Spoiled rich kids losing their free ride in UK

Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Member: 5668
Joined: Nov 19 2003

And man are they pissed:

Quote:
Headmasters are blaming a shortage of university places caused by funding cuts, combined with the effect of Labour's "social engineering" drive that prioritises bright children from under-performing comprehensives.

Two out of three top independent schools approached by The Daily Telegraph said teenagers were finding it harder to get into higher education this year compared with 12 months ago.

From the Telegraph.


Comments

500_Apples
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 13684
Joined: Jun 3 2006

I don't see the link between the thread title and the chosen quote.

Actually, income and performance on standardized test scores at the high school level have a very high degree of correlation, so cutting spots at the university level will primarily hurt those students at the bottom of the student-income distribution.

ETA: Reading the article, this squeeze is not happening because of a lower number of spots, but because schools are targetting the top students from bad schools, who won't have straight A's on standardized tests but may have more potential.


abnormal
rabble-rouser
Member: 2245
Joined: Aug 18 2001

The thread title is completely misleading.  It's not a free ride - it's simply a change in admissions criteria combined with an increased number of applicants.

Until now, the UK system was pretty much based entirely on the marks the students obtained on their school exams (in that sense it's very much like the Canadian system - at most Canadian universities it's marks, marks, and marks that determine your acceptance - in the US the schools tend to look at a lot of other things including extra-curricular activities and, at many schools if you make the short list, it culminates in an interview).

And it will hurt those "rich kids" from the private school systems a lot less than you might think.  The UK admissions system is quite different from the one we're used to in either Canada or the US.  Because of the peculiar way the UK admissions system worked there will be numerous students who have been accepted at their "safety schools" (for the record, in this context the "safety schools" included Harvard, Princeton, and so forth) but who are still waiting for the nod from their UK schools - they wouldn't get the answer there until relatively late after final marks became available.  Those students that didn't make it into their first choice schools get relegated to a pool and effectively get another kick at the can elsewhere - it's hardly the end of the world.  [And you'd be surprised how many Brits I went through school with that didn't have the marks to get into Oxford or Cambridge so they came to Canada with the intention of continuing grad schools at one of those two UK institutions.]


Fidel
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 6594
Joined: Apr 29 2004

My cousin had the marks to get into Cambridge. Her father was a coal miner and mother worked all kinds of odd jobs. They still needed the scholarship money though, because they couldn't afford for her to go otherwise. She's been teaching math and physics at a university for a few years now. She sounds like a toffey nose when speaking but votes Labour.


abnormal
rabble-rouser
Member: 2245
Joined: Aug 18 2001

Fidel, you're right - going to school in the UK isn't cheap (home school fees are currently about £4,000) which is roughly in line with Canadian university tuitions. 

[US tuitions are generally astronomical in comparison - I had dinner with some American friends and they were floored when I told them how little my daughter's tuition was in Canada - they're paying literally ten times as much.]


Fidel
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 6594
Joined: Apr 29 2004

They're also not paying the high interest on student loans that Canadian kids do. I think when they created the Millenium Fund, they were thinking that's about how long it would take Canadians to pay off their student loans.


just one of the...
rabble-rouser
Member: 15896
Joined: Jan 20 2008

Fidel wrote:

My cousin had the marks to get into Cambridge. Her father was a coal miner and mother worked all kinds of odd jobs. They still needed the scholarship money though, because they couldn't afford for her to go otherwise. She's been teaching math and physics at a university for a few years now.



You mean "maths," huh?


Unionist
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 12323
Joined: Dec 11 2005

We called it "maths" when we were kids. I think "math" is Amerkin and it took over... like crackers over biscuits, and jelly over jam, and grades over marks, and "second grade" over "Grade 2", etc. Oh my word.


Sky Captain
rabble-rouser
Member: 16353
Joined: Jul 14 2008

Boy, your anti-Americanism really shines through, dosen't it?


Login or register to post comments