rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Hill Dispatches: Parliament resumes with Jack Layton tributes, Bill-C4 debate

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Parliament is back after the truncated, post-election session last spring, and the traumatic summer we all experienced. It got going, on a rare, non-partisan note, with a tribute to Jack Layton.

Acting NDP leader Nycole Turmel started things off by reminding the House of Layton's abiding commitment to democracy. "He wanted to make Parliament an institution Canadians could be proud of," she said, and invited colleagues to honour the late Opposition Leader's memory by living up to that aspiration.

Acting Liberal leader Bob Rae and Green Party leader Elizabeth May quoted poet Dylan Thomas, "And Death Shall Have No Dominion" and "Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night," respectively. Rae made a point of emphasizing Jack's significant and tangible impact as a Toronto city councillor.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper underscored the notion of friendships that transcend political differences, and recognized the courage and dignity of Layton's widow, Olivia Chow.

Chow responded to all this with obviously sincere gratitude. She made a particular point of recognizing the common bonds of solidarity she feels with other Canadians who are living with cancer, and thanked the prime minister and his wife, not only for making the state funeral possible, but, also, for their personal support.

After the series of speeches, the speaker called for a moment of silence, then most of the members filed out, and it was back to partisan politics as usual.

The substantive debate scheduled for Monday morning was on a very significant piece of legislation, although you will not likely be hearing about it on the evening newscasts. This proposed legislation goes by the title "Bill C-4" and it's notionally designed to curtail what we have come to call "human smuggling."

Bill C-4 was drafted in response to two boatloads of Sri Lankan Tamil refugees who came to Canada over the past two years, fleeing civil war-wracked Sri Lanka. The over-heated media coverage of those arrivals-by-sea fed into the current government's law-and-order agenda. The result is a proposed law that would create a new, "designated" class of refugee claimants, to which special, harsh provisions would apply.

Bill C-4 provides that people seeking refuge in Canada who arrive on boats -- which are no doubt, in some cases, owned by unscrupulous operators, out to make a fast buck -- will be held in detention for a year and not permitted to apply for permanent status in Canada for five years, even if their refugee claims are accepted.

During the debate, the Liberals' Francis Scarpaleggia and the NDP's Don Davies both argued that Bill C-4 will do nothing to prevent the abuses of "human smuggling" and instead punishes the victims. They both pointed out that holding traumatized and frightened men, women and children in detention for a year is hardly likely to deter so-called "smugglers." As well, both opposition MPs argued that C-4 effectively creates two classes of refugee-claimant, based, essentially, on mode of transport, and it defies certain articles of the Canadian Charter of Rights and a number of international treaties and conventions to which Canada is a signatory.

Of course, for this government, in real-life political terms, evidence demonstrating a need for this legislation is not particularly relevant.

During today's debate, Conservative MP Stephen Woodworth revealed the bill's true motivation when he referred to the refugee-claimants this proposed law would target as "queue jumpers." These folks "cutting in on line" slow the process for "legitimate" refugees who patiently wait their turn, the Conservative MP claimed. The fact that there is no such thing as a "refugee queue" is, apparently, beside the point. And the added fact that the refugee and immigration processes are entirely separate, from both the legal and bureaucratic points of view, does not seem to matter much, either.

What counts -- in the world of pure, unvarnished politics -- is that Bill C-4 effectively taps into some fairly widespread, if inchoate, discomfort about Canada being flooded with unwanted (and, maybe, dangerous) people from far away places. It is, as the NDP's Davies put it, a sign of the style of governing we can expect from this Conservative majority.

We'll be going into this bill and its implications in greater detail, as it makes its way through the legislative process. In the meantime, fasten your seatbelts and get ready for more knee-jerk initiatives, based not on fact or sound legal principles, but on fear and fear alone.

By the time afternoon rolled around, during Question Period, some of the morning's commitment to civility seemed to return. It was evident that the NDP is not planning to indulge in name-calling and heckling, and the Conservatives seem to be holding back, too.

Of course, when it comes to policy, the government benches are not in a compromising mood. No way. Farmers may have voted to preserve the Canadian Wheat Board, in a recent plebiscite. No matter to the prime minister. As far as he's concerned, western farmers voted for a "free market" approach when they elected more Conservative MPs. If they don't like what they're getting -- well, they can wait four years and vote for someone else!

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.