rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

James Deen was promoting sexual violence and rape culture long before recent allegations

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

rabble is expanding our Parliamentary Bureau and we need your help! Support us on Patreon today! 

Keep Karl on Parl

On Sunday, porn actress and writer, Stoya, posted on Twitter that her ex-boyfriend and fellow porn performer, James Deen, had raped her.

Feminists across the board came out in support, applauding her bravery in coming forward. Undoubtedly, as many women do, she will face consequences for speaking out against a powerful man, particularly one who works in the same industry she does -- an incredibly misogynist one at that.

Stoya's point, that to hear people hold up your abuser or rapist as some kind of feminist hero can feel particularly upsetting, is one many of us understand firsthand. It compounds that sense of betrayal already present from the rape.

I'm glad she's getting so much support right now, and hope it continues.

Deen is losing gigs because of these allegations (more women have come forward since Stoya made her statement), which is a good sign, but I have to wonder: What were liberals lauding him as a feminist hero thinking to begin with?

Deen was no feminist porn star (whether such a thing exists within the context of patriarchy is, of course, debatable). He specialized in violent sex, particularly the "rape fantasy" genre. At The Daily Beast, Aurora Snow, a porn performer herself, writes: "James Deen gets paid to have rough sex. And by his own admission he's good at it, maybe even enjoys it. It's incentivized and celebrated." In an interview for the Observer, he says he's "been into rough sex pretty much [his] whole sexual life" and claims that many women are afraid to work with him, worried he'll "slap them in the face or something."

Unsurprisingly, as Snow points out, Deen is also a fan of rape jokes:

 

 

Are we really, truly surprised that a man whose career is based on his abuse of women, which he very publicly admits to enjoying, who thinks rape is both sexy and a hilarious joke, is, "in real life," not a man who respects women??

None of this was secret information, but countless liberal sites (including ones that claim to be feminist) bought into and pushed this representation of Deen as somehow "pro-woman," calling him the "good guy" of porn, "female-friendly,"  — even a feminist. Women's site, The Frisky, went so far as to hire him on as a sex columnist.

Since the allegations came out, The Frisky ended Deen's column, but has yet to offer any justification for providing a paid platform to a violent, misogynist male porn producer to give sex advice to women. Editor, Amelia McDonnell-Parry, quickly published a statement, hoping to position herself as the type who supports victims of male violence, but the whole charade seems transparent considering that she was the one who initiated the column in the first place, knowing full-well about Deen's active and ongoing promotion of violence against women. Knowing full-well that Deen "has long been an outspoken activist against condom laws" and mandatory STD-testing in the porn industry, on the grounds that it infringes on "freedom of speech" and violates "civil rights." Knowing that he consistently dehumanizes women, referring to them as "sluts" (and much worse). Knowing his fondness for rape jokes

Surely there are better sex advice columnists out there for a women's site? Ones who don't make videos called "James Deen Fucks Slut Into Submission," "James Deen Tortures Slutty Babysitter" -- videos that feature extremely violent gangbangs, facial abuse, "teen" fantasies, women tied to tables and abused and penetrated by multiple men, and on and on (needless to say, I am done Googling this stuff).

Deen should never have been brought on in the first place...For obvious reasons -- certainly to anyone who would claim concern for women's rights, safety, and humanity.

It wasn't even Deen himself who tried to sell himself as feminist -- telling Emily Heist Moss in 2011, "I hate feminism!" -- it was the liberal media and women who call themselves "sex-positive" who pushed the angle. Why?? Are we so desperate to prove that pornography is "good for women," that we'll sell women misogyny and call it feminism? Are we so afraid of naming male violence for what it is?

Apparently so.

While Deen's behaviour is his responsibility and I do hope that he will be held to account for these rape allegations, the liberal media are not innocent in all this. Selling misogyny, sexualized violence, and rape culture to women and calling it "feminism" is reprehensible. It's easy, now, to say "Oh, him, we want nothing to do with him!" but explaining these desperate efforts to force his misogyny onto women, all the while claiming to abhor whatever you believe "rape culture" is (hint: it looks just like James Deen's career) is much harder to do. Picking and choosing which violent misogynists are acceptable based on their "cool-factor" doesn’t protect women from violence and, in fact, it makes it much harder for women to speak out against said violence.

At some point, liberals are going to have to contend with the fact that the lines they keep trying to draw are blurry at best, and that their efforts to normalize sexualized violence do demonstrable harm.

Image from James Deen's sex advice column at The Frisky

rabble is expanding our Parliamentary Bureau and we need your help! Support us on Patreon today! 

Keep Karl on Parl

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.