rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Can the Great Wall of Saskatchewan resist Rachel Notley's wish to put democracy back into energy politics?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Rachel Notley

Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

The acerbic public disagreement between Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall and Alberta Premier Rachel Notley at the annual premiers' gathering in St. John's is not merely a spat about tactics as portrayed by the media.

Rather, their war of words about how energy development should proceed at the national provincial and territorial premiers' meeting this week reveals a significant rift over how Canada ought to be governed that is important to the future of the country.

The yearly summer premiers' conference yesterday yielded an "aspirational" agreement on a "Canadian energy strategy," which, despite being labelled "monumental" by its authors is not likely to be particularly earthshaking, unlike, say, hydraulic fracking in northern Alberta. Indeed, the long-term impact of Wall's sniping may turn out to be more pronounced.

On Wednesday, Wall blew a gasket and accused Notley of offering a "veto" to Ontario and Quebec on bitumen pipelines from the West. Dismissed as "ridiculous' by Notley and most of the other premiers in St. John's, the Saskatchewan conservative's outburst was approvingly parroted by Alberta mainstream media throughout the day yesterday.

Notley kept her cool and her trademark charm, shrugging off Wall's tantrum as 'a little bit of showboating" and expressing the view 'you don't get things done by picking fights with people gratuitously. You do get things done by having good conversations …"

However, it's said here Wall’s frustration reflects the opinion of many on the right, including his ideological fellow travellers in Ottawa, at the challenge mounted by Notley and Alberta's new NDP government to their neoliberal approach to governance. No doubt they are particularly vexed by what this might mean for their attempts to eliminate the ability of citizens within the Canadian federation to control the energy industry in their own jurisdictions.

Wall and like-minded conservatives elsewhere in Canada, including here in Alberta, have long attempted to erect, if readers will forgive me, a Saskatchewan Wall between the public face of democracy and the ability of citizens to influence fundamental policies undertaken by their governments.

In other words, in the neoliberal worldview, democracy is only about the periodic selection of leaders expected to carry out economic policies already determined by an "expert" leadership consensus.

While leaders remain important according to this mindset, if only to keep things operating as smoothly as possible for the leadership class, recent conservative governments in Ottawa and Canada's provinces have attempted to put in place such mechanisms as interprovincial and international trade agreements to ensure any variation from the elite consensus is impossible, even if by some fluke the "wrong" politician manages to get elected.

This would explain why Wall, the Alberta mainstream media and MLAs from this province's Opposition Wildrose Party are all so appalled by Notley's efforts to build consensus with other provinces to facilitate export of Alberta’s petroleum resources.

From their perspective, the very notion of consensus building is dangerous because it opens the door to the expectation participants in Canadian democracy may have some role other than merely electing powerless representatives who know enough to behave themselves and abide by the elite consensus.

Take this to its extreme -- which would presumably be fine with both Wall and Prime Minister Stephen Harper -- and you have Greece, at least in terms of the negotiability of policy decisions that have already been decided elsewhere behind closed doors. In this sense, recent Harper Government social media advertising about the NDP has it exactly backwards -- it's the Conservatives who want to turn Canada into Greece!

For this reason, any argument Notley has a clear mandate to keep the promises she made during the campaign leading up to her government's election on May 5 seems nonsensical to many conservatives. From their perspective, she has no more of a mandate than, say, Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras!

From Wall's point of view, building pipelines to all points of the compass and catering to every whim of the energy industry is not just sound policy, it is simply non-negotiable. Asking other provinces -- or, God forbid, their ordinary citizens -- what they think about it must seem deeply subversive to someone who believes such perspectives ought to be irrelevant.

The idea Notley was seeking consensus to help Alberta apparently appeared so outrageous to Wall he let his mask of congeniality slip in public. Well, he wouldn’t be the first person to mistake Notley's engaging manner for a lack of steel. This is a serious error, as some have discovered already.

Notley, by contrast, has a fundamentally different, much more traditional, view of democracy in which political parties are needed to act as brokers of conflicting ideas to build consensus on policies that a majority of voters can support.

That means for Alberta to succeed with its wish to benefit from the province's oil resources -- which Notley shares, despite the ravings and rantings of some right-wing newspaper columnists -- then social licence must be granted by citizens of the parts of Canada through which those resources flow on their way to market.

As noted, this is deeply threatening to neoliberals, for whom democracy is only a cosmetic tool. All the worse, from Wall's point of view, if Notley's plan works better than his alternative, which may well turn out to be the case.

Of course, there may also be a personal side to Wall's barbs. Some have suggested he may harbour ambitions to play larger role than possible on Saskatchewan’s tiny stage, and that could be upset by Notley's example. If so, his snarky resentment is showing through, surely doing no good to his reputation as the Mr. Congeniality of Canadian politics.

Nor will it help Alberta's opposition very much to claim Wall has this province's interests at heart when he has just proved he doesn't by using the NDP's plans for a badly needed royalty review to try to purloin businesses away from our province.

But the exchange between the two premiers should remind all Canadians that an opportunity may soon arise for them to choose between the neoliberal view of democracy represented by Wall and his friends in Ottawa and the traditional interpretation represented by Notley and Thomas Mulcair's NDP, in which citizens actually have a meaningful role.

That is scheduled to happen on Oct. 19.

This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, AlbertaPolitics.ca.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.