rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

TransCanada natural gas explosion raises new questions about pipeline safety

Keystone pipeline. Photo: shannonpatrick17/Flickr

A newly installed TransCanada natural gas pipeline exploded early Thursday morning on June 7, 2018, in the remote Nixon Ridge area of Marshall County in West Virginia, according to a report from EcoWatch.

TransCanada -- the same company behind the Keystone pipeline -- said the explosion has been contained and an investigation is underway. No injuries were reported, said EcoWatch, but the blast did shake residents and could be seen and felt as far as a reported 20 miles away. There was a very large fireball that burst through the sky.

"As soon as the issue was identified, emergency response procedures were enacted and the segment of impacted pipeline was isolated. The fire was fully extinguished by approximately 8:30 am," the company commented Thursday.

"The cause of this issue is not yet known," TransCanada stated. "The site of the incident has been secured and we are beginning the process of working with applicable regulators to investigate, including the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration."

Luckily, the pipeline exploded in a sparsely populated area. I can't help but wonder what could happen if a similar explosion happened along Enbridge's Pipeline 9, which runs through the north end of Toronto. What would be the potential impact to life and limb, and infrastructure and buildings in the surrounding areas?

Enbridge has completed the process of reversing the direction of its Line 9 pipeline between Sarnia and Montreal in order to transport their tar sands diluted bitumen from Alberta to East Coast ports for shipment around the world. This reversal and the strain of carrying heavy diluted bitumen in reverse has caused anti-pipeline activists to question whether the aging pipeline could be considered safe.

A Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration paper noted that it "is issuing this advisory bulletin to alert operators of hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines of the potentially significant impact flow reversals, product changes and conversion to service may have on the integrity of a pipeline. Failures on natural gas transmission and hazardous liquid pipelines have occurred after these operational changes." 

The same report notes two recent cases of pipeline failures:

"Two recent pipeline failures occurred on hazardous liquid pipelines where the flow had been reversed. The Tesoro High Plains Pipeline rupture was discovered on September 29, 2013, after leaking an estimated 20,000 barrels of crude oil in a North Dakota field. The location of pressure and flow monitoring equipment had not been changed to account for the reversed flow. The Pegasus Pipeline failed on March 29, 2013, releasing about 5,000 barrels of crude oil into a neighborhood in Faulkner County, Arkansas. The pipeline flow had been reversed in 2006."

A 2015 analysis of U.S. federal records reveals that in just the past year and four months, there have been 372 oil and gas pipeline leaks, spills and other incidents, leading to 20 deaths, 117 injuries and more than $256 million in damages. The data adds to a June 1, 2013 independent analysis of federal records revealing that since 1986, oil and gas pipeline incidents have resulted in 532 deaths, more than 2,400 injuries and more than $7.5 billion in damages.

Russ Girling, TransCanada president and CEO said at the line opening, "This is truly a best-in-class pipeline and we look forward to many years of safe, reliable, and efficient operation on behalf of our customers." This part of the TransCanada pipeline was newly installed, never mind the safety of aging pipeline infrastructure. The explosion left a crater, with an estimated 10 acres affected.

Robert Burrough, the director with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration's Eastern Regional Office, told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette the affected line is likely TransCanada's $1.6-billion, 160-mile Leach XPress pipeline, which started service in January.

Photo: shannonpatrick17/Flickr

Thank you for reading this story...

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.

If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.

We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing.

Make a donation.Become a monthly supporter.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.