broad economic and social policy, politics in the Legislature becomes silly nit-picking and name calling. The deeper debate is really about which party can best administer the operation of capitalism in Saskatchewan - the NDP or the Saskatchewan Party?
The only real difference at this point between the NDP and the Saskatchewan Party is that the old Calvert government refused to give the business lobby everything it demanded, only most of it. The Wall government is the loyal toady of the business lobby, willing to do pretty much anything business demands.
I read Conway's article last year. It still looks good, but has nothing changed?
According to the link I posted, "This is a revised, updated and expanded version of an article which first appeared in Briarpatch, Vol. 37, No. 8, December 2008, pp. 16-21 ("Wall's War on the Working Class")."
I just assumed it had been revised and updated to today.
Mr. Lingenfelter should never have won this race, there really was something strange going on in the party in this case. Lingenfelter was at the helm of a major political scandal and no one in Sask. really cared. I am from Regina and I have friends from Meadow Lake and the voter registration fraud took place in that Northern region (which is predominantly Aboriginal). The recruitment of 1,100 voters from the Meadow Lake area was not only mass voter fraud it was outright exploitation of people who had no participation in the party and in the process. Several constituents from Meadow Lake confirmed that no NDP member ever spoke to them personally and that it was near impossible to recruit over 1,100 members from the area in one fell swoop; most of these communities are disaffected with the provincial electoral process but that is another story. Lingenfelter was, of course, not held responsible for any wrongdoing citing that it was a rogue party member that put together this campaign in Meadow Lake and Lingenfelter had no connection to this mysterious person. This person then was disappeared and in fact this person was not even named. I guess it just did not happen at all. The local media ran with the story for a few days and the RCMP were ceremoniously brought-in and then nothing really happened. The investigation was over before it began. Lingenfelter was cleared of wrong-doing but the fact is that someone from his campaign was guilty. It was all surreal, as if this undemocratic and illegal political action did not even happen. Lingenfelter was at the helm and he was asked by certain members to leave the race but he refused and then ultimately he won.
The person that was held responsible was named Dennis Morin and he is some sort of volunteer with the party but if you ask me it all stinks.
Yep it does of oil money!
You are right, Mr. Lingenfelter is in bed with big business, i.e. - mass resource extraction corps. It is easy to ascertain that Lingenfelter is a neo-con but in a social-democrat's outfit and this is overt. Let's not forget the nuclear reactor that was supposed to be going under review directly by the people in Sask. but it now appears as if all the hoopla is over. The SaskParty has simply degreed that it will go ahead with the reactor in partnership with the U of S. No referendum was even proposed on the idea because the people might shoot the idea down, which was very possible; Lingenfelter was always in favour of the nuclear reactor.
What I cannot understand is this - why are most of the Sask. NDP members uncaring about all of this? Their party has been overtaken by a leader who is not centre-minded he is right-wing minded in his action and in his words. I cannot explain it. Most valid NDP'ers that I speak to are against Lingenfelter, this includes professors, writers, and younger members. Then I guess the old-guard voted for him? Sad news for sure.
Never under estimate poeples greed.
How badly will the NDP have to do in the next Sask election(and it now looks like we can assume it WILL do badly)before Mr. Lingenfelter has to resign.
No charisma, no speaking skills, no ideas-was there a REASON the bigs and the wigs in the Sask NDP INSISTED Link had to be the guy?
entire article from J. F. Conway
But I thought something about Liberal, Tory, same old story and old line parties and Mouseland...