rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

A strategy for home and long-term residential care in the 2014 Health Accord

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Premiers don't be puppets, stand up to Harper!

Universal health care is in jeopardy. Stephen Harper has been quite clear in the media that he will not meet with all of the premiers to create a 2014 Health Accord. According to Harper, the deal is already done. In December 2011, finance minister Jim Flaherty was flown into a meeting of the provincial finance ministers. He left a sheet of paper on their desks during the lunch hour which outlined the amount of money the provinces would receive in federal health transfers from 2014-2024. The paper outlined Harper government's plan to decrease the current six per cent escalating transfer by tying it to GDP. This will reduce the transfer by $36 billion from 2017 to 2024. Provinces simply cannot afford this loss.

A profile of aging in Canada

According to the Canadian Institute for Health Research's Institute of Aging, two-thirds of people who have ever reached age 65 are alive today. In Canada, the segment of the population that is 65 and older is larger than it has ever been and it continues to grow. Despite these facts, Canada does not have a national strategy or plan for continuing care -- home and community or residential care. This means that every province and territory is on its own to modify its policies and infrastructure to reflect our aging community. It also means that provinces/territories are on their own to fund those changes.

Data challenges

While there are lots of reports and research on what makes communities a successful place for aging there are few pan-Canadian studies which give us an accurate picture of how Canada is doing. Try as I might, I cannot obtain statistics that show the length of waitlists and wait times for long-term care beds in each of the provinces and territories. Part of the problem is that several provinces do not collect or make public this information. And finding out about what's happening in residential care is about to become even more challenging as Statistics Canada has had to cut their residential care survey.

Funding the necessary changes in home and long-term care

Of the research that is available, most studies show that home care is the most affordable and desired way to care for our senior population. For those who will not have their needs met through professional care provided in the home -- I use "professional care" because too often Canada relies on family members to provide care without the necessary training or skill set that may be required -- publicly-supported long-term care facilities need to be available. Publicly supported facilities are important because they charge lower rates than private for-profit facilities and are often the only option for low-income seniors. And while we know that many provinces have long waitlists for residential care placement because there are not enough beds, there are often still some empty beds in private for-profit facilities because most people cannot afford them.

Implementing changes in health care will cost money -- although increasing home care services could save a lot too. Yet, there is no reflection of this increased cost in the federal government's health transfer. Several provinces including those in the Atlantic provinces, Ontario and British Columbia are calling for federal funding formulas to consider aging populations. But provinces with young and employed workers such as Alberta aren't on board yet.

2014 Health Accord

So what does all of this have to do with the 2014 Health Accord and an upcoming health ministers' meeting?

The 2014 Health Accord should be an opportunity for the federal and provincial/territorial governments to come together and discuss how to improve Canadian health systems by protecting, strengthening and extending the Canada Health Act. This would include keeping long-term care facilities and home care accessible by stopping the mass privatization of services and expanding public and non-profit care. But instead of looking at improvements or the needs of Canadians -- such as affordable pharmaceuticals, home and community care, and free dental, mental, and vision care, the federal government has stopped the conversation before it really started. Now they've begun a process of meeting one-on-one with the premiers of each province and territory -- the St. John's Telegram broke this story on August 29.

Why do we need Harper at the Accord?

If Harper continues his one-on-one meetings with the provinces, the premiers will lose their ability to stand up to Harper. Financially strapped provinces will be forced to sign weaker agreements than if they had richer provinces with them. Premiers have a chance to improve health care across Canada, especially for our fastest growing population -- those 80 and above -- by demanding a pan-Canadian strategy on aging. They must stick together.

What is the Council doing?

The health ministers are coming to Halifax on September 27-28. The Council of Canadians is looking at ways to intervene and give Canadians a voice.

What can you do?

We encourage you to talk to your Ministers of Health and ask them to come to Halifax with one demand -- no one-on-ones, Harper must return to the 2014 Health Accord Negotiation table. It's time we take a stand for all generations. I finally get to win one for my parents and grandparents…and eventually myself!

What's Harper up to?  Award-winning journalist Karl Nerenberg keeps you in the know. Donate to support his efforts today.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.