Vancouver Police Officers Attack Black Man
July 14, 2010 - 8:32am
Support rabble | Advertise with us | Contact our staff | About rabble | Log-in or Register for a new account | Corrections | Privacy policy | Newsfeeds | Mailing lists
rabble: Features | Columnists | In Cahoots | Blogs | Books | Photos | What's Up | Polls
babble: Forum Topics | Active Topics
The rpn: Become a Podcaster | Find a Show
rabbleTV: Program Guide | Features | Indie Inside | Best of the net
Copyright © 2001-2012 the authors
Syndicate
Proper link to video
I thought prigs were more Victorian than Vancouverite.
Actually, I was considering just using the title, "Two white guys attack Black Man", since associating them with the "morale authority" associated with their function as police officers is really not something evident in the video. Looks more like a run of the mill KKK beating than anything I would associate with law and order.
How about: "Vancouver White Supremancists Thugs Disguised as Police Officers Attack Black Man"?
I presume you meant moral authority although morale authority fits nicely into the sentence.
Your other thread title would probably pass the rabble censor...
Sorry I made a spelling error, mispelled PIG in the thread title.
Your slipping, Cueball.
Must be too early in the morning.
Care to say anything about this vicious racist attack?
No?
Didn't think so.
The use of excessive force by these poilice officers should be condemned.
You mean to say, having police officers stand around and not do anything for you when you are having an altercation on a picket line, is not quite the same as having them grab you and drag you into an alley and beat you up, and then charge you with a bunch of bullshit and put you in jail for five days?
You would charachterize that as "excessive force". You can't manage, "brutality".
I haven't linked them at all Cueball since they have appeared in different threads.
What's with your attempt to try to make my language choices?
I've changed the title. You knew I would, Cueball.
And Caissa can use the words he chooses.
As far as the story is concerned, I'm interested in knowing what the (fake) "charges" were before the classic fake-o charges of assaulting a police officer, resisting arrest, etc were put forth after the fact. In other words, what justification do they have for harassing and assaulting him in the first place? Now that it's in the media and they have to make some shit up, I mean.
Assholes.
I thought you liked precise language. I shall be looking forward to our next discussion about the "excessive force" used by the brown shirts on the Hamburg waterfront.
Feel free to start a thread on the subject at your leisure. I'll choose what I believe is precise language and leave you to do the same. Maybe we might even come close to understaning what the other is trying to say. Somehow I doubt it. That would require goodwill and I'm not feeling any coming forth from you these days.