rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

BRICS summit as a 21st-century 'scramble for Africa'

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

While five heads of states of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) met in Durban last week for the developing nations' summit, civil society organizations gathered as "brics-from-below" under the banner of "Watching and challenging power". Through a week of intensive sessions, mass meetings, and protests, they shared experiences and networked around issues. This countered BRICS governments' common use of radical rhetoric around anti-imperialism and Northern multi-nationals while they promote investments by their countries in infrastructure, mining, energy, and agriculture.

According to the brics-from-below press statement: "The prospect that South Africa 'presents a gateway for investment on the continent' could leave Africa overwhelmed by BRICS corporations and is indicative that the trajectory of the 21st-century 'scramble for Africa' has already begun. Africa's 'resource curse' will attract billions of dollars' worth of BRICS infrastructure developments. In this light, the BRICS summit in Durban is set to be the next successor to the initial carving up of Africa, which took place in 1885 in Berlin."

What does "investment" mean for water in Africa? On 26 March, Blue Planet Project Organizer Mary Galvin spoke to over 70 activists at a brics-from-below session on land, agriculture and water. She highlighted how promised "investment" from the private sector never materialized in the area of water services, and how the private sector's engagement with water resources may be more sinister. Examples include private ownership of technologies needed to access water in areas facing water scarcity, water grabs, and the assertion of corporate influence/ control through the Water Resources Group (see earlier blog on private ownership of water resources).

She highlighted the "pain and gain of 'investment'":

1. Government welcomes the corporations and develops a close relationship that it considers win-win.
Government's neediness leads to dependency and poor regulation (or even a situation of a 'captive regulator')

2. Government sees 'investment' as increasing GDP and creating jobs and is willing to re-allocate resources to support investors' work. Infrastructure development as a spinoff of investment.
Profit is repatriated, few jobs are created, and non-renewables are used. Water is allocated to industry, mining, and agriculture over people's livelihoods and development.

This is evident in massive dam building like the Lesotho Highlands Water Project to provide water to industry around Johannesburg or like Belo Monte dam in Brazil, which will be the third largest dam in the world. Blue Planet Project's recently released report Dam Truths: A Compilation of Case Studies about Popular Struggles Against Big Dams shows how such dams result in displaced people, abuse of indigenous rights and possibly violence, no or inadequate compensation, people lacking access to water or electricity from a neighbouring dam, ecological damage, and potential danger downstream.

She concluded with Maude Barlow's warning:

"We have a huge fight on our hands over our water and our resources, and I think in the next few years we are going to see a lot more people stand up physically with their bodies in front of bulldozers and heavy equipment and mining companies and so on just to try to stop the damage."

"Investment" typically fulfills corporate interests of power and profit. Civil society needs to hold government accountable from inside and outside, and to promote a paradigm shift from a neo-liberal focus on fixes such as large dams to one of community control of the commons.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.