rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Government defends the tar sands

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Today, in my journey to the tar sands, I talked with people from the other side of the debate, pro-tar sands. I met with representatives from the Alberta Environment Ministry who defended the project for more than just economic reasons.

First I spoke with a water expert, who perspired during the interview when questioned on toxic tailing ponds leaking into the Athabasca River. He also told me that companies in the oil sands "have bad days" and "they do get away with some things." He even admitted that there is some leakage but the water is monitored and any thing they have found in the water is "natural."

The term "natural" is used a lot by the Alberta government as a kind of green double-speak to placate the public. Anything can be claimed to be natural, but when the so-called "natural" work by companies is affecting people downstream with rare cancers and diseases -- natural or not -- there is something wrong and unjust going on.

Next, I spoke with a climate change representative who touted the Albertan government as some kind of "eco-warrior" with their massive carbon capture and storage (CCS) scheme. The climatic "holy grail," or so its been claimed to be, that will be some kind of catch-all solution to the tar sands, as well as other carbon intensive industries like coal.

But for a technology that has been unproven, has no infrastructure in place yet and their will likely be a high expense to taxpayers -- it is not a "silver bullet" to our climate dilemma. Especially when the tar sands effects more than the climate, affecting also the boreal forest, water scarcity and pollution, as well as human health. It seems like more of a device to allow a business-as-usual with carbon emission when we are supposed to be cutting GHG.

But my meeting with representatives from the Alberta Environment Ministry made me think a little differently today. These were good people who seemed to genuinely believe in what they were doing was the right thing. This shocked me as we (or at least in environmental circles) typically paint corporate and government types as a form of evil in the world, organizing sinister schemes against us. But things aren't white and black, instead they are looking a little more grey right now.

I think these individuals and many like them are indeed trying to do the best they can with the oil situation we are in. But it comes down to a philosophical underpinning -- do you believe the 21st century will exist with oil or not? For those that do, like the people I have spoken with today, they are trying to lessen oils impacts and make it more efficient. For those that don't, they are trying to end our dependency on it all together. Neither one is the sinister party; the difference between them depends on what your oil philosophy is.

Emily Hunter's Journey to the Tar Sands airs this fall on MTV News Canada.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.