rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Former Wildrose Party leader Brian Jean ignores Canadian history in his agenda for Alberta

Brian Jean (Photo: Facebook).

If former Wildrose Party leader Brian Jean established anything on Monday with his Epistle to the Albertans, wherein he set out his "agenda to move Alberta forward," it's that he remains a man desperate to be taken seriously.

Much mocked in circles that no longer take Jean very seriously at all, if ever they did, his not-entirely-unexpected disquisition on Confederation and Alberta's place in it nevertheless generated lots of Serious Ink, actual and virtual.

In his screed, definitely meant to be taken seriously, the man on horseback from Fort McMurray proclaimed that "Canada is broken" and "Albertans are furious." These are the sort of claims journalists love to repeat, even if they are contentious and their motivation tendentious.

I suppose we can agree some Albertans are furious. This has always been true as long as I've lived here, which is getting to be a very long time indeed. Perhaps it's something in the water, although probably not in our constitutional arrangements with the rest of Canada, which for most of that time have been very much to Alberta's advantage.

It is also true there's an elite political consensus in this province that the country isn't working the way it ought to, that is, that our leaders are not getting everything they want the instant they want it. But since other Canadians don't necessarily or always want the same things Alberta's leaders do, one could argue that's evidence the country is working the way it should.

When a group of social media savvy Albertans who are not furious cooked up the ironic Twitter hash tag #NotAngryAB in response to Jean's musings, that just made the citizens of the Principality of Angry Alberta angrier, to mainly comedic effect.

This can't have been an entirely happy outcome for a man who had just informed us "Alberta's future looks bleak unless bold action is taken" -- that is, unless we Albertans swallow the prescription he has issued for us, to wit, to start acting like Quebec separatists, demand the Canadian Constitution be renegotiated to our advantage, and, while we're at it, recognize we have no better leader than Brian Jean. Still, better to be spoken of badly than not to be spoken of at all!

Jean made the first two propositions explicitly in his essay. As for the third, that's implied but pretty obvious. He's telling us he's the only person who can, in his words, "return Canada to the original spirit of Confederation."

The only problem with Jean's convenient declaration that "our country is not working the way it was intended in 1867" as a starting point for his prescription for the future is that it is a profound misinterpretation of the reasons Canada was created, and the federal form it took.

It is simply not true, as Jean contends, that "the original constitution was essentially a business deal guaranteeing free trade and free passage of goods between and through our provinces, to bring prosperity to all Canadians." This is an ideological fantasy with shallow roots in the late 20th century.

Indeed, Alberta was part of the Northwest Territories, entirely under federal jurisdiction, until 1905, and did not receive full control over its natural resources until 1930.

Confederation was a 19th-century British imperial project to strategically block the United States from the western half of British North America at an affordable cost that would be largely borne by citizens of the new country. It was also intended to meld badly functioning colonial governments like that in the former Upper Canada into a system that would be stable, and to break the historic deadlock between French and English Canada.

Notwithstanding the horrible example of the American Civil War, still fresh in everyone's memory in 1867, it took the form of a federation to ensure it could be accepted by the French-speaking colonists of what is now Quebec and long-established English-speaking colonists on the East Coast.

Free passage of goods among provinces was an afterthought at best, although it would get there in the fullness of time with the construction of railroads westward.

It is true our Canadian federation was structured to avoid the worst features of the United States' slaveholder constitution -- which led to the Civil War. So Jean is partly right when he says our original constitution -- the British North America Act, passed by the Parliament at Westminster -- "envisioned a central government making the ultimate political decision to declare a project to be in the national interest and thus override regional objections."

But to suggest Canada could or should return to a near-unitary government able if inclined to enforce the decisions Alberta wants (and presumably only the decisions Alberta wants) is dangerous nonsense that ignores a century and a half of Canadian constitutional jurisprudence.

In our nearly 152 years, Canada has gone from being a highly centralized federation dominated by Ottawa to one of the most decentralized federal unions in the world. The ship Jean so fondly remembers sailed long, long ago.

Nor would bringing it back to port be good for Alberta, which inevitably would sooner or later be overruled by the majority on policies that matter to it. If anyone was suggesting this seriously, Albertans would fight it tooth and nail -- and we would have allies in most other provinces.

Jean has to understand this stuff. He may be being a dope, but he's not a dummy. He's a lawyer, for heaven's sake!

So what's up? One can only speculate, of course, but consider the position he finds himself in.

Here it is, 2019, about the time he'd been hoping to be getting ready to take hold of the reins of Alberta's government. Instead he's a man without a party to lead or a political role to fulfill.

He's not exactly a spring chicken at 55, but he and his second wife Kimberly Michelutti, whom he married in 2017, have just declared that they're about to have a baby. Funny how his idea that "the marriage between Alberta and the rest of Canada is deeply troubled" seemed like an appropriate metaphor.

And recent polling suggests the aggressive advertising campaign by Alberta's current NDP government led by Premier Rachel Notley may in fact be working, moving Canadians in most places toward viewing a pipeline as a national necessity, just as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau also says it is.

Jean's rival in the conservative movement -- now the leader of the United Conservative Party -- is a former federal politician who apparently still casts covetous eyes at the Prime Minister's Office, just down the street from the half-million-dollar condo he bought in 2009 with a little help from taxpayers.

So, who knows, there might be a job opening in Edmonton soon. And if that doesn't work, there's always the "'Mad As Hell' Party, that isn't going to take it any more."

So never mind the facts of history. What better way to set yourself apart from all those other conservatives clamouring for the brass ring than to have a slogan concise enough to stitch on a ball cap: "Make Confederation Great Again."

David Climenhaga, author of the Alberta Diary blog, is a journalist, author, journalism teacher, poet and trade union communicator who has worked in senior writing and editing positions with the Toronto Globe and Mail and the Calgary Herald. This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, AlbertaPolitics.ca.

Photo: Facebook

Help make rabble sustainable. Please consider supporting our work with a monthly donation. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.