rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

NAFTA challenge threatened over uranium mine in Quebec

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Photo: The base camp for the Matoush mine

Here's yet another reason to abrogate NAFTA and to not ratify the Canada-European Union 'free trade' agreement.

Strateco Resources Inc's chief executive Guy Hébert says that his company may use the Chapter 11 investor-state clause of the North American Free Trade Agreement to challenge the delay due to Quebec's public consultation process related to the Matoush uranium mine. While an amount hasn't been specified, the company claims it has already invested $123 million in the mine.

Boucherville, Quebec-based Strateco (that according to media reports has both U.S. and European investors) wants to operate the mine in Eeyou Istchee in the Otish Mountains, some 275-kilometres north of Chibougamau and 210 km northeast of Mistissini.

The mine has been opposed by the Mistissini Cree, the Cree Regional Health Authority, the Coalition Québec meilleure mine!, the Quebec Network of Environmental Organizations, MiningWatch Canada, the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility, and the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society.

Last March, Quebec environment minister Yves-François Blanchet announced that no new permits would be issued for uranium exploration and mining projects in the province until after the government's 18-month public consultation and an environmental review agency report on the industry. The following month Strateco announced it was suing the Quebec government for at least $16 million -- money the company said it was losing while waiting for Quebec to make its decision about the mine. In August an interim Quebec Superior Court decision denied Strateco's demand for compensation.

News of this possible Strateco NAFTA challenge comes around the first anniversary of the Lone Pine Resources $250-million NAFTA challenge against Quebec's move to cancel oil and gas exploration permits for deposits under the St. Lawrence River.

Photo: The base camp for the Matoush mine

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.