rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

What are the details of Wildrose Leader Brian Jean's better way to unite the right?

Brian Jean

Wildrose Party Leader Brian Jean keeps saying he's got a better plan to unite Alberta's right than Progressive Conservative leadership candidate Jason Kenney's much-publicized double reverse hostile takeover of the two Alberta conservative parties.

"I think that our plan is, quite frankly, much more palatable to both sets of members," Jean told a reporter last week. The trouble is, as the reporter went on to explain, the Opposition leader "provided few details."

So far, in fact, Jean doesn't even seem to have provided many hints of how his plan might work, beyond telling the Postmedia reporter the two parties might find ways to co-operate without a formal merger.

Or did he?

Back in May, Jean revealed his party had registered the names "Alberta Conservative Party Association" and "Conservative Party of Alberta Association," either of which in theory could do political business under the name Conservative. "Everything, including the party name, can be put to a vote, as long as the rules are properly followed," the Opposition leader told a reporter at the time.

Well, a pretty little pink flower whose petals blow away in the fall probably isn't the best thing after which to name a party that complains incessantly about supposedly delicate lefty "snowflakes" insisting on "political correctness."

Anyway, everyone on the political right no matter how extreme their views wants to cash in on the solid old "conservative" brand, with its implications of steadiness and occupancy of the middle of the road. Indeed, appearing to be centre right could very well turn out to be essential if a conservative party, united or otherwise, is to topple the Alberta NDP government of Premier Rachel Notley.

It was also suggested at the time that such a new name would show more clearly how the Wildrose Party was aligned with the federal Conservative Party of Canada, then led by Stephen Harper, which was certainly the case then, and is now.

But many observers presumed back then that all Jean had in mind was keeping the option of having the Wildrose officially become a Conservative Party, as Preston Manning's Canadian Reform-Alliance Party managed to do back in the early Zeroes, in the event a deal couldn't be worked out with the flagging PCs.

All that said, I now hear a buzz that just such a name change is exactly what Jean is proposing within the secret chambers of the Wildrose Party as his better way to unite the right.

In other words -- so goes the buzz -- Jean is privately suggesting to his caucus that the old Wildrose name needs to be abandoned as quickly as possible so they can transfer their allegiance in the Legislature to the new, appropriately branded, political entity.

The trick, so the story goes, would be to do it fast enough for Jean and his 'Rosies to steal a march on Kenney and his plan to seize the Conservative brand.

This, the rumour says, is now being presented to Wildrose Caucus members not as a way to keep the PCs from using the name, as I think pretty well all commentators assumed last spring, but as the way to create a completely new Alberta conservative party that they're in charge of.

At least four Wildrose MLAs who are just now starting to suss out the leader's plan are rumoured to be mad enough about it to have threatened to quit and sit as Independents. These would-be Independents -- all far enough to the Alberta right to be called, as a wag of my acquaintance puts it, the "Alb-right" -- view the scheme as a betrayal of Wildrose grassroots principles.

Others in the fractious caucus are said to be looking for a way to align themselves with Kenney's effort as quickly as possible.

Well, if a few newly independent Alb-right MLAs then declared themselves to be Kenney Conservatives, this could have the interesting result of giving Kenney a legislative home even in the event he lost the leadership race in March to one of the three candidates who wants to preserve the old Progressive Conservatives. (Let’s call them the Progressive Preservatives).

Negotiations are said to be discreetly under way, just as happened before "The Great Betrayal" on Dec. 14, 2014, when then Wildrose leader Danielle Smith led nine of her MLAs into the PC government headed at the time by premier Jim Prentice. Manning was believed to be cracking the whip behind them all, to the eventual great displeasure of the Wildrose base.

The application to register the new party association was filed back in November 2015, as a simple corporate search will show.  The paperwork shows an eclectic mix of Wildrosers, not all of whom may be in complete agreement with Jean any more.

This, of course, all presumes Elections Alberta would let them do what's being suggested, which is no sure thing. As blogger Dave Cournoyer pointed out on his Daveberta.ca blog back in May, Alberta election legislation prohibits party names "likely to be confused with the name or abbreviation of (another) registered party."

Surely it is unlikely Elections Alberta would allow a Progressive Conservative Party and a Conservative Party on the same ballot.

Such an eventuality, of course, is presumably why someone has registered the name "Unite Alberta Party” with Elections Alberta -- although it seems to me that name too could be confused with "Alberta Party."

Well, this is idle pre-Christmas chatter. But what else is a blogger to do when the only comment he can get from Wildrose officials to queries about when Jean will announce his plan is, "No comment. :)"?

This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, AlbertaPolitics.ca.

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.