rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Why Harper and Wynne's meeting could undermine the right to water in Ontario

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Photo: Premier of Ontario Photography/flickr

After a series of requests from Kathleen Wynne, Prime Minister Stephen Harper finally agreed to meet the Ontario premier this week for a 30-45 minute meeting at the Royal York Hotel in Toronto just prior to a hockey game. The last time the prime minister met with the premier of the country's most populous province was 13 months ago.

The Toronto Star reports, "Infrastructure funding -- particularly for northern Ontario's Ring of Fire -- was on the agenda, as well as the drinking water available to First Nations." The Globe and Mail explains, "The province wants Ottawa to contribute $1-billion for a road or rail line to the Ring of Fire mineral deposit..."

On first glance, the part about the prime minister and premier discussing drinking water for First Nations could seem like a step forward. The crisis is clear enough. Late last year, CBC reported, "Nearly half of the 133 First Nations in Ontario currently have boil water advisories, and it has been more than ten years since ten First Nations in northwestern Ontario had clean drinking water."

But it's also possible -- and appears to be the case -- that this issue was discussed in the context of the 350-kilometre transportation corridor needed to ship ore out of the Ring of Fire area for processing. In 2012, the Globe and Mail noted, "Ironically, a road of some sort may help with Marten Falls [First Nation's] short-term drinking-water concerns. ...[It] would be ready access to the community, bringing in cheaper supplies and professional help that Marten Falls requires frequently to keep its water system in good shape."

The "ironic" part is that along with the water contamination risks of extracting $30-billion worth of chromite over a 5,000-kilometre area of pristine wilderness, which would include tailings ponds for the mining waste and hydro-electric dams to power the operations, the road would go through boreal forest and over several major waterways posing further water risks in the traditional lands of the Marten Falls, Webequie, Neskantaga and other First Nations. The Neskantaga First Nation has been without potable water since 1995.

So, did Harper and Wynne discuss access to water for First Nations only in the context of advancing a water-destructive mining agenda?

Additionally, a statement from the Prime Minister's Office (issued within a half hour of the meeting) says Harper and Wynne "agreed on the importance of ongoing investments in infrastructure, including the federal government's new Building Canada Fund. They also discussed the need to remove barriers to internal trade, the importance of continued support from both levels of government for the manufacturing and automotive sectors, as well as the important role of resource development for the Ontario and Canadian economies."

It's not clear from this statement if Harper and Wynne talked about the investor-state dispute settlement provision that could be part of an "internal trade" deal, or for that matter the estimated $1 billion in increased costs to the province for pharmaceutical drugs given the patent provisions Harper agreed to in the Canada-European Union "free trade" agreement. Nor is it clear when they discussed resource development if the 1.1 million barrel per day Energy East tar sands pipeline through Ontario was mentioned.

It's also not known if when the conversation turned to the Building Canada Fund, a federal fund that promotes privatization through public-private partnerships, if the Auditor General's report that revealed P3 projects had cost the people of Ontario $8 billion in extra costs was remembered. Likely not, given that the Globe and Mail notes, "Ms. Wynne has indicated she will play ball with the federal government on infrastructure, submitting several requests for project funding to the Building Canada Fund." Might those P3 requests include water and wastewater infrastructure?

The Toronto Star notes that the meeting likely happened because, "With Harper headed into a federal election on or before Oct. 19 -- and his Conservatives dependent on holding scores of Ontario seats to retain government -- he consented to see Wynne." The Globe and Mail adds that with the election, "Mr. Harper seems determined to defuse potential controversies. Hours before his confab with Ms. Wynne, he also demoted embattled cabinet minister Julian Fantino."

Maclean's magazine more fully notes, "In the 2011 federal election, there were 951,156 more Ontario voters who voted for the Harper Conservatives than there were Ontario voters who voted for the Hudak Conservatives in the 2014 Ontario election. That's not quite a million Ontario voters who didn't vote for Hudak, but whom Harper needs to vote for him if he's to hold his majority. That's what political moderation looks like. Harper needs the votes of a hell of a lot of Ontarians who basically have no problem with Kathleen Wynne. Realizing that, and acting on it, is an election-year instinct."

As such, it appears that while the meeting may have helped Harper's electoral prospects in Ontario and Wynne's agenda to move forward with mining in northern Ontario, in a series of other areas -- water, trade, health care and climate justice -- it was a setback for the public interest.

Photo: Premier of Ontario Photography/flickr

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.