rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Canada's WTO challenge to European seal product ban moves ahead despite real threat to free trade talks

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Photo: European Parliament/Flickr

Canada and Norway are moving ahead with their joint disputes at the World Trade Organization against a popular European Union ban on importing seal products. Almost immediately, members of the European Parliament shot back with veiled threats to scuttle the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement. They might actually be able to do it. Then again, the Harper government might not care.

"I am deeply disappointed to see Stephen Harper move this senseless WTO case forward in direct opposition to the will of Canadians and Europeans," said David Martin, a Socialist & Democrat group member of the committee on International Trade of the European Parliament, in a press release by the Humane Society International/Canada. "This pointless attack on the democratic rights of European citizens to choose which products we place on our market is doomed to failure and a colossal waste of millions of Canadian tax dollars. Furthermore, while the Canadian government may want the public to believe otherwise, this WTO challenge is putting a serious strain on the ongoing Canada-EU trade negotiations."

Colossal waste of Canadian tax dollars? The Human Society International estimates the WTO challenge will cost Canada $10 million in legal fees. And a 2009 poll showed that 86 per cent of Canadians supported the EU ban, which the EU parliament voted into place in May 2009 by a margin of 550 to 49 votes. Half of Newfoundland and Labrador's sealers support a federal buyout, according to the animal welfare group. No doubt it would be much more cost-effective than an expensive, lengthy and possibly unsuccessful WTO challenge.

Then there's the alleged threat to Harper's prized free trade deal with the EU. Already, over 100 MEPs have said the EU parliament should not ratify CETA while the WTO dispute is still active.

"EU citizens are not supporting any trade in products of inherently inhumane activities such as commercial sealing, and we have the right to defend our legislation vigorously at WTO," said Italian MEP Cristiana Muscardini in the same Human Society media release. "In addition, the European Parliament has made it clear that if Canada continues with the WTO challenge, it is far less likely to ratify the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement currently being negotiated. As I often underlined to the EU Trade Commissioner, it is time to have an Animal Welfare chapter inside any Trade Agreements with third countries."

So why take this risk? Ostensibly, the WTO dispute alongside Norway (which is not an EU member country) is in defence of Northern, First Nations and Maritime jobs. The government claims the EU seal ban violates several articles of the WTO's Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, as well as the GATT and Agriculture Agreement. At home it looks like Harper is standing up for Canadian interests, but he doesn't want to do it at the expense of other interests like signing trade deals. Or at least that's what articles this month about his government's u-turn on asbestos suggested.

I would suggest it's very difficult to know exactly how any of these issues -- asbestos, seals, tar sands and the EU Fuel Quality Directive -- relate to the ongoing CETA negotiations. But they do, and they will become more important as both Canada and the EU look to the final stages of these CETA talks. Until now, trade negotiators have developed a compromise text based on secret mandates from the Harper cabinet and European Commission. Those mandates could run their course by the end of October, at which point trade-offs (on things like procurement, investment, treatment of GMOs, agricultural tariffs or rules of origin) could come down to unrelated issues like the seal hunt.

Another thing to consider is that Harper might not care how this WTO challenge undermines (or not) the CETA negotiations. Seal products are an important source of subsistence and income for Nunavut and other Northern communities. The EU seal ban is a response to opposition and campaigning against the commercial hunts in Eastern Canada. Harper frequently speaks about Northern economic development so defending markets for Northern products is completely consistent with that stance.

It feels odd to be giving the prime minister the benefit of the doubt when polls today show his approval rating sinking to 50 per cent. I do so only to suggest that while Canada's WTO challenge may prove hazardous to the ongoing CETA negotiations, Harper might not be bothered. There's no way he can lose face in Canada (among prospective voters to be sure) by sticking up for Northern and Eastern sealers. If the EU wants to let it get in the way of a trade deal, that's their problem. Or so the prime minister could be thinking.

Luckily Harper has other problems at home with CETA. We used last week's negotiations in Ottawa to talk about one of them. Not everyone eats seal meat but everyone, including Conservative voters, at some point takes out a prescription. The idea that CETA could make drug plans more expensive if Canada sides with the EU and Big Pharma has even former ambassador to the WTO and chief NAFTA negotiator John Weeks asking the government "to think long and hard before it formulates final positions on these matters."

Drug costs aren't the only good reason to get in the way of CETA. But if the seal issue is ultimately going to finish the talks off, well so be it. You won't hear me complaining.

Photo: European Parliament/Flickr

What's Harper up to?  Award-winning journalist Karl Nerenberg keeps you in the know. Donate to support his efforts today.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.