rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Harper again rejects debate on China investment treaty, but public pressure is having an impact

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

The Conservative majority on trade committee defeated a motion yesterday from NDP trade critic Don Davies which would have forced the committee to study the Canada-China investment treaty (FIPA) before it’s allowed to become law, as early as November 1. In typical fashion, the committee went in-camera for the vote so that Harper’s abuse of democracy went unrecorded. They do this quite often.

“It boggles my mind that the government would want to move forward with that [treaty] without a debate, without a vote and without a study,” said Davies Thursday afternoon. Davies also complained about receiving “thousands upon thousands of emails” against the China treaty forwarded to him from the office of Conservative MP Bev Shipley, who is also on the trade committee.

The little prank proves how much public concern there is out there about giving excessive rights to companies investing in Canada. If you haven’t yet sent a letter to MPs demanding that they tear up or at least debate the FIPA with China, you can do it right here.

Green Party leader Elizabeth May, meanwhile, continues her fight against the FIPA in the House of Commons, even if she only has 60 seconds to do so. She rose on Tuesday to explain that she has been briefed by government trade officials on the treaty, and that:

It confirms that Chinese state-owned enterprises would have the right to complain and charge for damages for decisions in Canada by municipal, provincial, territorial or federal governments. It confirms this treaty will apply till 2027 for a minimum, and potentially till 2042, and China can complain of anything it feels is arbitrary.

News articles and commentary today acknowledge there is a lot of public unease about the China treaty. Despite Conservative debate-dodging at committee, we have to believe we can at least delay ratification of the FIPA. It will be the best opportunity we’ve had in years, since the Multilateral Agreement on Investment was defeated in 1998, to review Canada’s trade practice of including excessive corporate rights in investment treaties.

There’s no reason we should cancel one corporate rights pact with China and not the one Harper is including in his flagship Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the European Union. Shell, Total, BP all invest heavily in the tarsands, offshore drilling and pipelines. No corporations from any country should have a veto over Canadian resource, conservation or environmental policy.

Keep sending letters to the editor of your local papers about the China FIPA. Make the links with CETA and with the 18+ times Canada has been sued under the FIPA-like corporate rights in NAFTA’s Chapter 11

For more on the China investment treaty (FIPA or FIPPA), see our Action Alert here, which includes links to articles by Scott Sinclair (CCPA), Gus Van Harten (Osgoode Hall Law School) and others. Fore more on the Canada-EU trade deal (CETA), click here. For an up-to-date list of NAFTA lawsuits against Canada, Mexico and the United States, see the Public Citizen resource here.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.