rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Alberta NDP and UCP adopt opposite strategies on gay-straight alliances

Jason Kenney. Photo: Dave Cournoyer/Daveberta.ca

The impassioned, at times bitter, tone of the debate over the latest school gay-straight alliance legislation to come before the Alberta Legislature suggests both the New Democratic Party Government and the United Conservative Party Opposition see their positions as winners with the electorate.

As always in such situations, one of them is almost certainly wrong. But which way this wedge is actually likely to slice the Alberta vote remains far from clear.

A week ago, NDP Education Minister David Eggen introduced Bill 24, An Act to Protect Gay-Straight Alliances, legislation designed to prevent school administrators from informing parents in all but a few situations if their children have joined a GSA at their school, unless the young people themselves agree.

"We wanted to make it crystal clear that kids will not be outed," Eggen told the CBC last week.

UCP Leader Jason Kenney immediately accused the NDP of "using this sensitive matter as a partisan political wedge issue."

This is ironic, seeing as it was Kenney's use of the issue as a partisan political wedge that provoked the NDP to introduce the amendments to the Alberta School Act in the first place.

Kenney created a storm of controversy last March when, during a congenial visit with like-minded members of the Calgary Herald Editorial Board, he opined that while he might not repeal the law reluctantly brought in by premier Jim Prentice's Progressive Conservatives in 2015 that requires students to be permitted to form a gay-straight alliance at school if they see the need, their parents should be always notified if they sign up.

This infuriated GSA supporters, who argued that in many cases it could put LGBTQ children's lives at risk, but was red meat to Kenney’s social conservative base.

This blog wondered at the time if his position meant Kenney was turning into the Anita Bryant of Canada, a pretty good line for that tiny minority of readers old enough to remember who Anita Bryant is.

I wrote at the time: "Everybody -- including Kenney, obviously -- understands that the effect of such a policy, as The Globe and Mail's Tabitha Southey cleverly put it, would be 'basically just telling the kids that the GSAs are going to go live on a farm now, and no, you can't visit them.'" Southey, alas, is no longer with Canada’s National Website.

The heat from the blowback was intense enough that Kenney made himself scarce before resurfacing safe and well-fed a month later at a fund-raiser for then B.C. premier Christy Clark's Liberals in a chichi Vancouver restaurant. An NDP-Green alliance now runs the province to the west.

Notwithstanding the promise Monday by UCP House Leader Jason Nixon that the Opposition Caucus would be allowed a free vote on the bill, Kenney vowed the next day that his Legislative Caucus, of which he is leader but not yet a member, would vote against Bill 24.

Of course, given the makeup of the UCP Caucus, it's quite possible both a free vote and a unanimous vote could happily coexist within its ranks.

In any case, both Kenney's UCP supporters and Premier Rachel Notley's NDP seem to have cranked up the rhetoric on the issue.

As political commentator Dave Cournoyer argued on his thoughtful Daveberta.ca blog, "Kenney and the UCP are betting that Albertans will forgive their social conservative stances when reminded of the NDP's more unpopular economic policies. Notley and the NDP are betting that this bill to protect Alberta students will convince voters consider otherwise."

Many commentators had imagined that Kenney, once safely ensconced as leader of the UCP, would pivot to a more moderate position on social issues. Now it seems as if he will defy that conventional wisdom and continue to thump his social conservative tub.

It's always dangerous, of course, to hold up an American mirror to a Canadian jurisdiction -- even one as Americanized as Alberta -- in an effort to suss out how such a controversy might play out.

Still, the results of Tuesday's elections in the not-entirely-dissimilar republic next door are suggestive of possibilities, if not certainties.

"A Year After Trump, Women and Minorities Give Groundbreaking Wins to Democrats," read a headline in Wednesday's online edition of The New York Times.

"If the 2016 presidential election reflected a primal roar from disaffected white working class voters that delivered for President Trump and Republicans, Tuesday's results showed the potential of a rising coalition of women, minorities, and gay and transgender people who are solidly aligning with Democrats," the story began.

By all appearances, Kenney is still channeling Donald Trump on many issues. Notley's New Democrats are seeking a centrist sweet spot not unlike that identified with American Democrats.

So can the same thing happen in Alberta as happened in the United States on Tuesday night?

It's too soon to tell…

This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, AlbertaPolitics.ca

Image: Dave Cournoyer/Daveberta.ca

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. 

    Thank you for reading this story...

    More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.

    If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.

    We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing in 2017.

    Make a donation.Become a monthly supporter.

    Comments

    We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

    Do

    • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
    • Add context and background.
    • Report typos and logical fallacies.
    • Be respectful.
    • Respect copyright - link to articles.
    • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

    Don't

    • Use oppressive/offensive language.
    • Libel or defame.
    • Bully or troll.
    • Post spam.
    • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.