rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Council of Canadians urges premiers to insist on a national pharmacare plan

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Activists gather outside health ministers meeting to urge support for medicare.

Canada's health ministers met in Halifax September 27-28 to discuss the 2014 health accord, the recommendations coming out of the Council of the Federations' Innovation working group, and how to work together to improve health care without leadership from the federal government.

In July, the premiers announced that provinces would begin work on bulk purchasing two to three generic drugs. The advantage with bulk purchasing is that provinces and territories can often get a better deal with pharmaceutical manufacturers the more they buy. Currently, provinces and territories negotiate one-on-one with pharmaceutical companies and due to a non-disclosure clause they're often unaware of what the other provinces or territories paid for the same drug from the same manufacturer. Less populous provinces or territories are likely to purchase less of any drug and therefore they pay a higher price per pill.

Bulk purchasing is certainly a step in the right direction, but limiting bulk purchases to 2-3 generic drugs is a far cry from the national pharmacare program promised in the 2004 health accord.

The Ontario government had promised to look into bulk purchasing with their regional neighbours in hopes that they could bring down the cost of the drugs they use. However, every province and territory has a different drug formulary -- meaning they purchase different versions of drugs and the provincial plan covers different versions of different drugs. Negotiating which drugs should be included in the formulary and which shouldn't is rumoured to have been a nightmare and the provincial governments gave up on the idea of bulk purchasing all of their pharmaceuticals until the federal government was able to take leadership and help develop a national formulary.

Provincial/territorial premiers play tug-of-war with Stephen Harper

This summer when the premiers first announced their intentions to bulk purchase drugs, the Council of Canadians and many of our allies saw this an attempt from the provinces and territories to find solutions to the pharmacare crisis -- 1 in 10 Canadians are unable to afford their prescription medication -- regardless of the federal government's absence. We understood that the provinces and territories are in a tough position. They've been told that they'll lose $36 billion in health transfers in the next accord, more programs and services are being downloaded onto them by the federal government -- such as is the case with Manitoba and refugee health care -- and with many Canadians losing their full-time jobs, health benefits are also being lost. The premiers have a lot on their plate right now.

Due to the federal downloading of programs and services and the abdication of the federal government from their health-care responsibilities, the Council and our allies were expecting the implementation of programs like pharmacare to be a little slow. We encouraged and supported the premiers' calls for Harper to return to the 2014 negotiating table. But this Friday the federal government announced their intentions to join the premiers in bulk purchasing 2-3 generic drugs -- the federal government still purchases medicines for aboriginals, RCMP and prison inmates. Bulk purchasing would save the federal government some money and if the premiers are already doing most of the work, Ottawa can take a backseat in the negotiation process.

Having the federal and provincial governments work together to bulk purchase medicines will indeed save Canadians millions of dollars. However, if the governments fulfilled their promise of pharmacare in the 2004, we could be saving billions -- $10.7 billion -- each year! The federal government's announcement has simply turned into another abdication of responsibility. Instead of trying to negotiate a pan-Canadian pharmacare plan that would bulk purchase all medicines, change our current price comparator countries -- Canada artificially inflates the cost of drugs because we use the most expensive European comparator countries instead of the global or even OECD average -- and ensure that everyone in Canada has access to the best medication, the federal government is hopping on board with a less time-consuming program that will leave Canadians with cheaper access to only 2 or 3 medicines.

While we applaud the Council of the Federation for taking the first steps towards a national pharmacare plan, we are disappointed with the federal government's plan to continue rewarding big pharma with no plans to bulk purchase or change price comparator countries. The federal government is obviously on the side of big pharma -- they're even negotiating for a free trade agreement with the European Union that will extend patents for big pharma and cost Canadians $2.8 billion a year!

The health ministers are returning to their provinces this week to ask their premiers if the federal government is welcome to join the generic bulk purchasing plan. While we want Canadians to save money, we'd prefer that they save billions of dollars instead of just millions. But the only way for that to happen is for the premiers to insist that the federal government return to the 2014 negotiation table and lead talks on a pan-Canadian pharmacare plan.

What's Harper up to? Award-winning journalist Karl Nerenberg keeps you in the know. Donate to support his efforts today.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.