rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Leader Brian Jean appears to have violated Wildrose constitution when he tried to suspend Derek Fildebrandt

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Derek Fildebrandt & Brian Jean

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Wildrose Opposition Brian Jean appears to have been operating in violation of the party's constitution when he tried to suspend renegade MLA Derek Fildebrandt late Friday night.

Article 9.3 of the Wildrose Constitution, as adopted by the party's members in 2015, states unequivocally that "members of Caucus may only be ordered expelled from Caucus on the initiative of the Leader and supported by a majority vote of Caucus, held by secret vote by ballot." (Emphasis added; temptation to edit resisted.)

It's hard to see how Mr. Jean, who was in Vancouver attending the federal Conservative Party's policy convention and farewell bunfest for former prime minister Stephen Harper, could have arranged a secret ballot of his caucus.

After all, at least some caucus members were here in Alberta, and Mr. Fildebrandt himself, a member of caucus too who by his own testimony was surprised by the late-night press release announcing his putative expulsion, presumably didn't get to vote.

This might partly account for the short Wildrose Party press release this afternoon welcoming back Mr. Fildebrandt and including a carefully parsed denial of yesterday's media and blogosphere reports on the conditions Mr. Jean tried to impose on Mr. Fildebrandt before he would be readmitted to caucus.

"The multiple alleged conditions reported yesterday in the media were not accurate," the news release said.

If the story was wrong, however, the Wildrose Party missed a perfect opportunity to correct it yesterday when I asked two senior party communications officials if the reports were accurate. Neither responded to my emails.

Accompanied by a photo of the Wildrose caucus climbing stairs together, the party news release said Mr. Fildebrandt had agreed to "a plan to better handle and control social media, including hiring a social media manager to handle public interactions." That was all.

Postmedia's Alberta newspapers, meanwhile, reported confidently this afternoon that Mr. Fildebrandt had been restored to full caucus membership without agreeing to the five conditions he was supposedly required to meet before readmission.

This must be excruciatingly embarrassing to Mr. Jean personally, who has been revealed to have less power than a loose-cannon MLA who has made a nuisance of himself for a year. It also reveals the party to be deeply divided with the most right-wing faction led by Mr. Fildebrandt -- often known as Team Angry by opponents of the Wildrose Party -- firmly in the drivers seat.

This humiliation of Mr. Jean significantly degrades whatever authority he had left in an organization edging ever closer to becoming the Wild Rose Hip Tea Party. Let the intramural #Kudatah plotting resume.

This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, AlbertaPolitics.ca.

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.