rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

'Ethical Oil' attacks Sierra Club finances during fundraising season

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

I was on CBC's The Current with Anna Maria Tremonti two weeks ago talking about the chilling revelations the Canadian government was spying on us and other environmental groups. I find it a great irony that police forces resort to spying on groups like us because we make a point of being very public about our plans.

It was my third appearance on the show this year. Back in the spring, the topic was the new rules the (supposedly independent) National Energy Board is employing to prevent the public from participating in hearings on pipelines -- a power given to the NEB via the undemocratic Omnibus Bill-38. Sierra's application to participate in the "Line 9" pipeline hearings was denied, though we still got our message out quite effectively.

It is quite clear there is a coordinated campaign to drastically reduce our ability to raise questions, share information, and engage the public and (ultimately) impact decisions. So it was not surprising that just as the annual fall fund raising season began we received a fax from a Calgary law firm with ties to the Conservative Party on behalf of Ethical Oil.

Ethical Oil -- with its own close connections to the Prime Minister's Office -- has filed yet another complaint with the Canada Revenue Agency, just as the annual fall fundraising season began.

This is a critical time of year for Sierra and other organizations. Our success during the fall window dictates what we can take on in 2014 and whether we can stay flexible and ready for emerging issues (like pipeline/rail safety and the survival of bees).

Just receiving a fax these days is something, but this one was ominous. Another year in the multi-year campaign to restrict Canadians' input into how our environment is managed, it came at a critical time of year for Sierra and other charities and non-profits who fight to preserve Canadian values and depend on the financial support of our people to continue to raise issues and questions overlooked (or sidelined) by the private sector's sole focus on profit. So it is not surprising Ethical Oil filed its complaint to the Canadian Revenue Agency in the giving season.

On the other hand, on reading through their submission, I found it an enlightening review of the important work we are doing. It was truly a validation of everything we did in 2013. The Ethical Oil complaint tells the story of an organization determined to speak truth (often inconvenient) to power. The more I read it, the prouder I became.

Here are some of the highlights of the complaint:

- We discussed civil disobedience because it has been a tool of change in democracy. We didn’t advocate it -- a complete misrepresentation of the facts. You may remember Sierra Club Canada asked you what you thought, and an overwhelming number of you responded to our survey. Ethical Oil thinks that’s wrong.

- Next they suggest it is improper for Sierra Club Canada to have drawn attention to a plan by Atomic Energy Canada Ltd. (AECL) to ship highly enriched uranium (dissolved in acid) 1000 km to the United States without any environmental assessment and using unproven container technology. More than 1000 of you asked the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission to rethink the plan (Note: our intervention is ongoing and we are closely working with US groups to head off this scheme).

- They then turned their attention to our comments on the Draft Great Lakes Regional Adaptive Management Plan. The International Joint Commission issued a ""draft" plan for public comment. Our crime? Sierra's Great Lakes Section had sponsored a scientific study of the impact of low water levels in the Upper Great Lakes, noting lower water levels destroy shoreline, wetlands and fish spawning areas.

- Ethical Oil believes our call for a ban on bee-killing pesticides violates charity law. They say we are asking for a law to be changed. Well that’s just wrong - we aren't asking for a law to be changed at all. On the contrary, we are asking for a law to be enforced. Subsequent to our raising the issue, the Pest Management Regulatory Agency asked the public to comment on its neonicotinoid pesticides plan. We conveyed that to you and more than 5000 have so far responded to the PMRA’s invitation. (If you haven’t sent yours, it's not too late. The deadline is Dec. 12, 2013.)

- This may surprise you, but apparently my tweets are bad too -- especially one from April 29, 2013 noting our petition calling for a health study of the Tar Sands.

- Ontario didn’t go unnoticed. Our efforts to preserve the province’s Endangered Species Act were deemed too political too. Even asking for a law to be enforced is out-of-bounds, apparently.

- My "it's not easy being green" blog with its call for a reset of climate policy drew enemy fire as well. It’s worth noting that Canada won a lifetime achievement Fossil award in Warsaw last week for its dedication to preventing a global climate change agreement.

- In an article on the Experimental Lakes Area research station, my comments about Sierra Club Canada’s advocacy role even garnered a complaint.

- You don't even have to be a paid staff member to earn the ire of Ethical Oil. They didn’t like what Derek Leahey, a volunteer blogger, had to say about the Line 9 reversal (to ship Tar Sands bitumen to Montreal and beyond) and how the NEB had given the public only two weeks to apply to participate in environmental hearings.

    The complaint just took us up to the end of the summer. I'm looking for the next one to see how the rest of the year turned out in their dystopian view.

    I hope this snapshot of the work we did in 2013 justifies your continued support in the coming year. If you think we’re doing a REALLY good job, you can even become a monthly donor (this form of support helps us the most in planning our activities).


    Thank you for reading this story…

    More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

    rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

    So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

    And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


    We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


    • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
    • Add context and background.
    • Report typos and logical fallacies.
    • Be respectful.
    • Respect copyright - link to articles.
    • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


    • Use oppressive/offensive language.
    • Libel or defame.
    • Bully or troll.
    • Post spam.
    • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.