rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

To cover Trump, the press needs to be less objective, not more

Image: Wikimedia Commons

In his fine new documentary All Governments Lie, Canadian producer Peter Raymont presents an indictment of mainstream journalism, which proved to be too complicit with government and power to warn us of calamities like the Vietnam war, the wars against Iraq, the banking collapse of 2008 and the ongoing war on terror, including weekly U.S.-directed drone strikes.

The documentary noted that, on the eve of the first Iraq war, the Washington Post ran a story debunking every rationale the U.S. government offered for attacking that country. But the story was buried on page 19.

At a showing of his film the other evening at Ryerson University, Raymont asked a crowd of journalism students: "Do they still teach objectivity in journalism school?"

He confessed he considers himself an activist, not a journalist. "An activist for the truth," he said.

Surely we need lots more of that in journalism today.

Every day in Washington, 70 of the most senior journalists in the United States dutifully sit down for a staged briefing at the White House -- stenographers writing down what they’re told -- but no stories appear for weeks examining poverty or hunger among the dispossessed 99 per cent. Pictures of CEOs fill the financial pages daily but no one bothers to cover the world’s 65 million refugees. Newsrooms are being hollowed out because the economic model that has sustained mainstream journalism is broken. News is often reduced to clickbait to attract eyeballs. Publishers are usually hired for their business or marketing talents rather than any passion or understanding for how to cover the news.

All this has left journalists vulnerable to governments -- especially the Trump administration -- who demonize them as liars and providers of “fake news.” Public trust in the media has fallen to the level of used car salespeople.

When your job depends on getting along rather than going out on a limb, journalists tend to go along. They often hide behind the excuse of "being objective."

Being objective means reporting what people say, but not what they do. It means reporting the claims but not the proof. It means being "balanced" and not taking sides. It often causes you to be distracted by flashy bits of tinsel -- like Trump’s exaggerated claims of crowd size -- and not having time to report what he’s actually doing to the environment.

We need better from our journalism today.

We should be outraged when Gerald Baker, editor-in-chief of the formerly august Wall Street Journal, declared his newspaper would not refer to false statements from the Trump administration as "lies," because doing so would ascribe a "moral intent" to the statements.

The "public interest" demands that journalists today should be advocates for truth, transparency, justice and equality. They should free themselves of the shackles of objectivity and approach each story as skeptics, demanding evidence that government and business are acting truthfully and in the public interest. Too often, history tells us, they have not.

Stop teaching objectivity in journalism schools. No one, including reporters, can be truly "objective," especially when they spend most of their time covering news emanating from people in positions of privilege and power.

When Donald Trump says the press is "the enemy of the American people," and his chief strategist says "the media here is the opposition party," that is so far from the truth that it’s laughable.

The answer is not cool-headed impartiality, as Fred Hiatt, longtime editor of the Washington Post editorial page, suggests. "The answer to dishonest or partisan journalism," he assured readers, "cannot be more partisan journalism, which would only harm our credibility and make civil discourse even less possible."

That won't work. What if, as Leah Finnegan recently wrote in the New Republic, "the press can find a way to conceptualize itself as a true opposition party, then perhaps American journalism might stand for something that would be of value to readers and viewers."

When reporters understand that it’s actually their job to expose the government's misdeeds, crimes, and lies, being the opposition means nothing more than doing your job.

Like this article? Please chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Image: Wikimedia Commons

Thank you for reading this story...

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.

If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.

We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing in 2017.

Make a donation.Become a monthly supporter.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.