GRANDE PRAIRIE, Alberta
Just when you thought it was safe to breath the isotope-laden Western Canadian air again, now that the wind from Japan has died down a little, comes word that the tireless lobbyists for a nuclear power plant near the Alberta tar sands are back at it.
A Calgary Herald report last Friday told the story of a "debate" about nuclear energy in the oil sands at a conference of petroleum industry toffs at a famously luxurious Banff hotel.
Actually, if you read the story you'll find the kind of thing that could only pass for "debate" in the pages of the Calgary Herald, long justly known for its undeclared mission as the Fearless Champion of the Overdog.
The debate in question, at any rate, consisted of the differences between an oil industry exec who wants a $6-billion-plus taxpayer-paid nuclear power-generation plant here in the Peace River Country right flippin' now, and another big shot who only thinks the nuke should be built really, really soon.
At least as far as any alert reader could tell from the story, no one in a nicely tailored summer suit was standing up and asking, "Are we crazy, or what?"
Using nuclear power -- either in the form of "controlled" explosions, or in the more conventional manner of electricity generated in a multi-billion-dollar reactor paid for by someone else -- has long been a dream of the tar sands oil extraction industry.
When something like the recent Japanese typhoon-meltdown-incompetence disaster-cum-scandal illustrates the risks of nuclear power a little too vividly, these advocates issue a few soothing news releases (don't worry, "our country's nuclear sites are always built on sturdy foundations") and keep their heads down for a spell. Pretty soon, though, we can again hear the buzz of low-grade mumbling about what a wonderful thing a nuclear plant in northwestern Alberta would be.
The event stumbled upon by the Herald's Banff stringer -- or whoever it was that authored this muddled report, which was mainly concerned with the irony of the fact the power briefly went out during the conference -- is merely a little more evidence that, like rust, nuclear power advocates never sleep.
But with the oil industry in the vanguard, can the "reinvented" government of Alberta be far behind?
As has been said in this place before, pressure to build one of these massively expensive, high-risk, environmentally unsustainable white elephants out here in the Peace River Country of northwestern North America is likely to continue with the enthusiastic backing of the Alberta government, whoever leads it.
This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, Alberta Diary.
Thank you for reading this story...
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.
If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.
We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing in 2017.