Behind The Numbers

Behind The Numbers's picture

Behind The Numbers delivers timely, progressive commentary on issues that affect Canadians, including the economy, poverty, inequality, climate change, budgets, taxes, public services, employment and much more. Contributors include staff and research associates from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA).The views expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors, and do not necessarily represent the views of the CCPA. Visit the blog at Behindthenumbers.ca.

Social insurance benefits increase for 2012

| January 2, 2012

Amidst the plethora of media reports on "payroll tax" increases for 2012, there was little mention of increases in benefits.

For example, the Toronto Sun, cued by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, reported:

If you feel a hand grabbing at your wallet next week, calling the cops won't do any good because it's the federal government picking your pocket.

It's that time of year again when tax collectors at the Canada Revenue Agency, at the behest of their political masters, siphon more from the pay stubs of Canadians while giving corporations a New Year's bonus.

The New Year's Day hike will see employers and employees pay more into employment insurance and the Canada Pension Plan for a combined total of $306 a year in additional payroll taxes for working stiffs, says the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.

There are, of course, two sides to social insurance programs.

Starting in January, CPP benefits -- indexed to inflation -- rise by 2.8 per cent to a new monthly maximum of $986.67. (You can't say that about far too many defined benefit pension plans, and there is no inflation indexing of other pensions.)

Advertising

Reflecting the rise in maximum insurable earnings, the maximum weekly EI benefit goes from $468 to $485.

The amount of earnings replaced by both EI and CPP will increase, giving rise to a premium increase in non-inflation adjusted dollar terms. But, by the same token, there will be no fall in the real amount of income replaced by EI and CPP benefits during a spell of unemployment or when retiring.

Meanwhile, CPP premiums are unchanged as a percentage of earnings, and the employee EI premium contribution rate is up by an eye-watering 5 cents per week per $100 of earnings.

I wonder why the mainstream media highlighted only the cost as opposed to the benefits of these programs?

This article was first posted on Behind the Numbers.

embedded_video

Comments

Andrew Jackson wrote:
I wonder why the mainstream media highlighted only the cost as opposed to the benefits of these programs?

And I wonder why Andrew Jackson is so quick to tout the supposed largesse of the Harper Government™, and minimize the fact that the workers - and not the wealthy plutocracy - are being made to pay more for their own social benefits.

This reads like a Harper Government™ press release. Does Jackson think the Sun is being unfair to the government?

Does he think the unemployed should feel grateful for a maximum benefit of $485 a week?

Login or register to post comments