rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Behind The Numbers

Behind The Numbers's picture
Behind The Numbers delivers timely, progressive commentary on issues that affect Canadians, including the economy, poverty, inequality, climate change, budgets, taxes, public services, employment and much more. Contributors include staff and research associates from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA).The views expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors, and do not necessarily represent the views of the CCPA. Visit the blog at Behindthenumbers.ca.

Ontario kicked off 2015 with lacklustre job and wage trends

| February 9, 2015
Ontario kicked off 2015 with lacklustre job and wage trends

Like this article? Chip in to keep stories likes these coming.

Ontario started the New Year with very little change in its jobs numbers: the employment rate is holding steady but there is a shift in part-time job growth.

Despite the bad news on the job front in January -- massive Target Canada layoffs and the closing of Wrigley's chewing gum factory in Toronto -- Ontario created a 1,300 jobs last month. The layoffs will be hitting the labour market numbers in the months to come.

The devil is in the details: Ontario lost 23,200 full-time jobs and gained 24,400 part-time jobs.

That's a shift from Ontario's 2014 job trends -- a year where more than 90 per cent of the province's new jobs were full-time.

At the same time, the unemployment rate did tick down slightly to 6.9 per cent, a full half percentage point lower than it was in January 2014 (7.4 per cent). Much of that decline is a result of a drop in the labour force participation rate -- fewer people were participating in the labour force in Ontario in January than in the month previous.

The employment rate, on the other hand, remains unchanged.

The other measure I've been keeping an eye on lately is wages: are they going up, down, or is the needle stuck? Median wages remained virtually unchanged in January, reflecting a sustained pattern of stagnant real median wages in Ontario, as well as in Canada.

Given governments' reliance on consumer spending to help drive economic growth, wage stagnation is a red flag trend: workers are not seeing an increase in their purchasing power.

Add to the trend this development: the largest increase in employment came in the category of self-employment, where a total of 20,000 jobs were added in January. And, from a recent Hennessy's Index, we know that self-employed individuals earn about 20 per cent less than a "regular employee."

A year-over-year comparison of temporary work suggests that Ontario is following a similar path as British Columbia: it's creating more temporary than permanent jobs. Compared to January 2014, Ontario has just over 80,000 more temporary employees and just under 80,000 fewer permanent employees.

Ontario's jobs report is, once again, lacklustre and wage stagnation trends don't make the job news any easier to digest.

Kaylie Tiessen is an economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives' Ontario Office. Follow her on Twitter: @KaylieTiessen

embedded_video

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.